Falcon 9 first-stage landing tests

The Falcon 9 first-stage landing tests were a series of controlled-descent flight tests conducted by SpaceX between 2013 and 2016. Since 2017, the first stage of Falcon 9 missions has been routinely landed if the rocket performance allowed it, and if SpaceX chose to recover the stage.

The first stage of Falcon 9 flight 20 successfully landed for the first time on a ground pad at Landing Zone 1, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, after propelling 11 Orbcomm OG2 satellites to orbit.

The program's objective was to reliably execute controlled re-entry, descent and landing (EDL) of the Falcon 9 first stage into Earth's atmosphere after the stage completes the boost phase of an orbital spaceflight. The first tests aimed to touch down vertically in the ocean at zero velocity. Later tests attempted to land the rocket precisely on an autonomous spaceport drone ship (a barge commissioned by SpaceX to provide a stable landing surface at sea) or at Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1), a concrete pad at Cape Canaveral. The first ground landing at LZ-1 succeeded in December 2015, and the first landing at sea on a drone ship in April 2016. The second landed booster, B1021, was the first to fly again in March 2017, and was recovered a second time.

Landings of Falcon 9 first-stage boosters
This section is an excerpt from List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches § Booster landings[edit]
5
10
15
20
25
30
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
  1. Controlled descent; ocean touchdown control failed; no recovery
  2. Passive reentry failed before parachute deployment
  3. Controlled descent; soft vertical ocean touchdown; no recovery

Overview

The first landing test occurred in September 2013 on the sixth flight of a Falcon 9 and maiden launch of the v1.1 rocket version. From 2013 to 2016, sixteen test flights were conducted, six of which achieved a soft landing and recovery of the booster:

Since the January 2017 return to flight, SpaceX has stopped referring to landing attempts as "experimental", indicating that they have become a routine procedure (see Iridium-1 and CRS-10 press kits of 2017, compared with CRS-9 and JCSAT-16 of 2016). As of 15 December 2017, 14 routine landings have been performed (100% success) and three missions were launched in expendable configuration, not attempting to land.

The first-stage descent tests were part of the larger SpaceX reusable launch system development program, which included a large amount of new technology development activities and earlier low-altitude test flights at the SpaceX facility in McGregor, Texas in preparation for the high-altitude high-velocity testing of landing test phase of the program. The overall objective of the program is to privately develop reusable rockets using vertical-landing technology so as to substantially reduce the cost of space access.

Traditionally, the first stages of orbital carrier rockets have been discarded in the ocean once the ascent was complete. Achieving routine recovery and reuse of the launch vehicles could dramatically reduce the cost of access to space.[1][2][3][4]

History

From the beginning, Elon Musk wanted the first stage of SpaceX launch vehicles to be recoverable, and all Falcon 1 launches and the first two Falcon 9 launches had parachutes. However the boosters burned up on reentry, before the parachutes even deployed.[5] This meant a different approach had to be taken. Experimental prototypes were built and flown during 2012 to 2014 to test the idea of propulsive landings and gain experience.

SpaceX first announced in March 2013 that it would instrument and equip subsequent Falcon 9 first stages as controlled-descent test vehicles, able to propulsively decelerate towards a soft touchdown over the water surface. The company expected to begin these flight tests in 2013, with an attempt to return the vehicle to the launch site for a powered landing no earlier than mid-2014.[6]

In the event, SpaceX did perform their first controlled-descent test flight in 2013 but continued the over-water testing well into 2015. Following analysis of telemetry data from the first controlled descent in September 2013, SpaceX announced that a large amount of new technology passed their real-life test objectives, and that coupled with the technology advancements made on the Grasshopper prototype, they were now ready to test the full EDL process to recover the first stage. The rocket was "able to successfully transition from vacuum through hypersonic, through supersonic, through transonic, and light the engines all the way and control the stage all the way through [the atmosphere]".[7]

This second EDL test took place during the third cargo resupply mission for NASA in April 2014. SpaceX attached landing legs to the first stage, decelerated the stage through atmospheric re-entry and attempted a simulated landing over water, following the separation of the second stage carrying the Dragon capsule to the ISS. The first stage was slowed down sufficiently to perform a soft touchdown over the Atlantic Ocean.[8][9] SpaceX announced in February 2014 that they intended to continue over-water tests of the first stage until mastering precision control of the vehicle from hypersonic speed all the way through subsonic regimes.[9]

