Calcium imaging

Calcium imaging is a microscopy technique to optically measure the calcium (Ca2+) status of an isolated cell, tissue or medium. Calcium imaging takes advantage of calcium indicators, fluorescent molecules that respond to the binding of Ca2+ ions by changing their fluorescence properties. Two main classes of calcium indicators exist: chemical indicators and genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECI). This technique has allowed studies of calcium signalling in a wide variety of cell types. In neurons, electrical activity is always accompanied by an influx of Ca2+ ions. Thus, calcium imaging can be used to monitor the electrical activity in hundreds of neurons in cell culture or in living animals, which has made it possible to dissect the function of neuronal circuits.

Chemical indicators
Schematic of a typical setup for calcium fluorescence imaging of isolated cardiac myocytes

Chemical indicators are small molecules that can chelate calcium ions. All these molecules are based on an EGTA homologue called BAPTA, with high selectivity for calcium (Ca2+) ions versus magnesium (Mg2+) ions.

This group of indicators includes fura-2, indo-1, fluo-3, fluo-4, Calcium Green-1.

These dyes are often used with the chelator carboxyl groups masked as acetoxymethyl esters, in order to render the molecule lipophilic and to allow easy entrance into the cell. Once this form of the indicator is in the cell, cellular esterases will free the carboxyl groups and the indicator will be able to bind calcium. The free acid form of the dyes (i.e. without the acetoxymethyl ester modification) can also be directly injected into cells via a microelectrode or micropipette which removes uncertainties as to the cellular compartment holding the dye (the acetoxymethyl ester can also enter the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria). Binding of a Ca2+ ion to a fluorescent indicator molecule leads to either an increase in quantum yield of fluorescence or emission/excitation wavelength shift. Individual chemical Ca2+ fluorescent indicators are utilized for cytosolic calcium measurements in a wide variety of cellular preparations. The first real time (video rate) Ca2+ imaging was carried out in 1986 in cardiac cells using intensified video cameras.[1] Later development of the technique using laser scanning confocal microscopes revealed sub-cellular Ca2+ signals in the form of Ca2+ sparks and Ca2+ blips. Relative responses from a combination of chemical Ca2+ fluorescent indicators were also used to quantify calcium transients in intracellular organelles such as mitochondria.[2]

Calcium imaging, also referred to as calcium mapping, is also used to perform research on myocardial tissue.[3] Calcium mapping is a ubiquitous technique used on whole, isolated hearts such as mouse, rat, and rabbit species.

Genetically encoded calcium indicators

Genetically encodable calcium indicators (GECIs) are powerful tools useful for in vivo imaging of cellular, developmental, and physiological process.[4][5][6][7] GECIs do not need to be loaded into cells; instead the genes encoding for these proteins can be easily transfected to cell lines. It is also possible to create transgenic animals expressing the dye in all cells or selectively in certain cellular subtypes. GECIs have been used in the studies of neuron,[8][9] T-cell,[10] cardiomyocyte,[11] etc. Broadly speaking, GECIs can be divided into classes in which calcium detection is based on fluorescence or luminescence; however, both of these inevitably rely on fluorescent proteins as reporters, including green fluorescent protein GFP and its variants (eGFP, YFP, CFP).

Of the fluorescent variants, calcium indicator systems can be further divided into single fluorescent protein (FP) systems, and paired fluorescent protein systems. Camgaroos were one of the first developed variants involving a single protein system. Camgaroos take advantage of calmodulin (CaM), a calcium binding protein. In these structures, CaM is inserted in the middle of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) at Y145. Previous mutagenesis studies revealed that mutations at this position conferred pH stability while maintaining fluorescent properties, making Y145 an insertion point of interest. Additionally, the N and C termini of YFP are linked by a peptide linker (GGTGGS). When CaM binds to Ca2+, the effective pKa is lowered, allowing for chromophore deprotonation.[12] This results in increased fluorescence upon calcium binding in an intensiometric fashion. Such detection is in contrast with ratiometric systems, in which there is a change in the absorbance/emission spectra as a result of Ca2+ binding.[13] A later developed single-FP system, dubbed G-CaMP, also invokes circularly permuted GFP. One of the termini is fused with CaM, and the other termini is fused with M13 (the calmodulin binding domain of myosin light kinase).[14] The protein is designed such that the termini are close in space, allowing for Ca2+ binding to cause conformational changes and chromophore modulation, allowing for increased fluorescence. G-CaMP and its refined variants have nanomolar values for binding affinity.[15] A final single protein variant is the CatchER, which is generally considered to be a lower affinity indicator. Its calcium binding pocket is quite negative; binding of the cation helps to shield the large concentration of negative charge and allows for recovered fluorescence.[16]

