Adiabatic flame temperature

In the study of combustion, there are two types of adiabatic flame temperature depending on how the process is completed: the constant volume and constant pressure; both of which describe temperature that combustion products theoretically can reach if no energy is lost to the outside environment.

The constant volume adiabatic flame temperature is the temperature that results from a complete combustion process that occurs without any work, heat transfer or changes in kinetic or potential energy. Its temperature is higher than the constant pressure process because no energy is utilized to change the volume of the system (i.e., generate work).

Common flames

Propane

Octane

In daily life, the vast majority of flames one encounters are those caused by rapid oxidation of hydrocarbons in materials such as wood, wax, fat, plastics, propane, and gasoline. The constant-pressure adiabatic flame temperature of such substances in air is in a relatively narrow range around 1950 °C. This is because, in terms of stoichiometry, the combustion of an organic compound with n carbons involves breaking roughly 2n C–H bonds, n C–C bonds, and 1.5n O₂ bonds to form roughly n CO₂ molecules and n H₂O molecules.

Because most combustion processes that happen naturally occur in the open air, there is nothing that confines the gas to a particular volume like the cylinder in an engine. As a result, these substances will burn at a constant pressure allowing the gas to expand during the process.

Common flame temperatures

Assuming initial atmospheric conditions (1 bar and 20 °C), the following table[1] lists the flame temperature for various fuels under constant pressure conditions. The temperatures mentioned here are for a stoichiometric fuel-oxidizer mixture (i.e. equivalence ratio φ = 1).

Note these are theoretical, not actual, flame temperatures produced by a flame that loses no heat. The closest will be the hottest part of a flame, where the combustion reaction is most efficient. This also assumes complete combustion (e.g. perfectly balanced, non-smokey, usually bluish flame).

Adiabatic flame temperature (constant pressure) of common fuels
Fuel	Oxidizer	$T_{\text{ad}}$
Fuel	Oxidizer	(°C)	(°F)
Acetylene (C₂H₂)	Air	2500	4532
Acetylene (C₂H₂)	Oxygen	3480	6296
Butane (C₄H₁₀)	Air	1970	3578
Cyanogen (C₂N₂)	Oxygen	4525	8177
Dicyanoacetylene (C₄N₂)	Oxygen	4990	9010
Ethane (C₂H₆)	Air	1955	3551
Ethanol (C ₂H ₅OH)	Air	2082	3779[2]
Gasoline	Air	2138	3880[2]
Hydrogen (H₂)	Air	2254	4089[2]
Magnesium (Mg)	Air	1982	3600[3]
Methane (C H₄)	Air	1963	3565[4]
Methanol (C H₄O)	Air	1949	3540[4]
Natural gas	Air	1960	3562[5]
Pentane (C₅H₁₂)	Air	1977	3591[4]
Propane (C₃H₈)	Air	1980	3596[6]
Methylacetylene (C₃H₄; MAPP gas)	Air	2010	3650
Methylacetylene (C₃H₄; MAPP gas)	Oxygen	2927	5301
Toluene (C₇H₈)	Air	2071	3760[4]
Wood	Air	1980	3596
Kerosene	Air	2093[7]	3801
Light fuel oil	Air	2104[7]	3820
Medium fuel oil	Air	2101[7]	3815
Heavy fuel oil	Air	2102[7]	3817
Bituminous Coal	Air	2172[7]	3943
Anthracite	Air	2180[7]	3957
Anthracite	Oxygen	≈3500[8]	≈6332
Aluminum	Oxygen	3732	6750[4]
Lithium	Oxygen	2438	4420[4]
Phosphorus (white)	Oxygen	2969	5376[4]
Zirconium	Oxygen	4005	7241[4]