Subsequent tests, starting with the CRS-5 mission in January 2015, attempted to land the first stage on an autonomous spaceport drone ship stationed off the Florida coastline or in the Pacific Ocean depending on launch site.[10] The ships were used for six landing attempts, two of which succeeded in April and May 2016. Meanwhile, the first attempt to land on solid ground at Cape Canaveral occurred on December 21, 2015, and succeeded flawlessly.

Post-mission test plan

The post-mission Falcon 9 test plan for the earliest flight tests called for the first stage to perform a retro-propulsion burn in the upper atmosphere to slow it down and put it on a descent ballistic trajectory to its target landing location, followed by a second burn in the lower atmosphere before the first stage reached the water.[11] SpaceX announced in March 2013 that it intended to conduct such tests on Falcon 9 v1.1 launch vehicles and would "continue doing such tests until they can do a return to the launch site and a powered landing". The company said it expected several failures before it could land the vehicle successfully.[9][12]

In detailed information disclosed in the Falcon 9 flight 6 launch license for the CASSIOPE mission, SpaceX said it would fire three of the nine Merlin 1D engines initially to slow the horizontal velocity of the rocket and begin the attempt at a controlled descent.[11] Then, shortly before hitting the ocean, one engine would be relighted in an attempt to reduce the stage's speed so that it could be recovered. As of September 2013, SpaceX said the experiment had approximately a ten percent chance of success.[13]

SpaceX did not perform controlled-descent tests on all Falcon 9 v1.1 flights, as payloads going to GTO did not leave enough fuel margin.[14] In September 2013, SpaceX announced that the CRS-3 mission of April 2014 (fourth flight of Falcon 9 v1.1)[15] would be the second test of the descent test profile.[1]

Whereas the early tests restarted the engines only twice, by the fourth flight test, in September 2014, SpaceX was reigniting the engines three times to accomplish its EDL test objectives (although only three of the nine engines were used): a boost-back burn, a reentry burn, and a landing burn. The boost-back burn limits downrange translation of the used stage; the reentry burn (from approximately 70 to 40 km (43 to 25 mi) altitude) is used to control the descent and deceleration profile at atmospheric interface; and the landing burn completes the deceleration from terminal velocity to zero at the landing surface.[16][17]

Test flights

Flight 6

The first propulsive reentry, descent, and ocean-surface touchdown test occurred on September 29, 2013, on Falcon 9 flight 6, the maiden launch of the Falcon 9 rocket, version v1.1. After the three-minute boost phase and separation of the second stage with the CASSIOPE and nanosat payloads, the rocket's first stage was reoriented backwards and three of the nine Merlin 1D engines were reignited at high altitude to initiate a deceleration and controlled descent trajectory to the surface of the ocean. The first phase of the test "worked well and the first stage re-entered safely".[18] However, the stage began to roll because of aerodynamic forces during the atmospheric descent and the roll rate exceeded the capabilities of the first stage attitude control system (ACS) to null it out. The fuel in the tanks "centrifuged" to the outside of the tank and the single engine involved in the low-altitude deceleration maneuver shut down. SpaceX was able to retrieve some first-stage debris from the ocean.[1][18] The company did not expect to recover the first stage on this flight,[19] nor on the first several powered-descent tests, as predicted in their March 2013 announcement.[6]

This first experimental descent was considered successful, achieving substantial test milestones and collecting a great deal of engineering data, despite losing the stage into the ocean.[19] SpaceX tested a large amount of new technology on this flight, and, combining those results with the advances made on the Grasshopper demonstrator, the company now believed it had "all the pieces of the puzzle".[7][19][20]

Flight 9

The second test of controlled-descent hardware and software on the first stage occurred on April 8, 2014,[8] and became the first successful controlled ocean soft touchdown of a liquid-rocket-engine orbital first stage.[21][22] The first stage included landing legs for the first time which were extended to simulate a landing upon touchdown, and the test utilized more powerful gaseous Nitrogen control thrusters to control the aerodynamic-induced rotation that had occurred on the first test flight. The first stage successfully approached the water surface with no spin and at zero vertical velocity, as designed.[9][23]

