2019–2020 clerical protests in Montenegro

In late December 2019, a wave of protests started against the newly adopted controversial religion law ("Law on Freedom of Religion or Belief and the Legal Status of Religious Communities") which de jure transfers the ownership of church buildings and estates from the Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral and the Serbian Orthodox Church to the Montenegrin state.

2019–2020 clerical protests in Montenegro
Protest prayer walks in front of the Cathedral of the Resurrection of Christ in Podgorica, on 26 January 2020
Date24 December 2019 – 30 August 2020
(8 months and 6 days)
Location
Montenegro
Caused by
GoalsWithdrawal of the disputed law
MethodsNonviolent protest marches, road block protests, barricade, civil disobedience
Resulted inSerbian Orthodox Church victory;
  • Opposition parties win the 2020 elections.
  • Controversial parts of the Law removed
  • 30 years of DPS rule in Montenegro ended
Parties to the civil conflict
Lead figures
Amfilohije Radović
Joanikije Mićović
Zdravko Krivokapić
Momčilo Vuksanović
Miodrag Davidović
Andrija Mandić
Nebojša Medojević
Milan Knežević
Marko Carević
Goran Danilović
Marko Milačić
Vladimir Joković
Vladimir Pavićević
Aleksa Bečić		 Milo Đukanović
Milan Roćen
Duško Marković
Zoran Pažin
Predrag Bošković
Aleksandar Bogdanović
Mevludin Nuhodžić
Srđan Darmanović
Branimir Gvozdenović
Ivan Brajović
Ranko Krivokapić
Andrija Popović
Miraš Dedeić
Jevrem Brković

Background
Further information: Freedom of religion in Montenegro

Montenegro has experienced less religious conflict than the other former Yugoslavian states, and has historically had a high degree of religious tolerance and diversity. There is, however, an outstanding dispute between the Serbian Orthodox Church and the Montenegrin Orthodox Church, as both churches lay claim to the country's many Orthodox religious sites and dispute each other's legitimacy. Churches disputed over control of the 750 Orthodox religious sites in the country. Both groups claim to be the "true" Orthodox Church of Montenegro, and hold religious ceremonies separately. Police forces have provided security for such events. This dispute dates back to the original establishment of the Montenegrin Orthodox Church as a separate entity in 1993. Since 2011, members of both churches have been barred from celebrating the transfiguration of Christ at the Church of Christ in Ivanova Korita village near the historical capital of Cetinje.[5]

According to the 2017 survey conducted by the Council of Europe in cooperation with the Office of the state ombudsman, 45% of respondents reported having experienced religious discrimination and perception of discrimination were highest by a significant margin among Serbian Orthodox Church members.[6][7] In May 2019, the Venice Commission positively evaluated the proposed draft of the Law on Freedom of Religion, but recognized the articles 62 and 63, related to the church property, as substantive issues and one of the most controversial points.[8][9] They stated that the state may in certain conditions use property, but that it must provide the right to property of religious communities.[9]

At the eight Congress of the ruling Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro (DPS) in October 2019, a new political program of the party was adopted, stating that one of the main program goals of the party in the coming period is the "renewal" of the Montenegrin Orthodox Church, which is currently unrecognized by other Eastern Orthodox churches, announcing the adoption of a new law on the status of religious communities.[10]

Passing the law and unrests
Historical flag of Montenegro, one of the symbols of the protests.

As of late December 2019, the newly proclaimed religion law or officially Law on Freedom of Religion or Belief and the Legal Status of Religious Communities, which de jure transfers the ownership of church buildings and estates built before 1918 (when the Montenegrin state was abolished and united with Kingdom of Serbia)[11] from the Serbian Orthodox Church in Montenegro to the Montenegrin state,[12][13] sparked a series of massive protests followed with road blockages[14][15] which continued to February 2020.[16] Eighteen members of the parliament (opposition Democratic Front MPs) were arrested prior to the voting, under the charge for violently disrupting the vote.[17] Some Serb Orthodox clerics were attacked by the police.[18] and a number of journalists, opposition activists and protesting citizens were arrested.[19][20]

On 29 December 2019 Episcopal Council of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Montenegro excommunicated President of Montenegro Đukanović and Government coalition MPs and officials for passing religious law.[21]

2020 religion law protests
Cetinje Monastery, the seat of the Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral

