Sudbury (UK Parliament constituency)
Sudbury was a parliamentary constituency which was represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Sudbury | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1559–1844 | |
Number of members | two |
Sudbury | |
---|---|
Former County constituency for the House of Commons | |
1885–1950 | |
Number of members | one |
Replaced by | Sudbury and Woodbridge |
Created from | Western Division of Suffolk |
History
A parliamentary borough consisting of the town of Sudbury in Suffolk, the constituency returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) from 1559 until it was disenfranchised for corruption in 1844, after which it was absorbed into the Western Division of Suffolk. The Sudbury election of 1835, which Charles Dickens reported for the Morning Chronicle, is thought by many experts to be the inspiration for the famous Eatanswill election in his novel Pickwick Papers.[1]
It was re-established as one of five single-member county divisions of the Parliamentary County of Suffolk by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 for the 1885 general election, electing one MP by the first past the post voting system. It was abolished for the 1950 general election.
Boundaries and boundary changes
1885–1918: The part of the Municipal Borough of Sudbury in the county of Suffolk, the Sessional Divisions of Boxford, Cosford, Melford, and Risbridge, and parts of the Sessional Divisions of Newmarket, and Thingoe and Thedwestry.[2]
The county division was formed from part of the abolished Western Division, including Sudbury, Hadleigh and Haverhill.
1918–1950: The Municipal Borough of Sudbury, the Urban Districts of Glemsford, Hadleigh, and Haverhill, the Rural Districts of Clare, Cosford, and Melford, and parts of the Rural Districts of Moulton and Thingoe.[3]
Marginal changes to boundaries.
On abolition, western and northern parts, including Haverhill, transferred to Bury St Edmunds. Central, southern and western parts, including Sudbury and Hadleigh, formed part of the new county constituency of Sudbury and Woodbridge.
Members of Parliament
MPs 1559–1640
Parliament | First member | Second member |
---|---|---|
1559 | Clement Throckmorton | Henry Fortescue [4] |
1563 | John Heigham | Thomas Andrews [4] |
1571 | John Hunt | John Gurdon[4] |
1572 | Richard Eden | Martin Cole[4] |
1584 | Edward Waldegrave | Henry Blagge [4] |
1586 | Henry Blagge | Geoffrey Rusham [4] |
1588 | Thomas Eden | Thomas Jermin [4] |
1593 | William Fortescue | Dudley Fortescue [4] |
1597 | George Waldegrave | John Clapham [4] |
1601 | Philip Gawdy | Edward Glascock [4] |
1604–1611 | Sir Thomas Beckingham | Thomas Eden, jnr |
1614 | Robert Crane | Henry Binge |
1621 | Edward Osborne | Brampton Gurdon |
1624 | Robert Crane | Sir William Pooley |
1625 | Sir Nathaniel Barnardiston | Robert Crane |
1626 | Sir Nathaniel Barnardiston | Thomas Smith |
1628 | Sir Robert Crane | Sir William Pooley |
1629–1640 | No Parliaments summoned |
MPs 1640–1844
MPs 1885–1950
Elections
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Bethel Walrond | Unopposed | |||
Tory | John Walsh | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | John Walsh | 544 | 46.0 | ||
Tory | Digby Cayley Wrangham | 400 | 33.8 | ||
Whig | William Windham | 239 | 20.2 | ||
Majority | 161 | 13.6 | |||
Turnout | 656 | c. 65.6 | |||
Registered electors | c. 1,000 | ||||
Tory hold | |||||
Tory gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Michael Angelo Taylor | 263 | 33.0 | +22.9 | |
Tory | John Walsh | 253 | 31.8 | −14.2 | |
Tory | Digby Cayley Wrangham | 234 | 29.4 | −4.4 | |
Whig | John Bagshaw | 46 | 5.8 | −4.3 | |
Turnout | 474 | 93.1 | c. +27.5 | ||
Registered electors | 509 | ||||
Majority | 10 | 1.2 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | +16.1 | |||
Majority | 19 | 2.4 | −11.2 | ||
Tory hold | Swing | −12.8 |
Taylor's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Edward Barnes | 264 | 50.1 | −11.1 | |
Whig | John Bagshaw | 263 | 49.9 | +11.1 | |
Majority | 1 | 0.2 | −2.2 | ||
Turnout | 527 | 96.3 | +3.2 | ||
Registered electors | 547 | ||||
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | −11.1 | |||
- Both candidates received the same number of votes, but the mayor's vote was added in favour of Barnes
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Bagshaw | 285 | 28.4 | −4.6 | |
Whig | Benjamin Smith | 251 | 25.0 | +19.2 | |
Conservative | Edward Barnes | 241 | 24.0 | −7.8 | |
Conservative | Stephens Lyne-Stephens | 227 | 22.6 | −6.8 | |
Majority | 10 | 1.0 | −0.2 | ||
Turnout | 527 | 95.1 | +2.0 | ||
Registered electors | 554 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +1.4 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +13.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Barnes | 372 | 42.1 | +18.1 | |
Conservative | Sir James Hamilton, 2nd Baronet, of Woodbrook | 342 | 38.7 | +16.1 | |
Whig | William Abel Smith | 151 | 17.1 | −11.3 | |
Whig | Sir Thomas Edward Michell Turton, 2nd Baronet | 19 | 2.1 | −22.9 | |
Majority | 191 | 21.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 502 | 83.8 | −11.3 | ||
