Growth imperative

Growth imperative is a term in economic theory regarding a possible necessity of economic growth. On the micro level, it describes mechanisms that force firms or consumers (households) to increase revenues or consumption for not to endanger their income. On the macro level, a political growth imperative exists if economic growth is necessary to avoid economic and social instability or to retain democratic legitimacy, so that other political goals such as climate change mitigation or a reduction of inequality are subordinated to growth policies.[1][2]

The role of growth imperatives for the increase in the global gross domestic product per capita is disputed.

Current neoclassical, Keynesian and endogenous growth theories do not consider a growth imperative[3] or explicitly deny it, such as Robert Solow.[4] In neoclassical economics, adherence to economic growth would be a question of maximizing utility, an intertemporal decision between current and future consumption (see Keynes–Ramsey rule).[5] Other sociological and political theories consider several possible causes for pursuing economic growth, for example maximizing profit, social comparison, culture (conformity), or political ideologies, but they do not regard them to be compulsive. Possible growth imperatives are discussed in Marxist theory, Schumpeterian theory of creative destruction and ecological economics, as well as in political debates on post-growth and degrowth. It is disputed whether growth imperative is a meaningful concept altogether, who would be affected by it, and which mechanism would be responsible.[1]

Meaning and definitions

At the macroeconomic or political level, the concept of growth imperatives is used by some authors when there seems to be no acceptable political alternative to economic growth,[6] because insufficient growth would lead to economic and social instability[7] up to "severe economic crises".[8] The alternative to growth would not be a stable stationary economy, but uncontrolled shrinkage.[9][10] The consequences of a renunciation of growth would be inacceptable so that growth appears politically without alternative.[1] While some search for purely "structural theoretical explanations for the commitment to growth",[11] others argue that this macroeconomic phenomenon must be examined at the micro level in line with methodological individualism to explain how and why individual actors (firms, consumers) act and how this interacts with collective structures, and correspondingly study the growth of enterprises with microeconomics and business administration and the increase of consumption using consumption sociology or consumer choice theory.[1][12]

The discussion on growth imperatives is part of a standing debate over the primacy of structure or agency in shaping human behavior. In the social sciences the term social coercion is used when situation-related circumstances[13] or strong social pressure[14] determine the behaviour.[1] According to Marxist theory, a coercion for firms to "grow or die" is due to economic competition.[15][16] According to these Marxists, capitalism "cannot stand still, but must always be either expanding or contracting".[17] Similarly, the environmental economist Hans Christoph Binswanger speaks of a growth imperative for firms only when they are existentially threatened by steadily declining profits and ultimately bankruptcy; in other cases he uses the weaker term growth driver.[9][18][19][20][21] These definitions can be summarized that a growth imperative exists if exterior conditions make it necessary for agents to increase their economic efforts as to avoid existential consequences.[1]

Microeconomic theories

Firms
Das Kapital by Karl Marx contains the first theory of a growth imperative, which is still disputed today.

The first theory of a growth imperative is attributed[5] to Karl Marx. In capitalism, zero growth is not possible, because of the mechanisms of competition and accumulation.[22][23][24]

[T]he development of capitalist production makes it constantly necessary to keep increasing the amount of the capital laid out in a given industrial undertaking, and competition makes the immanent laws of capitalist production to be felt by each individual capitalist, as external coercive laws. It compels him to keep constantly extending his capital, in order to preserve it, but extend it he cannot, except by means of progressive accumulation.

— Karl Marx

Therefore, a company's growth is considered necessary to ensure the survival of the company ("grow or die"[15][16]): "investment is not an option, or a discretionary decision, it is an imperative that constrains every capitalists' actions and governs the overall economy"[25] Correspondingly, some authors argue that the compulsion to grow can only be defused by overcoming structures of market economies, or by pushing back profit-oriented companies that impropriate the surplus value.[15][16][26][27][28][29] Other authors criticize this Marxist perspective: a company could be profitable without growth if a positive accounting profit is distributed as dividend to the owners. Only if net income had to be retained, companies would be compelled to grow.[1][2][30] If a company shows an accounting profit, it has not yet achieved an economic profit in the economic sense, because a return on equity and an entrepreneurial salary would have to be paid from it - the profit would not necessarily be available for growth. Therefore, a market economy with profit-oriented companies is compatible with zero growth, as it is in the models of neoclassical theory (→ zero-profit condition).[1][3][31]