Demonstrations continued into January, February and March 2020 as peaceful protest walks, mostly organised by the Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral of the Serbian Orthodox Church in most of Montenegrin municipalities. As time went on a considerable percentage of Montenegro's population took to streets opposing the law. During February peaceful public gatherings reached over 50 or even 60,000 attendees in Podgorica alone and they are increasingly described as the most massive public gatherings in history of Montenegro. During peaceful protests in early 2020, more cases of police abuse of office and violence against protesting citizens and political activists were reported, several opposition activists and journalists were also arrested.[22]

European External Action Service (EEAS) pointed at fair reporting but also propaganda, disinformation and fake news in the media reports on the riots and the political crisis in Montenegro, which reached its peaks in the first week of January 2020. EEAS reported that sources of the false reporting included media which were based in Serbia (some of them state-owned), Russian-owned in Serbian language media Sputnik and some Montenegro-based news portals.[23][24] In March 2020 all protests have been paused by the Serbian Orthodox Church due to COVID-19 pandemic in Montenegro.[25]

On 13 May Bishop of Budimlja and Nikšić Joanikije Mićović and several other priests were arrested on charges of alleged organisation of a religious protest rally in Nikšić, although public gatherings were forbidden in the country due to the coronavirus pandemic.[26]

Protest prayer walks (litije), in front of the Old Town of Kotor, Jan 2020.

The police responded violently towards the peaceful protesters, with several police crackdowns taking place, resulting in beatings and arrests[27] which were highly criticised by other governments of Europe. Serbian authorities has repeatedly demanded release of bishop Joanikije, as well the other arrested Serb Orthodox clerics. During the next few days, the protests continued throughout the country, a couple of thousand remaining protesting citizens demanded the release of the arrested eparchy priests from detention, with more cases of police brutality reported.[28] On 16 May the Bishop of Budimlja and Niksić, Joanikije, along with other arrested clerics, were released after 72 hours passed from the processing, in accordance with the law, although a formal lawsuit was created against Joanikije and other arrested clerics, and is, as of the 16th of May, pending.[29]

Amid the 12 May protest in Niksic a correspondent journalist of Serbia-based Vecernje Novosti was arrested and his eyes were pepper sprayed while he reporting from the protest, journalist was released after three hours, but the material he had filmed was deleted by the police, which many media, NGOs and the OSCE mission characterized as another attack on media freedoms in Montenegro. Both the Associations of Journalists of Montenegro and Serbia condemned the arrest.[30]

The mass protests resumed in June, but after a few weeks, the Montenegrin government reintroduced a ban on public and religious gatherings due to a new wave of COVID-19 virus spread, so the protests were stopped again. Many have labeled the government's move as political, to stem protests against the enactment of a religion law, during the August 2020 parliamentary election campaign in the country.[31]

Even if public gatherings were banned, citizens organized several anti-government and pro-church protest walks during July and August, as well as protest car rallies, protesting against the law on religious communities and the DPS-led government.[32]

Government reactions

Montenegrin government and ruling Democratic Party of Socialists officials, including president Milo Đukanović and members of the current Cabinet of Montenegro blamed the Belgrade-based media and Government of Serbia for the current political crisis, destabilization and unrest across the country, claiming that the ongoing Church protests actually are not against the disputed law but against Montenegrin statehood and independence. Serbian Orthodox Church in Montenegro categorically rejects that allegations.[33] President Milo Đukanović called the protesting citizens "a lunatic movement".[34]

International reactions

Serbian reactions

Foreign Minister of Serbia Ivica Dačić said the Montenegrin government should discuss the controversial Religious Law with its citizens and called on Serbian citizens of Montenegrin descent to publicly state their views on the recent developments in Montenegro, saying that people who support Montenegrin Government should have their Serbian citizenship reviewed.[35]

Protest in Belgrade over the controversial Church law in Montenegro
Slogan of the protests (Ne damo svetinje) as a street graffiti

Following mass protests by Serbian Orthodox Church and ethnic Serbs in Montenegro agitation against the law has spread to neighbouring Serbia. On 2 January 2020, several thousand fans of the Red Star Belgrade marched to the Montenegrin embassy in Belgrade to support the protests in Montenegro against the law, setting off fireworks that partially burned the flag of Montenegro outside the embassy building. Several Serbian far-right organisations also joined the rally. Although the event was announced, the embassy was allegedly left unguarded by the Serbian police, with only undercover security units present, which sparked criticism from Montenegro.[36][37] President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić denied these claims and stated that the embassy was well-guarded[38] and Serbian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the vandalism and stated that the Montenegrin government is trying to shift the blame for ongoing crisis on Serbia.[39]

Peaceful protest against the controversial Religious Law took place in Belgrade, Novi Sad, Kragujevac, and a number of other cities and towns in Serbia.[40][41]

