Proposed Croat federal unit in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Croat federal unit in Bosnia and Herzegovina, or Croat entity, also informally known as the "Third entity" (Serbo-Croatian: Hrvatska federalna jedinica, Hrvatski entitet, Treći entitet), is a proposed administrative unit in Bosnia and Herzegovina based on territorial federalism and ethnic self-determination. The proposal has been invoked by several political scientists, politicians and political parties, including the Croat National Assembly (HDZ BiH, HDZ 1990 and HSS). So far it has not been discussed beyond the concept level.[1] Since the country is divided into two entities, the Serb-dominated Republika Srpska and the Bosniak-majority Federation, Croats, as one of the three equal constitutive nations, have proposed creating a symmetrical Croat-majority territorial unit.[2][3][4] Political advocates for such proposal argue it would ensure Croat equality and prevent electoral gerrymandering,[5] simplify the political gridlock while dismantle overburdening administration. Opponents argue it would further divide the country on ethnic grounds thus breaching the constitutional principles, put non-Croats in a subordinate position, and lead to separatism.

Proposed Croat subdivision of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2001 (in blue).

Background

Bosnian War and Herzeg-Bosnia
See also: Bosnian War and Herzeg-Bosnia

During the Bosnian War (1992–95), Bosnian Croats founded their own sub-national entity, Herzeg-Bosnia, which de facto functioned as a mini state, with its own army, police, parliament etc.

Peace plans
War-time Owen–Stoltenberg plan
  Croat entity
Main article: Peace plans proposed before and during the Bosnian War

During the Bosnian War, international mediators and envoys proposed several peace plans that included forming three federal units in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In 1992, EC diplomat José Cutileiro sketched a proposal in which he stated that the three constituent units would be "based on national principles and taking into account economic, geographic, and other criteria".[6] In late July 1993, representatives of Bosnia-Herzegovina's three warring factions entered into a new round of negotiations. On 20 August, the UN mediators, Thorvald Stoltenberg and David Owen, unveiled a map that would organise Bosnia into three ethnic mini-states. Bosnian Serb forces would be given 52% of Bosnia-Herzegovina's territory, Muslims would be allotted 30 percent and Bosnia Croats would receive 18 percent. Sarajevo and Mostar would be districts belonging to none of the three states. On 29 August 1993 the Bosniak side rejected the plan.

(Con)federal structure

In 1994, under the Washington Agreement, Croats joined their territory, Herzeg-Bosnia, with the Bosniak-government controlled areas (the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina) to create a subnational entity, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) with joint institutions. The 1995 Dayton Agreement that ended the war left the country divided into two political entities, the Serb-dominated and controlled Republika Srpska and the Bosniak-Croat Federation. FBiH was further divided into 10 autonomous cantons to ensure equality. The FBiH government and a bicameral Parliament were supposed to guarantee power-sharing and equal representation to the less numerous Croats. Some dissatisfaction with this situation was displayed by Croats already in 1999 together with the calls for an establishment of a Croat-majority federal unit, but the Croat member of the state presidency dismissed it and called for strengthening of the principle of equality of three communities and of canton autonomy.[7]

Federation
See also: Political divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Administrative division of Bosnia and Herzegovina

In 2001, the Office of the High Representative (OHR) in the country imposed amendments to the Federation's constitution and its electoral law, complicating its structure and impairing the parity between Bosniaks and Croats that was up until then in force in the Federation. Since Bosniaks compose roughly 70.4% of FBiH's population, Croats 22.4% and Serbs just around 2%, the Parliament's House of Peoples (with equal representation for the nationalities) is supposed to ensure that the interests of Croats, Serbs and national minorities are fairly represented during government creation and in the legislative process. However, ever since 2001–02 and foreign-imposed amendments to the constitution and electoral laws, Croats have claimed that the election system for the deputies in the House of Peoples is rigged, depriving them of their rights to representation and in fact enabling Bosniaks to control the majority in the upper house as well. Namely, after 2002 each nation's deputies to the House of Peoples are elected by 10 Cantonal assemblies, the majority of which (6) is controlled by Bosniak politicians. This dismantled checks and balances the Federation's Croats and Serbs had on the Federal legislature as well as the executive, particularly government-building. In 2010-14 Federation's Government was formed and Federation's president appointed without the consent of Croat deputies in the House of Peoples, receiving just 5 votes of confidence out of 17. In March 2011 country's Central Electoral Commission declared HoP's composition and decisions to be illegal, but the High Representative Valentin Inzko suspended CEC's decision.[8] After Bosnian Croat politician Božo Ljubić filed an appeal, in December 2016 the Constitutional Court found the election system of the deputies in the House of Peoples unconstitutional and abrogated the controversial rules.[9]