The link between technical progress and resource use is disputed

On the basis of concepts of evolutionary economics, other authors point out that firms can become dependent on growth as a result of certain economic conditions. Joseph Schumpeter[32] had described the creative destruction in which the existence of firms is endangered if they cannot keep up with the innovation competition. This is interpreted as a need to invest in new technologies and to expand production[7][30][33] - but which investments would be necessary can only be understood in the light of growth theory. Within neoclassical growth accounting it is largely undisputed that only technological change and new combinations of factors of production make sustainable growth of firms and per capita income possible.[3][34][35] However, the contribution of single production factors to economic growth has been disputed for decades:[1][36] While endogenous growth theory concentrates on the role of human capital (ideas, education, innovations),[37][38] proponents of ecological or environmental economics emphasize the importance of energy consumption as well as raw materials, which are often non-renewable resources (e.g. fossil fuels).[39][40][41][42] While from the human capital perspective no ecologically damaging growth imperative arises, the resource perspective emphasizes that raw material consumption is lucrative for firms because it allows them to substitute expensive labour with cheaper machines. Accordingly, they would constantly invest in new resource-intensive technologies plus the human capital needed for development, which increases resource consumption and compensates advances in energy efficiency (rebound effects).[1][43]

There is also disagreement as to whether these dependencies can be overcome at the company level - provided that this is desired by the owners or the management. Proposals include new management practices, changes in product range, supply chains and distribution channels,[7][44] as well as the creation of solidarity enterprises, collective enterprises[3][28] and cooperatives.[45][46] Other authors call for institutional solutions: reforms of corporate law to overcome the legal constraint of public limited companies to maximise profits,[47] reforms of competition law to prevent externalisation at the expense of common goods,[48] or an institutional limitation of resource consumption and/or increasing their costs through ecotaxes or emissions trading (Cap and Trade), so that technical innovations would put a stronger focus on resource productivity instead of labour productivity.[1][33]

Private households
Smart phone and car: voluntary consumption or necessary increases of individual productivity?

An imperative for private households to increase their income and consumption expenditure is rarely discussed.[49] In neoclassical household theory, households try to maximize their utility, whereby, in contrast to the profit maximization of firms, they are not subject to market imperatives.[1] Therefore, a growth imperative is usually not assumed here, but rather a free decision between current and future consumption.[5] This "intertemporal optimization" is represented, for example, by the Keynes-Ramsey rule.[50] In consumption sociology various theories of consumer society examine the influence of social norms on consumption decisions. Examples are conspicuous consumption, which was addressed as early as 1899 by Thorstein Veblen in his book The Theory of the Leisure Class,[51] or competition with positional goods, which was described by Fred Hirsch in 1976 in the book Social Limits to Growth.[52] Some authors claim that comparison with others and the unfair distribution of income and power would lead to a growth imperative for consumers: Consumers would have to work and consume more and more in order to achieve a minimum level of social participation,[53] because the economically weak are stigmatised.[54] The reasons given for this behaviour are fear and powerlessness, guilt and shame. However, whether these theories can actually justify a compulsion to increase consumption is disputed, as long as it is not a matter of securing one's livelihood (for example because of unemployment).[1][55]

Another line of argument views certain consumption decisions rather as investments for future growth,[56] but sometimes to increase one's own productivity.[49] Technical products such as vehicles, kitchen appliances or smartphones were used to save time and retain opportunities to earn an income. Over time, these goods would become a necessity, therefore a compulsion to increase one's consumption expenditure could be derived in order to not be left behind technically and economically.[1]

Macroeconomic theories

Political resp. macroeconomic growth imperative
Economic growth is part of goal 8 of the Sustainable Development Goals

Economic growth has been formulated as an important economic policy goal for decades.[57][58] Examples include the "growth duty" in British legislation,[59] but also the Canadian Jobs and Growth Act, the African Growth and Opportunity Act or the European Stability and Growth Pact of 1997. This has been criticised as politically adhering to a dogma or ideology by some critics of growth.[60][61][62]

The theory of a political growth imperative, on the other hand, argues that economic growth would be necessary to avoid economic or social instability and to retain democratic legitimacy, or to guarantee national security and international competition.[1][2] Some authors stress that public finances[63] or social insurance systems such as unemployment insurance or pensions are dependent on growth.[55][64] Raghuram Rajan sees the cause primarily in political promises that are inherent to social systems.[65] Unemployment, which would occur in the event of technical progress and simultaneous lack of economic growth, is identified as a central problem (Okun's law).[1][66][67][68] Thus, growth above the employment threshold is repeatedly called for in political debates, in order to reduce unemployment.[61] Growth enhancing state investment, but also numerous incentives for private investment would not be simply politician's free will but indispensable to prevent social instability through mass unemployment.[1] This situation would be aggravated by international competition and free trade.[58]

As a way out, a redirection of technological development with the help of resource taxes is discussed (ecotax, emissions trading),[47][69] but also a general reduction of working time to reduce unemployment.[70][71][72] At the same time, a more equal distribution of income is demanded, either by fighting the privatisation of economic rents such as land rent or resource rent (→ rentier state),[1][73][74] or by calling for an unconditional basic income.[72]