Hip-hop collective Beogradski sindikat released a song about the ongoing protest. When attempting to enter Montenegro they were not allowed entrance, and another group member was deported from Podgorica Airport without any official explanation.[42][43] Tennis player Novak Djokovic supported the ongoing protests, as well as Basketball player Nikola Mirotić.[44]

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Citizens of Bijeljina, Trebinje, Pale, Gacko and Banja Luka organised several peaceful protest against the proclaimed law.[45][46] Serb member of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina Milorad Dodik also participated in the protest rally in Banja Luka, calling the law discriminatory against the Serbian church and its property and called for law withdrawal.[47] A group of citizens from Gacko walked several kilometers in order to support the ongoing peaceful protests, but was not allowed entry to Montenegro as they were deemed "threat to national security of Montenegro".

Diaspora

Around 2,000 people from Chicago metropolitan area protested against the proclaimed law.[48] On 8 March 2020 a Serbian Orthodox Eparchy of Austria and Switzerland organized in Vienna a protest rally against the Montenegrin religion law.[49]

Russian reactions

Bishop Hilarion (Alfeyev) stated that Russian Orthodox Church firmly stands with the position held by Serbian Orthodox Church. He also stated that the newly adopted law represents direct meddling of Montenegrin government into affairs of the church.

On 29 February 2020 a senior Russian-backed bishop in Ukraine Onufriy Berezovsky participated and led a prayer walk and protest rally in Podgorica, reflecting tense relations between the Montenegrin government and Russia.[50]

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia has publicly denied all of the allegations of the Montenegrin government on the involvement of the Russian Federation in events and ongoing crisis in Montenegro.[51]

United States reactions

In the annual International Religious Freedom Report, the State Department wrote that the Serbian Orthodox Church strongly criticized the law, which stipulates religious property lacking clear ownership and that, after the passing of the religion law, they organized regular peaceful protests in which hundreds of thousands turned out.[52] The report said that the Montenegrin government continued its policy of not providing restitution of religious properties expropriated by the former Yugoslav communist government, as well as that contrary to the announcements, this law did not address the restitution issues.[52] Furthermore, the State Department described the protests as generally peaceful except for isolated incidents of violence against the police, accompanied by online incitements to violence.[52] The report mentioned that the government and analysts said there was an apparently coordinated campaign of disinformation, propaganda, and provocation, "seeking to fan ethnonationalistic divisions and provoke conflict through the protests."[52]

In June 2020 the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom state that Christian rights have been attacked in Montenegro by a controversial law, and protests continue after the adoption of the Law on Religion, which many believe will allow the government to confiscate religious property, the ban on religious gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic has further increased tensions. Commissioner Johnnie Moore Jr. pay special attention to the arrest of Metropolitan Amfilohije. Commission are critical of the rather restrained attitude of European officials towards such persecution of Christians. The decision not to extend the position of the European Union Special Envoy, whose mandate included the promotion of freedom of religion and belief, is marked as particularly unjustified.[53]

Non-governmental organizations

The Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, a non-governmental organization concerned with human rights issues in Serbia, accused the government of Serbia of standing behind the riots and attempt to destabilize Montenegro and influence the internal affairs of this country.[54][55]

Freedom House, the US-based non-governmental organization that measures the degree of civil liberties and political rights in the world, described that the religion law is widely seen to target the Serbian Orthodox Church and that its adoption as one of the "questionable decisions".[56] They explain that the requirements of the law likely burden the Serbian Orthodox Church and that it provoked peaceful nationwide protests.[56]

