Electricity provider switching

Electricity provider switching is the ability of power consumers to have an option—or the "power to choose"—their electricity provider in a deregulated electricity market as permitted by a state public utilities governing body.

Australia

The Australian market has been somewhat deregulated, but still sees consumers provided with a narrow band of choices.

Canada

Electricity is deregulated in two Canadian provinces: Ontario and Alberta. Both markets showed price spikes in the first year of deregulation, but then settled down into a volatile but reasonably stable environment. Alberta's market is dominated by fossil fuel generation and as such reacts more closely to the price of natural gas. Ontario's generation mix is about 50% nuclear.[1]

Ontario

The consumer has the choice between buying from their local utility (Local Distribution Company - LDC) or from one of the deregulated suppliers. There is a large range of contract options from a variable price to 1,3 or 5 year fixed prices. Electricity provider switching is difficult once the consumer is in one of these contracts, unless they are close to the end of a fixed price contract. However, as of January 2010 there is a maximum termination penalty allowed.[2]

A very important element in switching electricity providers in Ontario is understanding the Global Adjustment.[3] This is an adjustment for some commitments government agencies have made on your behalf. It is included in the LDC Regulated Price Plan, but is an additional line item if a contract is signed.

Alberta

The consumer has the choice between buying from their local utility (Local Distribution Company - LDC) or from a deregulated suppliers. There are however many fewer of these in Alberta. Electricity provider switching is difficult once the consumer is in one of these contracts, unless they are close to the end of a fixed price contract.

There is a price comparison service operation in Canada.

France

In France, electricity market is totally deregulated and consumers have the choice between the historical formerly state-owned provider EDF and several new private providers like Direct Énergie.

United Kingdom

Electricity supply has also been deregulated in the United Kingdom. For a list of suppliers see: Category:Power companies of the United Kingdom at the foot of the page.

United States

In 2019, the state of Arizona, through the states' regulatory agency (Arizona Corporation Commission) considered implementing retail electricity deregulation. The proposal was opposed by Arizona Public Service Co. (APS), an electric utility that provides electricity to 2.7 million people. APS said it was opposed because the change would "not be in the best interest of customers," according to Daily Energy Insider, because it would create issues surrounding reliability, "conflicts . . . with existing law," and clean energy implementation difficulties.[4]

In deregulated markets such as Texas and Maryland, the state government may require the incumbent utility energy provider to allow for unlimited competition within the marketplace, where the consumer is free to choose any electricity provider. Electricity provider switching is only practical if a customer is either buying from a utility or is at the end of a fixed-price contract with a provider.

Certain U.S. states allow for consumer choice in electricity providers, with Texas being the most-widely watched deregulatory scheme. Many other states are surveying the Texas deregulatory model in order to use its design as a model for the imposition of free market forces within such other power markets.[5]

As of 2019, 19 U.S. states and the District of Columbia have "either full or partial retail choice."[4] Along with aforementioned Maryland and Texas, electricity deregulation is current in Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. Seven additional U.S. states began the process of electricity deregulation but have suspended efforts: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Nevada, New Mexico, Virginia, and Wyoming.[6]

A broad and diverse group of retail energy suppliers who share the common vision that competitive retail energy markets deliver a more efficient, customer-oriented outcome than a regulated utility structure. [7]

Retailers Include: AEP Energy , APG&E Energy Solutions , Calpine Energy Solutions , Constellations NewEnergy, INC , Crius Energy , Direct Energy Services LLC , Dynegy , ENGIE Resources , Entrust Energy , IGS Energy , Just Energy , Liberty Power , Next Era Energy Services , Nordic Energy Services, LLC , NRG Energy INC , Source Energy , Spark Energy , Starion Energy , Stream Energy , Talen Energy , TransCanada Power Marketing LTD. [8]

See also

References
  1. Ontario Power Authority Long Term Energy Plan http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/sites/default/files/page/MEI_LTEP_en.pdf Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine
  2. Ontario Energy Board http://www.ontarioenergyboard.ca/OEB/Consumers/Consumer+Protection/Retail+Energy+Contracts/Before+Signing+an+Energy+Contract
  3. Independent Electricity System Operator http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/siteShared/electricity_bill.asp?sid=bi Archived 2011-11-24 at the Wayback Machine
  4. Brandt, Jaclyn (2019-09-20). "Red flags raised as Arizona weighs deregulating electricity". Daily Energy Insider. Retrieved 2019-12-04.
  5. "Electricity Deregulation Map of the United States". Electricity Local. Retrieved 2014-04-24.
  6. "Electricity Deregulation Map of the United States". Electricity Local. Retrieved 2014-04-24.
  7. "Members". Retail Energy Supply Association. Retail Energy Supply Association. Retrieved 2018-01-14.
  8. "Members". Retail Energy Supply Association. Retail Energy Supply Association. Retrieved 2018-01-14.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.