Criticism of Spotify

Spotify, a music streaming company, has attracted significant criticism since its 2008 launch,[1] mainly over artist compensation. Unlike physical sales or downloads, which pay artists a fixed price per song or album sold, Spotify pays royalties based on the artist's "market share"—the number of streams for their songs as a proportion of total songs streamed on the service. Spotify distributes approximately 70% of its total revenue to rights holders, who then pay artists based on their individual agreements. Multiple artists have criticised the policy, most notably Thom Yorke and Taylor Swift, who temporarily withdrew their music from the service.

Spotify faces particular scrutiny due to its free service tier, which allows users to listen free with advertisements between tracks. The tier has led to a variety of major album releases being delayed or withdrawn from the service. Spotify claims it benefits the industry by migrating users away from piracy and less monetized platforms and encouraging them to upgrade to paid accounts. Record labels keep a large amount of Spotify earnings.

Spotify has also attracted media attention for several security breaches, as well as for controversial moves including a significant change to its privacy policy, "pay-for-play" practices based on receiving money from labels for putting specific songs on popular playlists, and allegedly creating "fake artists" for prominent playlist placement, which Spotify denies.

Business practices

Allegations of unfair artist compensation

Spotify, together with the music streaming industry in general, faces criticism from some artists and producers, claiming they are being unfairly compensated for their work as music sales decline and music streaming increases.[2] Unlike physical sales or legal downloads, which pay artists a fixed price per song or album sold, Spotify pays royalties based on their "market share"—the number of streams for their songs as a proportion of total songs streamed on the service. Spotify distributes approximately 70% of its total revenue to rights-holders, who will then pay artists based on their individual agreements.[3]

The variable (and some say unsustainable)[4] nature of this compensation, has led to criticism. In a 2009 Guardian article, Helienne Lindvall wrote about why "major labels love Spotify", writing that the labels receive 18% of shares from the streaming company—something that artists themselves never actually get. She further wrote that "On Spotify, it seems, artists are not equal. There are indie labels that, as opposed to the majors and Merlin members, receive no advance, receive no minimum per stream, and only get a 50% share of ad revenue on a pro-rata basis (which so far has amounted to next to nothing)."[5] In 2009, Swedish musician Magnus Uggla pulled his music from the service, stating that after six months he had earned "what a mediocre busker could earn in a day".[6]

Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet reported in 2009 that the record label Racing Junior earned only NOK 19 ($3.00 USD) after their artists had been streamed over 55,100 times.[7] According to an infographic by David McCandless, an artist on Spotify would need over four million streams per month to earn the U.S. minimum monthly wage of $1,160.[8] In October 2011, U.S. independent label Projekt Records stated: "In the world I want to live in, I envision artists fairly compensated for their creations, because we (the audience) believe in the value of what artists create. The artist's passion, dedication, and expression is respected and rewarded. Spotify is NOT a service that does this. Projekt will not be part of this unprincipled concept."[9]

In March 2012, Patrick Carney of The Black Keys said that "Spotify isn't fair to artists",[10] and further commented that streaming services "are becoming more popular, but it still isn’t at a point where you’re able to replace royalties from record sales with the royalties from streams. For a band that makes a living selling music, it's not at a point where it’s feasible for us."[11] Replying to Spotify board member Sean Parker's claim that Spotify would make more money for the music industry than iTunes, Carney said: "That guy has $2 billion that he made from figuring out ways to steal royalties from artists, and that's the bottom line. You can't really trust anybody like that."[10] In May 2012, British Theatre vocalist and Biffy Clyro touring guitarist Mike Vennart stated: "I'd sooner people stole my work than stream it from [Spotify]. They pay the artists virtually nothing. Literally pennies per month. Yet they make a killing. They've forced the sales way down in certain territories, which wouldn't be so bad if the bands actually got paid."[12]

Singer David Byrne of Talking Heads criticized streaming services such as Spotify in October 2013, writing: "If artists have to rely almost exclusively on the income from these services, they'll be out of work within a year." Byrne concluded his piece by admitting "I don't have an answer."[13] In March 2014, American funk band Vulfpeck exposed a loophole in Spotify's royalty calculation model. The band created an album titled Sleepify, which consisted solely of silence. The band asked users to stream the album on a loop while they slept to increase the amount of money earned. The album was pulled by Spotify in April 2014, citing unspecified service violation. Vulfpeck had accumulated enough streams to result in around $20,000 in royalties before the album was pulled.[14][15][16] In July 2015, Neil Young removed almost all of his music from Spotify and other streaming services, citing low sound quality as the primary reason. He stated that he did not think his fans deserved the low quality they were receiving, and said it was bad for his music.[17] Young's music has since returned to Spotify and other streaming services.[18]

In response, Spotify claims that they are benefiting the music business by "migrating them away from piracy and less monetized platforms, and allowing them to generate far greater royalties than before" by offering a free, ad-supported service tier, and then encouraging users to opt into the paid subscription.[3]

In an additional response on July 31, 2020, Hypebeast reported Ceo Daniel Ek's recent stance in their article called "Billionaire Spotify CEO Wants Musicians to Work Harder, Stop Complaining About Streaming Royalties".

On August 2, 2020, MarketWatch reported on the artist's response to Daniel Ek's implication that they should work harder in an article called "Musicians Have Some Choice Words For Spotify Ceo Daniel Ek Who Says They Should Work Harder".

