Coquina

Coquina (/koʊˈkiːnə/) is a sedimentary rock that is composed either wholly or almost entirely of the transported, abraded, and mechanically sorted fragments of the shells of mollusks, trilobites, brachiopods, or other invertebrates.[1][2] The term coquina comes from the Spanish word for "cockle" and "shellfish".[3][4]

For the small marine bivalves, see Donax variabilis and Donax trunculus.
Coquina outcrop on the beach at Washington Oaks State Gardens, Florida

For a sediment to be considered to be a coquina, the particles composing it should average 2 mm (0.079 in) or greater in size. Coquina can vary in hardness from poorly to moderately cemented. Incompletely consolidated and poorly cemented coquinas are considered grainstones in the Dunham classification system for carbonate sedimentary rocks.[5] A well-cemented coquina is classified as a biosparite (fossiliferous limestone) according to the Folk classification of sedimentary rocks.[6]

Coquinas accumulate in high-energy marine and lacustrine environments where currents and waves result in the vigorous winnowing, abrasion, fracturing, and sorting of the shells that compose them. As a result, they typically exhibit well-developed bedding or cross-bedding, close packing, and good orientation of the shell fragments. The high-energy marine or lacustrine environments associated with coquinas include beaches, shallow submarine raised banks, swift tidal channels, and barrier bars.[6][7]

Composition and distribution

Coquina is composed mainly of the mineral calcite, often including some phosphate, in the form of seashells or coral. Coquinas dating from the Devonian period through to the much more recent Pleistocene epoch are a common find all over the world, with the depositional requirements to form a coquina being a common thing in many marine facies.

History and use

Australia

Adjacent to Shark Bay Road 45 kilometres (28 mi) southeast of Denham is an approximately 110 kilometres (68 mi) long stretch of coastline composed of billions of tiny shells of the Shark Bay cockle (Fragum erugatum), averaging less than 14 millimetres (0.55 in) in length. The shell deposit, between 8 to 9 metres (26 to 30 ft) thick, has compacted and cemented in some areas into solid masses of limestone that formerly was quarried and cut into blocks used in local construction.

St Andrew's Anglican Church, the Old Pearler Restaurant, and parts of the Shark Bay Hotel in Shark Bay were built from coquina shell blocks.[8] The church, built in 1954, has walls infilled with coquina shell blocks between a light steel frame and a shell facing, while the Old Pearler was built in 1974–1977 with buttressed coquina shell block walls.[9]

Brazil

Recently discovered petroleum-bearing formations off the coast of northeastern Brazil hold coquina reservoirs of oil. The coquinas are generally heterogeneous in their porosity and permeability, but like other lacustrine carbonates, they are uncommonly reservoirs. Corbett et al. (2015) in their discussion of the reservoirs say the finding of the Badejo Field (Campos Basin) in 1975 was the first hydrocarbon discovery in the coquinas of the Lagoa Feia, followed by that of the Pampo and Linguado Fields in 1978. The coquinas of the Morro do Chaves Formation were formed by non-marine bivalves and ostracods. The shells of the bivalves, which lived in shallow oxygenated water, were transported and deposited as washout over stream fans and beaches by storms and long-shore drift.[10]

The palynological record of coquinas of the Sergipe-Alagoas Basin has been analyzed and the sediments dated to the late Barremian age; the results suggest a marine and/or brackish environment. Daniel Thompson (2013) asserts that the coquinas of the Morro do Chaves Formation include a wide range of marine mollusca characteristic of brackish environmental conditions, suggesting periodic marine ingression during the Early Cretaceous.[11]

According to a paper by Senira Kattah published in The Sedimentary Record, the discovery of the Lula Field by Petrobras and partners in 2006 opened petroleum exploration in the Barremian/Aptian pre-salt play in the offshore Santos and Campos basins, and consequently deeper coquina reservoirs have become important targets. He says the two main reservoir targets recognized for the pre-salt within the study areas are: "late rift coquinas, lacustrine facies deposited at the Late Barremian to Early Aptian, and the younger rift/sag microbial limestones deposited during the Aptian, just before the establishment of the major evaporitic sag basin between South America and Africa."[12] There are abundant beds of coquina in the Outer High of the Santos Basin, similar to those from the neighboring Campos.[13] Pre-salt stratigraphy of the Santos Basin shows lacustrine sediments composed of coarse pelecypod (bivalve) coquina during the Barremian and Aptian sag phase of the continental crust subsidence.[14]