Monetary system and the role of positive interest rates

For a long time,[75] several authors especially from German-speaking countries[76] have been locating a macroeconomic growth imperative in the monetary system, especially due to the combination of credit money and compound interest. This is considered to lead inevitably and system-immanently to an exponential growth of debt and interest-bearing deposits.[77][78][79] Some proponents of post-growth would derive a general criticism of positive interest rates from that and support ideas such as demurrage on currency, a concept from Freiwirtschaft,[75][80][81][82][83] or full-reserve banking.[84]

A second line of argument goes back to Hans Christoph Binswanger, his doctoral student Guido Beltrani,[85] and his son Mathias Binswanger.[86][87] They argue[88] that "a portion of money is constantly removed from circulation" by banks[89] which is mainly responsible for the growth imperative.[90][91] In his book The Growth Spiral (2013), Hans Christoph Binswanger estimated a necessary minimum growth rate to be 1.8 %, while Mathias Binswanger (2009)[91] derived a minimum growth rate of 0.45 %, such that enterprises can still generate profits in the aggregate. In his book Der Wachstumszwang (2019), this minimum rate is lowered to zero as to enable firms to accumulate profits.[92][93]

Numerical stability analysis of Stock-Flow consistent models. For certain parameter values (here: interest rate and consumption out of wealth), zero growth is unstable, but stable for others.[94]

Other authors criticise the results of Beltrani as well as H. C. and M. Binswanger on the basis that they are based on inconsistent economic models and therefore not valid (→ Stock-Flow consistent model).[95][96] In different models of a monetary economy there would be either no growth imperative at all or only for certain parameters in the consumption function.[28][88][97][98] They argue that ultimately it is not the interest rate but the savings rate that is decisive for the stability of a stationary economy. If any interest income is consumed in full by the lender, i.e., bank or creditor of the bank, it is available again for repayment. Whether a stationary state can be reached, therefore, depends on the saving decisions of those who earn income or own assets. For zero growth it would only be necessary that savings of some are balanced by consumption out of wealth by others[21][88][94] (→ life-cycle hypothesis). The assumption that banks must retain profits even in a non-growing economy would be unfounded.[88] Accordingly, there would be no grow imperative "inherent" to the monetary system, but zero growth would be impossible as long as actors decide to continuously accumulate financial assets.[99]

In neoclassical theory and all varieties that presuppose the neutrality of money (classical dichotomy), the money market has no long-term effects on real economic variables such as economic growth. A monetary growth imperative is already excluded here by assumption.[76][100][99] However, post-Keynesian authors who doubt the neutrality of money reject a monetary growth imperative as well.[94][98][101][102]

Political demands to overcome growth imperatives

In September 2018, more than 200 scientists asked the European Union to turn away from any growth imperative[103] – a similar demand was raised by the participants of the International Conference on Degrowth[104][105] and the post-growth working group of attac Germany.[106] But even within the post-growth or degrowth movement, the existence of growth imperatives is disputed.[1][28] Among German parties, the demand was included in the political programmes of the Ecological Democratic Party[107] and Alliance 90/The Greens.[108] Green politicians such as Reinhard Loske[109] or Jürgen Trittin[110] call for overcoming growth imperatives. In a dissenting opinion on the final report of the Enquete Commission on Growth, Prosperity and Quality of Life of the German parliament (Bundestag), the experts Michael Müller, Uwe Schneidewind, Ulrich Brand, Norbert Reuter and Martin Jänicke, as well as the members of the Bundestag Hermann E. Ott and the parliamentary group Die Linke, argued that "the question must be answered as to whether progress that is innovative and integrative, socially just and ecologically sustainable is possible without any growth imperative".[111]

Literature
  • Binswanger, Hans Christoph (2013). The Growth Spiral: Money, Energy, and Imagination in the Dynamics of the Market Process. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31881-8. ISBN 978-3-642-31881-8.
  • Binswanger, Mathias (2019). Der Wachstumszwang: Warum die Volkswirtschaft immer weiterwachsen muss, selbst wenn wir genug haben. Wiley-CVH. ISBN 978-3-527-50975-1.
  • Ferguson, Peter (2019). "The Growth Imperative". Post-growth Politics. Cham: Springer. pp. 75–100. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78799-2. ISBN 978-3-319-78797-8.
  • Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2019). "Technologie, Ressourcenverbrauch und Wachstumszwang". Marktwirtschaft reparieren: Entwurf einer freiheitlichen, gerechten und nachhaltigen Utopie. München: oekom. hdl:10419/213814. ISBN 978-3-96238-099-1.
  • Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2019). "Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept". Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 51: 126–137. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.012. Preprint: Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics V-414-18, November 2018, hdl:10419/184870.