On October 14, 2020, a Spotify Inventor's response to the general allegation of unfair compensation was also released by independent artist Ashley Jana in the form of an audio recording on YouTube The recording features excerpts from an interview that took place on June 14, 2019 at the NYC Sync Summit at Les Poisson Rouge (where Jim Anderson, a Spotify Inventor who was described on the Sync Summit website as "The man who built out the system architecture of Spotify") was a guest speaker. Jim Anderson can also be found on Angel's List underneath Spotify CEO Daniel Ek in the Spotify "People" column. In the released recording, Jim Anderson made several comments in response to Ashley Jana's question, which centered around the general allegation of unfair artist compensation. Some of the comments that Jim Anderson made in response were the following: " So, maybe I should go down the entitlement road now? Or should I wait a few minutes?", " Kay. Okay, so we should talk about entitlement. Alright. I mean, I have an issue with Taylor Swift's comments." , " The problem is this. Spotify was created to solve a problem. The problem was this - piracy and music distribution. The problem was to get artists' music out there to solve a problem. The problem was not to pay people money.", " I mean, I consider myself an artist because I'm an inventor, okay? Now, I freely give away my patents for nothing. I never collect royalties on anything.", "I think that Taylor Swift doesn't need .000001 cent more a stream.", and " This wor.. world right now we live in is built also on entitlement. Right now today, everybody here in this younger world here - everybody seems to think about entitlement.". The artist who released the recording stated within the video caption that she has access to the full recording, and that she can be compared to Woodward.

Support to Spotify

In June 2012, Charles Caldas, CEO of the Merlin Network (a representative body for over 10,000 independent labels), clarified that Spotify pays royalties to the music labels, and not the artists. According to Caldas, the payments Merlin’s labels received from Spotify rose 250 percent from the year ending March 2011 to the year ending March 2012, while at the time, the revenue per user was "the highest it has been since the launch of the service". Caldas said that Merlin had observed "consistent, ongoing growth on revenue per user, revenue per stream, and the total revenue" that Spotify generates for the labels it represents. "The thing about ‘Spotify doesn’t pay artists enough’—Spotify doesn’t pay artists... They pay labels", said Caldas.[19]

Caldas also highlighted the issue of time lag for artists, as they are not gaining an impression of Spotify's status at the time they receive their payments. They are "getting reporting quarterly, or six-monthly, on sales that happened six months ago." Caldas explained that "royalty statements could be a year old".[19]

In February 2015, Music Business Worldwide reported on a French study between music trade body SNEP and EY that concluded that major labels kept 73% of Spotify Premium payouts, while writers/publishers received 16%, and artists received 11%.[20] Mike Masnick of Techdirt wrote: "Sure, in the past, it may have been reasonable for the labels to take on large fees for distribution, but that's when it meant manufacturing tons of plastic and vinyl, and then shipping it to thousands of record stores around the globe. In this case, there's no manufacturing, and distribution is an "upload" button.[21]

Spotify's "artist-in-residence" aid

In February 2012, Forbes reported on "Spotify's secret weapon": musician D. A. Wallach, member of the band Chester French and former Harvard classmate of Mark Zuckerberg. He acts as Spotify's "artist-in-residence" and helps Spotify "brainstorm artist-friendly applications that can be carved from the gusher of data it collects". One such application includes geographical data of which cities listen to artists' music the most as suitable tour locations. He told Forbes:[22]

We're working very carefully to make Spotify the most artist-friendly company that has ever existed. ... We’re very interested in a high level of letting artists directly connect to their fans and manage that relationship and deliver value to their fans, and vice versa. We want to do that really elegantly, at a scale that's never existed before.

In a June interview with Hypebot, Wallach reported that $180 million of royalties was paid out in 2011 and 70% of Spotify's revenue consisted of royalty payments. Spotify's growth meant that the per-stream royalty rate doubled between the service's inception and mid-2012. He said that, at the time, compared to iTunes, the average listener spends $60 annually on music, whereas Spotify Premium users spend twice that amount. According to Wallach in 2012: "The growth of the platform is proportional to the royalty pay out, and since inception, we’ve already doubled the effective per play rate."[23]

Thom Yorke
Radiohead singer Thom Yorke (front) and producer Nigel Godrich (rear) have accused Spotify of not supporting new artists fairly.

In July 2013, Radiohead singer Thom Yorke and producer Nigel Godrich removed their band Atoms for Peace and Yorke's solo music from Spotify. In a tweet, Yorke stated: "Make no mistake—new artists you discover on #Spotify will not get paid. Meanwhile, shareholders will shortly be rolling in it. Simples." Godrich stated: "[Streaming] cannot work as a way of supporting new artists' work. Spotify and the like either have to address that fact and change the model for new releases, or else all new music producers should be bold and vote with their feet."[24]

In an October 2013 interview with Mexican website Sopitas, Yorke said: "I feel like as musicians, we need to fight the Spotify thing. I feel that, in some ways, what's happening in the mainstream is the last gasp of the old industry. Once that does finally die, which it will, something else will happen." He described Spotify as "the last desperate fart of a dying corpse".[25] Spotify responded in a statement that it was "still in the early stages of a long-term project that's already having a hugely positive effect on artists and new music", and that it is "100% committed to making Spotify the most artist-friendly music service possible, and are constantly talking to artists and managers about how Spotify can help build their career".[26] In 2015, Brian Message, partner at Radiohead's management company Courtyard Management,[27] stated that he disagreed with Yorke, noting that Spotify pays 70 percent of its revenue back to the music industry. He said that "Thom's issue was that the pipe has become so jammed ... We encourage all of our artists to take a long-term approach ... Plan for the long term, understand that it's a tough game."[28]

On 17 June 2016, Radiohead's ninth album, A Moon Shaped Pool, was made available on Spotify, six weeks after it was released on paid-for streaming services including Apple Music and Tidal and Deezer. Spotify had been in "advanced discussions" with Radiohead's management and label to make A Moon Shaped Pool the first album available exclusively to Spotify's paid subscribers, but no agreement was reached. Spotify spokesperson Jonathan Prince stated: "Some of the approaches we explored with Radiohead were new, and we ultimately decided that we couldn’t deliver on those approaches technologically in time for the album's release schedule."[29] In Rainbows, the only other Radiohead album not previously available on Spotify, was added on 10 June 2016.[30] Yorke's solo material and Atoms for Peace were re-added in December 2017.[31]

Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift, pictured in 2017, temporarily removed her music from Spotify.