During the second test, the first stage was traveling at a velocity of Mach 10 (10,200 km/h; 6,340 mph)[23] at an altitude of 80 kilometers (260,000 ft)[24] at the time of the high-altitude turn-around maneuver, followed by ignition of three of the nine main engines for the initial deceleration and placement onto its descent trajectory.[3] The "first stage executed a good re-entry burn and was able to stabilize itself on the way down. ... [The] landing in [the] Atlantic [ocean] was good! ... Flight computers continued transmitting [telemetry data] for eight seconds after reaching the water" and stopped only after the first stage went horizontal.[25]

The major modifications for the second first stage controlled-descent test flight included changes to both the reentry burn and the landing burn as well as adding increased attitude control system (ACS) capabilities.[26]

SpaceX had projected a low probability of stage recovery following the flight test due to complexity of the test sequence and the large number of steps that would need to be carried out perfectly.[9] The company was careful to label the entire flight test as "an experiment".[27] In a press conference at the National Press Club on April 25, Elon Musk said that the first stage achieved a soft touchdown on the ocean but due to rough seas, the stage was destroyed.[28][29]

Flight 10

The third test flight of a returned first stage was July 14, 2014, on Falcon 9 flight 10. Whereas the previous test reached a target landing area some hundreds of kilometers off the Florida coast, this flight aimed for a boost-back trajectory that would attempt the ocean touchdown much nearer the coast, and closer to the original launch location at Cape Canaveral. Following the third controlled-descent test flight, SpaceX expressed confidence in their ability to successfully land in the future on a "floating launch pad or back at the launch site and refly the rocket with no required refurbishment."[30]

Following the first stage loft of the second stage and payload on its orbital trajectory, SpaceX conducted a successful flight test on the spent first stage. The first stage successfully decelerated from hypersonic speed in the upper atmosphere, made a successful reentry, landing burn, and deployment of its landing legs, and touched down on the ocean surface. The first stage was not recovered for analysis as the hull integrity was breached, either upon touchdown or on the subsequent "tip over and body slam".[31] Results of the post-landing analysis showed that the hull integrity was lost as the 46-metre (150 ft)-tall first stage fell horizontally, as planned, onto the ocean surface following the landing.[30]

Flight 13
Infrared thermal imagery of Falcon 9 SpaceX CRS-4 launch. The larger image was captured shortly after second stage separation from the first stage: the top of the first stage appears as a dim dot below the larger plume. In the inset, the restarted first stage engines power the stage.

The fourth test flight of a returned first stage, with a planned ocean touchdown, occurred on Falcon 9 flight 13 which was launched on September 21, 2014.[32] and the first stage flew a profile approaching a zero-velocity at zero-altitude simulated landing on the sea surface.[17] SpaceX made no attempt to recover the first stage, since earlier tests had confirmed that the 14-story tall first stage would not survive the tip-over event into the sea. The booster did run out of liquid oxygen.[33]

One month later, detailed thermal imaging infrared sensor data and video were released of the controlled-descent test. The data was collected by NASA in a joint arrangement with SpaceX as part of research on retropropulsive deceleration technologies in order to develop new approaches to Mars atmospheric entry. A key problem with propulsive techniques is handling the fluid flow problems and attitude control of the descent vehicle during the supersonic retropropulsion phase of the entry and deceleration. All phases of the night-time flight test on the first stage were successfully imaged except for the final landing burn, as that occurred below the clouds where the IR data was not visible.[17] The research team is particularly interested in the 70–40-kilometer (43–25 mi) altitude range of the SpaceX "reentry burn" on the Falcon 9 Earth-entry tests as this is the "powered flight through the Mars-relevant retropulsion regime" that models Mars entry and descent conditions.[16]

Flight 15
Falcon 9 flight 15 first stage re-entry with grid fins. Onboard camera view

