David H. Remes

David H. Remes (born 1954) is an American lawyer.[1][2][3][4]

Lawyer David Remes in Harvard Magazine

Remes was a partner at the law firm Covington & Burling.[3] Most recently, Remes was "Counsel" at the Washington, DC law firm Gilbert LLP. Remes has been recognized for his human rights work.[5][6]

Volunteered to serve Guantanamo captives

Remes is notable for volunteering to serve as a pro bono attorney for some of the captives held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.[4][7]

Remes played a role in a challenge focused around the captives' detention based on an avenue of appeal that the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA) opened.[4] The DTA closed the opportunity for captives who had not yet had writs of habeas corpus filed on their behalf. But the DTA allowed captives to challenge the determinations of their Combatant Status Review Tribunals, that they were properly classified as "enemy combatants". The DTA allowed captives to challenge the enemy combatant determination if the Tribunal failed to follow the rules laid out in their mandate.

One aspect of that challenge was a request that the court force the DoD to release more information on the evidence used to justify the captive's detention.[4] Leading officials in the United States counter-terrorism establishment appealed a July 20, 2007 appeals court ruling forcing the release of information about the captives on national security grounds. Remes responded:

This is just a smoke screen to hide the fact that they can’t justify the detentions,

Remes is one of the attorneys for Saifullah Paracha, a Pakistani businessman who lived in the US for several years, who is suffering from serious heart disease.[4] Paracha has been appealing to get permission to travel temporarily to an American hospital for heart surgery. Camp authorities claim his heart surgery could be performed in Guantanamo's infirmary. They complained that $400,000 had been spent preparing the infirmary for his surgery. Paracha's lawyers have argued that previous procedures at Guantanamo have been botched.

Brought Guantanamo cases to Federal court under the Detainee Treatment Act

The Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA) closed off the right of Guantanamo captives to submit new petitions of habeas corpus. (Pending cases were left open.) The DTA opened a path for Guantanamo captives to submit a limited appeal to Federal Courts of appeal in Washington DC.[8] The Military Commission Act of 2006 (MCA) closed down the pending habeas corpus cases. Attorneys for the captives have both initiated a challenge to the constitutionality of the MCA's stripping of the right to habeas corpus; and they have initiated appeals in the DC Federal Courts of appeal.

The DTA's limited avenue of appeal only allows challenges as to whether the Combatant Status Review Tribunal correctly followed their rules.[8] Remes was one of the first lawyers to initiate an appeal in the DC courts.

Remes reacts to the Governments desire to "rewrite detainee evidence"

On June 20, 2008 the Associated Press reported that the Government wanted to "rewrite detainee evidence".[9] The impetus to rewrite the evidence is a reaction to the Supreme Court's June 12, 2008 ruling on Boumediene v. Bush. The Supreme Court had ruled that Guantanamo captives were entitled to challenge the basis for their detention through the US Justice System, because the Combatant Status Review Tribunals were not an adequate substitute for habeas corpus. According to the Associated Press:

At a closed-door meeting with judges and defense attorneys this week, government lawyers said they needed time to add new evidence and make other changes to evidentiary documents known as "factual returns."

The Associated Press quoted Remes reaction to this development.[9]

It's sort of an admission that the original returns were defective. It's also an admission that the government thinks it needs to beef up the evidence.

Defense of Adnan Latif

Remes continued his pro bono legal work on behalf of captives held in extra judicial detention at Guantanamo Bay, taking on the case of Adnan Farhan Abd Al Latif one of his most notable clients.[10]

Though Latif was ordered to be released in 2004, 2007, 2009 and lastly in July 2010 by district court Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr., an appeals court that handles Guantanamo habeas cases reversed the decision in October 2011, and in 2012 the Supreme Court turned down the Latif case.[11][12]

Remes was quoted in a CNN article as saying related to the Latif case and efforts to get Latif transferred or released "So now, the executive is against transfers, Congress is against transfers and the courthouse doors are shut," "All three branches of the government are aligned against us.".

On September 8, 2012 Latif, who had a history of mental illness, was said to have committed suicide by the Department of Defense.[13] and Remes via Amnesty International promised to continue his work on behalf of Guantanamo detainees who have been ordered released, only to have their cases reversed by appeals courts.[14] However, Latif's cause of death is now in question.

Publications
  • "Playboy's Progeny: Court's Cable TV Decision Bodes Well for Internet and Commercial Speech" (PDF). Legal Times. June 5, 2000. Retrieved 2007-09-12.

References
  1. "David H. Remes". Covington & Burling. Retrieved 2007-09-13.
  2. "Guantanamo Bay Bar Association". Seton Hall University School of Law. Archived from the original on 2007-08-10. Retrieved 2007-08-30.
  3. William Glaberson (May 5, 2007). "Many Detainees At Guantanamo Rebuff Lawyers". Boston Globe. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
  4. William Glaberson (September 12, 2007). "Officials Cite Danger in Revealing Detainee Data". The New York Times. p. A18. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  5. "Covington Receives Human Rights Campaign's "National Ally of Justice" Award". Covington & Burling. July 24, 2006. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  6. "Human Rights Campaign to Honor Covington & Burling and David Remes with 2006 National Ally of Justice Award". July 21, 2006. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011.
  7. Charlie Savage (August 10, 2005). "Guantanamo detainees find fault with lawyers". Boston Globe. Retrieved 2007-09-13.
  8. Carol D. Leonnig (December 22, 2007). "Detainee Evidence Probe Weighed: Judge Told Guantanamo Information May Have Been Destroyed". The Washington Post. pp. Page A02. Retrieved 2008-01-06.
  9. Matt Apuzzo (June 20, 2008). "US asks to rewrite detainee evidence". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2008-06-21.
  10. Lewis, Libby (24 June 2012). "Lawyer for Gitmo detainees: 'Less hope now than ever'". CNN. Retrieved 6 December 2012.
  11. Rosenberg, Carol (9 November 2012). "Dead Guantánamo detainee won, then lost court-ordered release". Miami Herald. Retrieved 6 December 2012.
  12. Wire Staff, CNN (16 August 2010). "Judge Order's long time Gitmo Detainee released". Retrieved 6 December 2012.
  13. Cohen, Andrew (12 September 2012). "A Death at Guantanamo". Retrieved 6 December 2012.
  14. Wittes, Benjamin. "Sabin Willett and David Remes on Adnan Latif". Lawfare. Retrieved 6 December 2012.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.