This article was translated from Wachstumszwang in the German Wikipedia which is based on:

References
  1. Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2019). "Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept". Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 51: 126–137. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.012. Preprint: Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics V-414-18, November 2018, hdl:10419/184870.
  2. Ferguson, Peter (2019). "The Growth Imperative". Post-growth Politics. Cham: Springer. pp. 75–100. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78799-2. ISBN 978-3-319-78797-8.
  3. Lange, Steffen (2018). Macroeconomics Without Growth: Sustainable Economies in Neoclassical, Keynesian and Marxian Theories. Marburg: Metropolis. pp. 109–216. ISBN 978-3-7316-1298-8.
  4. Robert Solow said in an interview: "There is nothing intrinsic in the system that says it cannot exist happily in a stationary state". Cited after: Steven Stoll: Fear of Fallowing: The specter of a no-growth world. In: Harper’s Magazine, March 2008, pp. 88–94, steadystate.org, accessed February 27, 2019. See also Mathias Binswanger, Der Wachstumszwang, 2019, p. 39.
  5. Gordon, Myron J.; Rosenthal, Jeffrey S. (2003). "Capitalism's growth imperative". Cambridge Journal of Economics. 27 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1093/cje/27.1.25.
  6. Scherhorn, Gerhard (1996). "Der innere Zwang zum Wirtschaftswachstum". In Biervert, Bernd; Held, Martin (eds.). Die Dynamik des Geldes: über den Zusammenhang von Geld, Wachstum und Natur. Frankfurt/Main: Campus. pp. 162ff. ISBN 978-3-593-35461-3.
  7. Paech, Niko (2012). Befreiung vom Überfluss. Auf dem Weg in die Postwachstumsökonomie. oekom. ISBN 978-3-86581-181-3.
  8. Binswanger, Hans Christoph; von Flotow, Paschen (1994). Geld & Wachstum. Zur Philosophie und Praxis des Geldes. Weitbrecht. p. 8. ISBN 978-3-5227-1670-3.
  9. Binswanger, Hans Christoph (2006). Die Wachstumsspirale: Geld, Energie und Imagination in der Dynamik des Marktprozesses. Marburg: Metropolis. ISBN 978-3-89518-554-0.
  10. Binswanger, Hans Christoph (2012). "Wachstumszwang und Wachstumsdrang in der modernen Wirtschaft". In Woynowski, Boris; et al. (eds.). Wirtschaft ohne Wachstum?! Notwendigkeit und Ansätze einer Wachstumswende. Working Paper. pp. 46–53. hdl:10419/69631. ISSN 1431-8261.
  11. Ferguson, Peter (2019). "The Growth Imperative". Post-growth Politics. Cham: Springer. p. 119. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78799-2. ISBN 978-3-319-78797-8.
  12. Deutschmann, Christoph (2014). "Moderne Ökonomie ohne Wachstumszwang: ein Wunschtraum?" (PDF). WSI-Mitteilungen. 67 (7): 513–521. doi:10.5771/0342-300X-2014-7-513.
  13. Abercrombie, Nicholas; Hill, Stephen; Turner, Bryan S. (1984). The Penguin dictionary of sociology. A. Lane. p. 45. ISBN 978-0-7139-1380-4. compelled [...] by situational circumstances, that is by the structure of society and not by individuals
  14. Sullivan, Larry E., ed. (2009). The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-4129-5143-2.
  15. Smith, Richard. "Beyond Growth or Beyond Capitalism" (PDF). Real-world economics review. 53: 28–42.
  16. Foster, John Bellamy; Magdoff, Fred (2010). "What every environmentalist needs to know about capitalism". Monthly Review. 61 (10): 1–30.
  17. Ferguson, Peter (2019). "The Growth Imperative". Post-growth Politics. Cham: Springer. p. 76. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78799-2. ISBN 978-3-319-78797-8.
  18. Binswanger, Hans Christoph (2013). The Growth Spiral: Money, Energy, and Imagination in the Dynamics of the Market Process. Springer. p. 119. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31881-8. ISBN 978-3-642-31881-8.
  19. Seidl, Irmi; Zahrnt, Angelika (2010). "Argumente für einen Abschied vom Paradigma des Wirtschaftswachstums". Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis. p. 24. ISBN 978-3-89518-811-4.
  20. Mugier, Simon (2019). Wirtschaftswachstum und soziale Frage. Zur soziologischen Bedeutung der ökonomischen Theorie von Hans Christoph Binswanger. Marburg: Metropolis. ISBN 978-3-7316-1383-1.
  21. Wenzlaff, Ferdinand; Kimmich, Christian; Richters, Oliver (2014). Theoretische Zugänge eines Wachstumszwangs in der Geldwirtschaft. Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien. hdl:10419/103454.
  22. Radkau, Joachim (2010). "Wachstum oder Niedergang: ein Grundgesetz der Geschichte?". In Seidl, Irmi; Zahrnt, Angelika (eds.). Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis. pp. 37–52. ISBN 978-3-89518-811-4.