Thermodynamics

First law of thermodynamics for a closed reacting system

From the first law of thermodynamics for a closed reacting system we have,

{}_{R}Q_{P}-{}_{R}W_{P}=U_{P}-U_{R}

where, ${}_{R}Q_{P}$ and ${}_{R}W_{P}$ are the heat and work transferred from the system to the surroundings during the process respectively, and $U_{R}$ and $U_{P}$ are the internal energy of the reactants and products respectively. In the constant volume adiabatic flame temperature case, the volume of the system is held constant hence there is no work occurring,

{}_{R}W_{P}=\int \limits _{R}^{P}{pdV}=0

and there is no heat transfer because the process is defined to be adiabatic: ${}_{R}Q_{P}=0$ . As a result, the internal energy of the products is equal to the internal energy of the reactants: $U_{P}=U_{R}$ . Because this is a closed system, the mass of the products and reactants is constant and the first law can be written on a mass basis,

U_{P}=U_{R}\Rightarrow m_{P}u_{P}=m_{R}u_{R}\Rightarrow u_{P}=u_{R}

.

Enthalpy versus temperature diagram illustrating closed system calculation

In the constant pressure adiabatic flame temperature case, the pressure of the system is held constant which results in the following equation for the work,

{}_{R}W_{P}=\int \limits _{R}^{P}{pdV}=p\left({V_{P}-V_{R}}\right)

Again there is no heat transfer occurring because the process is defined to be adiabatic: ${}_{R}Q_{P}=0$ . From the first law, we find that,

-p\left({V_{P}-V_{R}}\right)=U_{P}-U_{R}\Rightarrow U_{P}+pV_{P}=U_{R}+pV_{R}

Recalling the definition of enthalpy we recover: $H_{P}=H_{R}$ . Because this is a closed system, the mass of the products and reactants is constant and the first law can be written on a mass basis,

H_{P}=H_{R}\Rightarrow m_{P}h_{P}=m_{R}h_{R}\Rightarrow h_{P}=h_{R}

.

We see that the adiabatic flame temperature of the constant pressure process is lower than that of the constant volume process. This is because some of the energy released during combustion goes into changing the volume of the control system.

Adiabatic flame temperatures and pressures as a function of ratio of air to iso-octane. A ratio of 1 corresponds to the stoichiometric ratio

Constant volume flame temperature of a number of fuels, with air

If we make the assumption that combustion goes to completion (i.e. CO
₂ and H
₂O), we can calculate the adiabatic flame temperature by hand either at stoichiometric conditions or lean of stoichiometry (excess air). This is because there are enough variables and molar equations to balance the left and right hand sides,

{\rm {C}}_{\alpha }{\rm {H}}_{\beta }{\rm {O}}_{\gamma }{\rm {N}}_{\delta }+\left({a{\rm {O}}_{\rm {2}}+b{\rm {N}}_{\rm {2}}}\right)\to \nu _{1}{\rm {CO}}_{\rm {2}}+\nu _{2}{\rm {H}}_{\rm {2}}{\rm {O}}+\nu _{3}{\rm {N}}_{\rm {2}}+\nu _{4}{\rm {O}}_{\rm {2}}

Rich of stoichiometry there are not enough variables because combustion cannot go to completion with at least CO and H
₂ needed for the molar balance (these are the most common incomplete products of combustion),

{\rm {C}}_{\alpha }{\rm {H}}_{\beta }{\rm {O}}_{\gamma }{\rm {N}}_{\delta }+\left({a{\rm {O}}_{\rm {2}}+b{\rm {N}}_{\rm {2}}}\right)\to \nu _{1}{\rm {CO}}_{\rm {2}}+\nu _{2}{\rm {H}}_{\rm {2}}{\rm {O}}+\nu _{3}{\rm {N}}_{\rm {2}}+\nu _{5}{\rm {CO}}+\nu _{6}{\rm {H}}_{\rm {2}}

However, if we include the Water gas shift reaction,

{\rm {CO}}_{\rm {2}}+H_{2}\Leftrightarrow {\rm {CO}}+{\rm {H}}_{\rm {2}}{\rm {O}}

and use the equilibrium constant for this reaction, we will have enough variables to complete the calculation.