SpaceX had planned to make the sixth controlled-descent test flight and second[34] landing attempt on their drone ship no earlier than February 11, 2015. Landing a returning rocket at sea would have been a "potentially historic rocket launch and landing", as such a feat "was unheard of" five years earlier.[34][35][36]

According to regulatory paperwork filed in 2014, SpaceX plans had called for the sixth test flight to occur on a late January 2015 launch attempt. However, after the completion of the fifth test flight, and with some damage being incurred by the drone ship in the botched landing, it was not clear whether the sixth test would still be feasible only a few weeks later.[37] This issue was resolved within days of the ship's return to Jacksonville, and by January 15, SpaceX was unambiguous about its plans to attempt a landing of the first stage following the boost phase of the Deep Space Climate Observatory mission.[36]

However, in a statement by SpaceX, the drone ship was in conditions "with waves reaching up to three stories in height crashing over the decks". Additionally, one of the four thrusters that keep the barge in a constant position had malfunctioned, making station-keeping difficult. For these reasons, the post-launch flight test did not involve the barge, but instead attempted a soft touchdown over water.[38]

The test was successful, and the first stage of the Falcon 9 landed "nicely vertical" with an accuracy of 10 meters from the target location in the ocean.[39]

Therefore, this test represented the fifth ocean touchdown, and the sixth overall Falcon 9 first stage controlled-descent test.

Flight 46 and 48

Flight 46 and 48 were both boosters on their second flight that were not recovered due to the older Block 3 design only being capable of two flights. Instead of having an uncontrolled descent, SpaceX softly landed both boosters in the water to test high energy landing techniques without the risk of damaging a drone ship.[40][41] On flight 48, the booster survived landing and stayed intact after tipping over. Unplanned recovery was discussed but the booster broke up before it could be attempted.[42]

Landing attempts
Depiction of Falcon 9 landing trajectory in floating-platform recovery tests

As of 6 June 2019, SpaceX has attempted 47 landings of a first stage on a solid surface, 40 of which have succeeded.

In July 2014, SpaceX announced that the fifth and sixth controlled-descent test flights would attempt to land on a solid surface, merging the lessons from the high-altitude envelope expansion of the first four controlled-descent flights over water with the low-altitude lessons of the F9R Dev testing in Texas.[32] At that time, the "solid surface" was not further described, and was later revealed to be a seafaring barge dubbed an autonomous spaceport drone ship.

Many of the test objectives were achieved on the first attempt, including bringing the stage to the specific location of the floating platform and collecting a large amount of test data with the first use of grid fin control surfaces for more precise reentry positioning. However the touchdown on the corner of the barge was a hard landing and most of the rocket body fell into the ocean and sank; SpaceX published a short clip of the crash.[43] It would take four more attempts to achieve the first barge landing at sea on flight 23.[44] Meanwhile, ground landing succeeded on the first attempt with flight 20 on December 21, 2015.[45]

In October 2014, SpaceX clarified that the "solid surface" would be a floating platform constructed from a barge in Louisiana, and confirmed that they would attempt to land the first stage of the fourteenth Falcon 9 flight on the platform.[46] For the landing to succeed, the 18 m (60 ft)-wide span of the rocket landing legs must not only land within the 52 m (170 ft)-wide barge deck, but would need to also deal with ocean swell and GPS errors.[47] In late November, SpaceX revealed that the landing barge would be capable of autonomous operation and would not need to be anchored or moored;[10] it was hence called an autonomous spaceport drone ship. As of January 2015 three of these ships had been built, two of which were operational.[48]

Flight 14

This fifth controlled-descent test flight was anticipated by the specialized press as a historic core return attempt.[49] It incorporated for the first time in an orbital mission the grid fin aerodynamic control surfaces that had previously been tested only during a low-altitude, low-speed test with the F9R Dev1 prototype vehicle in early 2014. The addition of grid fins, with continuation of the control authority obtained from gimbaling the engines as on previous test flights, was projected to improve the landing accuracy to 10 m (33 ft), a thousand-fold improvement over the four previous test flights which landed within 10 km (6.2 mi) of their target coordinates.[50] Prior to the flight, SpaceX projected that the likelihood of success on the first try was 50 percent or less.[47]

