Civil Rights Act of 1990

The Civil Rights Act of 1990 was a bill that, had it been signed into law, would have made it easier for litigants in race or sex discrimination cases to win.[3] It was introduced into the 101st United States Congress on February 7, 1990 by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) in the United States Senate, and by Augustus Hawkins (D-CA) in the House of Representatives.[4] While making its way through Congress, the bill was considered to be civil rights groups' #1 legislative priority.[5] Soon before the bill made it to the desk of then-President of the United States George H. W. Bush, it was criticized by the Harvard Law School professor Charles Fried. In a New York Times op-ed, Fried wrote that descriptions of the bill as the most important civil rights legislation in a quarter-century were "a public relations flimflam perpetrated by a cabal of overzealous civil rights plaintiffs' lawyers." He concluded by saying that Bush should "veto this bill in its present form."[6]

Civil Rights Act of 1990
Long titleAn Act To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to restore and strengthen civil rights laws that ban discrimination in employment, and for other purposes.
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the Senate as (S. 2104) by Ted Kennedy(D–MA) on February 7, 1990 (1990-02-07)
  • Committee consideration by Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources
  • Passed the Senate on July 18, 1990 (1990-07-18) (65–34[1])
  • Passed the House on August 3, 1990 (1990-08-03) (272–154[2])
  • Reported by the joint conference committee on October 12, 1990 (1990-10-12); agreed to by the Senate on October 16, 1990 (1990-10-16) (62–34) and by the House on October 17, 1990 (1990-10-17) (273–154)
  • Vetoed by President George H. W. Bush on October 22, 1990 (1990-10-22)

On October 22, 1990, President Bush vetoed the bill, claiming that it "employs a maze of highly legalistic language to introduce the destructive force of quotas into our national employment system."[4][7] The Bush administration argued that the bill's provisions were strict enough that they would give employers "powerful incentives" to adopt quotas. Supporters of the bill argued that, contrary to Bush's claims, the bill would not have led employers to adopt quotas. For example, Benjamin Hooks, the then-executive director of the NAACP, said he was "at a loss" as to why Bush described the legislation as a quota bill.[8] Congress attempted to override his veto on October 24, but their attempt failed in the Senate by one vote to achieve the two-thirds majority required.[4][9]

References
  1. "S. 2104 (101st): Civil Rights Act of 1990 -- Senate Vote #161 -- July 18, 1990". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
  2. "H.R. 4000 (101st): Civil Rights Act of 1990 -- House Vote #310 -- Aug 3, 1990". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
  3. Campbell, Linda P. (1990-10-23). "Bush Vetoes Civil-rights Measure". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
  4. "Civil Rights Act of 1990 (1990 - S. 2104)". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
  5. LAUTER, DAVID (1990-10-23). "Civil Rights Bill Vetoed by Bush". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
  6. Fried, Charles; School, professor of law at Harvard Law; 1989, was Solicitor General from 1985 to (1990-10-04). "The Civil Rights Sham of 1990". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2018-01-05.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  7. Holmes, Steven a; Times, Special to The New York (1990-10-23). "President Vetoes Bill on Job Rights; Showdown Is Set". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
  8. Devroy, Ann (1990-10-23). "BUSH VETOES CIVIL RIGHTS BILL". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2018-01-05.
  9. "Civil Rights Act of 1991". Dictionary of American History. 2003. Archived from the original on 2018-01-11. Retrieved 2018-01-11.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.