Jennifer Nagel

Jennifer Nagel is a Canadian philosopher in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Toronto.[1][2][3] Her research focuses on epistemology, philosophy of mind, and metacognition. She has also written on 17th century (Western) philosophy, especially John Locke and René Descartes.

Education and career

After a B.A. in Philosophy at the University of Toronto, Nagel earned her M.A. (1994) and Ph.D. (2000) in Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh. Her dissertation, The Role of Necessity in Empirical Knowledge, was written under the supervision of John McDowell.[4]

In September 2015, Nagel founded a group called Room for More, a Toronto-based group sponsoring Syrian Refugees coming to Canada, in partnership with Humanity First.[1][5]

Nagel was President of the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association in 2018-19.[6]

Philosophical work

Much of Nagel's research draws on empirical developments from the cognitive sciences and experimental philosophy in order to address longstanding questions in epistemology and philosophy of mind. For example, Nagel is well-known for defending the value of intuitions in philosophical methodology.[7][8][9] While the emergence of experimental philosophy in the 21st century has often cast doubt on the reliability of intuitions,[10] Nagel argues that intuitions about particular cases and thought experiments are a legitimate source of knowledge and justification. Nagel also argues, building on suggestions made by Timothy Williamson, that knowledge is a mental state. Whereas knowledge is traditionally thought to be reducible to a form of belief, i.e., a justified and true belief, Nagel argues that knowledge should itself be counted among the fundamental types of mental state, on a par with beliefs, desires, intentions, and so on.

Nagel is the author of Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction, which has been praised as an "admirably clear and engaging" introduction to epistemology.[11] Nagel considers classic questions, including about skepticism, rationalism, and empiricism, as well as more contemporary concerns, such as whether Wikipedia, "where most articles have multiple and anonymous authors", can be a reliable source of knowledge.[12]

Publications
  • "The Psychological Context of Contextualism" (with Julia Jael Smith), forthcoming in The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism. Jonathan Ichikawa, ed. (Routledge).
  • "Armchair-Friendly Experimental Philosophy" (with Kaija Mortensen), forthcoming in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, Justin Sytsma and Wesley Buckwalter, eds. (Blackwell).
  • "Knowledge and Reliability", forthcoming in Alvin Goldman and his Critics, Hilary Kornblith and Brian McLaughlin, eds.
  • "Sensitive Knowledge: Locke on Skepticism and Sensation", in The Blackwell Companion to Locke, Matthew Stuart, ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2015, 313-333.
  • "The Social Value of Reasoning", Episteme 12:2 (2015), 297-308.
  • "The Meanings of Metacognition", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89:3 (2014), 710-718.
  • "Intuition, Reflection, and the Command of Knowledge", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 88 (2014), 217-39.
  • "The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions" (with Kenneth Boyd), in Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, Edouard Machery, ed., New York: Routledge, 2014, 109-127.
  • "Authentic Gettier Cases: a reply to Starmans and Friedman" (with Valerie San Juan and Raymond A. Mar), Cognition 129 (2013), 666-669.
  • "Lay Denial of Knowledge for Justified True Beliefs" (with Valerie San Juan and Raymond A. Mar), Cognition 129 (2013), 652-661.
  • "Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86:1 (2013), 179-199.
  • "Knowledge as a Mental State", Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4 (2013), 275-310.
  • "Motivating Williamson’s Model Gettier Cases", Inquiry 56:1 (2013), 54-62.
  • "Intuitions and Experiments: A Defence of the Case Method in Epistemology", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85:3 (2012).
  • "The Attitude of Knowledge", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84:3 (2012), 678-685.
  • "Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases", in Knowledge Ascription: New Essays, Jessica Brown and Mikkel Gerken, eds. (Oxford University Press, 2012), 171-191
  • "The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox", Philosophers' Imprint 11:5 (March 2011), 1-28.
  • "Epistemic Anxiety and Adaptive Invariantism", Philosophical Perspectives 24 (2010), 407-435.
  • "Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Thinking about Error", Philosophical Quarterly 60:239 (2010), 286-306.
  • "Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Changing Stakes", Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2008), 279-294.
  • "Epistemic Intuitions", Philosophy Compass 2:6 (November 2007), 792-819.
  • "Contemporary Skepticism and the Cartesian God", Canadian Journal of Philosophy (September 2005), 465-497.
  • "The Empiricist Conception of Experience", Philosophy 75 (July 2000), 345-376

References
  1. "Canadians are coming out in droves, again, to resettle refugees — on their own dime". Public Radio International. Retrieved 2016-10-09.
  2. "Jennifer Nagel - Department of Philosophy". Department of Philosophy. Retrieved 2016-10-09.
  3. "Home Page". individual.utoronto.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-09.
  4. "CV". individual.utoronto.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-10.
  5. Ayub, Mahnoor (2016-01-11). "There's "Room for More" refugees | The Medium". The Medium. Retrieved 2016-10-09.
  6. https://individual.utoronto.ca/jnagel/CV.html
  7. Nagel, Jennifer (2012-11-01). "Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 85 (3): 495–527. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00634.x. ISSN 1933-1592.
  8. Stich, Stephen (2013-07-01). "Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions? A Reply to Jennifer Nagel". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 87 (1): 151–178. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00590.x. ISSN 1933-1592.
  9. Nagel, Jennifer (2013-07-01). "Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 87 (1): 179–199. doi:10.1111/phpr.12008. ISSN 1933-1592.
  10. Nado, Jennifer and Michael Johnson (2016-03-24). "Intuitions and the Theory of Reference" Advances in Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Methodology. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 151. ISBN 9781474223225.
  11. Poole, Steven (2014-10-16). "Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction review – the sceptic chuckles darkly". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2016-10-10.
  12. Nagel, Jennifer (2014). Knowledge: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. Oxford. p. 72. ISBN 9780199661268.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.