In July 2014, Taylor Swift wrote an article in The Wall Street Journal in which she stated: "Music is art, and art is important and rare. Important, rare things are valuable. Valuable things should be paid for. It's my opinion that music should not be free, and my prediction is that individual artists and their labels will someday decide what an album's price point is. I hope they don't underestimate themselves or undervalue their art."[32] On 3 November 2014, Swift removed her discography from Spotify. Swift had previously delayed the streaming of her 2012 album Red.[33] Swift stated: "I'm not willing to contribute my life's work to an experiment that I don't feel fairly compensates the writers, producers, artists, and creators of this music. And I just don't agree with perpetuating the perception that music has no value and should be free."[34]

Spotify launched a social media campaign to persuade Swift to return and, in a statement on its website, claimed that nearly 16 million of over 40 million users had played her music in the preceding 30-day period.[35] Spotify CEO Daniel Ek wrote: "Taylor Swift is absolutely right; music is art, art has real value, and artists deserve to be paid for it. ... At our current size, payouts for a top artist like Taylor Swift (before she pulled her catalog) are on track to exceed $6 million a year."[36] However, Scott Borchetta, CEO of Big Machine Records (Swift's label), disputed those figures, and claimed that Swift had received "less than $500,000" in the past 12 months of domestic streaming of her songs. A Spotify spokesperson disputed this, telling Time that the total payout for Swift's streaming was $2 million globally.[37]

According to Ben Popper of The Verge, Borchetta's figure of $500,000 only covered Spotify's payment for Taylor Swift streams in the US, which is not its largest market. Regarding the $6 million figure, Popper wrote: "As more people sign up for Spotify and Taylor Swift continues her march towards infinite popularity, the amount she is getting paid is increasing. [Ek] took her trend line and ran it forward a year to get to the highest possible number he could quote."[38]

According to Borchetta, the amount Swift earned from streaming her videos on Vevo was greater than the payout she received from Spotify. He told Time: "The facts show that the music industry was much better off before Spotify hit these shores ... Don’t forget this is for the most successful artist in music today. What about the rest of the artists out there struggling to make a career? Over the last year, what Spotify has paid is the equivalent of less than 50,000 albums sold."[37]

Borchetta said in a February 2015 interview that Swift's catalog would be permitted on a streaming service "that understands the different needs that we [Swift and Big Machine Records] have," whereby "the choice to be [on the free, ad-supported tier] or not" is provided. Borchetta argued that Swift's musical oeuvre is "arguably the most important current catalog there is", and stated that the streaming issue is "about each individual artist, and the real mission here is to bring ... attention to it."[39] In November 2014, Borchetta stated in a radio interview that "If this fan went and purchased the record, CD, iTunes, wherever, and then their friends go, 'Why did you pay for it? It's free on Spotify', we're being completely disrespectful to that superfan."[40]

In December 2015, a bootleg release of Swift's song, "I Knew You Were Trouble", appeared on Spotify credited to Welsh rock band Lostprophets. The release was removed three days later.[41]

In an interview with Music Week in November 2016, Spotify's UK head of content programming George Ergatoudis said: "I've got every reason to be very optimistic Taylor Swift will be coming back to Spotify. I'm not saying it's done, but the indications are good, put it like that".[42][43]

Swift collaborated with Zayn Malik for the song "I Don't Wanna Live Forever" for the movie Fifty Shades Darker. The song, released in December 2016, was withheld from Spotify for one week after its original release on competing streaming services.[44]

In June 2017, it was announced that Swift's full catalog would be released on all streaming services, including Spotify. On social media, Swift's management team stated: "In celebration of 1989 selling over 10 million albums worldwide and the RIAA's 100 million song certification, Taylor wants to thank her fans by making her entire back catalog available to all streaming services."[45] Rolling Stone questioned whether the move to allow her music on all streaming services was permanent.[46] On 25 August 2017, Swift released her single "Look What You Made Me Do"; it was made available on Spotify immediately following release.[47] However, her sixth studio album, Reputation, featuring "Look What You Made Me Do", was withheld from all streaming services after its 10 November release date,[48][49] being made available for streaming on 1 December 2017.[50]

Content withdrawals and delays

Spotify states in its support pages that: "We want all the world’s music on Spotify. However, some artists and tracks are not currently available. Sometimes agreements can’t be reached with the artist or label, or a change may happen in music ownership."[51] Furthermore, in its apps, Spotify states a message for unavailable content: "The artist or their representatives have decided not to release this album on Spotify. We are working on it and hope they will change their mind soon."