In contrast to these systems are paired fluorescent protein systems, which include the prototypical Cameleons. Cameleons consist of two different fluorescent proteins, CaM, M13, and a glycylglycine linker.[13] In the absence of Ca2+, only the donor blue-shifted fluorescent protein will be fluorescent. However, a conformational change caused by calcium binding repositions the red-shifted fluorescent protein, allowing for FRET (Forster resonance energy transfer) to take place. Cameleon indicators produce a ratiometric signal (ie. the measured FRET efficiency depends on the calcium concentration). Original variants of chameleons were originally more sensitive to Ca2+ and were acid quenched.[17] Such shortcomings were abrogated by Q69K and V68L mutations. Both of these residues were close to the buried anionic chromophore and these mutations probably hinder protonation, conferring greater pH resistance.

Of growing importance in calcium detection are near-IR (NIR) GECIs, which may open up avenues for multiplexing different indicator systems and allowing deeper tissue penetration. NIRs rely on biliverdin-binding fluorescent proteins, which are largely derived from bacterial phytochromes. NIR systems are similar to inGCverse pericams in that both experience a decrease in fluorescence upon Ca2+ binding. RCaMPs and RGECOs are functional at 700+ nm, but are quite dim and experience high scattering.[18] A Cameleon analog involving NIR FRET has been successfully constructed as well.[19]

A special class of GECIs are designed to form a permanent fluorescent tag in active neurons. They are based on the photoswitchable protein Eos which turns from green to red through photocatalyzed (with violet light) backbone cleavage.[20] Combined with the CaM, violet light photoconverts only neurons that have elevated calcium levels. SynTagMA is a synapse-targeted version of CaMPARI2.[21]

While fluorescent systems are widely used, bioluminescent Ca2+ reporters may also hold potential because of their ability to abrogate autofluorescence, photobleaching [no excitation wavelength is needed], biological degradation and toxicity, in addition to higher signal-to-noise ratios.[22] Such systems may rely on aequorin and the luciferin coelenterazine. Ca2+ binding causes a conformational change that facilitates coelenterazine oxidation. The resultant photoproduct emits blue light as it returns to the ground state. Colocalization of aequorin with GFP facilitates BRET/CRET (Bioluminescence or Chemiluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer),[16] resulting in a 19 - 65 brightness increase. Such structures can be used to probe millimolar to nanomolar calcium concentrations. A similar system invokes obelin and its luciferin coelenteramide, which may possess faster calcium response time and Mg2+ insensitivity than its aqueorin counterpart.[23] Such systems can also leverage the self-assembly of luciferase components. In a system dubbed “nano-lantern,” the luciferase RLuc8 is split and placed on different ends of CaM. Calcium binding brings the RLuc8 components in close proximity, reforming luciferase, and allowing it to transfer to an acceptor fluorescent protein.

To minimize damage to the visualized cells, two-photon microscopy is often invoked to detect the fluorescence from the reporters.[24] The use of near-IR wavelengths and minimization of axial spread of the point function[25] allows for nanometer resolution and deep penetration into the tissue. The dynamic range is often determined from such measurements. For non-ratiometric indicators (typically single protein indicators), it is the ratio of the fluorescence intensities obtained under Ca2+ saturated and depleted conditions, respectively. However, for ratiometric indicators, the dynamic range is the ratio of the maximum FRET efficiency ratio (calcium saturated) to the minimum FRET efficiency ratio (calcium depleted). Yet another common quantity used to measure signals produced by calcium concentration fluxes is the signal-to-baseline ratio (SBR), which is simply the ratio of the change in fluorescence (F - F0) over the baseline fluorescence. This can be related to the SNR (signal to noise ratio) by multiplying the SBR by the square root of the number of counted photons.[16]