Florida
Coquina from Florida

Coquina deposits in Florida occur mostly along the eastern coast of the peninsula. This coquina is named the Anastasia Formation after Anastasia Island, where the Spanish quarried the rock to construct the Castillo de San Marcos, the fortress they built to defend St. Augustine. The Anastasia Formation stretches from just north of St. Augustine in St. Johns County to southern Palm Beach County. The formation and associated sand form part of the Atlantic Coastal Ridge, a Pleistocene barrier island chain that extends from Duval County to Dade County. Other coquina deposits are found in the state, but only in limited areas. The Anastasia Formation is naturally exposed in a number of places along the east coast including Washington Oaks Gardens State Park, Gilbert's Bar House of Refuge, Hutchinson Island in Martin County and Blowing Rocks Preserve, owned by The Nature Conservancy, in Martin County.[15]

Still occasionally quarried or mined, and used as a building stone in Florida for over 400 years, coquina forms the walls of the Castillo in St. Augustine. The stone made a very good material for building forts, particularly those built during the period of heavy cannon use. Because of coquina's softness, cannonballs would sink into, rather than shatter or puncture the walls. The first Saint Augustine lighthouse, built by the Spanish, was also made of coquina.

Close-up of coquina from Florida. The scale bar is 10 mm (0.39 in).

Coquina was used as building stone in St. Augustine as early as 1598 for construction of a powder house. This was the beginning of a building tradition that extended into the 1930s along Florida's Atlantic Coast. In the St. Augustine vicinity, the Castillo de San Marcos, Fort Matanzas, the old city gates, the Cathedral, Spanish and British Period residential structures, property line walls and tombs were constructed of coquina quarried on Anastasia Island. To the south in New Smyrna, a large storehouse and wharf were constructed of coquina at the 1770s Andrew Turnbull colony. Around 1816, John Addison constructed a kitchen house of coquina on his plantation on the Tomoka River. The material was also used in the construction of sugar mill buildings on sugar plantations in the 1820s and 1830s. Examples are the Bulow, Dunlawton and New Smyrna sugar mills. In these early structures, the porous coquina was protected by lime plaster. With the exception of a few residences that have been restored in St. Augustine, the coquina masonry of these structures is today exposed to the elements and is slowly deteriorating.[16]

Mexico

Overlying the fossiliferous sands and sandy clays of the upper San Fernando River in northeastern Mexico is a bed of coquina limestone dating probably to the Cenozoic era.[17] Coquina deposits also occur in the Baja California peninsula, including submerged "reefs". So-called coquina "reefs" occur at Punta Borrascosa, San Felipe and Coloraditos on the northeast coast of Baja California. These have been uranium-thorium dated to the Pleistocene epoch, with an age estimated at 130,000 ybp. Semi-continuous coquina outcrops have been found 13 kilometres (8.1 mi) east of Puerto Peñasco, in the shallow subtidal zone or partly submerged under intertidal sands.

Other Pleistocene outcrops occur along both coastlines of the upper Gulf. On the Vizcaino Peninsula of western Baja California, the informally named "Tivela stultorum" coquina is abundant in shells of the Pismo clam. Until analysis of the shells by U-series and amino-acids methods is concluded, this marine transgression is assigned an approximate age of 200,000 ybp. Outcrops in Bahía de San Hipolito and Bahía de Asunción are loosely consolidated, sandy beachrock a few meters thick, found 15 to 20 metres (49 to 66 ft) above present mean sea level.[18][19]

The ancient Maya built their city of Toniná in the highlands of what is now Chiapas in southern Mexico using native rocks to construct its masonry buildings, among them large coquina flagstones from which they made blocks and bricks for floors, walls, and stairways.[20]