See also

References
  1. Vulin: Nećemo ćutati dok Crna Gora otima svetinje Srba; Dačić: Biće teških posledica Archived 2020-09-11 at the Wayback Machine, Novosti (December 2019)
  2. Od napada litije sve masovnije: Dačić poručio da se Đukanović preigrao Archived 2020-09-11 at the Wayback Machine, Novosti (February 2020)
  3. Vučić i Irinej: U Crnoj Gori cilj da se protjera srpski narod, uništi SPC i stvori nova nacija - crnogorska Archived 2020-09-11 at the Wayback Machine, Antena M/Tanjug (May 2020)
  4. Vučić: Srpski narod u Crnoj Gori će uvek imati našu pomoć i podršku Archived 2020-09-11 at the Wayback Machine, Srbija danas/Tanjug (June 2020)
  5. International Religious Freedom Report 2017 Montenegro Archived 2020-09-10 at the Wayback Machine, US Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  6. "Discrimination Patterns in Montenegro". Council of Europe. Archived from the original on 11 September 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  7. "2017 Report on International Religious Freedom: Montenegro". United States Department of State. Archived from the original on 10 September 2020. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
  8. "Montenegro: Opinion on the draft law on freedom of religion or beliefs and legal status of religious communities". Venice Commission. 24 June 2019. Archived from the original on 18 July 2020. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
  9. "Montenegrin Law on Religious Freedom: Polarization that benefits the government(s)?". European Western Balkans. 13 January 2020. Archived from the original on 7 May 2020. Retrieved 2 September 2020.
  10. ĐUKANOVIĆ NAJAVIO PREISPITIVANJE VLASNIČKIH ODNOSA CRKVENIH OBJEKATA Archived 2020-06-28 at the Wayback Machine, Mondo
  11. U Crnoj Gori stupio na snagu Zakon o slobodi vjeroispovijesti Archived 2020-02-19 at the Wayback Machine, Radio Slobodna Evropa
  12. Reuters (2019-12-26). "Serbs Protest in Montenegro Ahead of Vote on Religious Law". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2019-12-26. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  13. "Montenegro's Attack on Church Property Will Create Lawless Society". Balkan Insight. 2019-06-14. Archived from the original on 2019-06-17. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  14. "Montenegro Adopts Law on Religious Rights Amid Protests by pro-Serbs". Voice of America. Archived from the original on 2019-12-28. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  15. "Protesti u Crnoj Gori: Građani Berana blokirali put, policija upotrebila suzavac". www.021.rs. Archived from the original on 2019-12-29. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  16. "Several Thousand Protest Church Bill in Montenegro". The New York Times. Associated Press. 2020-01-01. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2020-01-02. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  17. "Montenegro's parliament approves religion law despite protests". BBC. 2019-12-27. Archived from the original on 2019-12-29. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  18. "Episkop Metodije, posle prebijanja u Crnoj Gori, hospitalizovan na VMA". Politika Online. Archived from the original on 2020-01-26. Retrieved 2020-01-20.
  19. Reuters (2019-12-30). "Montenegrin Protesters Clash With Police Over Religion Law". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2019-12-30. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  20. Vojvodine, Javna medijska ustanova JMU Radio-televizija. "Marko Milačić uhapšen zbog jučerašnjeg protesta, Carević pozvao građane Budve večeras na protest". JMU Radio-televizija Vojvodine. Archived from the original on 2020-01-16. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
  21. Episkopski savet: Milo i poslanici izopšteni iz SPC, B92
  22. Pismo evropskim institucijama povodom hapšenja novinara u Crnoj Gori Archived 2020-01-16 at the Wayback Machine, Aljazeera
  23. EU vs Disinfo: Dezinformacije zaoštravaju odnose Crne Gore i Srbije Archived 2020-09-11 at the Wayback Machine, aktuelno.me
  24. Disinformation sharpened tensions between Serbia and Montenegro Archived 2020-02-23 at the Wayback Machine, euvsdisinfo.eu
  25. "U Crnoj Gori obustavljaju se litije zbog korona virusa". Al Jazeera Balkans (in Bosnian). 2020-03-13. Archived from the original on 2020-03-26. Retrieved 2020-03-26.
  26. "Unrest in Montenegro after arrest of SPC clergy; Vucic to talk to Serbs there". N1 Srbija (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 2020-09-11. Retrieved 2020-05-15.
  27. Protesters clash with police after priests arrest Archived 2020-05-28 at the Wayback Machine, Balkan insight, Retrieved: 2020-12-30