In December 2015, Coldplay withheld A Head Full of Dreams from Spotify until one week after its release, citing that all music on Spotify is available to both paid and free users.[52][53][54] Coldplay previously delayed their album Ghost Stories from all streaming services for four months after CD, vinyl and download release,[55] and did the same with its earlier album Mylo Xyloto.[56]

Beyoncé's self-titled album was not available until 24 November 2014, nearly a year after its original release.[57] Adele's 21 was not initially available on Spotify, as Adele wanted Spotify to make her album available to paid subscribers only, but not to free users. Spotify declined her offer to avoid creating separate catalogues for subscribers and non-subscribers.[58] The album, originally released in January 2011, became available to stream 17 months later in June 2012.[59] In November 2015, the singer confirmed that her new album, 25, wouldn't be available for streaming on any service.[60][61] In a series of interviews with Time, Adele stated: "I know that streaming music is the future, but it’s not the only way to consume music. ... I can’t pledge allegiance to something that I don’t know how I feel about yet."[62] However, the album was made available for streaming seven months later, in June 2016.[63]

Several bands from the 1960s and 1970s delayed their work being made available on Spotify or any streaming services. Until the end of 2013, Led Zeppelin's music was not available, before the parties reached an agreement in December.[64] In 2015, AC/DC and The Beatles allowed their music on streaming services.[65][66] In 2018, many songs from the album Get Happy!! by Elvis Costello and the Attractions were removed from the site, including "New Amsterdam" and many others.

Icelandic singer Björk initially chose not to release her album Vulnicura on Spotify, saying: "This streaming thing just does not feel right. I don’t know why, but it just seems insane. ... To work on something for two or three years and then just, 'Oh, here it is for free.' It's not about the money; it’s about respect, you know? Respect for the craft and the amount of work you put into it."[67][68]

In February 2017, Prince's music produced under the Warner Bros. label, including the albums 1999, Purple Rain, Dirty Mind, and Sign o' the Times, became available on Spotify and other streaming services.[69][70]

In April 2017, rapper Jay Z, part-owner of streaming service Tidal, pulled his music catalog from Spotify and Apple Music. This was the third time the artist removed his albums from competing services, following the release of his debut album Reasonable Doubt, and later The Blueprint.[71][72][73] On December 4th, 2019, Jay Z's entire catalogue returned to Spotify after a two year abscene in honour of his 50th birthday.[74]

On 2 August 2019, progressive metal band Tool's catalog premiered on Spotify and other digital services for the first time.[75]

Aaliyah, De La Soul, Garth Brooks and Joanna Newsom are some of the few major artists still missing from Spotify.[76] All of Aaliyah's Blackground Records albums (except for her 1994 debut album Age Ain't Nothing but a Number, which is already available) have never been released digitally because her uncle/manager, Barry Hankerson, has let those releases go out of print.[77] In August 2020, the estate of Aaliyah entered talks to make her music available to stream.[78] In De La Soul's case, the group did not believe that their label Tommy Boy Records was offering a fair deal, as well as the cost of re-clearing the samples.[79] Brooks has an exclusive deal with Amazon Music.[80] Meanwhile, Newsom's main catalogue is nowhere to be found on Spotify. She said that the streaming platform is "the banana of the music industry" and calls it "the villainous cabal of major labels".[81] The only song available on Spotify by Newsom is a collaboration she did with The Muppets for their 2011 film of the same name.

In January 2021, Spotify removed nearly 750,000 tracks from its catalogue for having fraudulent stream totals. Distributor DistroKid has offered a counter-notification process for artists whose music was removed from Spotify.[82]

2015 privacy policy ambiguity

In August 2015, Spotify changed its terms and privacy policy, expanding Spotify's lawful access to media and location data stored on user devices. Initial concerns were raised about the policy being "far too broad without examples or vital context and detail around the data gathering the service is implementing," something Ek ascribed to poor communication from Spotify about the implications of the policy change. The Verge has criticised Wired's coverage (which was republished by Gizmodo) to the policy change, sighting a lack of context in their reporting in terms of failing to mention opt-out and explicit consent clauses, describing it as an "overreaction", as "FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt)", and fearmongering.[83]

In response to concerns about the change, Ek tweeted a list of specific scenarios when then this data is needed. For example, he described that access to photos is needed to upload playlist covers, and contacts for sharing tracks.[83] Later, Ek published a post on the Spotify blog explicitly listing out the times when Spotify may ask to access this data, apologising for poor communication, and reiterating a "100 percent committed to protecting" user privacy.[84][85]

Wired has since removed its coverage of the policy change.[86]

Pay for Play practice

In August 2015, Billboard reported that Spotify was among the streaming services influenced by "pay for play", in which labels pay for songs to be placed on popular playlists followed by many users. Daniel Glass, executive of Glassnote Records, stated that playlist promotion was "a very, very big deal". Billboard referenced an August 5 practice, in which Universal Music Group hired Jay Frank as its Senior Vice President of Global Streaming Marketing, followed by an investment in Frank's marketing firm DigMark, "an innovator" in pay-for-play practices that charges clients US$2,000 for a six-week campaign. The price goes up for playlists followed by more users, up to US$10,000. "For a while, Spotify didn't take a view", on the practice, according to a music label executive, but its then-new Terms of Service agreements would "[take] a stand against commercializing accounts and playlists by rank-and-file users", as well as prohibit the practice of "accepting any compensation, financial or otherwise, to influence ... the content included on an account or playlist". However, Billboard wrote that "policing, let alone enforcing, these terms could be difficult", adding that loopholes can still be exploited to continue the practice.[87]

