None of the above (India)

"None of the Above" (or NOTA) has been provided as an option to the voters of India in most elections since 2009.The Supreme Court in PUCL vs Union of India Judgement 2013 directed the use of NOTA in the context of direct elections to the Lok Sabha and the respective state assemblies. By expressing a preference for none of the above, a citizen can choose not to vote for any candidates who are contesting the elections. The vote does not hold any electoral value: even if a majority of votes are cast the candidate with the largest vote share would be declared the winner.[1] The NOTA option was first used in the 2013 assembly elections held in four states (Chhattisgarh, Mizoram, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh), and the Union Territory of Delhi. Since its introduction, NOTA has gained increasing popularity amongst the Indian electorate, securing more votes than the victory margin, for instance, in the Assembly Elections in Gujarat (2017),[2] Karnataka (2018),[3] Madhya Pradesh (2018) [4] and Rajasthan (2018).[5] NOTA enables the voter to show their inacceptance for the fielded candidates.

Symbol used with NOTA option on ballot papers and electronic voting machines in India

Supreme Court Judgement on NOTA

A writ petition was filed by People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). The Supreme Court of India judgement said, "We direct the Election Commission to provide necessary provision in the ballot papers/EVMs and another button called “None of the Above” (NOTA) may be provided in EVMs so that the voters, who come to the polling booth and decide not to vote for any of the candidates in the fray, are able to exercise their right not to vote while maintaining their right of secrecy." [6] The Supreme Court also observed that it is essential that people of high moral and ethical values are chosen as people's representatives for proper governance of the country, and NOTA button can compel political parties to nominate a sound candidate.

Election Commission of India (ECI) and NOTA
  1. ECI has stated that "...even if, in any extreme case, the number of votes against NOTA is more than the number of votes secured by the candidates, the candidate who secures the largest number of votes among the contesting candidates shall be declared to be elected..."[7][8]
  2. In a clarification released in 2013, ECI has stated that votes polled for NOTA cannot be considered for determining the forfeiture of security deposit.[9]
  3. In 2014, ECI introduced NOTA in Rajya Sabha elections.[10]
  4. In 2015, Election Commission of India announced the symbol for 'None of the Above' option, with the design being done by National Institute of Design (NID), Ahmedabad.[11] Earlier, there were demands that Election Commission allot the symbol of a donkey for NOTA.[12]

Performance

In many elections, NOTA has won more votes than many of the political parties that contested.[3][13]

In many constituencies, votes received by NOTA have been higher than the margin by which the candidate has won.[14][15] Observations have been made that NOTA can influence more citizens to participate in voting, though there is a danger that the novelty factor associated with NOTA will gradually erode.

A pie chart depicting the scenario where (top) the number of votes polled for the None of the Above (NOTA) option are greater than the Victory Margin in an election where NOTA has no electoral value versus (bottom) two scenarios where the NOTA voters would have chosen one of the winning parties, leading to two different outcomes.

However, it seems that the popularity of NOTA is growing with time. NOTA has not yet managed to secure a majority so far, but in many of the elections since its introduction - including the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections as well as several Assembly Elections - the number of NOTA votes polled has been higher than the victory margin in many constituencies. This means that if instead of NOTA, the voters would have opted to go with one of the two top-scoring parties, it could have changed the outcome of the election, as depicted in the pie chart.

In the 2017 Gujarat Assembly Elections, the total vote share of NOTA was lesser only than BJP, Congress, and Independent Candidates. In 118 constituencies, NOTA polled the third largest vote share after BJP and Congress.[2]

In the 2018 Karnataka Assembly Elections, NOTA polled more votes than some parties with a nation-wide presence such as CPI(M) and BSP.[3]

In the Madhya Pradesh Assembly Elections conducted in 2018, the difference between the vote share of the (winning) BJP and Congress was just 0.1%, whereas NOTA polled a vote share of 1.4%.[16]

To cite an example, in the South Gwalior Constituency, the sitting MLA Narayan Singh Kushwah lost by 121 votes, whereas NOTA got 1550 votes. Had all the NOTA voters hypothetically voted for Kushwah, he would have won by a huge margin.