  23. Marx, Karl (1965). Das Kapital, Band 1. Dietz. p. 618.
  24. Marx, Karl (1906). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Modern Library. p. 649.
  25. Pineault, Eric (2019). "From Provocation to Challenge: Degrowth, Capitalism and the Prospect of "Socialism without Growth": A Commentary on Giorgios Kallis". Capitalism Nature Socialism. 30 (2): 251–266. doi:10.1080/10455752.2018.1457064. S2CID 150255333.
  26. Blauwhof, Frederik Berend (December 2012). "Overcoming accumulation: Is a capitalist steady-state economy possible?". Ecological Economics. 84 (84): 254–261. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.012.
  27. Karathanassis, Athanasios (2015). Kapitalistische Naturverhältnisse. Ursachen von Naturzerstörungen – Begründungen einer Postwachstumsökonomie. VSA-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-89965-623-7.
  28. Kallis, Giorgos; Kostakis, Vasilis; Lange, Steffen; Muraca, Barbara; Paulson, Susan; Schmelzer, Matthias (2018). "Research On Degrowth". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 43 (1): 291–316. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941.
  29. Kallis, Giorgos (2019). "Socialism without growth". Capitalism Nature Socialism. 30 (2): 189–206. doi:10.1080/10455752.2017.1386695. S2CID 158796873.
  30. Lawn, Philip (February 2011). "Is steady-state capitalism viable?: A review of the issues and an answer in the affirmative". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1219 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05966.x. PMID 21332490.
  31. Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2019). Marktwirtschaft reparieren: Entwurf einer freiheitlichen, gerechten und nachhaltigen Utopie. München: oekom. pp. 49–59. hdl:10419/213814. ISBN 978-3-96238-099-1.
  32. Schumpeter, Joseph (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers.
  33. Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2019). Marktwirtschaft reparieren: Entwurf einer freiheitlichen, gerechten und nachhaltigen Utopie. oekom. pp. 96–116. hdl:10419/213814. ISBN 978-3-96238-099-1.
  34. Hulten, Charles (2009). "Growth Accounting". NBER Working Paper (w15341). doi:10.3386/w15341.
  35. Blanchard, Olivier J. Macroeconomics. Pearson. chapter 12.
  36. Stern, David I. (2015). "Energy-GDP Relationship". The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK: 1–19. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_3015-1. ISBN 978-1-349-95121-5.
  37. Jones, Charles I. (2005). "Growth and Ideas". In Aghion, Philippe; Durlauf, Steven N. (eds.). Handbook of Economic Growth. 2. Elsevier. pp. 1063–1111. doi:10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01016-6. ISBN 978-0-444-52043-2.
  38. Rosen, Shervin (2008). "Human Capital". In Vernengo, Matias; Caldentey, Esteban Perez; Rosser Jr, Barkley J. (eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 1–15. doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_743-2. ISBN 978-1-349-95121-5.
  39. Kümmel, Reiner (2011). The Second Law of Economics: Energy, Entropy, and the Origins of Wealth. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4419-9365-6.
  40. Kümmel, Reiner; Lindenberger, Dietmar (December 2014). "How energy conversion drives economic growth far from the equilibrium of neoclassical economics". New Journal of Physics. 16 (12): 125008. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/125008.
  41. Ayres, Robert U.; Warr, Benjamin (2009). The economic growth engine: how energy and work drive material prosperity. Edward Elgar. ISBN 978-1-84844-595-6.
  42. Ozturk, Ilhan (January 2010). "A literature survey on energy–growth nexus". Energy Policy. 38 (1): 340–349. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.024.
  43. Grahl, Jürgen; Kümmel, Reiner (2009). "Das Loch im Fass – Energiesklaven, Arbeitsplätze und die Milderung des Wachstumszwangs" (PDF). Wissenschaft und Umwelt Interdisziplinär: 195–212.
  44. Reichel, André (2013). "Betriebswirtschaftliche Perspektiven. Das Ende des Wirtschaftswachstums, wie wir es kennen". Ökologisches Wirtschaften (1): 15–18. doi:10.14512/oew.v28i1.1262.
  45. Posse, Dirk (2015). Zukunftsfähige Unternehmen in einer Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie. hdl:10419/110257. ISBN 978-3-9811006-2-4.