In June 2018, allegations resurfaced after the release of Drake's new album Scorpion. According to users the songs of the artist were included in various playlists, some that were unrelated to the genre of their songs, such as gospel, ambient music and "best of British". Heavy criticism followed, with reports of some paying Spotify subscribers demanding refunds or unsubscribing. One of them reported to call the Federal Trade Commission to report advertising fraud.[88][89][90][91]

2016–17: "Fake artists" controversy

In August 2016, Music Business Worldwide reported that Spotify had begun paying producers to create music and placing the tracks on highly followed and popular playlists on the service. The production of the music, reportedly paid for by Spotify, was published on the service using fake artist names, and the motivation behind the practice reportedly due to creating tracks to "quality control" the mood of specific playlists and gain more favorable royalty rates than major and independent labels offer. However, the implications of the practice meant certain rightsholders who normally earned decent payouts from being featured on such playlists were excluded.[92] After being mentioned in an article by Vulture in July 2017,[93] a Spotify spokesperson told Billboard that "We do not and have never created 'fake' artists and put them on Spotify playlists. Categorically untrue, full stop [...] We pay royalties -- sound and publishing -- for all tracks on Spotify, and for everything we playlist. We do not own rights, we’re not a label, all our music is licensed from rightsholders and we pay them -- we don’t pay ourselves".[94] However, in another report, the Music Business Worldwide publication discussed the situation, including the artists' lack of social media profiles, lack of managers, lawyers and industry relationships, the listing of owning all their own rights, the lack of appearance on other streaming services, Spotify's denial to comment regarding questions of the artists' frequent placement on playlists, royalty rates and recommendation origins, and anonymous comments from "very senior figures in the music business" with alleged knowledge of the practice. The publication listed 50 of the top artists under suspicion, and asked them to contact the publication to verify their authenticity, adding that "We’re pretty sure A&R teams from across the globe would love to hear about artists with no online presence who have managed to rack up millions of Spotify plays with their first few tracks".[95]

2017–18: Hate Content & Hateful Conduct policy

In August 2017, Spotify announced that it would remove music that promotes white nationalism from its catalogue.[96]

In May 2018, Spotify attracted criticism for its "Hate Content & Hateful Conduct policy" that removed the music of R. Kelly and XXXTentacion from its editorial and algorithmic playlists because "When we look at promotion, we look at issues around hateful conduct, where you have an artist or another creator who has done something off-platform that is so particularly out of line with our values, egregious, in a way that it becomes something that we don't want to associate ourselves with". R. Kelly has faced accusations of sexual abuse since the 1990s, being the subject of numerous allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct, often with underage girls, while XXXTentacion was on trial for charges of false imprisonment, witness tampering, and aggravated battery of a pregnant victim.[97] This policy was revoked in June because the company deemed the original wording to be too "vague"; they stated that "Across all genres, our role is not to regulate artists. Therefore, we are moving away from implementing a policy around artist conduct".[98]

In April 2019, Spotify completely erased the discography of Blood on the Dance Floor on the grounds of hate content. This happened in the wake of accusations made by nearly two dozen women regarding statutory rape by lead singer Dahvie Vanity.[99] While the catalogues of Lostprophets and Gary Glitter are still available on Spotify, it is impossible to create an artist station for Gary Glitter.

Security issues

2009 security breach

In March 2009, Spotify warned users that a security flaw discovered and fixed in December 2008 was more serious than previously thought, having compromised the password hashes of individual users in Spotify's pre-December 2008 customer base, as well as potentially "registration information such as your email address, birth date, gender, postal code and billing receipt details". Credit card information was not exposed, due to being handled by a secure third-party provider. Spotify advised users to change their passwords, especially in cases where the same password was used for multiple sites.[100][101]

2011 PC malware reports

In March 2011, Spotify temporarily removed display advertising on its computer software, after reports from users on the free service tier that a malicious advertisement had infected their systems. Then-named security firm Websense stated that the attack used the Blackhole exploit kit.[102] Spotify said in a statement that "Users with anti-virus software will have been protected", and "We sincerely apologise to any users affected. We'll continue working hard to ensure this does not happen again and that our users enjoy Spotify securely and in confidence".[103]

2014 security breach

In May 2014, Spotify announced it had been hacked, but stated that only one user's information was accessed. It released a new Spotify app on the Android platform, replacing the former app, with Spotify chief technology officer Oskar Stål writing in a blog post that the upgrade was "a necessary precaution" and that no action for apps on other platforms were necessary.[104][105]

Missing or inadequate application features

Lack of explicit content filter

Spotify is one of the few music streaming services that do not allow users to filter explicit content, which Rick Broida of CNET writes "may prevent users from opting into Spotify's Family Plan subscription offering".[106] However, in April 2018, Spotify added the explicit filter for lyrics to mobile and tablet versions, but still displays explicit album art to all users.[107]

Limit on music library

Spotify used to limit users' music libraries to 10,000 songs.[108][109] This caused negative publicity on several occasions and "years of user complaints".[108] Derek Mead of Motherboard wrote in March 2016 that the limit was "insane", and suggested that Spotify, after raising "another billion dollars" in funding, should "fix the service's most asinine limitation".[110] Chris Welch of The Verge wrote in May 2017 that "It’s time for Spotify to stop capping how much music you can save", further questioning "Why is there such an arbitrary cap?" Welch's article also highlighted the "thousands of votes from users" on Spotify's community forum asking for a higher limit, and attached a reply from a company representative, stating "At the moment, we don’t have plans to extend the "Your Music" limit. The reason is because less than 1% of users reach it. The current limit ensures a great experience for 99% of users instead of an "OK" experience for 100%".[108]