In 2005 Croat member of the country's tripartite Presidency Ivo Miro Jović said "I don't mean to reproach Bosnian Serbs, but if they have a Serb republic, then we should also create a Croat republic and Bosniak (Muslim) republic". The Croat representative in the federal Bosnian Presidency, Željko Komšić, opposed this, but some Bosnian Croat politicians advocated for the establishment of a third (Croatian) entity.[10]

Herzeg Stjepan Kosača building in Mostar, seat of the Croatian National Assembly.

Another issue Croats raised is the election of Croat member of the country's Presidency. Namely, every citizen in the Federation can decide whether to vote for a Bosniak or a Croat representative. However, since Bosniaks make up 70% of Federation's population and Croats only 22%, a candidate running to represent Croats in the Presidency can be effectively elected even without a majority among the Croat community - if enough Bosniak voters decide to vote on a Croat ballot. This happened in 2006 and in 2010, when an ethnic Croat, Željko Komšić, backed by multiethnic Social-Democrat Party, won the elections with very few Croat votes.[11][12] In 2010 he didn't win in a single municipality that had Croat-majority or plurality; nearly all of these went to Borjana Krišto. Bulk of the votes Komšić received came from predominantly Bosniak areas and he fared quite poorly in Croat municipalities, supported by less than 2,5% of the electorate in a number of municipalities in Western Herzegovina, such as Široki Brijeg, Ljubuški (0,8%), Čitluk, Posušje and Tomislavgrad, while not being able to gain not even 10% in a number of others.[13] Furthermore, total Croat population in whole of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was then estimated around 495,000;[14] Komšić received 336,961 votes alone, while all other Croat candidates won 230,000 votes altogether. Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina consider him to be an illegitimate representative and generally treat him as a second Bosniak member of the presidency.[15][16][17][18] This raised frustration among Croats, undermined their trust in federal institutions and empowered claims for their own entity or a federal unit.[19] In addition to that, two minorities' representatives appealed to the European Court of Human Rights since they cannot run for state presidency due to their ethnic background (being neither of the three constitutive nations) and won the case. EU asked Bosnia and Herzegovina to implement the ruling, named Sejdić-Finci, which would require changing electoral laws and perhaps the constitution.

Although Krišto won majority of Croat votes in 2010 elections while Komšić won very few Croat votes, thanks to Bosniak votes, Komšić was still elected the Croat member of the Presidency.[19][15]
Relative majority by municipality for presidential election in the Federation.
  Komšić
  Krišto
Komšić's 2010 election results as a share of total votes cast in each municipality. Note that Komšić did not win more than 15% of votes in a single Croat-majority municipality
relative distribution of Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina (share of municipalities' Croats in total Croat population)

Croat political parties also complain about the lack of a public broadcasting system in Croatian language, focused on Croatian community,[20][21] as well as about unequal funding their cultural and education institutions receive in the Federation. The largest town with Croat majority, Mostar, with a sizeable Bosniak minority, has been in a gridlock since 2008 since the two communities cannot agree on the electoral rules for local elections.[22]

Dissatisfied with the representation of Croats in the Federation, Croat political parties insist on creating a Croat-majority federal unit instead of several cantons. SDA and other Bosniak parties strongly oppose this.[23] In January 2017, Croatian National Assembly stated that "if Bosnia and Herzegovina wants to become self-sustainable, then it is necessary to have an administrative-territorial reorganization, which would include a federal unit with a Croatian majority. It remains the permanent aspiration of the Croatian people of Bosnia and Herzegovina."[24]


Croatian Self-Rule
Croat- and Bosniak- controlled parts of the Federation in 1997
Croat self-government in Bosnia – a challenge for Dayton?
Bosnia Herzegovina 2001: the international community versus the Bosnian Croats
Office of the High Representative: Chronology/Monthly Tracker 2001

In 2000, the Office of the High Representative in the country imposed amendments to the Federation's constitution and its electoral law, which complicated its structure and impaired the parity between Bosniaks and Croats that had been in force. Dissatisfied Croat politicians set up a separate Croatian National Assembly, held a referendum parallel to the elections and proclaimed Croatian federal unit in Croat-majority areas in the Federation (Croatian Self-Government or Self-Rule, Hrvatska samouprava). The Federation was declared obsolete and Croat soldiers in Federation's Army and Croat customs and police officers were asked to pledge allegiance.

