James A. Lindsay
James Stephen Lindsay (born June 8, 1979),[1] known professionally as James A. Lindsay,[2] is an American mathematician, author, and cultural critic. He is known for his involvement in the grievance studies affair with Peter Boghossian and Helen Pluckrose.
James A. Lindsay | |
---|---|
Lindsay in 2020 | |
Born | Ogdensburg, New York | June 8, 1979
Occupation | Author, mathematician, cultural critic |
Education | Maryville High School |
Alma mater | |
Period | 2017–present |
Subject | criticism of critical social justice |
Notable works | Cynical Theories (2020) |
Early life and career
James Stephen Lindsay was born in Ogdensburg, New York. He moved to Maryville, Tennessee, at the age of five, later graduating from Maryville High School in 1997. Lindsay attended Tennessee Technological University, where he obtained both his B.S. and M.S. in mathematics; he later obtained his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of Tennessee in 2010. His doctoral thesis is titled "Combinatorial Unification of Binomial-Like Arrays", and his advisor was Carl G. Wagner.[3]
Lindsay began using the middle initial "A." in order to pseudonymously write books about atheism and leftism in the predominantly conservative and Christian South.[2]
Lindsay, along with Peter Boghossian, is the co-author of How to Have Impossible Conversations: A Very Practical Guide, a non-fiction book released in 2019 and published by Lifelong Books.[4] In 2020, Lindsay released the non-fiction book Cynical Theories, co-authored with Helen Pluckrose and published by Pitchstone Publishing. The book became a Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Publishers Weekly bestseller upon release[5][6][7] and a #1 bestseller in Philosophy on Amazon.[5] Harvard University psychologist Steven Pinker praised the book for exposing "the surprisingly shallow intellectual roots of the movements that appear to be engulfing our culture".[8]
Lindsay has also appeared twice on comedian Joe Rogan's podcast The Joe Rogan Experience.[9]
He is registered as a director of New Discourses LLC.[10]
Grievance studies affair
In 2017, Lindsay and Boghossian published a hoax paper titled "The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct".[11] In writing the paper, Lindsay and Boghossian intended to imitate the style of "poststructuralist discursive gender theory". The paper argued that the penis should be seen "not as an anatomical organ but as a social construct isomorphic to performative toxic masculinity".[11][12] After the paper was rejected by Norma, they later submitted it to Cogent Social Sciences, an open access journal that has been criticized as a pay-to-publish operation, where it was accepted for publication.[11][13][14]
Beginning in August 2017, Lindsay, Boghossian, and Pluckrose wrote 20 hoax papers, which they submitted to peer-reviewed journals using several pseudonyms as well as the name of Richard Baldwin, friend of Boghossian and professor emeritus of history at Florida’s Gulf Coast State College. The project ended early after one of the papers, published in the feminist geography journal Gender, Place and Culture, was criticized on social media, and then questioned in its authenticity by Campus Reform.[15]
The trio subsequently revealed the full scope of their work in a YouTube video created and released by documentary filmmaker Mike Nayna, which was accompanied by an investigation by The Wall Street Journal.[16][17] By the time of this revelation, seven of their twenty papers had been accepted, seven were still under review, and six had been rejected. One paper, accepted by feminist social work journal Affilia, was a rewrite of Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf in feminist language.[11]
Tom Whipple of The Times wrote that academic reviewers had praised the hoax studies of Lindsay, Boghossian, and Pluckrose as "a rich and exciting contribution to the study of ... the intersection between masculinity and anality", "excellent and very timely", and "important dialogue for social workers and feminist scholars".[18]
Views
Lindsay is a critic of wokeness, which he analogizes to religious belief.[19] Columnist Cathy Young described Lindsay as "an author with a large 'anti-woke' online following" in 2020.[20] He announced his intention to vote for Donald Trump in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, citing illiberalism on the left as the reason.[21][22][23]
References
- @conceptualjames (June 8, 2019). "So, I'm 40 now" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- @conceptualjames (August 1, 2020). "Oh, yeah. The A. I was writing atheist leftist books in the conservative Christian South and decided a thin veneer of pseudonym might help keep me safer at the time. The A stands for 'next to S on the keyboard.'" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- Lindsay, James (2010-05-01). Combinatorial Unification of Binomial-Like Arrays (Doctor of Philosophy). University of Tennessee.
- "How to have impossible conversations". spiked-online.com. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
- Pluckrose, Helen; Lindsay, James A. (2020). Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity – And Why This Harms Everybody. ISBN 9781634312028.
- "Bestselling Books Week Ended August 29". The Wall Street Journal. 2020-09-03. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
- "US-Best-Sellers-Books-USAToday". The Washington Post. Associated Press. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
- Paul Kelly (12 September 2020). "Tracing the dangerous rise and rise of woke warriors". The Australian. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
- Peters, Justin (2019-03-21). "How Joe Rogan's Hugely Popular Podcast Became an Essential Platform for "Freethinkers" Who Hate the Left". Slate. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
- "New Discourses LLC". OpenCorporates. Retrieved December 26, 2020.
- Schuessler, Jennifer (October 4, 2018). "Hoaxers Slip Breastaurants and Dog-Park Sex Into Journals". The New York Times. Retrieved 2018-10-08.
...a third paper, published in a journal of feminist social work and titled 'Our Struggle Is My Struggle,' simply scattered some up-to-date jargon into passages lifted from Hitler's 'Mein Kampf....' They set out to write 20 papers that started with 'politically fashionable conclusions,' which they worked backward to support by aping the relevant fields' methods and arguments, and sometimes inventing data.
- Jaschik, Scott (May 22, 2017). "Hoax With Multiple Targets". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
- Tillberg, Anneli (12 June 2017). "Attack on gender studies despite rejection of hoax article". genus.se. Retrieved 17 April 2019.
- "Statement regarding hoax article". normajournal.wordpress.com. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies. 26 May 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2019.
- "Academic journal duped by author of 'dog rape culture' article". Campus Reform. 2018-07-25. Retrieved 2018-10-08.
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVk9a5Jcd1k
- Melchior, Jillian Kay (2018-10-05). "Opinion | Fake News Comes to Academia". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2018-10-08.
- Whipple, Tom (October 4, 2018). "Journals publish hoaxers' absurd gender studies". The Times. p. 19. Retrieved January 27, 2019 – via EBSCOhost Newspaper Source Plus.
- Romano, Aja (2020-10-09). "How being 'woke' lost its meaning". Vox. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
- "Young: Trump no answer to left's excesses". Newsday. Retrieved 2020-11-07.
- Mounk, Yascha (October 26, 2020). "Trump Is the Best Candidate for the Illiberal Left". The Atlantic. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
- "@ConceptualJames". Twitter. October 20, 2020. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
- "Biden Is Not The Room". YouTube. October 21, 2020. Retrieved February 4, 2021.