  46. Gebauer, Jana; Lange, Steffen; Posse, Dirk (2017). "Wirtschaftspolitik für Postwachstum auf Unternehmensebene. Drei Ansätze zur Gestaltung". In Adler, Frank; Schachtschneider, Ulrich (eds.). Postwachstumspolitiken: Wege zur wachstumsunabhängigen Gesellschaft. oekom. pp. 239–253. ISBN 978-3-86581-823-2.
  47. Binswanger, Hans Christoph (2009). Vorwärts zur Mäßigung. Perspektiven einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaft. Murmann. ISBN 978-3-86774-072-2.
  48. Scherhorn, Gerhard (2010). "Unternehmen ohne Wachstumszwang: Zur Ökonomie der Gemeingüter". In Seidl, Irmi; Zahrnt, Angelika (eds.). Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis. pp. 129–144. ISBN 978-3-89518-811-4.
  49. Siemoneit, Andreas (2019). "An offer you can't refuse – Enhancing personal productivity through 'efficiency consumption'". Technology in Society. 59: 101181. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101181. hdl:10419/201502. Preprint: ZOE Discussion Paper 3, January 2019, hdl:10419/201502.
  50. Blanchard, Olivier J.; Fischer, Stanley (1989). Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 41–43. ISBN 0-262-02283-4.
  51. Veblen, Thorstein (1899). The theory of the leisure class. An economic study in the evolution of institutions. The Macmillan Company.
  52. Hirsch, Fred (1976). Social Limits to Growth. Harvard University Press.
  53. Sturn, Simon; Treeck, Till van (2010). "Wachstumszwang durch Ungleichheit und Ungleichheit als Wachstumsbremse?" (PDF). SPW – Zeitschrift für sozialistische Politik und Wirtschaft. 177: 15–21.
  54. Rogall, Holger (2008). Ökologische Ökonomie. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. p. 131. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91001-7. ISBN 978-3-5311-6058-0.
  55. Paech, Niko (2006). "Wirtschaften ohne Wachstumszwang". Ökologisches Wirtschaften. 21 (3): 30–33. doi:10.14512/oew.v21i3.460.
  56. Perrotta, Cosimo (2004). Consumption as an Investment. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4153-0619-5.
  57. Schmelzer, Matthias (2015). "The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship". Ecological Economics. 118: 262–271. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.029.
  58. Schmelzer, Matthias (2016). The Hegemony of Growth. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-3164-5203-5.
  59. Growth duty: statutory guidance, 30 March 2017.
  60. Stratmann-Mertens, Eckhard; Hickel, Rudolf; Priewe, Jan (1991). Wachstum: Abschied von einem Dogma: Kontroverse über eine ökologisch-soziale Wirtschaftspolitik. S. Fischer. ISBN 978-3-1003-1408-6.
  61. Rivera, Manuel (January 2018). "Growth in parliament: Some notes on the persistence of a dogma". Futures. 95: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.09.002.
  62. Barry, John (2018). "A Genealogy of Economic Growth as Ideology and Cold War Core State Imperative". New Political Economy. 25 (1): 18–29. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1526268. S2CID 159024755.
  63. Seidl, Irmi; Zahrnt, Angelika (2010). "Staatsfinanzen und Wirtschaftswachstum". Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis. pp. 179–188. ISBN 978-3-89518-811-4.
  64. Höpflinger, François (2010). "Alterssicherungssysteme: Doppelte Herausforderung von demografischer Alterung und Postwachstum". In Seidl, Irmi; Zahrnt, Angelika (eds.). Postwachstumsgesellschaft: Konzepte für die Zukunft. Marburg: Metropolis. pp. 53–64. ISBN 978-3-89518-811-4.
  65. Rajan, Raghuram. "Going Bust for Growth". In Blanchard, Olivier; Rajan, Raghuram; Rogoff, Kenneth S.; Summers, Lawrence (eds.). Progress and Confusion: The State of Macroeconomic Policy. MIT Press. pp. 267–284.
  66. Antal, Miklós (2014). "Green goals and full employment: Are they compatible?". Ecological Economics. 107: 276–286. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.014.
  67. Antal, Miklós; van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M. (2013). "Macroeconomics, financial crisis and the environment: Strategies for a sustainability transition". Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 6: 47–66. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.01.002. hdl:10419/129023.
  68. Jackson, Tim; Victor, Peter (2011). "Productivity and work in the 'green economy' – some theoretical reflections and empirical tests". Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 1 (1): 101–108. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.005.
  69. Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2017). "Wachstumszwänge: Ressourcenverbrauch und Akkumulation als Wettbewerbsverzerrungen". In Adler, Frank; Schachtschneider, Ulrich (eds.). Postwachstumspolitiken: Wege zur wachstumsunabhängigen Gesellschaft. oekom. pp. 169–182. hdl:10419/152267. ISBN 978-3-86581-823-2.
