Columbia Law Review

The Columbia Law Review is a law review edited and published by students at Columbia Law School. The journal publishes scholarly articles, essays, and student notes.

Columbia Law Review
DisciplineJurisprudence
LanguageEnglish
Edited byOluwatumise Asebiomo[1]
Publication details
History1901–present
Publisher
Columbia Law Review Association, Inc.[2] (United States)
Frequency8/year
2.224 (2018)
Standard abbreviations
BluebookColum. L. Rev.
ISO 4Columbia Law Rev.
Indexing
CODENCOLRAO
ISSN0010-1958
LCCN29-10105
JSTOR00101958
OCLC no.01564231
Links

It was established in 1901 by Joseph E. Corrigan and John M. Woolsey, who served as the review's first editor-in-chief and secretary. The Columbia Law Review is one of four law reviews that publishes the Bluebook.

History

The Columbia Law Review represents the school's third attempt at a student-run law periodical. In 1885, the Columbia Jurist was founded by a group of six students but ceased publication in 1887.[3] Despite its short run, the Jurist is credited with partially inspiring the creation of the Harvard Law Review, which began publication a short time later.[4]

The second journal, the Columbia Law Times was founded in 1887 and closed down in 1893 due to lack of revenue.[5]

Publication of the current Columbia Law Review began in 1901,[6] making it the fifth oldest surviving law review in the US. Dean William Keener took an active involvement during its founding to help ensure its longevity.[7]

Impact

The Columbia Law Review was the top-cited law journal during the 2018 Supreme Court term.[8]

According to the Journal Citation Reports the Columbia Law Review had a 2009 impact factor of 3.610, ranking it third out of 116 journals in the category "Law".[9] In 2007 the Columbia Law Review ranked second for submissions and citations within the legal academic community, after Harvard Law Review.[10]

Notable alumni

Notable alumni of the Columbia Law Review include:

Past Editors-in-Chief
Past Review Editors-in-Chief (1990-2018) [11]
Year Name
2019-2020 Mary Marshall
2018-2019 Tomi O. Williams[12]
2017-2018 Kelsey A. Ruescher [13]
2016-2017 Daniela Dekhtyar [14]
2015-2016 Krystina L. Ho [15]
2014-2015 Dennis Fan [16]
2013-2014 Angela A. Sun [17]
2012-2013 Liliana Zaragoza [18]
2011-2012 Maren Hulden [19]
2010-2011 Farhang Heydari [20]
2009-2010 Devi M. Rao [21]
2008-2009 Z. W. Julius Chen [22]
2007-2008 Karin S. Portlock [23]
2006-2007 Grant R. Mainland [24]
2005-2006 Young K. Lee [25]
2004-2005 Richard A. Kaplan [26]
2003-2004 Elizabeth M. Evenson [27]
2002-2003 Pankaj Venugopal [28]
2001-2002 Margaret L. Taylor [29]
2000-2001 Joellen R. Valentine [30]
1999-2000 Bryan R. Diederich [31]
1998-1999 Lawrence Wu [32]
1997-1998 Joshua Waldman [33]
1996-1997 William Savitt [34]
1995-1996 Geoffrey B. Goldman [35]
1994-1995 Susan Stayn [36]
1993-1994 Joseph P. Liu [37]
1992-1993 Elizabeth L. Earle [38]
1991-1992 Daniel P. Penn [39]
1990-1991 Nancy L. Sanborn [40]

Notable articles

  • Cohen, Felix S. (1935). "Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach". Columbia Law Review. 35 (6): 809–849. doi:10.2307/1116300. JSTOR 1116300.
  • Fuller, Lon L. (1941). "Consideration and Form". Columbia Law Review. 41 (5): 799–824. doi:10.2307/1117840. JSTOR 1117840.
  • Frankfurter, Felix (1947). "Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes". Columbia Law Review. 47 (4): 527–546. doi:10.2307/1118049. JSTOR 1118049. S2CID 158802030.
  • Hart, Henry M. (1954). "The Relations Between State and Federal Law". Columbia Law Review. 54 (4): 489–542. doi:10.2307/1119546. JSTOR 1119546.
  • Wechsler, Herbert (1954). "The Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Role of the States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government". Columbia Law Review. 54 (4): 543–560. doi:10.2307/1119547. JSTOR 1119547.

References
  1. https://www.law.columbia.edu/news/archive/meet-columbia-law-review-editor-chief-oluwatumise-asebiomo-21. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. "Columbia Law Review on JSTOR". www.jstor.org. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  3. Swygert, Michael; Bruce, Jon (1985). "The Historical Origins, Founding, and Early Development of Student-Edited Law Reviews". Hastings Law Journal. 36 (5): 739. ISSN 0017-8322.
  4. Association (1886- ), Harvard Law School; School, Harvard Law (1918). The Centennial History of the Harvard Law School, 1817-1917. Harvard law school association. p. 139.
  5. Swygert & Bruce 1985, p. 782.
  6. "About the Review". Columbia Law Review.
  7. Swygert & Bruce 1985, p. 783.
  8. "Empirical SCOTUS: What the justices cited in OT 2018". SCOTUSblog. July 24, 2019.
  9. "Web of Science". 2011. Retrieved June 26, 2011.
  10. "Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking". Archived from the original on May 8, 2006. Retrieved January 15, 2007.
  11. "Archived Mastheads". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law Review. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  12. Review, Columbia Law. "Announcements 2018–2019". Columbia Law Review. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  13. "Announcements 2017–2018".
  14. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 116 (6). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  15. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 115 (6). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  16. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  17. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  18. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  19. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  20. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  21. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 110 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  22. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 109 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  23. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 108 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  24. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 107 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  25. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 106 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  26. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 105 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  27. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 104 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  28. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 103 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  29. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 102 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  30. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 101 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  31. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 100 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  32. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 99 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  33. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 98 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  34. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 97 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  35. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 96 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  36. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 95 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  37. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 94 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  38. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 93 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  39. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 92 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  40. "Columbia Law Review" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. 91 (1). Retrieved February 5, 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.