Allelic exclusion

Allelic exclusion is a process by which only one allele of a gene is expressed while the other allele is silenced.[1] This phenomenon is most notable for playing a role in the development of B lymphocytes, where allelic exclusion allows for each mature B lymphocyte to express only one type of immunoglobulin. This subsequently results in each B lymphocyte being able to recognize only one antigen.[2] This is significant as the co-expression of both alleles in B lymphocytes is associated with autoimmunity and the production of autoantibodies.[3]

Many regulatory processes can lead to allelic exclusion. In one instance, one allele of the gene can become transcriptionally silent, resulting in the transcription and expression of only the other allele.[2] This could be caused in part by decreased methylation of the expressed allele.[4] Conversely, allelic exclusion can also be regulated through asynchronous allelic rearrangement.[5] In this case, both alleles are transcribed but only one becomes a functional protein.[2]

In B-lymphocytes

Allelic exclusion has been observed most often in genes for cell surface receptors and has been extensively studies in immune cells such as B lymphocytes. Allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy chain and light chain genes in B cells forms the genetic basis for the presence of only a single type of antigen receptor on a given B lymphocyte, which is central in explaining the ‘one B cell — one antibody’ rule.[6] The variable domain of the B-cell antigen receptor is encoded by the V, (D), and J gene segments, the recombination of which gives rise to Ig gene allelic exclusion. V(D)J recombination occurs imprecisely, so that while transcripts from both alleles are expressed, only one is able to give rise to a functional surface antigen receptor. If no successful rearrangement occurs on either chromosome, the cell dies.

Stochastic

In the stochastic model, while the Ig rearrangement is proposed to be very efficient, the probability of functional allelic rearrangement is assumed to be very low as compared to the probability of non-functional rearrangement.[7] As a result, successful recombination of more than one functional Ig allele in one B cell is statistically occurs very infrequently.[8]

Asynchronous recombination

In the asynchronous recombination models, the recombination process is controlled by timing of recombination-activating gene (RAG) recombinase and accessibility of each Ig allele within the chromatin structure.[7]

  1. Asynchronous Probabilistic Recombination Model: This probabilistic model relies on the mechanisms which control chromatin accessibility. The limited accessibility of Ig alleles due to chromatin structure leads to low efficiency of recombination therefore, the probability of biallelic rearrangement is negligible.[7]
  2. Asynchronous Instructive Recombination Model: The instructive model is based on the difference in timing of allele replication, wherein the alleles undergo recombination sequentially. In this model the second allele undergoes rearrangement only if the first rearrangement was unsuccessful.[7][9]

Classic feedback inhibition

The feedback inhibition model is similar to the asynchronous recombination mode, but it emphasizes the mechanisms that maintain the rearrangement asynchrony. This model suggests that a recombination which gives rise to a functional B cell surface receptor will cause a series of signals which suppress further recombination.[10] Without these signals, allelic rearrangement will carry on.  The classic feedback model is empirically corroborated by observed recombination ratios.[10]

In Igκ and Igλ light chain genes

The allelic exclusion of light chain genes Igκ and Igλ is a process that is controlled by the monoallelic initiation of V(D)J recombination. While little is known about the mechanism leading to the allelic exclusion of Igλ genes, the Igκ locus is generally inactivated by RAG-mediated deletion of the exon Cκ. The V(D)J recombination step is a random and non-specific process that occurs one allele at a time where segments V, (D) and J are rearranged to encode the variable region, resulting in a fraction of functional genes with a productive V(D)J region.[11] Allelic exclusion is then enforced via feedback inhibition where the functional Ig gene inhibits V(D)J rearrangement of the second allele. While this feedback mechanism is mainly achieved through inhibition of the juxtaposition of V and D-J segments, the down-regulation of transcription and suppression of RAG accessibility also plays a role.[12]

Vomeronasal sensory neurons are found in the vomeronasal organ at the nasal septum base and their specialty is in pheromone detection.[13][14][15][16][17][18] A vomeronasal receptor, V1R, exhibits allelic exclusion.[13] When a V1R receptor gene is expressed, an odorant receptor gives negative feedback that prevents transcription of other V1R receptor genes.[13][14][15][16] In mice, vomeronasal sensory neurons, an odorant receptor coding sequence's exogenous transcription from a V1R promoter can stop endogenous V1R genes from being transcribed.[13][14][15][16] They[13] also obtained data supporting monoallelic expression of V1rb2mv and V1rb2vg alleles and monogenic expression of the V1rb2 locus.[13]