On May 26, 2020, Spotify relented on their decision and decided to not limit user music libraries to 10,000 songs & albums. The new system only applies to the ability to save songs to your Spotify library. Individual playlists are still limited to 10,000 songs, and users can still only download up to 10,000 songs on each of their five different devices for offline listening.[109]

Other criticism

"Scorpion SZN" promotion

On June 27, 2018, Spotify held a "takeover" promotion (dubbed "Scorpion SZN") to promote the release of Drake's fifth studio album Scorpion. During the promotion, many of the service's curated playlists had their cover art modified to include photos of Drake, even if the playlist's topic was not associated with Drake's music. The campaign faced criticism from some users, who felt that it was excessive (especially to users not necessarily interested in Drake's music), and contradictory to Spotify Premium being promoted as an ad-free service. It was reported that some users had successfully received refunds after complaining about the promotion.[111][112]

In September 2013, Ministry of Sound sued Spotify, alleging that user playlists mimicking the track listings of their compilation albums were infringing on the copyrights of the albums themselves (citing the skill and effort in their compilation).[113][114]

In 2014, the two parties reached a settlement, under which Spotify agreed to restrict the ability to search for or follow the infringing playlists.[115]

References
  • Music HUB (10 August 2020). "spotify mod apk". Nola Booker. Retrieved 10 August 2020.
  1. "We've only just begun!". Spotify News. Spotify. 7 October 2008. Archived from the original on 11 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  2. Guttenberg, Steve (29 May 2014). "Is Spotify unfair to musicians?". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  3. "How is Spotify contributing to the music business?". Spotify. Archived from the original on 3 November 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
  4. Plaugic, Lizzie (7 December 2015). "Spotify's Year in Music shows just how little we pay artists for their music". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  5. Lindvall, Helienne (17 August 2009). "Behind the music: The real reason why the major labels love Spotify". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  6. Sidung, Erik (13 August 2009). "Uggla ursinnig över Spotify och Sony Music". Aftonbladet. Schibsted. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  7. Bryne, Snorre; Thorkildsen, Joakim (11 August 2009). "55 100 avspillinger ga 19 kroner". Dagbladet. Aller Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  8. "How Much Do Music Artists Earn Online?". Information Is Beautiful. April 2010. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  9. Paul (3 October 2011). "Projekt Keeps Fighting; Calls Spotify an "Unprincipled Concept..."". Digital Music News. Archived from the original on 6 October 2011. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  10. Makarechi, Kia (28 March 2012). "Black Keys: Sean Parker Is An A**hole, Spotify Isn't Fair To Artists". HuffPost. AOL. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  11. Perpetua, Matthew (13 December 2011). "Black Keys: Why We Won't Stream 'El Camino'". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  12. "And now to British Theatre". Screaming Silence. 17 May 2012. Archived from the original on 22 October 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  13. Byrne, David (11 October 2013). "David Byrne: 'The internet will suck all creative content out of the world'". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  14. Grow, Kory (25 April 2014). "Don't Enjoy the Silence: Spotify Pulls Silent Publicity Stunt Album". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  15. Brown, Harley (26 April 2014). "Spotify Removes Vulfpeck's 'Sleepify'". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  16. Welch, Chris (7 May 2014). "Spotify removes silent album that earned indie band $20,000". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  17. Roettgers, Janko (28 July 2015). "Two Weeks Later, Neil Young Finally Removes His Music From Spotify". Variety. Penske Media Corporation. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
  18. "You Can Keep on Rockin' to Neil Young on Spotify and Apple Music — He's Back!". Vulture. New York Media, LLC. 4 November 2016. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  19. Buskirk, Eliot Van (21 June 2012). "David Lowery Might Be Right About Some Things, But He's Wrong About Streaming, Money, and Artists". Evolver.fm. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  20. Ingham, Tim (3 February 2015). "Major labels keep 73% of Spotify Premium payouts - Report". Music Business Worldwide. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  21. Masnick, Mike (5 February 2015). "Yes, Major Record Labels Are Keeping Nearly All The Money They Get From Spotify, Rather Than Giving It To Artists". Techdirt. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  22. Greenburg, Zack (1 February 2012). "Spotify's Secret Weapon". Forbes. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  23. Dahud, Hisham (21 June 2012). "Hypebot Interviews Spotify's "Secret Weapon" – Artist In Residence, D.A. Wallach". Hypebot. Retrieved 17 December 2016.
  24. "Thom Yorke pulls albums from Spotify". BBC News. BBC. 15 July 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  25. Dredge, Stuart (7 October 2013). "Thom Yorke calls Spotify 'the last desperate fart of a dying corpse'". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  26. Arthur, Charles (15 July 2013). "Thom Yorke blasts Spotify on Twitter as he pulls his music". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  27. Marshall, Alex (15 April 2016). "Radiohead have not yet decided whether to stream new album, says man from their management firm". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  28. McGoogan, Cara (16 October 2015). "Brian Message: Apple Music won't be bigger than YouTube". Wired. Condé Nast. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  29. Forde, Eamonn (9 June 2016). "Exclusive: Spotify pulled out of Radiohead album-windowing plan". Music Ally. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  30. Brandle, Lars (10 June 2016). "Radiohead's 'In Rainbows' Is Available on Spotify". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