North Carolina

Coquina has a very limited distribution in southeastern North Carolina. The best known outcrop is located in New Hanover County, near Fort Fisher, along the southern tip of North Carolina's coast. It is one of the few naturally occurring outcrops in the coastal plain region of North Carolina, described as “a low-relief plain underlain by beds of shallow-marine, estuarine, shoreline, and fluvial sediments" in The Geology of the Carolinas.[21] These sediments were deposited during numerous episodes of sea level rise and fall over hundreds of thousands of years. The coastlines of the Tidewater region of North Carolina change constantly in response to wind and wave action, sedimentary deposition, tidal movements, and changes in sea level. Although the inner coastal plain is considered to be more stable, the coastal plain was inundated by repeated marine transgressions due to fluctuating sea levels during the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene.

Historical records and extant buildings, foundations, basements, and retaining walls indicate that coquina was being mined in North Carolina by at least 1760, evidenced by the extant architectural ruins at the colonial-era Clear Springs Plantation near New Bern.[22]

Sedgeley Abbey, an 18th-century plantation house on the lower Cape Fear River was built of locally quarried coquina. The house that once stood on a vast tract of land directly across the river from Orton was described by local historian and author James Sprunt as "the grandest colonial residence of the Cape Fear".[23] Sprunt compared Sedgeley Abbey in dimensions and appearance to the two-story, cellared, Governor Dudley mansion that still stands in Wilmington. Like many southern plantations, Sedgeley Abbey was abandoned after the Civil War. The vacant house was demolished in the 1870s and the coquina rubble was burned and spread on the fields as fertilizer. A cellar eight feet deep carved into solid coquina was located during archaeological investigations on the site of the former plantation in 1978.[24][25]

Other uses

In the past coquina was used for the construction of buildings in Denham, Western Australia, but quarrying is no longer permitted in the World Heritage Site.

When first quarried, coquina is extremely soft. This softness makes it very easy to remove from the quarry and cut into shape. However, the stone is also at first much too soft to be used for building. In order to be used as a building material, the stone is left out to dry for approximately one to three years, which causes the stone to harden into a usable, but still comparatively soft, form.

Coquina has also been used as a source of paving material. It is usually poorly cemented and easily breaks into component shell or coral fragments, which can be substituted for gravel or crushed harder rocks. In the 1930s, large-scale mining of coquina for use in highway construction began at Fort Fisher in North Carolina.[22] Large pieces of coquina of unusual shape are sometimes used as landscape decoration.

Because coquina often includes a component of phosphate, it is sometimes mined for use as fertilizer.