GECI Year Sensing Reporting Precursor
Cameleons[26] 1997 Calmodulin FRET pair: BFP or CFP, and GFP or YFP -
FIP-CBSM[27] 1997 Calmodulin FRET pair: BFP and RFP -
Pericams[28] 2000 Calmodulin cpGFP -
GCaMP[29][30] 2000 Calmodulin cpEGFP -
TN-L15[31] 2004 Modified chicken skeletal muscle troponin C FRET pair: YFP (Citrine) and CFP (Cerulean) -
TN-humTnC[31] 2004 Human cardiac troponin C FRET pair: YFP (Citrine) and CFP (Cerulean) -
TN-XL[32] 2006 Modified chicken skeletal muscle troponin C FRET pair: permuted YFP (Citrine) and CFP (Cerulean) TN-L15
TN-XXL[33] 2008 Modified csTnC in TN-XL FRET pair: permuted YFP (Citrine) and CFP (Cerulean) TN-XL
Twitch's[34] 2014 Troponin C FRET pair (various of two FPs) -
RCaMP1[35] 2013 Calmodulin mRuby (red FP) -
jRGECO1a[36] 2016 Calmodulin mApple (red FP) R-GECO[37]

A special class of genetically encoded calcium indicators are designed to form a permanent fluorescent tag in active neurons. They are based on the photoswitchable protein mEos which turns from green to red when illuminated with violet light. Combined with the calcium sensor calmodulin, violet light photoconverts only neurons that have elevated calcium levels. SynTagMA is a synapse-targeted version of CaMPARI2.

GECI Year Sensing Reporting Precursor
CaMPARI[38] 2015 Calmodulin + violet light mEos: green to red conversion -
CaMPARI2[39] 2018 Calmodulin + violet light mEos: green to red conversion CaMPARI
SynTagMA[40] 2020 Calmodulin + violet light mEos: green to red conversion CaMPARI2

Usage

Regardless of the type of indicator used the imaging procedure is generally very similar. Cells loaded with an indicator, or expressing it in the case of a GECI, can be viewed using a fluorescence microscope and captured by a Scientific CMOS (sCMOS)[41] camera or CCD camera. Confocal and two-photon microscopes provide optical sectioning ability so that calcium signals can be resolved in microdomains such as dendritic spines or synaptic boutons, even in thick samples such as mammalian brains. Images are analyzed by measuring fluorescence intensity changes for a single wavelength or two wavelengths expressed as a ratio (ratiometric indicators). If necessary, the derived fluorescence intensities and ratios may be plotted against calibrated values for known Ca2+ levels to measure absolute Ca2+ concentrations. Light field microscopy methods[42] extend functional readout of neural activity capabilities in 3D volumes.