In the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections, 2G scam accused MP - A Raja (DMK candidate) - lost to the AIADMK candidate, while NOTA emerged with the third largest vote share, possibly as an expression of public anger towards corrupt candidates.[17]

In the 2019 Indian general election, about 1.04 percent of the voters chose to vote for None Of The Above (NOTA), with Bihar and Assam leading with 2.08 percent NOTA voters.[18]

Responses

NOTA has been described as the maturing of India's democracy.[19] One kind of opinion is that the purpose and advantage of NOTA has been defeated as the winner will be the candidate who receives the second highest number of votes, even if NOTA receives the highest number of votes.[20] Hence, "NOTA is a positive step", while "it does not go far enough".[21] NOTA is considered a "waste of vote",[22] "merely cosmetic",[23] "a symbolic instrument to express resentment",[24] voters expressing their "disenchantment with the existing political system"[25] and possibly "a mere decoration".[26]

However, the power of NOTA to express dissent is clearly visible in reports where entire communities decided to democratically protest against governments that have failed to meet their needs. For instance, there have been multiple cases of entire villages deciding to vote for NOTA due to consistent failure of local governments to meet basic requirements like roads, electricity,[27][28] inaction towards villagers' complaints about water contamination by industries,[29] and even reports of sex workers who have been pushing for legalisation of their profession to get themselves covered under labour laws, but have received no government attention, deciding to go for NOTA.[30]

What is unclear is whether so far this protest has translated into compensatory action by the elected Government. However, while passing the NOTA ruling, the Chief Justice of India, P. Sathasivam, was quoted as stating “Giving right to a voter not to vote for any candidate while protecting his right of secrecy is extremely important in a democracy. Such an option gives the voter the right to express his disapproval of the kind of candidates being put up by the parties. Gradually, there will be a systemic change and the parties will be forced to accept the will of the people and field candidates who are known for their integrity.”.[31]

A number of groups and individuals have been conducting voter awareness campaigns about NOTA.[32] Recent year election results have shown an increasing trend of people choosing NOTA.

It has been observed that some of the highest NOTA votes polled are consistently seen in Reserved Constituencies (Constituencies that, based on their demographic composition, are required to field only candidates from Reserved Categories to contest elections). This could be interpreted as a refusal of general category voters to vote for an SC/ST candidate[25] - a scenario where NOTA is being misused to uphold caste-based bias.

While on the one hand, more votes for NOTA could be interpreted as more expression of the prevailing dissatisfaction in the electorate, there is also the danger that the underlying cause is ignorance about the candidates, uninformed and irresponsible voting, or expression of bias on the basis of caste, as seen in the case of Reserved Constituencies. Thus, while NOTA is definitely providing a voice to dissent, it needs to be accompanied with efforts to raise voter awareness to prevent the misuse of this measure.

Suggested Improvements

There have been discussions to improve on NOTA, and to empower the voter through NOTA. Some of those suggested improvements include:

  1. If NOTA receives the highest number of votes, re-election should be held in that constituency with new and freshers candidate or that constituency should be ruled by the Governor.
  2. If NOTA receives the highest number of votes, re-elections should be held in that constituency [23][33][34]
  3. When conducting re-elections, the NOTA button may be disabled to avoid a series of re-elections[35]
  4. Political parties that lose to NOTA to bear the cost of re-election [36]
  5. The candidates who lose to NOTA should not be allowed to contest elections for a defined period of time (for example, 6 years) [36]
  6. Candidates receiving votes less than NOTA to be disqualified to contest any election in future, even in constituencies where NOTA might not have got maximum votes [37]
  7. To conduct re-election, if the votes polled for NOTA is higher than the winning margin of votes.[38]

There have been PILs filed to 'strengthen' the impact of NOTA in 2016 and 2017[39][40] by providing it the Power to Reject - asking for re-elections if NOTA wins majority, and barring the rejected candidates from contesting. However, the Supreme Court responded to these PILs by stating that such a solution is 'unworkable' and stating that "holding an election in our country is a very serious and expensive business".[39]

But voicing another line of opinion, Sanjay Parikh, a Supreme Court advocate who argued for PUCL in favour of NOTA, had stated in a 2013 interview:[41]

"Some people argue that the implementation of NOTA will drive up election expenses. But a tainted candidate who indulges in corruption and malpractices is a greater cost for the country. It is only the desire to continue in power and the greed for money that take prominence over values."