In sensory neurons

Vomeronasal sensory neurons are found in the vomeronasal organ at the nasal septum base and their specialty is in pheromone detection.[13][14][15][16][17][18] A vomeronasal receptor, V1R, exhibits allelic exclusion. When a V1R receptor gene is expressed, an odorant receptor gives negative feedback that prevents transcription of other V1R receptor genes.[13][14][15][16] In mice vomeronasal sensory neurons, an odorant receptor coding sequence's exogenous transcription from a V1R promoter can stop endogenous V1R genes from being transcribed.[13][14][15][16] They[13] also obtained data supporting monoallelic expression of V1rb2mv and V1rb2vg alleles and monogenic expression of the V1rb2 locus.[13]

Monoallelic expression was also found in mice olfactory receptor genes in olfactory sensory neurons.[14][15][16] An upstream cis-acting DNA region controls an olfactory receptor gene cluster's activation and resulted in monogenic expression of one olfactory receptor gene.[14][15][16] The expressed coding region's disruption or deletion resulted in expression of a second olfactory receptor gene.[15] Based on this, they[15] hypothesized that in order to enforce the "one receptor-one neuron rule” (Serizawa et al, 2003[15]), one olfactory receptor gene's random activation and the expressed gene product's negative feedback are necessary.[14][15][16]

Recent research

Intracellular GATA3 expression is a crucial component of T cell receptor beta (TCR𝛽) allelic exclusion in mammalian cells.[14][15][16][19][20] GATA3 transgenic overexpression by a 2.5- to 5-fold increase partly due to Gata3 transcriptional activation from monoallelic to biallelic primarily resulted in both alleles of TCR𝛽 recombining.[14] Intracellular GATA3 expression can divide wild-type immature thymocyte cell populations.[14][15][16][19][20] Although cells regardless of GATA3 expression level yielded functional TCR𝛽 sequences, there was nearly sole recombination of one Tcrb locus in lowly expressed GATA3 cells and constant recombination of both alleles in highly expressed GATA3 cells.[14]

V𝛽 Recombination signal sequences (RSSs) with poor qualities suppressed one allele's expression of two TCR𝛽 genes.[21][22] These poor quality V𝛽 RSSs decreased the chances of upstream V𝛽 and V31 recombination on the same allele, which in turn enabled functional TCR𝛽 genes’ monoallelic assembly and expression.[21][22] However, poor quality V𝛽 RSSs were unlikely to result in monogenic TCR𝛽 expression alone and might have involved other epigenetic processes.[21][22] RSSs is involved in mammalian TCR𝛽 genes’ monogenic assembly and expression and may also be involved in other mammalian TCR-related genes.[21] Low quality V𝛽 recombinase targets randomly constrain two functional rearrangements’ production which imposes TCR𝛽 allelic exclusion.[22]