Notable exposures

In architecture

See also

References
  1. Dictionary of Mining, Mineral, & Related Terms. Report SP-96-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Bureau of Mines. 1996.
  2. Neuendorf, K. K. E.; J. P., Jr, Mehl; Jackson, J. A., eds. (2005). Glossary of Geology (5th ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Geological Institute. ISBN 978-0-922152-76-6.
  3. "Definition of coquina in English". English Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. 2018. Archived from the original on September 25, 2016. Retrieved 10 December 2018. Mid 19th century: from Spanish, literally 'cockle', based on Latin concha.
  4. English Wiktionary: concha mussel, shell."
  5. Dunham, R. J. (1962). "Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture". In Ham, W. E. (ed.). Classification of Carbonate Rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, no. 1. pp. 108–121.
  6. Folk, R. L. (1980). The Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Austin, TX: Hemphill Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0-914696-14-8.
  7. Scholle, P. A.; Bebout, D. G.; Moore, C. H. (1983). Carbonate Depositional Environments. Memoir no. 33. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. ISBN 978-0-89181-310-1.
  8. "Coquina (Shell Block) Quarry – Shark Bay". Shark Bay. Denham Western Australia: Parks and Wildlife Service. Archived from the original on November 26, 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  9. "Shire of Shark Bay – What to See and Do". Shire of Shark Bay. 6 July 2011. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  10. P. W. M. Corbett; R. Estrella; A. Morales; A. Shoeir; Borghi, Leonardo; A.C. Tavares (June 2015). "Coquina Carbonate Reservoir Analogues - Key Learnings from the Cretaceous, NE Brazil, and the Holocene, W Australia". 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2015. pp. 4–5. doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201412675. ISBN 978-94-6282-146-0. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  11. Gustavo Gonçalves Garcia; Antônio Jorge Vasconcellos Garcia; Maria Helena Paiva Henriquesa (1 October 2018). "Palynology of the Morro do Chaves Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Sergipe Alagoas Basin, NE Brazil: Paleoenvironmental implications for the early history of the South Atlantic". Cretaceous Research. Elsevier B.V. 90: 7–20. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2018.03.029. ISSN 0195-6671.
  12. Senira Kattah (1 March 2017). "Exploration Opportunities in the Pre-Salt Play, Deepwater Campos Basin, Brazil". The Sedimentary Record. 15 (1): 4–8. doi:10.2110/sedred.2017.1.4. ISSN 1543-8740.
  13. J.P. Buckley; D.W.J. Bosence; C. Elders (21 August 2015). "Pre-Salt Carbonates of the Santos Basin". In D.W.J. Bosence; K.A. Gibbons; D.P. Le Heron; W.A. Morgan; T. Pritchard; B.A. Vining (eds.). Microbial Carbonates in Space and Time:: Implications for Global Exploration and Production. Geological Society of London. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-86239-727-9.
  14. Teresa Sabato Ceraldi; Darryl Green (5 January 2017). "Evolution of the South Atlantic lacustrine deposits in response to Early Cretaceous rifting, subsidence and lake hydrology.". In T. Sabato Ceraldi; R. A. Hodgkinson; G. Backe (eds.). Petroleum Geoscience of the West Africa Margin. Geological Society of London. p. 77. ISBN 978-1-78620-243-7.
  15. Thomas M. Scott (December 2000). "The Coquina Resources of Florida's East Coast". halsema.org. Tallahassee, Florida: Bureau of Historic Preservation. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 25, 2018. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  16. David Ferro (December 2000). "The Conservation and Preservation of Coquina". halsema.org. Tallahassee, Florida: Bureau of Historic Preservation. p. i. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 25, 2018. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  17. Edwin Theodore Dumble (1915). Tertiary Deposits of Northeastern Mexico. California Academy of Sciences. pp. 192–193.
  18. Luc Ortlieb (January 1979). "Quaternary Marine Terraces in Southwestern Vizcaino Peninsula, Baja California, Mexico" (PDF). In P.I. Abbott; R.G. Gastil (eds.). Baja California Geology: Field Guides and Papers. Dept. of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University. p. 89.
  19. Richard C. Brusca (November 2018). "A Brief Geologic History Of Northwestern Mexico, Version 6" (PDF). p. 21.
  20. Francisco Riquelme; Martha Cuevas-García; Jesús Alvarado-Ortega; Shannon Taylor; José Luis Ruvalcaba-Sil; Carlos Linares-López; Manuel Aguilar-Franco; Juan Yadeun-Angulo (16 August 2012). "New Insights into Ancient Maya Building Materials: Characterization of Mortar, Plaster, and Coquina Flagstones from Toniná". MRS Proceedings. 1374: 145–164. doi:10.1557/opl.2012.1385.
  21. P. Geoffrey Feiss; Arthur H. Maybin III; Stanley Riggs; Andrew E. Grosz (1991). "Resources of the Coastal Plain". In J. Wright Horton; Victor A. Zullo (eds.). The Geology of the Carolinas: Carolina Geological Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume. Univ. of Tennessee Press. p. 339. ISBN 978-0-87049-662-2.
  22. John J. Mintz (December 2000). "Coquinas Of Coastal North Carolina: A Preliminary Assessment". halsema.org. Tallahassee, Florida: Bureau of Historic Preservation. p. 9. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 25, 2018. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  23. James Sprunt (1896). Tales and Traditions of the Lower Cape Fear, 1661–1896. Le Gwin Brothers, Printers. p. 50.
  24. Wilson, Angley (March 1995). "A History of the Sedgeley Abbey Site in New Hanover County". Retrieved 27 September 2015.
  25. Sandy Jackson (10 February 2015). "A Brief History of Sedgeley Abbey [Originally published in the January, 1995 – FPHPS Newsletter]". Federal Point Historic Preservation Society. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.