Cognitive sociology

Cognitive sociology is a sociological sub-discipline devoted to the study of the "conditions under which meaning is constituted through processes of reification."[1] It does this by focusing on "the series of interpersonal processes that set up the conditions for phenomena to become “social objects,” which subsequently shape thinking and thought."[1] Thus, this research aims to sort out the social and cultural contingencies and consequences of human cognition. It has its roots in classical sociological theory, notably Durkheim and Weber, and from contemporary sociological theory, notably Goffman and Bourdieu.[1]

Notable authors include but are not limited to, Eviatar Zerubavel, Aaron Cicourel, Barry Schwartz, Karen A. Cerulo, and Paul DiMaggio.[2]

The term 'cognitive sociology' was used already in 1974 by Cicourel.[3] However, in 1997 DiMaggio[4] published what has been referred to as a now classic paper[5] of how cognitive sociology overlaps with the sociology of culture & cognition. Michael W. Raphael provides an overview of cognitive sociology in its current form.[1]

Special journal issues on the topic of Cognitive Sociology has been published by the scientific journals Poetics[6] and the European Journal of Social Theory[7] in 2010 and 2007 respectively.

Graduate-level courses in cognitive sociology has been organized at the University of Copenhagen by Jacob Strandell in 2014 and 2016 [8][9]

In order to organize this interdisciplinary investigation, scholars have articulated five models of the actor that stress different locations of human cognition in relation to the social contract.[10] These models are:

  1. Universal cognitivism stresses "naturalistic explanations of human behavior".[1] This is reflected in the work of Stephen Park Turner,[11] Omar Lizardo[12] and Gabriel Ignatow.[13]
  2. Fuzzy universal cognitivism "emphasizes naturalism in the explanations, but its ontological positions are not as balanced as plural cognitivism".[1] This is reflected in the work of Jürgen Habermas[14] and Paul DiMaggio.
  3. Plural cognitivism seeks to formulate a "balanced model of the actor subjected to socio-mental control. Socio-mental control describes how impersonal cognitive norms shape the thinking, learning, and courses of activity individual actors are able to undertake as a result of institutional reflexivity."[1] Institutional reflexivity is a process described by Goffman in "The Arrangement between the Sexes".[15] This is reflected in the work of Eviatar Zerubavel and his students.
  4. Fuzzy individual cognitivism "emphasizes humanism in the explanations, but its ontological positions are not as balanced as plural cognitivism".[1] This is reflected in the work of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot[16] as well as Alban Bouvier.[17]
  5. Individual cognitivism investigates the "inner determinants of action with respect to the practical, cognitive, and moral properties of social facts."[1] This is reflected in the work of Raymond Boudon and Patrick Pharo.[18]

References
  1. Raphael, Michael W. (2017). "Cognitive Sociology". Oxford Bibliographies Online in Sociology. 187. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0187.
  2. Cerulo, Karen (2014). "Cognitive Sociology". Encyclopedia of Social Theory: 108–112.
  3. Cicourel, Aaron (1974). Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. New Tork: Free Press.
  4. DiMaggio, Paul (1997). "Culture and Cognition". Annual Review of Sociology. 23 (1): 263–287. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263.
  5. Cerulo, Karen (2010). "Mining the Intersection of Cognitive Sociology and Neuroscience". Poetics. 38 (2): 115–132. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.005.
  6. Cerulo, Karen (2010). "Brain, Mind and Cultural Sociology". Poetics. 38 (2).
  7. Strydom, Piet (2007). "Social Theory after the Cognitive Revolution". European Journal of Social Theory. 10 (3).
  8. University of Copenhagen. "Cognitive Sociology: Self, Identity and Self-Esteem". Retrieved 10 November 2014.
  9. Universitet, Københavns. "Culture-Cognition Interaction in Self- and Identity - 2015/2016". kurser.ku.dk. Retrieved 2018-02-10.
  10. Raphael, Michael W. (2015). "On the Prospect of a Cognitive Sociology of Law: Recognizing the Inequality of Contract". Annual Meeting of the Mid-Atlantic Law and Society Association – via CUNY Academic Works.
  11. Turner, Stephen P. (2002). Brains/practices/relativism: Social theory after cognitive science. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
  12. Lizardo, Omar (2012). "The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning". Cognitive Linguistics. 23 (2): 367–393. doi:10.1515/cog-2012-0011. ISSN 1613-3641. S2CID 146835158.
  13. Ignatow, Gabriel (2009). "Culture and Embodied Cognition: Moral Discourses in Internet Support Groups for Overeaters". Social Forces. 88 (2): 643–669. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0262. JSTOR 40645819.
  14. Strydom, Piet (2015). "The latent cognitive sociology in Habermas: Extrapolated from Between Facts and Norms". Philosophy & Social Criticism. 41 (3): 273–291. doi:10.1177/0191453714563877.
  15. Goffman, Erving (1977). "The Arrangement between the Sexes". Theory and Society. 4 (3): 301–331. doi:10.1007/bf00206983. JSTOR 656722.
  16. Boltanski, Luc; Thévenot, Laurent (2000). "The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement". Philosophical Explorations. 3 (3): 208–231. doi:10.1080/13869790008523332. ISSN 1386-9795.
  17. Bouvier, A. (2007). "An Argumentativist Point of View in Cognitive Sociology". European Journal of Social Theory. 10 (3): 465–480. doi:10.1177/1368431007080707.
  18. Pharo, P. (2007). "How is Sociological Realism Possible?: Sociology after Cognitive Science". European Journal of Social Theory. 10 (3): 481–496. doi:10.1177/1368431007080708.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.