Photon upconversion

Photon upconversion (UC) is a process in which the sequential absorption of two or more photons leads to the emission of light at shorter wavelength than the excitation wavelength. It is an anti-Stokes type emission. An example is the conversion of infrared light to visible light. Upconversion can take place in both organic and inorganic materials, through a number of different mechanisms. Organic molecules that can achieve photon upconversion through triplet-triplet annihilation are typically polycyclicaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Inorganic materials capable of photon upconversion often contain ions of d-block or f-block elements. Examples of these ions are Ln3+, Ti2+, Ni2+, Mo3+, Re4+, Os4+, and so on.

Example of normal Stokes emission through fluorescence (left, red) and anti-Stokes emission (right, blue) through sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation based photon upconversion, samples excited with green light.
Upconversion fluorescence. Optical fiber that contains infrared light shines with a blue color in the dark

Physical mechanisms behind photon upconversion

There are three basic mechanism for photon upconversion in inorganic materials and at least two distinct mechanisms in organic materials. In inorganic materials photon upconversion occurs through energy transfer upconversion (ETU), excited-state absorption (ESA) and photon avalanche (PA). Such processes can be observed in materials with very different sizes and structures, including optical fibers, bulk crystals or nanoparticles, as long as they contain any of the active ions mentioned above. Organic molecules can upconvert photons through sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation (sTTA) and energy pooling.[1][2]

Upconversion should be distinguished from two-photon absorption and second-harmonic generation. These two physical processes have a similar outcome to photon upconversion (emission of photons of shorter wavelength than the excitation) but the mechanism behind is different.[3] An early proposal (a solid-state IR quantum counter) was made by Nicolaas Bloembergen in 1959[4] and the process was first observed by François Auzel in 1966.[5]

A thermal upconversion mechanism is also possible. This mechanism is based on the absorption of photons with low energies in the upconverter, which heats up and re-emits photons with higher energies.[6][7] To improve this process, the density of optical states of the upconverter can be carefully engineered to provide frequency- and angularly-selective emission characteristics. For example, a planar thermal upconverting platform can have a front surface that absorbs low-energy photons incident within a narrow angular range, and a back surface that efficiently emits only high-energy photons. These surface properties can be realized through designs of photonic crystals, and theories and experiments have been demonstrated on thermophotovoltaics and radiation cooling.[8][9] Under best criterion, energy conversion efficiency from solar radiation to electricity by introducing up-converter can go up to 73% using AM1.5D spectrum and 76% considering sun as a black body source at 6,000 K for a single-junction cell.[10]

Sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation

Sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation (sTTA) based photon upconversion is a bimolecular process that through a number of energy transfer steps, efficiently combines two low frequency photons into one photon of higher frequency.[1][11][12] TTA systems consist of one absorbing species, the sensitizer, and one emitting species, the emitter (or annihilator). Emitters are typically polyaromatic chromophores with large singlet-triplet energy splitting, such as anthracene and its derivatives.[1][11]

The first step in sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation is absorption of a low energy photon by the sensitizer. The sensitizer then populates its first triplet excited state (3Sen*) after intersystem crossing (ISC). The excitation energy on the sensitizer then transfers through a Dexter type triplet energy transfer (TET) to a ground state emitter, generating a triplet excited emitter (3Em*). Two triplet excited emitters then interact in a second energy transfer process, known as triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA). Upon TTA the triplet energies are fused leaving one emitter in its excited singlet state (1Em*) and the other emitter in its ground state. From the singlet excited state the emitter returns to the ground state through the emission of a photon. In this way two low energy photons are converted into one photon of higher energy. The principle relies on long lived triplet states to temporarily store the photon energy. Since molecular oxygen effectively quenches triplet states it is important that samples are thoroughly degassed or encapsulated to function efficiently.[1][11][12]

Photon upconversion through sensitized triplet-triplet annihilation has the advantage of being efficient even at low excitation intensities making it potentially useful for converting sun light to enhance solar cell efficiencies.[11][13]

Upconverting nanoparticles
Main article: Upconverting nanoparticles

Although photon upconversion was first studied in bulk crystals and optical fibers, it became better known with the development of nanomaterials. This happened due to the many ways in which nanostructures with photon upconversion properties can be applied. This new class of materials may broadly be referred to as upconverting nanoparticles or UCNPs.

Lanthanide-doped nanoparticles

Lanthanide-doped nanoparticles emerged in the late 1990s due to the prevalent work on nanotechnology, marking a turning point in the landscape of modern lanthanide research. Although the optical transitions in lanthanide-doped nanoparticles essentially resemble those in bulk materials, the nanostructure amenable to surface modifications provides new opportunities for research. Besides, the small size of the particles allow their use as alternatives to molecular fluorophores for biological applications. Their unique optical properties, such as large Stokes shift and nonblinking, have enabled them to rival conventional luminescent probes in challenging tasks including single-molecule tracking and deep tissue imaging. In the case of bioimaging, as lanthanide-doped nanoparticles can be excited with near-infrared light, they are optimal to reduce autofluorescence of biological samples and thus, improve the contrast of the image.