Registered electors | 599 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +17.6 | |||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +16.6 | |||
Hamilton's resignation caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Joseph Bailey | 303 | 54.3 | −26.5 | |
Whig | James Morrison | 255 | 45.7 | +26.5 | |
Majority | 48 | 8.6 | −13.0 | ||
Turnout | 558 | 92.7 | +8.9 | ||
Registered electors | 602 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −26.5 |
Barnes' death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Walsh | 293 | 52.4 | −28.4 | |
Whig | John Bagshaw | 266 | 47.6 | +28.4 | |
Majority | 27 | 4.8 | −16.8 | ||
Turnout | 559 | 92.9 | +9.1 | ||
Registered electors | 602 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −28.4 |
Elections in the 1840s
Walsh resigned by accepting the office of Steward of the Chiltern Hundreds in order to contest a by-election at Radnorshire, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Tomline | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Frederick Villiers Meynell | 284 | 25.5 | +8.4 | |
Whig | David Ochterlony Dyce Sombre | 281 | 25.2 | +23.1 | |
Conservative | David Jones | 274 | 24.6 | −17.5 | |
Conservative | Charles Taylor | 274 | 24.6 | −14.1 | |
Majority | 7 | 0.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 557 | 92.4 | +8.6 | ||
Registered electors | 603 | ||||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +12.1 | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +19.5 | |||
After an election petition was lodged, a Royal Commission found proof of extensive bribery and the writ was suspended in 1844. The constituency was absorbed into West Suffolk.
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Cuthbert Quilter | 4,913 | 58.7 | ||
Conservative | Thomas Weller Poley [21] | 3,461 | 41.3 | ||
Majority | 1,452 | 17.4 | |||
Turnout | 8,374 | 79.6 | |||
Registered electors | 10,522 | ||||
Liberal win (new seat) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Cuthbert Quilter | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist gain from Liberal |
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Cuthbert Quilter | 5,111 | 63.8 | N/A | |
Liberal | Arthur Graeme Ogilvie | 2,905 | 36.2 | New | |
Majority | 2,206 | 27.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,016 | 75.4 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,638 | ||||
Liberal Unionist hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Cuthbert Quilter | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | Cuthbert Quilter | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Heaton-Armstrong | 4,201 | 50.8 | New | |
Liberal Unionist | Cuthbert Quilter | 4,065 | 49.2 | N/A | |
Majority | 136 | 1.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,266 | 81.7 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,121 | ||||
Liberal gain from Liberal Unionist | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Cuthbert Quilter | 5,026 | 55.9 | +6.7 | |
Liberal | Francis Hirst | 3,958 | 44.1 | −6.7 | |
Majority | 1,068 | 11.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,984 | 89.5 | +7.8 | ||
Registered electors | 10,036 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +6.7 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Cuthbert Quilter | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
General Election 1914/15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
- Unionist: Cuthbert Quilter
- Liberal: Stephen Howard[22]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Stephen Howard | 6,656 | 52.1 | New | |
C | Unionist | Richard George Proby | 5,746 | 44.9 | N/A |
Labour | Joseph Rouse Hicks* | 390 | 3.0 | New | |
Majority | 910 | 7.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 12,792 | 48.4 | N/A | ||
Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | N/A | |||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
- * some records describe Hicks as an 'Agriculture' candidate
Elections in the 1920s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Herbert Mercer | 7,298 | 47.0 | +2.1 | |
National Liberal | Stephen Howard | 5,410 | 34.9 | New | |
Liberal | Ernest William Tanner | 2,813 | 18.1 | -34.0 | |
Majority | 1,888 | 12.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 15,521 | 59.3 | +10.9 | ||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Frederick Loverseed | 8,813 | 52.0 | * -1.0 | |
Unionist | Herbert Mercer | 8,148 | 48.0 | +1.0 | |
Majority | 665 | 4.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 16,961 | 63.8 | +4.5 | ||
Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | -1.0 | |||
- compared to combined 1922 Liberal vote.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Henry Burton | 10,579 | 53.6 | +5.6 | |
Liberal | Frederick Loverseed | 9,168 | 46.4 | -5.6 | |
Majority | 1,411 | 7.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 19,747 | 73.3 | = +9.5 | ||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +5.6 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Henry Burton | 9,715 | 40.2 | -13.4 | |
Liberal | Alan Sainsbury | 8,309 | 34.4 | -12.0 | |
Labour | W. Jack Shingfield | 6,147 | 25.4 | New | |
Majority | 1,406 | 5.8 | -1.4 | ||
