Overcharging (law)

Overcharging, in law, refers to a prosecutorial practice that involves "tacking on" additional charges that the prosecutor knows he cannot prove.[1] It is used to put the prosecutor in a better plea bargaining position.[2] The term has been defined in different ways. Alschuler writes that "to prosecutors, overcharging is accusing the defendant of a crime of which he is clearly innocent to induce a plea to the 'proper' crime. Defense counsel identify two types of overcharging. 'Horizontal' overcharging is the unreasonable multiplying of accusations against a single defendant. He may be either charged with a separate offense for every technical criminal transaction in which he participated, or the prosecutor may fragment a single criminal transaction into numerous component offenses. 'Vertical' overcharging is charging a single offense at a higher level than the circumstances of the case seem to warrant."[3] Vertical overcharging is deemed to be the more abusive of the two practices.[4] In defense of overcharging, it has been argued that in order to obtain a plea bargain that results in a lower sentence than the prosecutor's original position, while still obtaining a penalty that promotes public safety, the prosecutor must select an initial charge higher than is penologically appropriate.[5]

Although theoretically overcharging is impermissible, courts are reluctant to dismiss charges that are supported by probable cause.[6] American Bar Association guidelines discourage overcharging, but do not prohibit it.[7] It has been said that rules aimed at combating prosecutorial vindictiveness that force prosecutors to justify any distinct indictments brought subsequent to an initial charge raise the possibility of overcharging.[8] It has been argued that restrictions on the current practice of plea bargaining would most likely result in a reduction in overcharging by the prosecutor.[9]

References
  1. Angela J. Davis (2007). Arbitrary justice: the power of the American prosecutor.
  2. K Kipnis (1976), Criminal Justice and the Negotiated Plea, Ethics, JSTOR 2379810
  3. AW Alschuler (1968), Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining, National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  4. SF Ross (1978), Bordenkircher v. Hayes: Ignoring Prosecutorial Abuses in Plea Bargaining, California Law Review, JSTOR 3479971
  5. M Tushnet, J Jaff (1985), Critical Legal Studies and Criminal Procedure, Catholic UL Rev.
  6. Plea Bargaining: A Shortcut To Justice, JRank
  7. LC Griffin (2000), Prudent Prosecutor, The, Geo. J. Legal Ethics
  8. EJ Maiman (1980), Criminal Procedure-Due Process of Law-Prosecuting Attorneys-When a Prosecutor Adds a Distinct Charge Stemming from the Same Conduct Underlying the Original, U. Cin. L. Rev.
  9. GT Felkenes (1976), Plea bargaining: Its pervasiveness on the judicial system, Journal of Criminal Justice
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.