Lanthanide-doped nanoparticles are nanocrystals of a transparent material (more often the fluorides NaYF4, NaGdF4, LiYF4, YF3, CaF2 or oxides such as Gd2O3) doped with certain amounts of lanthanide ions. The most common lanthanide ions used in photon upconversion are the pairs erbium-ytterbium (Er3+,Yb3+) or thulium-ytterbium (Tm3+, Yb3+). In such combinations ytterbium ions are added as antennas, to absorb light at around 980 nm and transfer it to the upconverter ion. If this ion is erbium, then a characteristic green and red emission is observed, while when the upconverter ion is thulium, the emission includes near-ultraviolet, blue and red light.

Despite the promising aspects of these nanomaterials, one urgent task that confronts materials chemists lies in the synthesis of nanoparticles with tunable emissions, which are essential for applications in multiplexed imaging and sensing.[14] The development of a reproducible, high yield synthetic route that allows controlled growth of rare earth halide nanoparticles has enabled the development and commercialization of upconversion nanoparticles in many different bioapplications.[15] The first worldwide, commercially available upconversion nanoparticles were developed by Intelligent Material Solutions, Inc. and distributed through Sigma-Aldrich.[16] Recently, moving forward in the challenge of designing particles with tunable emissions, important progress in synthesis of high-quality nano-structured crystals has enabled new pathways for photon upconversion. This includes the possibility of creating particles with core/shell structures, allowing upconversion through interfacial energy transfer (IET).[17][18][19]

Semiconductor nanoparticles

Semiconductor nanoparticles or quantum dots have often been demonstrated to emit light of shorter wavelength than the excitation following a two-photon absorption mechanism, not photon upconversion. However, recently the use of semiconductor nanoparticles, such as CdSe, PbS and PbSe as sensitizers combined with molecular emitters has been shown as a new strategy for photon upconversion through triplet-triplet annihilation.[20] They have been used to upconvert 980 nm infrared light to 600 nm visible light;[20] green light to blue light;[21][22] and blue light to ultraviolet.[23] This technique benefits from a very high upconverting capability. Especially, these materials can be used to capture the infrared region of sunlight to electricity and enhance the efficiency of photovoltaic solar cells.[11][13]

Upconversion nanocapsules for differential cancer bioimaging in vivo

Early diagnosis of tumor malignancy is crucial for timely cancer treatment aimed at imparting desired clinical outcomes. The traditional fluorescence-based imaging is unfortunately faced with challenges such as low tissue penetration and background autofluorescence.[20] Upconversion (UC)-based bioimaging can overcome these limitations as their excitation occurs at lower frequencies and the emission at higher frequencies. Kwon et al. developed multifunctional silica-based nanocapsules, synthesized to encapsulate two distinct triplet-triplet annihilation UC chromophore pairs. Each nanocapsule emits different colors, blue or green, following a red light excitation. These nanocapsules were further conjugated with either antibodies or peptides to selectively target breast or colon cancer cells, respectively. Both in vitro and in vivo experimental results demonstrated cancer-specific and differential-color imaging from single wavelength excitation as well as far greater accumulation at targeted tumor sites than that due to the enhanced permeability and retention effect. This approach can be used to host a variety of chromophore pairs for various tumor-specific, color-coding scenarios and can be employed for diagnosis of a wide range of cancer types within the heterogeneous tumor microenvironment.[24]