Different fuels with different levels of energy and molar constituents will have different adiabatic flame temperatures.

Constant pressure flame temperature of a number of fuels, with air

Nitromethane versus isooctane flame temperature and pressure

We can see by the following figure why nitromethane (CH₃NO₂) is often used as a power boost for cars. Since each molecule of nitromethane contains two atoms of oxygen, it can burn much hotter because it provides its own oxidant along with fuel. This in turn allows it to build up more pressure during a constant volume process. The higher the pressure, the more force upon the piston creating more work and more power in the engine. It stays relatively hot rich of stoichiometry because it contains its own oxidant. However, continual running of an engine on nitromethane will eventually melt the piston and/or cylinder because of this higher temperature.

Effects of dissociation on adiabatic flame temperature

In real world applications, complete combustion does not typically occur. Chemistry dictates that dissociation and kinetics will change the relative constituents of the products. There are a number of programs available that can calculate the adiabatic flame temperature taking into account dissociation through equilibrium constants (Stanjan, NASA CEA, AFTP). The following figure illustrates that the effects of dissociation tend to lower the adiabatic flame temperature. This result can be explained through Le Chatelier's principle.

References

See under "Tables" in the external references below.
Flame Temperature Analysis and NOx Emissions for Different Fuels
"Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-09-17. Retrieved 2017-09-17.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 96th Edition, p. 15-51
North American Combustion Handbook, Volume 1, 3rd edition, North American Mfg Co., 1986.
"Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2013-05-19.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
Power Point Presentation: Flame Temperature, Hsin Chu, Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
Analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle utilizing a pressurized coal combustor by Jongsup Hong et al., MIT, which cites IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2005. p. 122.. But the IPCC report actually gives a much less precise statement: "The direct combustion of fuel and oxygen has been practised for many years in the metallurgical and glass industries where burners operate at near stoichiometric conditions with flame temperatures of up to 3500°C." The temperature may depend on pressure, because at lower pressure there will be more dissociation of the combustion products, implying a lower adiabatic temperature.

External links

General information

Babrauskas, Vytenis (2006-02-25). "Temperatures in flames and fires". Fire Science and Technology Inc. Archived from the original on 12 January 2008. Retrieved 2008-01-27.
Computation of adiabatic flame temperature
Adiabatic flame temperature

Tables

"Adiabatic Flame Temperature". The Engineering Toolbox. Archived from the original on 28 January 2008. Retrieved 2008-01-27. adiabatic flame temperature of hydrogen, methane, propane and octane with oxygen or air as oxidizers
"Flame Temperatures for some Common Gases". The Engineering Toolbox. Archived from the original on 7 January 2008. Retrieved 2008-01-27.
Temperature of a blue flame and common materials

Calculators

Online adiabatic flame temperature calculator using Cantera
Adiabatic flame temperature program
Gaseq, program for performing chemical equilibrium calculations.
Flame Temperature Calculator - Constant pressure bipropellant adiabatic combustion
Adiabatic Flame Temperature calculator

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] See under "Tables" in the external references below.

[che.msstate.edu-2] Flame Temperature Analysis and NOx Emissions for Different Fuels

[3] "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-09-17. Retrieved 2017-09-17.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[Physics_p._15-51-4] CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 96th Edition, p. 15-51

[5] North American Combustion Handbook, Volume 1, 3rd edition, North American Mfg Co., 1986.

[6] "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2013-05-19.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[Chu-7] Power Point Presentation: Flame Temperature, Hsin Chu, Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

[8] Analysis of oxy-fuel combustion power cycle utilizing a pressurized coal combustor by Jongsup Hong et al., MIT, which cites IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2005. p. 122.. But the IPCC report actually gives a much less precise statement: "The direct combustion of fuel and oxygen has been practised for many years in the metallurgical and glass industries where burners operate at near stoichiometric conditions with flame temperatures of up to 3500°C." The temperature may depend on pressure, because at lower pressure there will be more dissociation of the combustion products, implying a lower adiabatic temperature.