  70. D'Alisa, Giacomo; Demaria, Federico; Kallis, Giorgios (2015). Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-1380-0077-3.
  71. Videira, Nuno; Schneider, François; Sekulova, Filka; Kallis, Giorgos (2014). "Improving understanding on degrowth pathways: an exploratory study using collaborative causal models". Futures. 55: 58–77. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.11.001.
  72. Ferguson, Peter (2013). "Post-growth policy instruments". International Journal of Green Economics. 7 (4): 405–421. doi:10.1504/IJGE.2013.058560.
  73. Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (2019). Marktwirtschaft reparieren: Entwurf einer freiheitlichen, gerechten und nachhaltigen Utopie. oekom. pp. 96–153. hdl:10419/213814. ISBN 978-3-96238-099-1.
  74. Stratford, Beth (March 2020). "The Threat of Rent Extraction in a Resource-constrained Future". Ecological Economics. 169: 106524. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106524.
  75. Onken, Werner (1992). Gerechtes Geld – gerechte Welt: Auswege aus Wachstumszwang und Schuldenkatastrophe: 1891–1991. 100 Jahre Gedanken zu einer natürlichen Wirtschaftsordnung. Verlag für Sozialökonomie. ISBN 978-3-87998-433-6.
  76. Strunz, Sebastian; Bartkowski, Bartosz; Schindler, Harry (2017). "Mythos monetärer Wachstumszwang. Am Gelde hängt doch alles?". Ökologisches Wirtschaften. 32 (1): 23–25. doi:10.14512/OEW320123.
  77. Douthwaite, Richard (2000). The ecology of money. Green Books. ISBN 978-1-8700-9881-6.
  78. Lietaer, Bernard; Arnsperger, Christian; Goerner, Sally; Brunnhuber, Stefan (2012). Money and Sustainability: The Missing Link. Triarchy Press. ISBN 978-1-908009-75-3.
  79. Walter, Johann (2011). "Geldordnung – eine ordnungspolitische Analyse". Wirtschaftsdienst. 91 (8): 543–549. doi:10.1007/s10273-011-1260-4. hdl:10419/88820. S2CID 154298933.
  80. Suhr, Dieter (1986). Befreiung der Marktwirtschaft vom Kapitalismus. Monetäre Studien zur sozialen, ökonomischen und ökologischen Vernunft (PDF). Basis Verlag. pp. 47ff. ISBN 3-88025-415-X.
  81. Bender, Harald; Bernholt, Norbert; Simon, Klaus (2014). Das dienende Geld: die Befreiung der Wirtschaft vom Wachstumszwang. oekom. ISBN 978-3-86581-471-5.
  82. Creutz, Helmut (1994). Das Geldsyndrom. Wege zu einer krisenfreien Marktwirtschaft. Ullstein. ISBN 978-3-548-35456-9.
  83. Kennedy, Margrit (1991). Geld ohne Zinsen und Inflation. Ein Tauschmittel, das jedem dient. Goldmann. pp. 26–7. ISBN 978-3-442-12341-4.
  84. Farley, Joshua; Burke, Matthew; Flomenhoft, Gary; Kelly, Brian; Murray, D. Forrest; Posner, Stephen; Putnam, Matthew; Scanlan, Adam; Witham, Aaron (June 2013). "Monetary and Fiscal Policies for a Finite Planet". Sustainability. 5 (6): 2802–2826. doi:10.3390/su5062802.
  85. Beltrani, Guido (1999). Monetäre Aspekte des Wirtschaftswachstums. Universität St. Gallen. OCLC 722449216.
  86. Binswanger, Mathias (May 2015). "The growth imperative revisited: a rejoinder to Gilányi and Johnson". Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 37 (4): 648–660. doi:10.1080/01603477.2015.1050333. S2CID 54606846.
  87. Binswanger, Mathias; Beltrani, Guido; Kölbl, Robert (2010). "Warum müssen moderne Geldwirtschaften wachsen?". In Aubauer, Hans Peter; Knoflacher, Hermann; Woltron, Klaus (eds.). Kapitalismus gezähmt? Sozialer Wohlstand innerhalb der Naturgrenzen. Peter Lang. pp. 203–231. ISBN 978-3-631-58919-9.
  88. Richters, Oliver; Siemoneit, Andreas (June 2017). "Consistency and Stability Analysis of Models of a Monetary Growth Imperative". Ecological Economics. 136: 114–125. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.017. hdl:10419/144750. Preprint: VÖÖ Discussion Paper 1, February 2016, hdl:10419/144750.
  89. Binswanger, Hans Christoph (2013). The Growth Spiral: Money, Energy, and Imagination in the Dynamics of the Market Process. Springer. p. 131. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31881-8. ISBN 978-3-642-31881-8.
  90. Binswanger, Hans Christoph (2006). Die Wachstumsspirale. Geld, Energie und Imagination in der Dynamik des Marktprozesses. Marburg: Metropolis. p. 331. ISBN 3-89518-554-X.
  91. Binswanger, Mathias (2009). "Is there a growth imperative in capitalist economies? a circular flow perspective". Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 31 (4): 707–727. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477310410. S2CID 54702411.
