Schad v. Arizona

Schad v. Arizona
Schad v. Arizona
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 27, 1991; Decided June 21, 1991
Full case name	Schad v. State of Arizona
Citations	501 U.S. 624 (more) 111 S. Ct. 2491; 115 L. Ed. 2d 555
Case history
Prior	State v. Schad, 163 Ariz. 411, 788 P.2d 1162 (1989); cert. granted, 498 U.S. 894 (1990).
Holding
	(1) Robbery is not a lesser included offense of felony murder predicated on robbery, and so Beck v. Alabama does not require a jury instruction on robbery when a defendant is charged with felony murder. (2) Because jurors need not agree on the mode of commission of an offense, Arizona may classify both premeditated murder and felony murder as first-degree murder and require that jurors unanimously agree only that first-degree murder was committed, rather than that felony murder or premeditated murder was committed.
Court membership
	Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices Byron White · Thurgood Marshall; Harry Blackmun · John P. Stevens; Sandra Day O'Connor · Antonin Scalia; Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Case opinions
Majority	Souter, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy (in full); Scalia (part III)
Concurrence	Scalia
Dissent	White, joined by Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens
Laws applied
	U.S. Const. amends. VI, XIV

Schad v. Arizona, 501 U.S. 624 (1991), is a United States Supreme Court decision that explained which charges need to be explained to the jury in trials for felony murders.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.