References
  1. Cannell MB, Berlin JR, Lederer WJ (1987-01-01). "Intracellular calcium in cardiac myocytes: calcium transients measured using fluorescence imaging". Society of General Physiologists Series. 42: 201–14. PMID 3505361.
  2. Ivannikov MV, Macleod GT (June 2013). "Mitochondrial free Ca²⁺ levels and their effects on energy metabolism in Drosophila motor nerve terminals". Biophysical Journal. 104 (11): 2353–61. Bibcode:2013BpJ...104.2353I. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.064. PMC 3672877. PMID 23746507.
  3. Jaimes R, Walton RD, Pasdois P, Bernus O, Efimov IR, Kay MW (June 2016). "A technical review of optical mapping of intracellular calcium within myocardial tissue". American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 310 (11): H1388-401. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00665.2015. PMC 4935510. PMID 27016580.
  4. Hendel, T., Mank, M., Schnell, B., Griesbeck, O., Borst, A., & Reiff, D. F. (2008). Fluorescence changes of genetic calcium indicators and OGB-1 correlated with neural activity and calcium in vivo and in vitro. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 28(29), 7399–7411.
  5. Gordon, S., & Dickinson, M. H. (2006). Role of calcium in the regulation of mechanical power in insect flight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(11), 4311–4315.
  6. Kerr, R., Lev-Ram, V., Baird, G., Vincent, P., Tsien, R. Y., & Schafer, W. R. (2000). Optical imaging of calcium transients in neurons and pharyngeal muscle of C. elegans. Neuron, 26(3), 583–594.
  7. Kim, J., Lee, S., Jung, K. et al. Intensiometric biosensors visualize the activity of multiple small GTPases in vivo. Nat Commun 10, 211 (2019).
  8. Afshar Saber W, Gasparoli FM, Dirks MG, Gunn-Moore FJ, Antkowiak M (2018). "All-Optical Assay to Study Biological Neural Networks". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 12: 451. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00451. PMC 6041400. PMID 30026684.
  9. Kovalchuk Y, Homma R, Liang Y, Maslyukov A, Hermes M, Thestrup T, et al. (February 2015). "In vivo odourant response properties of migrating adult-born neurons in the mouse olfactory bulb". Nature Communications. 6: 6349. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.6349K. doi:10.1038/ncomms7349. PMID 25695931.
  10. Mues M, Bartholomäus I, Thestrup T, Griesbeck O, Wekerle H, Kawakami N, Krishnamoorthy G (June 2013). "Real-time in vivo analysis of T cell activation in the central nervous system using a genetically encoded calcium indicator". Nature Medicine. 19 (6): 778–83. doi:10.1038/nm.3180. PMID 23685843.
  11. Shinnawi R, Huber I, Maizels L, Shaheen N, Gepstein A, Arbel G, et al. (October 2015). "Monitoring Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes with Genetically Encoded Calcium and Voltage Fluorescent Reporters". Stem Cell Reports. 5 (4): 582–96. doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.08.009. PMC 4624957. PMID 26372632.
  12. Baird, G. S., Zacharias, D. A., & Tsien, R. Y. (1999). Circular permutation and receptor insertion within green fluorescent proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(20), 11241–11246.
  13. Park, J. G., & Palmer, A. E. (2014). Quantitative measurement of Ca2+ and Zn2+ in mammalian cells using genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 1071, 29–47.
  14. Rodriguez EA, Campbell RE, Lin JY, Lin MZ, Miyawaki A, Palmer AE, Shu X, Zhang J, Tsien RY. The Growing and Glowing Toolbox of Fluorescent and Photoactive Proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017 Feb;42(2):111-129.
  15. Nakai, J., Ohkura, M. & Imoto, K. A high signal-to-noise Ca2+ probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 19, 137–141 (2001).
  16. Pérez Koldenkova, V., & Nagai, T. (2013). Genetically encoded Ca(2+) indicators: properties and evaluation. Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1833(7), 1787–1797.
  17. Miyawaki, A., Griesbeck, O., Heim, R., & Tsien, R. Y. (1999). Dynamic and quantitative Ca2+ measurements using improved cameleons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(5), 2135–2140.
  18. Qian, Y., Piatkevich, K.D., Mc Larney, B. et al. A genetically encoded near-infrared fluorescent calcium ion indicator. Nat Methods 16, 171–174 (2019).
  19. Shemetov, A.A., Monakhov, M.V., Zhang, Q. et al. A near-infrared genetically encoded calcium indicator for in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol (2020).
  20. Nienhaus, K., Nienhaus, G. U., Wiedenmann, J., & Nar, H. (2005). Structural basis for photo-induced protein cleavage and green-to-red conversion of fluorescent protein EosFP. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(26), 9156–9159.
  21. Fosque, B. F., Sun, Y., Dana, H., Yang, C. T., Ohyama, T., Tadross, M. R., Patel, R., Zlatic, M., Kim, D. S., Ahrens, M. B., Jayaraman, V., Looger, L. L., & Schreiter, E. R. (2015). Neural circuits. Labeling of active neural circuits in vivo with designed calcium integrators. Science, 347(6223), 755–760.
  22. Baubet, V., Le Mouellic, H., Campbell, A. K., Lucas-Meunier, E., Fossier, P., & Brúlet, P. (2000). Chimeric green fluorescent protein-aequorin as bioluminescent Ca2+ reporters at the single-cell level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(13), 7260–7265.
  23. Boris A. Illarionov, Ludmila A. Frank, Victoria A. Illarionova, Vladimir S. Bondar, Eugene S. Vysotski, John R. Blinks, Recombinant obelin: Cloning and expression of cDNA, purification, and characterization as a calcium indicator, Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press, Volume 305, 2000 (223-249).