  31. Rossignol, Derrick (8 December 2017). "Thom Yorke's Solo Albums Are Finally Streaming On Spotify, Which He Famously Hates". Uproxx. Uproxx Media Group. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  32. Swift, Taylor (7 July 2014). "For Taylor Swift, the Future of Music Is a Love Story". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company. Retrieved 23 December 2016. (subscription required)
  33. Alter, Charlotte (3 November 2014). "Taylor Swift Just Removed Her Music From Spotify". Time. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  34. Grow, Kory (6 November 2014). "Taylor Swift Shuns 'Grand Experiment' of Streaming Music". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  35. "On Taylor Swift's Decision To Remove Her Music from Spotify". Spotify. 3 November 2014. Archived from the original on 25 December 2016. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  36. Ek, Daniel (11 November 2014). "$2 Billion and Counting". Spotify. Archived from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  37. Dickey, Jack (12 November 2014). "Taylor Swift's Spotify Paycheck Mystery". Time. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  38. Popper, Ben (13 November 2014). "Spotify says it paid Taylor Swift millions. Her label disagrees. Here's the truth". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  39. Newman, Melinda (5 February 2015). "Taylor Swift's Label Boss on Her Future, His Spotify Showdown and 'American Idol'". The Hollywood Reporter. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  40. Knopper, Steve (8 November 2014). "Taylor Swift Pulled Music From Spotify for 'Superfan Who Wants to Invest,' Says Rep". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
  41. "Taylor Swift reappears on Spotify, but her music is credited to Lostprophets". the Guardian. December 7, 2015.
  42. Gumble, Daniel (28 November 2016). "George Ergatoudis: Taylor Swift and Adele set for Spotify return". Music Week. Intent Media. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  43. Harp, Justin (30 November 2016). "Is Taylor Swift planning a return to Spotify?". Digital Spy. Hearst. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  44. Trust, Gary (16 December 2016). "Zayn & Taylor Swift's 'I Don't Wanna Live Forever' Headed for Top 10 Hot 100 Debut". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
  45. "Taylor Swift's Music Returning to Spotify & Other Streaming Services Tonight". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. 8 June 2017. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
  46. Legaspi, Althea (8 June 2017). "Taylor Swift Makes Full Catalog Available via Streaming Services". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 8 June 2017.
  47. Bruner, Raisa (25 August 2017). "Listen to Taylor Swift's New Song 'Look What You Made Me Do'". Time. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  48. Shaw, Lucas (7 November 2017). "Taylor Swift Will Keep New Album From Streaming for a Week". Bloomberg Technology. Bloomberg. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  49. Weaver, Hilary (7 November 2017). "Taylor Swift Gives In, a Little, to Spotify". Vanity Fair. Condé Nast. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  50. Withers, Rachel (1 December 2017). "Ready for It? Taylor Swift's Reputation Is Now Streaming". Slate. The Slate Group. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
  51. "Content missing". Spotify. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  52. Karp, Hannah (3 December 2015). "Coldplay to Headline Super Bowl Halftime Show". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company. Retrieved 24 December 2016. (subscription required)
  53. Welch, Chris (3 December 2015). "Coldplay's new album won't be on Spotify when it's released". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  54. Cox, Jamieson (8 December 2015). "Coldplay's new album will be available on Spotify this Friday, even for free users". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  55. Dredge, Stuart (23 September 2014). "Coldplay's Ghost Stories goes live on Spotify and streaming music services". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  56. Indvik, Lauren (27 October 2011). "Why Coldplay and Adele Aren't Bringing New Albums to Spotify". Mashable. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  57. Luckerson, Victor (24 November 2014). "Beyoncé's Latest Album Is Finally on Spotify". Time. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  58. Carr, Austin (15 February 2012). "Why Spotify Turned Down Adele's 21". Fast Company. Mansueto Ventures. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  59. Zirm, Jordan (27 June 2012). "You Can Now Stream Adele's "21" On Spotify". Complex. Verizon Hearst Media Partners. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  60. Cox, Jamieson (19 November 2015). "Adele's new album 25 won't be available on any streaming services". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  61. Sisario, Ben (19 November 2015). "Adele Is Said to Reject Streaming for 25". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  62. "Adele Talks Decision To Reject Streaming Her New Album". Time. 21 December 2015. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  63. Cox, Jamieson (23 June 2016). "Adele's 25 is coming to Spotify tomorrow, seven months after its release". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  64. Sisario, Ben (11 December 2013). "Spotify Adds Led Zeppelin, and Turns Focus to Mobile". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  65. McCormick, Rich (29 June 2015). "AC/DC is putting its records on Spotify, Rdio, and Apple Music". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  66. Kelion, Leo (23 December 2015). "Beatles music joins streaming services". BBC. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  67. Brunner, Rob (26 February 2015). "Bjork On Keeping "Vulnicura" Off Spotify: "It's About Respect, You Know?"". Fast Company. Mansueto Ventures. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  68. Kreps, Daniel (27 February 2015). "Bjork Keeping Vulnicura Off Spotify: 'It Just Seems Insane'". Rolling Stone. Wenner Media. Retrieved 24 December 2016.