Croatian Self-Rule was supposed to be a temporary solution until the controversial amendments and election rules are overturned. The attempt ended shortly after a crackdown by SFOR and judiciary proceedings.

Since 2001

Since 2001, various Croatian politicians and parties in different electoral cycles have proposed creating a federal unit with a Croatian majority. Sometimes, it is proposed as a federal unit within the Croat-Bosniak Federation, while others have proposed dismantling the Federation into two separate entities, Croat- and Bosniak-majority ones, respectively, and thus ending up with three entities on a national level (the third being current Republika Srpska). One of the few worked-out reform proposals calling for an establishment of a Croat federal unit within the Federation was sketched out before the 2014 general elections by a minor Croat party from West Herzegovina, Croatian Republican Party.[25] According to CRP, Croat-majority federal unit would assume the powers and competencies currently held by cantons in the Federation. Federation would continue to exist as a federation of a Croat-majority and a Bosniak-majority canton, together with few mutually shared districts. Federation's bicameral Parliament would be retained; the House of Peoples deputies would be elected in canton and district assemblies by assembly members from respective nations, proportionate to their share in the cantons' population.[26] CRP's proposal:

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Republika SrpskaFederation of Bosnia
and Herzegovina
Croat CantonBosniak Canton
Districts

The most prominent Croatian parties (HDZ BiH, HDZ 1990 and HSS), assembled together in Croatian National Assembly, have so far failed to deliver anything more than a mere concept.[1] Dragan Čović, president of one of the main Croatian party in Bosnia, Croatian Democratic Union of Bosnia and Herzegovina, said that "all Croatian parties will propose that Bosnia and Herzegovina be divided into three ethnic entities, with Sarajevo as a separate district. Croatian politicians must be the initiators of a new constitution which would guarantee Croats the same rights as to other constituent peoples. Every federal unit would have its legislative, executive and judiciary organs". He claimed the two-entity system is untenable and that Croats have been subject to assimilation and deprived of basic rights in the federation with the Bosniaks.[27]

In July 2014, the International Crisis Group published a report Bosnia's Future, among others, proposing establishing Croat entity and reorganizing the country in three entities:

There is nothing inherently wrong with a Croat entity. It would solve many problems: there would be no further need for cantons, and relations between state and entity, and between entity and municipality, could be consistent throughout Bosnia. Instead of a tangled federation of entities and peoples, the country would be a normal federation of territorial units, a design with many successful European examples. Ethnic quotas could be replaced by regional representation and protection of fundamental human rights.[28] — International Crisis Group, Bosnia's Future

Political scientist from Macalester College and Georgetown University, Valentino Grbavac, proposed the establishment of a Croat entity in his 2016 book "Unequal democracy" as the optimal solution. He proposed assigning same powers that Republika Srpska currently holds to new Croat and Bosniak entities, possibly changing borders of municipalities to better reflect ethnic composition and turning Jajce into a Croat-Bosniak district, like Brčko today. Croat entity would also "look out for the well-being and protection of Croats in other entities," while introducing "strong legal protection" and "guarantees of rights of other nationalities" in Croat-majority entity.[29]

In his December 2016 essay in the Foreign Affairs, Timothy Less argued that the U.S. foreign policy should accept "the Croats' demand for a third entity in Bosnia. In the medium term, the United States should allow [the entity] to form close political and economic links with [Croatia], such as allowing dual citizenship and establishing shared institutions" as this would enable the population to "satisfy their most basic political interests."[30] David B. Kanin, an adjunct professor of international relations at Johns Hopkins University and a former senior intelligence analyst for the CIA, pointed out in February 2017 that Bosniak politicians' unilateral policy "justifies the Croats' demand for their own entity."[31]

Constitutional principles

Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in its landmark Decision on the constituency of peoples ruled that:

Territorial delimitation [of Entities] must not serve as an instrument of ethnic segregation – on the contrary – it must accommodate ethnic groups by preserving linguistic pluralism and peace in order to contribute to the integration of the state and society as such [...] Constitutional principle of collective equality of constituent peoples, arising out of designation of Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs as constituent peoples, prohibits any special privileges for one or two constituent peoples, any domination in governmental structures and any ethnic homogenization by segregation based on territorial separation [...] [D]espite the territorial division of BiH by establishment of two Entities, this territorial division cannot serve as a constitutional legitimacy for ethnic domination, national homogenization or the right to maintain results of ethnic cleansing [...] Designation of Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs as constituent peoples in the Preamble of the Constitution of BiH must be understood as an all-inclusive principle of the Constitution of BiH to which the Entities must fully adhere...[32]

Territory
Ethnic composition of municipalities. Croat-majority/plurality municipalities in shades of orange
Share of Croats in municipalities
Operation area of the utility company of Croatian Community of Herzeg-Bosnia, "Elektroprivreda HZ HB", roughly corresponding with the area of Herzeg-Bosnia political and institutional control in 1995-7, has been proposed by International Crisis Group and Croatian Peasant Party as the tentative area of Croat entity.

It is unclear what territory Croat federal unit would encompass. It is generally assumed it would comprise Croat-majority municipalities in the country, but the criteria haven't been clearly defined (whether two-thirds majority, absolute majority, or plurality would be required).[33] In some municipalities, especially in Central Bosnia, Croats have a small majority (Vitez, 55%) or just plurality (Mostar 48.4%, Busovača 49.5%). CRP's 2014 proposal assumed that in Central Bosnia, Vitez, Jajce, Busovača, Dobretići, Kiseljak, Kreševo and Novi Travnik together with the eastern, Croat-majority part of Fojnica municipality would become part of the Croat canton, while Gornji Vakuf-Uskoplje, Travnik, and Mostar would be districts in Bosniak-Croat condominia.[34] However, this proposal came before the 2013 census results had been published. Contrary to the previously held assumptions, these showed that Jajce and Novi Travnik did not have Croat majority.

Dragan Čović, Croat member of the state Presidency, claimed in 2017 that the Croat entity will encompass "Herzegovina, Posavina, Žepče and parts of Central Bosnia."[35] At the end of 2016 Croat Catholic cardinal Vinko Puljić stated that he believed Croat entity would have to include parts of Republika Srpska territory as well.[36]

Some academic proposals, as well as partially CRP's 2014 proposal (with respect to Fojnica) and somewhat the proclaimed area of Croatian Self-Government in 2001 envisage changing borders of municipalities in mixed Bosniak-Croat areas (Mostar, Central Bosnia) in order to encompass larger share of Croats there.

The International Crisis Group pointed out that the vestiges of Croat territorial autonomy in the Federation exist in the form of the area served by the electricity utility Elektroprivreda HZ HB, "which covers most areas of Croat habitation",[28] Croatian Post Mostar, HT Mostar etc. These are areas that were under control of Herzeg-Bosnia and Croatian Defence Council (HVO) in late 1995. In February 2017, Croatian Peasant Party of Bosnia-Herzegovina president Mario Karamatić said CPP will demand a reestablishment of Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia in its 1995 shape if the Republika Srpska secedes.[37] As far as the Herzeg-Bosnia's tentative territory, Karamatić proposed the area served by the electricity utility Elektroprivreda HZ HB.[38]

Demographics

In February 2017, Croatian-language newspaper in Bosnia, Večernji list, published a proposal for a Croat entity that would include all of the Croat-majority or plurality municipalities (24 in total). Out of 497.883 Croats that live in FBiH, 372.276 or 75% would live in the Croat federal unit.[39] It would have a population of 496.385, with the ethnic breakdown as follows:[40]

  • 372.276 Croats (75%)
  • 111.821 Bosniaks (22.5%)
  • 9.200 Serbs (1.9%)

This would make the Croat entity virtually a symmetric version of the current Federation (70% Bosniak, 22% Croat, 2% Serb). If only the western, Croat-inhabited part of Mostar municipality is included in the entity, this would reduce the number of Bosniaks in the Croat entity by roughly 45,000 and increase Croat majority to 83%. If Gornji Vakuf-Uskoplje municipality would be divided into Croat- and Bosniak-majority municipalities to be added to two entities, respectively, Večernji list claims that as much as 83% of Federation's Croats would end up in the Croat federal unit.[39]

Opinion polls

Share of Croatian or overall population that believes creating a third, Croat entity would be the best solution for Bosnia and Herzegovina:

DateSupportPollster
November 20165% FBiH[41]IMPAQ International
November 20159% FBiH[42]IMPAQ International
June 201451% Croats[43]National Democratic Institute
October 201353% Croats[44]University of Mostar
May 201337.7% Croats
7.7% FBiH[45]		Prism Research (Sarajevo)
Early 201139% Croats[46]Friedrich Ebert Stiftung
November 201043% Croats[47][48]Gallup Balkan Monitor
August 201053% Croats
9% overall[49]		National Democratic Institute
October 200936% Croats
8% overall[50]		National Democratic Institute
September 200522% Croats[51]Prism Research (Sarajevo)
May 200429% Croats[52]Prism Research (Sarajevo)
Early 200440% Croats[53]Early Warning Report, UNDP

See also

References
  1. Danijal Hadžović (9 February 2017). "HDZ-OV PUCANJ U PRAZNO: Mirno spavajte, trećeg entiteta neće biti!". slobodna-bosna.ba (in Serbo-Croatian). Retrieved 22 August 2019.
  2. Pabst, Volker (3 December 2018). "Der serbischstämmige Präsident von Bosnien-Herzegowina lehnt den Staat ab, dem er vorsteht" (in German). ISSN 0376-6829. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
  3. May 2017 Monthly Forecast: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Security Council Report, Posted 28 April 2017
  4. Velina Lilyanova: Bosnia and Herzegovina: Political parties, European Parliamentary Research Service - Members' Research Service, 2015, p. 2
  5. Janko Bekić: "A Third Entity?: A Federalist Solution for Bosnia and Herzegovina's Constitutional Imbalance", Abstract, UACES 47th Annual Conference at Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland, 4–6 September 2017
  6. Glaurdić, Josip (2011). The Hour of Europe: Western Powers and the Breakup of Yugoslavia. London: Yale University Press. p. 294. ISBN 030016629X.
  7. "Balkan Report: March 17, 1999". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  8. "Bosnia and Herzegovina, Freedom in the World in 2012", Freedom House
  9. Rose, Eleanor: "Bosnian Court Ruling Lends Weight to Croat Agitation", Balkan Insight, 15 Dec 16
  10. Staff. "Bosnia: Regionalization proposal on table". B92. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 27 April 2015.
  11. Andrew MacDowall: "Dayton Ain’t Going Nowhere", Foreign Policy, 12 December 2015.
  12. "News Analysis: Few surprises expected in Bosnian general elections". Xinhua. 3 October 2010.
  13. Central Electorate Commission, results in municipalities, 2010
  14. U BiH ima 48,4 posto Bošnjaka, 32,7 posto Srba i 14, 6 posto Hrvata (Article on the preliminary report of 2013 census) Archived 31 July 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  15. International Crisis Group: Bosnia’s Future Europe, Report N°232, 10 July 2014
  16. Vogel, T. K. (9 October 2006). "Bosnia: From the Killing Fields to the Ballot Box". The Globalist. Archived from the original on 10 October 2009. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
  17. Pavić, Snježana (8 October 2010). "Nije točno da Hrvati nisu glasali za Željka Komšića, u Grudama je dobio 124 glasa". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). Retrieved 6 April 2013.
  18. "Reforma Federacije uvod je u reformu izbornog procesa" (in Croatian). Dnevno. 13 May 2013. Archived from the original on 4 December 2013. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
  19. Luka Oreskovic: "Doing Away with Et Cetera", Foreign Policy. 30 October 2013
  20. Rubina Čengić: "Hrvati insistiraju na svom kanalu", Nezavisne novine, 12 May 2008.
  21. Samir Huseinović: "U Strazbur po TV-kanal na hrvatskom jeziku", Deutsche Welle, 11 June 2008.
  22. Bevanda, 2012.
  23. Bosnia's Future, pp. 37-8
  24. Rose, Eleanor: "Bosniaks Slap Down Calls for Bosnian Croat Entity", Balkan Insight, 30 January 2017
  25. CRP: Ustavne promjene u Bosni i Hercegovini Archived 2 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine, September 2014.
  26. Ustavne promjene, p. 8
  27. "BOSNIA: 'Sanctions if no progress on reform', warns top envoy's deputy". ADN Kronos International. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  28. Bosnia's Future, p. 37
  29. Grbavac, pp. 166–68
  30. Less, Timothy: "Dysfunction in the Balkans", Foreign Affairs, 20 December 2016
  31. Kanin, David B. "Doing harm", Transconflict, 28 February 2017