  24. Oh, J., Lee, C., & Kaang, B. K. (2019). Imaging and analysis of genetically encoded calcium indicators linking neural circuits and behaviors. The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology, 23(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2019.23.4.237
  25. Kaminer, Ido; Nemirovsky Jonathan; Segev Mordechai (2013). "Optimizing 3D multiphoton fluorescence microscopy". Optics Letters. 38 (19): 3945–3948
  26. Miyawaki A, Llopis J, Heim R, McCaffery JM, Adams JA, Ikura M, Tsien RY (August 1997). "Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ based on green fluorescent proteins and calmodulin". Nature. 388 (6645): 882–7. Bibcode:1997Natur.388..882M. doi:10.1038/42264. PMID 9278050.
  27. Romoser VA, Hinkle PM, Persechini A (May 1997). "Detection in living cells of Ca2+-dependent changes in the fluorescence emission of an indicator composed of two green fluorescent protein variants linked by a calmodulin-binding sequence. A new class of fluorescent indicators". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 272 (20): 13270–4. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.20.13270. PMID 9148946.
  28. Nagai T, Sawano A, Park ES, Miyawaki A (March 2001). "Circularly permuted green fluorescent proteins engineered to sense Ca2+". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98 (6): 3197–202. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.3197N. doi:10.1073/pnas.051636098. PMC 30630. PMID 11248055.
  29. Nakai J, Ohkura M, Imoto K (February 2001). "A high signal-to-noise Ca(2+) probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein". Nature Biotechnology. 19 (2): 137–41. doi:10.1038/84397. PMID 11175727.
  30. Dana H, Sun Y, Mohar B, Hulse BK, Kerlin AM, Hasseman JP, et al. (July 2019). "High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments". Nature Methods. 16 (7): 649–657. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0435-6. PMID 31209382.
  31. Heim N, Griesbeck O (April 2004). "Genetically encoded indicators of cellular calcium dynamics based on troponin C and green fluorescent protein". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279 (14): 14280–6. doi:10.1074/jbc.M312751200. PMID 14742421.
  32. Mank M, Reiff DF, Heim N, Friedrich MW, Borst A, Griesbeck O (March 2006). "A FRET-based calcium biosensor with fast signal kinetics and high fluorescence change". Biophysical Journal. 90 (5): 1790–6. Bibcode:2006BpJ....90.1790M. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.073536. PMC 1367327. PMID 16339891.
  33. Mank M, Santos AF, Direnberger S, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Hofer SB, Stein V, et al. (September 2008). "A genetically encoded calcium indicator for chronic in vivo two-photon imaging". Nature Methods. 5 (9): 805–11. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1243. PMID 19160515.
  34. Thestrup T, Litzlbauer J, Bartholomäus I, Mues M, Russo L, Dana H, et al. (February 2014). "Optimized ratiometric calcium sensors for functional in vivo imaging of neurons and T lymphocytes" (PDF). Nature Methods. 11 (2): 175–82. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2773. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0017-C32A-B. PMID 24390440.
  35. Akerboom J, Carreras Calderón N, Tian L, Wabnig S, Prigge M, Tolö J, et al. (2013). "Genetically encoded calcium indicators for multi-color neural activity imaging and combination with optogenetics". Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 6: 2. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2013.00002. PMC 3586699. PMID 23459413.
  36. Dana H, Mohar B, Sun Y, Narayan S, Gordus A, Hasseman JP, et al. (March 2016). "Sensitive red protein calcium indicators for imaging neural activity". eLife. 5: e12727. doi:10.7554/eLife.12727. PMC 4846379. PMID 27011354.
  37. Zhao Y, Araki S, Wu J, Teramoto T, Chang YF, Nakano M, et al. (September 2011). "An expanded palette of genetically encoded Ca²⁺ indicators". Science. 333 (6051): 1888–91. Bibcode:2011Sci...333.1888Z. doi:10.1126/science.1208592. PMC 3560286. PMID 21903779.
  38. Fosque BF, Sun Y, Dana H, Yang CT, Ohyama T, Tadross MR, et al. (February 2015). "Neural circuits. Labeling of active neural circuits in vivo with designed calcium integrators". Science. 347 (6223): 755–60. doi:10.1126/science.1260922. PMID 25678659.
  39. Moeyaert B, Holt G, Madangopal R, Perez-Alvarez A, Fearey BC, Trojanowski NF, et al. (October 2018). "Improved methods for marking active neuron populations". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 4440. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.4440M. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06935-2. PMC 6202339. PMID 30361563.
  40. Perez-Alvarez A, Fearey BC, O'Toole RJ, Yang W, Arganda-Carreras I, Lamothe-Molina PJ, et al. (May 2020). "Freeze-frame imaging of synaptic activity using SynTagMA". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 2464. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16315-4. PMC 7235013. PMID 32424147.
  41. Nguyen JP, Shipley FB, Linder AN, Plummer GS, Liu M, Setru SU, Shaevitz JW, Leifer AM (February 2016). "Whole-brain calcium imaging with cellular resolution in freely behaving Caenorhabditis elegans". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 113 (8): E1074–81. arXiv:1501.03463. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113E1074N. doi:10.1073/pnas.1507110112. PMC 4776509. PMID 26712014.
  42. Pégard NC, Liu HY, Antipa N, Gerlock M, Adesnik H, Waller L (May 2016). "Compressive light-field microscopy for 3D neural activity recording". Optica. 3 (5): 517–24. Bibcode:2016Optic...3..517P. doi:10.1364/optica.3.000517.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.