NOTA in local elections

NOTA was not included in the 2015 Kerala panchayat elections.[42]

Section 79 (d) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, recognises "electoral right" to also include the right to "refrain from voting at an election".[43] 'The Representation of People Act' is applicable to "...either House of Parliament or in the House or either House of the Legislature of a State..."[44] Recognition of "electoral right" as also the right to "refrain from voting at an election" is not made in the acts pertaining to elections to panchayats in Kerala.

Including NOTA in panchayat elections to these states and making improvements to NOTA may require changes or amendments to these acts and rules.

In 2018, the State Election Commission (SEC) of Maharashtra studied local body elections over the previous two years, and found several cases where NOTA had won more votes than the winning candidates. To cite some examples:[45] In the Bori gram panchayat polls in the Pune district, NOTA polled 85.57% votes; in the Mankarwadi gram panchayat polls in same district, 204 of a total 330 valid votes went to NOTA. The sarpanch of Khugaon Khurd in Nanded district got just 120 votes while NOTA had got 627 of the total 849 votes. Similarly, in a local election in the Khavadi village in Lanja tehsil, the winning candidate got 130 votes of 441 valid votes, while NOTA polled 210 votes.

Considering this, the Maharashtra SEC decided to consider amending the existing laws on NOTA. In November 2018, the SEC announced that if NOTA gets the maximum votes in an election, re-elections would be held. The order would be applicable to polls and by-polls to all municipal corporations, municipal councils and nagar panchayats with immediate effect. If NOTA gets the highest number of votes in the re-election as well, the candidate with the most votes, excluding NOTA, will be declared the winner.[46] However, the rejected candidates are not barred from re-elections.

The Haryana SEC followed suit too, declaring in November 2018 that NOTA would be treated as a fictional candidate and re-elections would be conducted if NOTA won the majority vote in the upcoming Municipal Elections in December 2018.[47]