  32. Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, U-5/98 (Partial Decision Part 3), para. 26, 54, 57, 60, 61, Sarajevo, 1 July 2000
  33. Mirjana Kasapović: "PLAN BISKUPA O PREUREĐENJU BiH DOVEO BI DO RATA! Njihov prijedlog je iznimno opasan i prava je sreća da je njihova politička moć - nikakva", Globus, 24 February 2017.
  34. CRP: Ustavne promjene u Bosni i Hercegovini Archived 2 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine, p. 9 (map)
  35. "Čović: Treći entitet će činiti Hercegovina, Posavina, srednja Bosna i Žepče", Nezavisne novine, 7 January 2017
  36. "Cardinal: Croat entity would have to include RS territory", tanjug, b92.net, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2016
  37. "HSS will demand re-establishment of HR- HB in case of secession of RS", fena.ba, 22 February 2017.
  38. "Beljak u Mostaru: Hrvati Herceg-Bosne bili su na braniku Hrvatske, a ona ih je ignorirala 100 godina" Archived 23 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine, RADIO LJUBUŠKI, 22 February 2017
  39. "Evo koliko bi Hrvata živjelo u većinski hrvatskoj federalnoj jedinici u BiH", vecernji.ba, 6 February 2017
  40. "JOŠ STATISTIKE: Donosimo nacionalnu strukturu većinski hrvatskog i bošnjačkog entiteta", hms.ba, 6 February 2017
  41. Carsimamovic Vukotic et al. (March, 2017) Findings from the National Survey of Citizens’ Perceptions in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2016, p. 25.
  42. Ye Zhang and Naida Carsimamovic Vukotic (April, 2016) Findings from the National Survey of Citizens’ Perceptions in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2015, p. 26.
  43. Jazvić, Dejan. "Hrvati bi htjeli treći entitet, Bošnjaci ukidanje entiteta, a Srbi status quo", Večernji list, 7 August 2014.
  44. Jukić, Elvira: "Bosnian Croats Want Entity and TV, Poll Says", Balkan Insight, 19 December 2013
  45. Public opinion poll results - Analitical report for Office of the UN Resident Coordinator in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Prism Research, 2013, pp. 41–42
  46. Skoko, Božo. "ŠTO HRVATI, BOŠNJACI I SRBI MISLE JEDNI O DRUGIMA A ŠTO O BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI?", Ekstra, 18 April 2011.
  47. Mabry, T. J., McGarry, J., Moore, M., & O'Leary, B. (Eds.). (2013). Divided nations and European integration. University of Pennsylvania Press., pp. 243, f5.
  48. Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2012 — Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2012., p. 6
  49. "Public Opinion Poll Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) August 2010", p. 42
  50. "Public opinion poll in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) October 2009", p. 37
  51. Tuathail, G. Ó., O'Loughlin, J., & Djipa, D. (2006). Bosnia-Herzegovina ten years after Dayton: Constitutional change and public opinion. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47(1), 61–75, p. 68
  52. Mabry, T. J., McGarry, J., Moore, M., & O'Leary, B. (Eds.). (2013). Divided nations and European integration. University of Pennsylvania Press., pp. 243, f5.
  53. Nations in Transit - Bosnia and Herzegovina 2005, Freedom House

Sources

Further reading
  • Bieber, Florian (2001). "Croat Self-Government in Bosnia: A Challenge for Dayton?". European Centre for Minority Issues. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Keil, Soeren (2013.) Multinational Federalism in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Farnham & Burlington, VT: Ashgate
  • Listhaug, Ola i Sabrina P. Ramet [ur.]: Bosnia-Herzegovina since Dayton: civic and uncivic values, Ravenna: Longo Editore, 2013.
  • Markešić, Ivan [ed.] (2010.): Hrvati u BiH: ustavni položaj, kulturni razvoj i nacionalni identitet, Zagreb: Zagreb University School of Law, Center for democracy and law "Miko Tripalo", ISBN 978-953-270-044-2
  • Neškoviċ, Radomir (2013). Nedovršena država : politički sistem Bosne i Hercegovine Sarajevo : Friedrich‐Ebert Stiftung, ISBN 9789958884207
  • Tadić, Mato (2013.): Ustavni položaj Hrvata u BiH od Washingtonskog sporazuma do danas, Mostar: Matica hrvatska, ISBN 978-9958-9790-2-6
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.