References
  1. Singh-Rachford, T. N., Castellano, F. N. (2010). "Photon upconversion based on sensitized triplet–triplet annihilation". Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 254 (21–22): 2560–2573. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.003.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. Weingarten, D. H. (2017). "Experimental demonstration of photon upconversion via cooperative energy pooling". Nature Communications. 8: 14808. Bibcode:2017NatCo...814808W. doi:10.1038/ncomms14808. PMC 5355946. PMID 28294129.
  3. Moffatt, J. E.; Tsiminis, G.; Klantsataya, E.; Prinse, T. J. de; Ottaway, D.; Spooner, N. A. (2019-10-12). "A practical review of shorter than excitation wavelength light emission processes". Applied Spectroscopy Reviews: 1–23. doi:10.1080/05704928.2019.1672712. ISSN 0570-4928.
  4. Bloembergen, N (1959). "Solid State Infrared Quantum Counters". Physical Review Letters. 2 (3): 84–85. Bibcode:1959PhRvL...2...84B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.84.
  5. Auzel, François (2004). "Upconversion and Anti-Stokes Processes with f and d Ions in Solids". Chemical Reviews. 104 (1): 139–174. doi:10.1021/cr020357g. PMID 14719973.
  6. Ye, Huanqing; Bogdanov, Viktor; Liu, Sheng; Vajandar, Saumitra; Osipowicz, Thomas; Hernández, Ignacio; Xiong, Qihua (2017-12-07). "Bright Photon Upconversion on Composite Organic Lanthanide Molecules through Localized Thermal Radiation". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 8 (23): 5695–5699. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02513. PMID 29099188.
  7. Wang, Junxin; Ming, Tian; Jin, Zhao; Wang, Jianfang; Sun, Ling-Dong; Yan, Chun-Hua (2014-11-28). "Photon energy upconversion through thermal radiation with the power efficiency reaching 16%". Nature Communications. 5 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1038/ncomms6669. ISSN 2041-1723. PMID 25430519.
  8. Raman, A. P.; et al. (2014). "Passive radiative cooling below ambient air temperature under direct sunlight". Nature. 515 (7528): 540–544. Bibcode:2014Natur.515..540R. doi:10.1038/nature13883. PMID 25428501.
  9. Lenert, A.; et al. (2014). "A nanophotonic solar thermophotovoltaic device" (PDF). Nature Nanotechnology. 9 (2): 126–130. Bibcode:2014NatNa...9..126L. doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.286. hdl:1721.1/93174. PMID 24441985.
  10. Boriskina, S.V.; Chen, G. (2014). "Exceeding the solar cell Shockley–Queisser limit via thermal up-conversion of low-energy photons". Optics Communications. 314: 71–78. arXiv:1310.5570. Bibcode:2014OptCo.314...71B. doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2013.10.042.
  11. Gray, V. (2014). "Triplet–triplet annihilation photon-upconversion: Towards solar energy applications". Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 (22): 10345–10352. Bibcode:2014PCCP...1610345G. doi:10.1039/c4cp00744a. PMID 24733519.
  12. Turro, N. J., Ramamurthy, V., Scaiano, J.C. (2010) Modern Molecular Photochemistry of Organic Molecules, University Science Books, ISBN 978-1-891389-25-2
  13. Schulze, T. (2015). "Photochemical upconversion: Present status and prospects for its application to solar energy conversion". Energy & Environmental Science. 8: 103–125. doi:10.1039/c4ee02481h.
  14. Wang, F.; Liu, X. (2014). "Multicolor Tuning of Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles by Single Wavelength Excitation". Accounts of Chemical Research. 2014 (4): 1378–1385. doi:10.1021/ar5000067. PMID 24611606.
  15. Ye, X.; Collins, J. (2010). "Morphologically controlled synthesis of colloidal upconversion nanophosphors and their shape-directed self-assembly". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (52): 22430–22435. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10722430Y. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008958107. PMC 3012508. PMID 21148771.
  16. "Sunstone® Luminescent UCP Nanocrystals – Sigma Aldrich". www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/articles/biology/upconvering-ucp-nanocrystals.html. Sigma-Aldrich. 2011. Retrieved February 23, 2017. Sunstone® Luminescent Nanocrystals for Low Background Detection in Life Sciences
  17. Zhou, B.; et al. (2015). "Photon upconversion through Tb-mediated interfacial energy transfer". Advanced Materials. 27 (40): 6208–6212. doi:10.1002/adma.201503482. PMID 26378771.
  18. Zhou, B.; et al. (2016). "Constructing interfacial energy transfer for photon up- and down-conversion from lanthanides in a core-shell nanostructure". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 55 (40): 12356–12360. doi:10.1002/anie.201604682. hdl:10397/66648. PMID 27377449.
  19. Zhou, B.; et al. (2018). "Enabling photon upconversion and precise control of donor–acceptor interaction through Interfacial Energy Transfer". Advanced Science. 5 (3): 1700667. doi:10.1002/advs.201700667. PMC 5867046. PMID 29593969.
  20. Hany, Ronald; Cremona, Marco; Strassel, Karen (2019). "Recent advances with optical upconverters made from all-organic and hybrid materials". Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 20 (1): 497–510. doi:10.1080/14686996.2019.1610057. PMC 6542176. PMID 31191760.
  21. Huang, Z. (2015). "Hybrid Molecule–Nanocrystal Photon Upconversion Across the Visible and Near-Infrared" (PDF). Nano Letters. 15 (8): 5552–5557. Bibcode:2015NanoL..15.5552H. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02130. PMID 26161875.
  22. Mongin, C. (2016). "Weaving of organic threads into a crystalline covalent organic framework". Science. 351 (6271): 365–369. Bibcode:2016Sci...351..365L. doi:10.1126/science.aad4011. PMID 26798010.
  23. Gray, V. (2017). "CdS/ZnS core–shell nanocrystal photosensitizers for visible to UV upconversion". Chemical Science. 8 (8): 5488–5496. doi:10.1039/c7sc01610g. PMC 5613741. PMID 28970929.
  24. Kwon OS, Song HS, Conde J, Kim HI, Artzi N, Kim JH (2016). "Dual-Color Emissive Upconversion Nanocapsules for Differential Cancer Bioimaging in Vivo". ACS Nano. 10 (1): 1512–1521. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b07075. PMID 26727423.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.