References
  1. "NOTA- The rejection or Just a negative opinion? - The Election Hub". 24 February 201.
  2. Vora, Rutam. "How NOTA played spoilsport in 30 crucial seats in Gujarat polls". @businessline. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  3. "Karnataka Verdict: NOTA Polls More Votes Than Six Parties". BloombergQuint. Archived from the original on 2019-03-23. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  4. Dutta, Prabhash K. (December 13, 2018). "What tilted MP in favour of Congress: Seats with margin of less than 1000 votes and NOTA". India Today. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  5. "NOTA votes in 15 Rajasthan constituencies outscore victory margin". The Economic Times. December 12, 2018. Retrieved December 21, 2018.
  6. "WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 161 OF 2004". Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  7. "Election Commission of India : Provision for 'None of the Above' option on the EVM/Ballot Paper 0 Instructions" (PDF). Eci.nic.in. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  8. "Election Commission of India : Supreme Court's judgement for 'None of the Above' (NOTA) option on EVM - clarification" (PDF). Eci.nic.in. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  9. "Election Commission of India : Clarification on 'None of the Above' - counting of votes-reg" (PDF). Eci.nic.in. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  10. "Letter stating "A doubt has arisen about the NOTA option..."" (PDF). Eci.nic.in. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  11. "Election Commission of India : Symbol for 'None of the Above' (NOTA) option" (PDF). Eci.nic.in. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  12. Staff Reporter (14 April 2014). "Donkey symbol sought for NOTA option". The Hindu.
  13. "NOTA polls more than 5 parties". Tribuneindia.com. 2017-03-12. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  14. "Thin margin losers become victim of NOTA during Assembly elections". Babushahi.com. Archived from the original on 2018-07-09. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  15. "NOTA count more than the Margin of Victory in 21 constituencies of Bihar- Factly". Factly.in. 11 November 2015. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 4 April 2017.
  16. "Angry Nota votes knock out 4 BJP ministers in Madhya Pradesh". timesofindia.com.
  17. ""NOTA" gets 5.68 lakh votes in Tamil Nadu". Business Standard India. Press Trust of India. 2014-05-16. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  18. "Lok Sabha Election Results 2019: Most NOTA votes were cast in Bihar; Maharashtra recorded 4,86,902 such votes with Palghar topping the list". Firstpost. Archived from the original on 2019-05-28. Retrieved 2019-05-28.
  19. "'None Of The Above' option: The maturing of democracy in India or setting in of disillusionment with it?". Southasiamonitor.org. Archived from the original on 2017-12-25. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  20. "NOTA – "right to reject", What does it mean? – Legal Desire". Legaldesire.com. 2017-02-14. Archived from the original on 2019-03-23. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  21. "Digital Governance Initiative - DigitalGovernance.org - None of The Above (NOTA): Bringing Cleaner Politics, More Power to the People". Digitalgovernance.org. Archived from the original on 2019-03-23. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
  22. "How NOTA is a wastage of votes in elections". Moneycontrol.com. 2017-03-11. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  23. "NOTA in elections". Iasscore.in. Archived from the original on 2019-03-23. Retrieved 2018-07-09.
  24. Vachana, M R (February 28, 2017). "NOTA and the Indian Voter". The Hindu. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  25. "NOTA and the Indian Voter". Economic and Political Weekly. 53 (6). 5 June 2015. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 9 July 2018.
  26. Avantika Mehta (2013-10-26). "The option of no choice is welcome but it doesn't quite empower the voter". Sunday-guardian.com. Retrieved 2017-04-02.
  27. LucknowJanuary 26, Shiv Pujan Jha; January 29, 2017UPDATED; Ist, 2017 19:30. "NOTA only option: Over 1200 villagers from Uttar Pradesh's Lakhimpur to boycott Assembly election". India Today. Retrieved 2018-12-21.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  28. "Left with no option, villagers press NOTA button - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  29. "Farmers affected by Karur's dye industry to exercise NOTA". www.downtoearth.org.in. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  30. Das, Soumya (2016-04-22). "Sonagachi sorrowful, but no boycott". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2018-12-21.
  31. "People'S Union For Civil ... vs Union Of India & Anr on 27 September, 2013". indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  32. "VOTER AWARENESS POSTERS – N O T A (NONE OF THE ABOVE) - MAM". Mahitiadhikarmanch.ngo. Archived from the original on 2019-03-23. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
  33. "Despite Higher Vote Share NOTA Fails To Impact Assembly Elections - Hill Post". Hillpost.in. 2017-03-21. Archived from the original on 2018-07-16. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  34. "Will NOTA make a difference?". Theshillongtimes.com. Archived from the original on 23 August 2018. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  35. Says, Krishan Ahuja (2015-08-22). "Compulsory voting: Step towards democracy or dictatorship?: Why not 'Right-To-Reject'?". Live Law. Archived from the original on 2019-03-23. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  36. "The option of no choice is welcome but it doesn't quite empower the voter". Sunday-guardian.com.
  37. "Compulsory voting: Step towards democracy or dictatorship?: Why not 'Right-To-Reject'?". Livelaw.in. 22 August 2015. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 16 May 2017.
  38. "Four winners have victory margins lower than NOTA - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  39. "Supreme Court's no to plea to nullify polls if NOTA gets majority". The Indian Express. 2017-11-24. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  40. "Tranquebar Dorai Vasu vs The Chief Election Commissioner on 5 July, 2016". indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  41. DUTTA, SAGNIK. "Respect public perception". Frontline. Archived from the original on 2018-12-24. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  42. "No NOTA vote in local body elections". The Hindu. 28 April 2015.
  43. "THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, 1951 : ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS" (PDF). Indiacode.nic.in. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  44. "Error: Chief Electral Officer , Delhi" (PDF). Ceodelhi.gov.in. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 23 August 2018.
  45. "Maharashtra may hold re-election in local polls where NOTA got maximum votes". Hindustan Times. 2018-07-20. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  46. "Fresh polls if NOTA gets most votes, says Maharashtra poll panel". The Indian Express. 2018-11-07. Retrieved 2018-12-24.
  47. "In Haryana Municipal Elections, NOTA To Be A "Fictional Candidate"". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2018-12-24.

[1]

  1. People of Navi Mumbai decided to vote for NOTA in 2019 election https://www.facebook.com/aagrikoliyouthfoundation/photos/rpp.535253953299655/1375657239259318/?type=3&theater
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.