References
  1. Korochkin LI, Grossman A (1981). "The Phenomenon of Allelic Exclusion". Gene Interactions in Development. 4. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 108–124. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-81477-8_4. ISBN 978-3-642-81479-2.
  2. Levin-Klein R, Bergman Y (December 2014). "Epigenetic regulation of monoallelic rearrangement (allelic exclusion) of antigen receptor genes". Frontiers in Immunology. 5: 625. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00625. PMC 4257082. PMID 25538709.
  3. Pelanda R (April 2014). "Dual immunoglobulin light chain B cells: Trojan horses of autoimmunity?". Current Opinion in Immunology. 27: 53–9. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.012. PMC 3972342. PMID 24549093.
  4. Schroeder HW, Imboden JB, Torres RM (2019-01-01). "Chapter 4: Antigen Receptor Genes, Gene Products, and Coreceptors". In Rich R, Fleisher TA, Shearer WT, Schroeder HW (eds.). Clinical Immunology (Fifth ed.). London: Elsevier. pp. 55–77.e1. doi:10.1016/b978-0-7020-6896-6.00004-1. ISBN 978-0-7020-6896-6.
  5. Jackson A, Kondilis HD, Khor B, Sleckman BP, Krangel MS (February 2005). "Regulation of T cell receptor beta allelic exclusion at a level beyond accessibility". Nature Immunology. 6 (2): 189–97. doi:10.1038/ni1157. PMID 15640803.
  6. Burnet FM (1959). The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity. Nashville, Temessee: Vanderbilt University Press. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.8281.
  7. Vettermann C, Schlissel MS (September 2010). "Allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin genes: models and mechanisms". Immunological Reviews. 237 (1): 22–42. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2010.00935.x. PMC 2928156. PMID 20727027.
  8. Coleclough C, Perry RP, Karjalainen K, Weigert M (April 1981). "Aberrant rearrangements contribute significantly to the allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin gene expression". Nature. 290 (5805): 372–8. doi:10.1038/290372a0. PMID 6783959.
  9. Matthias P (2001-11-23). Faculty Opinions recommendation of Asynchronous replication and allelic exclusion in the immune system. Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature (Report). doi:10.3410/f.1002314.23155.
  10. "Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable, Diversity, and Joining Region Gene Rearrangement". National Cancer Institute Thesaurus.
  11. Mostoslavsky R, Alt FW, Rajewsky K (September 2004). "The lingering enigma of the allelic exclusion mechanism". Cell. 118 (5): 539–44. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.023. PMID 15339659.
  12. Brady BL, Steinel NC, Bassing CH (October 2010). "Antigen receptor allelic exclusion: an update and reappraisal". Journal of Immunology. 185 (7): 3801–8. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1001158. PMID 20858891.
  13. Capello L, Roppolo D, Jungo VP, Feinstein P, Rodriguez I (February 2009). "A common gene exclusion mechanism used by two chemosensory systems". The European Journal of Neuroscience. 29 (4): 671–8. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06630.x. PMC 3709462. PMID 19200072.
  14. Monahan K, Lomvardas S (2015-11-13). "Monoallelic expression of olfactory receptors". Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 31 (1): 721–40. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125308. PMC 4882762. PMID 26359778.
  15. Serizawa S, Miyamichi K, Nakatani H, Suzuki M, Saito M, Yoshihara Y, Sakano H (December 2003). "Negative feedback regulation ensures the one receptor-one olfactory neuron rule in mouse". Science. 302 (5653): 2088–94. doi:10.1126/science.1089122. PMID 14593185.
  16. Lewcock JW, Reed RR (January 2004). "A feedback mechanism regulates monoallelic odorant receptor expression". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101 (4): 1069–74. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307986100. PMC 327152. PMID 14732684.
  17. Shykind BM, Rohani SC, O'Donnell S, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, Sun Y, et al. (June 2004). "Gene switching and the stability of odorant receptor gene choice". Cell. 117 (6): 801–15. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.015. PMID 15186780.
  18. Serizawa S, Ishii T, Nakatani H, Tsuboi A, Nagawa F, Asano M, et al. (July 2000). "Mutually exclusive expression of odorant receptor transgenes". Nature Neuroscience. 3 (7): 687–93. doi:10.1038/76641. PMID 10862701.
  19. Hosoya T, Maillard I, Engel JD (November 2010). "From the cradle to the grave: activities of GATA-3 throughout T-cell development and differentiation". Immunological Reviews. 238 (1): 110–25. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00954.x. PMC 2965564. PMID 20969588.
  20. Ho IC, Tai TS, Pai SY (February 2009). "GATA3 and the T-cell lineage: essential functions before and after T-helper-2-cell differentiation". Nature Reviews. Immunology. 9 (2): 125–35. doi:10.1038/nri2476. PMC 2998182. PMID 19151747.
  21. Wu GS, Bassing CH (August 2020). "Inefficient V(D)J recombination underlies monogenic T cell receptor β expression". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 117 (31): 18172–18174. doi:10.1073/pnas.2010077117. PMC 7414081. PMID 32690689.
  22. Wu GS, Yang-Iott KS, Klink MA, Hayer KE, Lee KD, Bassing CH (September 2020). "Poor quality Vβ recombination signal sequences stochastically enforce TCRβ allelic exclusion". The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 217 (9). doi:10.1084/jem.20200412. PMID 32526772.

Further reading
  • Abbas AK, Lichtman AH (2003). Cellular and Molecular Immunology (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.