  28. Amfilohije poziva 'uhapsite mene', premijer optužuje za 'brutalan napad' na državu Archived 2020-05-21 at the Wayback Machine, Radio Slobodna Evropa
  29. Bishop Joanikije freed! The people exclaimed "Our Bishop!", "it's a victory!" Archived 2020-06-08 at the Wayback Machine, Mondo
  30. "Solidarnost sa našim kolegom i protest zbog eskalacije režimske torture": Udruženje novinara Crne Gore osudilo hapšenje dopisnika "Novosti" Archived 2020-09-11 at the Wayback Machine, Večernje Novosti
  31. Crnogorska vlada zabranila litije Archived 2020-07-02 at the Wayback Machine, JMU Radio-televizija Vojvodine
  32. Protesti u više gradova, Nikšićani pozvani da se ne okupljaju za vikend Archived 2020-08-29 at the Wayback Machine, Vijesti, 28 August 2020
  33. Cilj nam je da promijenimo zakon, a ne državu Archived 2020-02-05 at the Wayback Machine, CdM
  34. "Đukanović: "To je ludački pokret", DF: "Mi smo deo tog pokreta"". Independent Balkan News Agency. 2020-01-28. Archived from the original on 2020-02-13. Retrieved 2020-02-13.
  35. Dačić: Pitanje da li onaj ko podržava Podgoricu i dalje treba da ima državljanstvo Srbije Archived 2020-01-26 at the Wayback Machine, Radio Slobodbna Evropa
  36. Protesti u Crnoj Gori i Beogradu protiv Zakona o slobodi vjeroispovijesti Archived 2020-11-30 at the Wayback Machine, Glas Amerike
  37. Beograd: Huligani raketama gađali zastavu Crne Gore, niko nije pokušao da ih spriječi, Vijesti
  38. "Burne reakcije iz Crne Gore nakon pokušaja paljenja zastave u Beogradu". Al Jazeera Balkans (in Bosnian). 2020-01-03. Archived from the original on 2020-02-02. Retrieved 2020-02-02.
  39. "Ministarstvo spoljnih poslova Srbije osudilo pokušaj paljenja zastave Crne Gore". Radio Slobodna Evropa (in Serbo-Croatian). Archived from the original on 2020-02-02. Retrieved 2020-02-02.
  40. "FOTO, VIDEO: U Novom Sadu protest protiv "antisrpskog režima u Crnoj Gori", na čelu kolone vladika Irinej". www.021.rs. Archived from the original on 2020-02-11. Retrieved 2020-02-02.
  41. "U Kragujevcu protest i moleban za "prestanak terora nad crkvom u Crnoj Gori"". N1 Srbija (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 2020-02-02. Retrieved 2020-02-02.
  42. Nedeljnik.rs (2020-02-22). ""Beogradski sindikat" vraćen s crnogorske granice: "Zabranjen nam je ulaz bez ikakvog objašnjenja"". Nedeljnik. Archived from the original on 2020-02-23. Retrieved 2020-02-23.
  43. Tanjug (2020-02-22). "Članovi "Beogradskog sindikata" vraćeni sa granice sa Crnom Gorom". Nezavisne novine (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 2020-02-23. Retrieved 2020-02-23.
  44. N.N (2020-02-16). "Mirotić u Crnoj Gori, stigao na litiju". Nezavisne novine (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 2020-03-26. Retrieved 2020-03-26.
  45. Bjelica, Nikolija (2019-12-30). "Republika srpska: Protesti u Republici Srpskoj protiv zakona u Crnoj Gori" [Protests in Republika Srpska against the law in Montenegro] (in Serbian). Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 2020-07-10. Retrieved 2020-02-17.
  46. "I u Trebinju održan protest podrške crnogorskim Srbima". Radio Slobodna Evropa (in Serbo-Croatian). Archived from the original on 2020-02-17. Retrieved 2020-02-17.
  47. Dodik: Neprihvatljiv crnogorski Zakon o slobodi vjeroispovjesti Archived 2020-02-19 at the Wayback Machine, ATV, 19-1-2020
  48. Serbia, RTS, Radio televizija Srbije, Radio Television of. "Čikago, prva litija podrške protiv spornog zakona o slobodi veroispovesti". www.rts.rs. Archived from the original on 2020-02-17. Retrieved 2020-02-17.
  49. Podrška SPC i u Austriji: Litija u Beču Archived 2020-09-11 at the Wayback Machine, 8 March 2020, Mondo
  50. Mitropolit Onufrije u Podgorici: U Crnoj Gori i Ukrajini progon crkve Archived 2020-03-01 at the Wayback Machine, Danas, 29 February 2020
  51. D, Piše: S. "Rusija odbacuje optužbe Crne Gore". Dnevni list Danas (in Serbian). Archived from the original on 2020-03-26. Retrieved 2020-03-26.
  52. "2019 Report on International Religious Freedom: Montenegro". United States Department of State. Archived from the original on 2020-06-11. Retrieved 2020-06-12.
  53. Članovi Komisije SAD: Napad na hrišćane u Crnoj Gori Archived 2020-06-27 at the Wayback Machine, Radio Slobodna Evropa
  54. Apel za osudu ugrožavanja mira u Crnoj Gori i regionu od strane Beograda Archived 2020-02-19 at the Wayback Machine, Peščanik
  55. Helsinški odbor za ljudska prava: Srbija strateg nemira u Crnoj Gori Archived 2020-01-31 at the Wayback Machine
  56. "Nation in Transit 2020: Montenegro". Freedom House. Archived from the original on 2020-05-15.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.