  92. Binswanger, Mathias (2019). Der Wachstumszwang: Warum die Volkswirtschaft immer weiterwachsen muss, selbst wenn wir genug haben. Wiley-CVH. p. 275. ISBN 978-3-527-50975-1.
  93. Richters, Oliver (2019). "Review of Mathias Binswanger's Der Wachstumszwang". Ökologisches Wirtschaften (3): 53–55.
  94. Berg, Matthew; Hartley, Brian; Richters, Oliver (2015). "A Stock-Flow Consistent Input-Output Model with Applications to Energy Price Shocks, Interest Rates, and Heat Emissions". New Journal of Physics. 17 (1): 015011. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/015011.
  95. Gilányi, Zsolt (2018). "Comment on Johnson's creating dimensional stock-flow inconsistency in Binswanger's model". Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 42 (2): 319–327. doi:10.1080/01603477.2018.1431791. S2CID 158184441.
  96. Johnson, A. Reeves (2018). "Response to "Comment on Johnson's creating dimensional stock-flow inconsistency in Binswanger's model"". Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 42 (2): 328–334. doi:10.1080/01603477.2018.1458631. S2CID 158990885.
  97. Jackson, Tim; Victor, Peter (December 2015). "Does credit create a 'growth imperative'? A quasi-stationary economy with interest-bearing debt". Ecological Economics. 120: 32–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.009. Preprint: PASSAGE Working Paper 15/01. Guildford: University of Surrey.
  98. Cahen-Fourot, Louison; Lavoie, Marc (June 2016). "Ecological monetary economics: A post-Keynesian critique". Ecological Economics. 126: 163–168. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.007.
  99. Strunz, Sebastian; Bartkowski, Bartosz; Schindler, Harry (2017). "Is there a monetary growth imperative?". In Victor, Peter A.; Dolter, Brett (eds.). Handbook on growth and sustainability (PDF). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. pp. 326–355. doi:10.4337/9781783473564.00024. ISBN 978-1-7834-7356-4. Preprint: UFZ Discussion Papers 5/2015, hdl:10419/108971.
  100. Binswanger, Mathias (2019). Der Wachstumszwang: Warum die Volkswirtschaft immer weiterwachsen muss, selbst wenn wir genug haben. Wiley-CVH. ISBN 978-3-527-50975-1.
  101. Fontana, Giuseppe; Sawyer, Malcolm (September 2016). "Full Reserve Banking: More 'Cranks' Than 'Brave Heretics'" (PDF). Cambridge Journal of Economics. 40 (5): 1333–1350. doi:10.1093/cje/bew016.
  102. Carnevali, Emilio; Deleidi, Matteo; Pariboni, Riccardo; Veronese Passarella, Marco (2019). "Stock-Flow Consistent Dynamic Models: Features, Limitations and Developments". In Arestis, Philip; Sawyer, Malcolm (eds.). Frontiers of Heterodox Macroeconomics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 223–276. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23929-9_6. ISBN 978-3-030-23928-2..
  103. WissenschaftlerInnen fordern Abkehr vom Wachstumszwang, wachstumsimwandel.at, Bundesministerium für Nachhaltigkeit und Tourismus, September 20, 2018.
  104. "Konkrete Schritte für eine Gesellschaft und Impulse für eine gemeinsame gesellschaftliche Vision jenseits von Wachstumszwängen standen im Mittelpunkt der Degrowth-Konferenz 2014." Dokumentation: Degrowth 2014, Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung.
  105. Daniel Constein, Nina Treu: "The focus of this Fourth International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity will be on concrete steps towards a society beyond the imperative of growth." Programme of the International Conference on Degrowth 2014, p. 3. www.degrowth.info. Accessed February 6, 2019.
  106. Jenseits des Wachstumszwangs – Globale Armut und Naturzerstörung solidarisch überwinden, attac Germany. Accessed February 6, 2019.
  107. Wohlstand ohne Wachstumszwang, basic programme of Ecological Democratic Party Germany 2016. Accessed February 6, 2019.
  108. Federal board of Alliance 90/The Greens: Neue Zeiten. Neue Antworten. April 6, 2018. Accessed February 6, 2019.
  109. Loske, Reinhard (2011). Abschied vom Wachstumszwang. Konturen einer Politik der Mäßigung (2 ed.). Basilisken Presse. ISBN 978-3941365117.
  110. Ulrich Schulte: Ausrichtung der Grünen: Die Möchtegern-Liberalen. die tageszeitung, September 26, 2018.
  111. Abschlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität, Deutscher Bundestag, Drucksache 17/13300. p. 749: es müsse "die Frage beantwortet werden, ob ein Fortschritt, der innovativ und integrativ, sozial gerecht und ökologisch verträglich ist, ohne Wachstumszwang möglich ist."
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.