  69. Flanagan, Andrew (9 February 2017). "It's Official: Prince Is Coming To Streaming This Sunday". NPR. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  70. Mullin, Joe (10 February 2017). "Prince's music will be on Spotify and other services starting Sunday". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  71. Singleton, Micah (7 April 2017). "Jay Z's catalog has been pulled from Apple Music and Spotify". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  72. Morris, David Z. (8 April 2017). "Tidal Owner Jay-Z Pulls Every Album from Spotify, Apple Music". Fortune. Time Inc. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  73. Gensler, Andy (8 April 2017). "Jay Z Pulls Catalog From Spotify". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 10 April 2017.
  74. Ricker, Thomas (December 4, 2019). "Jay Z returns to Spotify". The Verge.
  75. "Tool's Discography Now Available to Stream". Spin. August 2, 2019.
  76. "8 Artists You Still Can't Find on Any Major Streaming Service". Billboard.
  77. "Aaliyah would have turned 40 today...here's why we can't stream her music online". TheGrio. January 16, 2019.
  78. Wang, Lydia. "Aaliyah's Music Will Finally Hit Streaming Services 19 Years After Her Tragic Death". www.refinery29.com.
  79. "Legendary Hip-Hop Act De La Soul Protests Streaming Deal for Its Classic Albums". Fortune.
  80. "Garth Brooks On His Amazon Deal and Putting Radio First: 'Country Radio is the 800-Pound Gorilla'". Billboard.
  81. Gordon, Jeremy. "Joanna Newsom: "Spotify Is the Banana of the Music Industry. It Just Gives Off a Fume"". Pitchfork.
  82. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2021/01/06/spotify-reportedly-pulls-indie-songs
  83. Warren, Tom (21 August 2015). "Spotify's new privacy policy generates unnecessary outrage". The Verge. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  84. Welch, Chris (21 August 2015). "Spotify CEO apologizes for controversial new privacy policy". The Verge. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  85. Ek, Daniel (21 August 2015). "SORRY". Spotify News. Archived from the original on 9 March 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  86. Gottsergon, Gordon (20 August 2015). "You Can't Do Squat About Spotify's Eerie New Privacy Policy (UPDATED)". Wired. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  87. Peoples, Glenn (19 August 2015). "How 'Playola' Is Infiltrating Streaming Services: Pay for Play Is 'Definitely Happening'". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 30 April 2017.
  88. "Spotify Really, Really, REALLY Wants You To Listen To Drake's New Album". Music Feeds. 2018-07-01. Retrieved 2018-07-03.
  89. "Spotify users demand Drake refunds". BBC News. Retrieved 2018-07-03.
  90. "What It Means When Spotify Has Nothing to "Recommend" But Drake | Pitchfork". webcache.googleusercontent.com. Retrieved 2018-07-03.
  91. "Apple Music Is Crushing Spotify In User Engagement — And the Latest D…". archive.is. 2018-07-03. Archived from the original on 2018-07-03. Retrieved 2018-07-03.
  92. Ingham, Tim (31 August 2016). "Spotify is making its own records... and putting them on playlists". Music Business Worldwide. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  93. Raymond, Adam K. (5 July 2017). "The Streaming Problem: How Spammers, Superstars, and Tech Giants Gamed the Music Industry". Vulture. New York. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  94. Gensler, Andy (7 July 2017). "Spotify on Non-Existent Artist Allegations: 'We Do Not and Have Never Created Fake Artists'". Billboard. Eldridge Industries. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  95. Ingham, Tim (9 July 2017). "Spotify denies it's playlisting fake artists. So why are all these fake artists on its playlists?". Music Business Worldwide. Retrieved 10 July 2017.
  96. "Spotify has removed white power music from its platform. But it's still available on dozens of other sites". PBS NewsHour. August 18, 2017.
  97. Strauss, Matthew (10 May 2018). "Spotify Removes R. Kelly and XXXTentacion From Its Playlists". Pitchfork. Retrieved 21 October 2018.
  98. Minsker, Evan; Yoo, Noah (1 June 2018). "Spotify Walks Back Controversial "Hateful Conduct" Policy, Adds XXXTentacion to Major Playlist". Pitchfork. Retrieved 21 October 2018.
  99. Plenty, Maleaha Brings. "Brings Plenty: Spotify removing controversial artists is important".
  100. Leyden, John (4 March 2009). "Spotify breach creates password hack risk". The Register. Situation Publishing. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
  101. Beaumont, Claudine (5 March 2009). "Spotify user data compromised after service hacked". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
  102. Deleon, Nicholas (30 March 2011). "Spotify Becomes Latest High Profile Inadvertent Malware Distributor". TechCrunch. AOL. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
  103. "Spotify ads hit by malware attack". BBC News. BBC. 29 March 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
  104. Stål, Oskar (27 May 2014). "Important Notice to Our Users". Spotify. Archived from the original on 18 December 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  105. Gibbs, Samuel (28 May 2014). "Spotify hack leads to rollout of new Android app". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  106. Broida, Rick (1 June 2016). "Block explicit lyrics in music subscription services". CNET. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
  107. , BBC News
  108. Welch, Chris (26 May 2017). "It's time for Spotify to stop capping how much music you can save". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
  109. Gartenberg, Chaim (May 26, 2020). "Spotify finally removes its 10,000-song library limit". The Verge.
  110. Mead, Derek (31 March 2016). "Spotify Should Spend Its Latest Billion Dollars Fixing Its Dumbest Bug". Motherboard. Vice Media. Retrieved 27 May 2017.
  111. "Spotify users push back at the over-the-top Drake promotion". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2020-02-05.
  112. Savage, Mark (2018-07-03). "Spotify users demand Drake refunds". BBC News. Retrieved 2020-02-05.
  113. Mullin, Joe (4 September 2013). "Spotify sued over user playlists, said to infringe copyright". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  114. Dredge, Stuart (4 September 2013). "Ministry of Sound sues Spotify for copyright infringement". The Guardian. Guardian Media Group. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
  115. Dredge, Stuart (2014-02-27). "Spotify and Ministry of Sound settle music playlists copyright lawsuit". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2020-02-05.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.