Turnout | 24,171 | 75.9 | +2.6 | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | -0.7 |
Elections in the 1930s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Burton | 13,500 | 55.3 | +15.1 | |
Liberal | Alan Sainsbury | 10,929 | 44.7 | +10.3 | |
Majority | 2,571 | 10.6 | +4.8 | ||
Turnout | 24,429 | 76.7 | +0.8 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +2.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Burton | 11,700 | 49.3 | -6.0 | |
Liberal | Alan Sainsbury | 8,344 | 35.2 | -9.5 | |
Labour | Horace Denton | 3,670 | 15.5 | New | |
Majority | 3,356 | 14.1 | +3.5 | ||
Turnout | 23,714 | 74.4 | -2.3 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.7 |
Elections in the 1940s
General Election 1939/40:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1940. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place from 1939 and by the end of this year, the following candidates had been selected;
- Conservative: Henry Burton
- Liberal: Frederic Sellers
- Labour: Roland Hamilton
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Roland Hamilton | 9,906 | 40.3 | +24.8 | |
Conservative | Henry Burton | 9,659 | 39.2 | -10.1 | |
Liberal | Margaret Hitchcock | 5,045 | 20.5 | -14.7 | |
Majority | 247 | 1.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 24,610 | 69.5 | -4.9 | ||
Labour gain from Conservative | Swing | ||||
References
- M.C. Rintoul (1993). Dictionary of Real People and Places in Fiction. Taylor & Francis. p. 872. ISBN 9780415059992.
- Great Britain, Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales. The public general acts. unknown library. Proprietors of the Law Journal Reports, 1884.
- S., Craig, Fred W. (1972). Boundaries of parliamentary constituencies 1885–1972;. Chichester: Political Reference Publications. ISBN 0900178094. OCLC 539011.
- "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 20 October 2011.
- Created a baronet, July 1641
- Created a baronet, September 1772
- Created a baronet, May 1774
- On petition, the result of the election of 1774 was overturned: Fonnereau and Crespigny were declared not to have been duly elected and their opponents, Blake and Hanmer, were seated in their place
- On petition, Crespigny was declared not to have been duly elected and his opponent, Marriott was seated in his place
- Stooks Smith, Henry (1845). The Parliaments of England, from 1st George I., to the Present Time. Vol II: Oxfordshire to Wales Inclusive. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co. pp. 61–63. Retrieved 12 December 2018 – via Google Books.
- Elected on the casting vote of the returning officer after a tie in votes. His opponent petitioned against the decision, denying that the returning officer was entitled to a casting vote, but Parliament was dissolved before the issue had been settled.
- The Spectator, Volume 7. F. C. Westley. 1834. p. 702. Retrieved 13 May 2018.
- The Spectator, Volume 10. F. C. Westley. 1837. p. 651. Retrieved 13 May 2018.
- Sperling, Charles Frederick Denne (1896). A short history of the borough of Sudbury, in the county of Suffolk, compiled from materials collected by W.W. Hodson. Sudbury: Sudbury, Printed by B.R. Marten. pp. 162, 259. Retrieved 13 May 2018.
- "General Intelligence". Coventry Standard. 24 June 1853. p. 2. Retrieved 13 May 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- The 1841 election was declared void on petition and a Royal Commission was appointed to investigate, which eventually led to the disfranchisement of the constituency
- "Electoral Decisions". Northern Star and Leeds General Advertiser. 3 July 1841. p. 24. Retrieved 12 December 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Escott, Margaret. "Sudbury". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 26 April 2020.
- Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885 (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. p. 294. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885–1918. London: Macmillan Press. p. 394. ISBN 9781349022984.
- ‘WELLER-POLEY, Thomas’, Who Was Who, A & C Black, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing plc, 1920–2016; online edn, Oxford University Press, 2014 ; online edn, April 2014 accessed 22 Sept 2017
- Cambridge Independent Press 16 Jan 1914
- British parliamentary election results, 1918–1949 (Craig)
- Robert Beatson, A Chronological Register of Both Houses of Parliament (London: Longman, Hurst, Res & Orme, 1807)
- D Brunton & D H Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- Cobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803 (London: Thomas Hansard, 1808)
- F W S Craig, British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885 (2nd edition, Aldershot: Parliamentary Research Services, 1989)
- Craig, F. W. S. (1983) [1969]. British parliamentary election results 1918–1949 (3rd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. ISBN 0-900178-06-X.
- Maija Jansson (ed.), Proceedings in Parliament, 1614 (House of Commons) (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1988)
- H G Nicholas, To The Hustings: Election scenes from English fiction (London, Cassell & Co., 1956)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "S" (part 6)