The first test flight for this new hardware occurred on January 10, 2015, on the CRS-5 mission for NASA. The controlled-descent flight started approximately three minutes after launch, following the second stage separation event,[49] when the first stage was approximately 80 km (50 mi) high and moving at a velocity of Mach 10 (10,000 km/h; 6,300 mph).[51]

The SpaceX webcast indicated that the boostback burn and reentry burns for the descending first stage occurred, and that the descending rocket then went "below the horizon," as expected, which eliminated the live telemetry signal, so that the retropropulsive landing attempt was not shown live. Shortly thereafter, SpaceX released information that the rocket did get to the drone ship as planned, but "landed hard ... Ship itself is fine. Some of the support equipment on the deck will need to be replaced."[52][53][54] Musk later elaborated that the rocket's flight-control surfaces had exhausted their supply of hydraulic fluid prior to impact.[55] Musk posted photos of the impact while talking to John Carmack on Twitter. SpaceX later released a video of the impact on Vine.[43]

Flight 17

A seventh test flight of the first stage controlled-descent profile occurred on April 14, 2015, on Falcon 9 flight 17, which carried CRS-6 to the International Space Station. This was SpaceX's second attempt to land on a floating platform. The first stage was fitted with grid fins and landing legs to facilitate the post-mission test.

An early report from Elon Musk suggested that the first stage made a hard landing on the drone ship.[56] Musk later clarified that the bipropellant valve was stuck, and therefore the control system could not react rapidly enough for a successful landing.[57] On April 15, SpaceX released a video of the terminal phase of the descent, the landing, the tip over, and the resulting deflagration as the stage broke up on the deck of the ASDS.[58]

Flight 20: first landing on ground pad

The first attempt to land the first stage of Falcon 9 on a ground pad near the launch site occurred on flight 20, the maiden flight of the Falcon 9 Full Thrust version, on the evening of December 21, 2015. The landing was successful and the first stage was recovered.[45][59] This was the first time in history that a rocket first stage returned to Earth after propelling an orbital launch mission and achieved a controlled vertical landing.

SpaceX applied to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) US regulatory authority to perform its eighth booster controlled-descent test culminating with a landing attempt at the Landing Zone 1 facility (formerly Launch Complex 13) that SpaceX had recently built at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.[60] The FAA cleared SpaceX to attempt this landing after assessing that it would inflict minimal damage on the environment.[61][62] Additionally, NASA planned to close the NASA Causeway near the launch and landing site and significantly increase the size of exclusion zones during the launch and landing attempt.[63][64] Both options to attempt landing on the ground pad or on the drone ship at sea remained open until the day of the launch. The final decision to return the booster to Cape Canaveral was made based on a number of factors, including weather at the potential landing sites.

Flight 20 took off at 20:29 EST on December 21, 2015 (01:29 UTC on December 22, 2015). About 9 minutes and 45 seconds later, the first stage landed vertically on the pad.[45][59][65]

SpaceX does not plan to fly the Falcon 9 flight 20 first stage again.[66] Rather, the rocket was inspected and moved back to the launch pad a few miles north to perform a static fire test. After the hot fire test, the vehicle was evaluated in detail by SpaceX to assess capabilities for reflight of the launch vehicle design after future landings.

On December 31, SpaceX announced that no damage had been found on the stage and that it was ready to fire again.[67][68] On January 15, 2016, SpaceX conducted the static fire test on the recovered booster and reported a good overall outcome, except for some thrust fluctuations in one of the outer engines (engine 9). Elon Musk reported that this may have been due to debris ingestion.[69]

This booster has been on display outside of SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, California since August 20, 2016.

Flight 21

Flight 21, the final launch of a Falcon 9 v1.1, carried the Jason 3 payload. At one point this was the first possible opportunity for an attempt to land the first stage on land,[70] but the launches were reordered following the loss of Falcon 9 flight 19 in June 2015. Jason-3 was successfully launched on January 17, 2016, and while the first stage managed to slow down towards a soft landing, the lockout collet on one of the landing legs did not latch correctly, which caused the rocket to fall over and explode after touching down.[71][72] Elon Musk noted that ice buildup on the collet from the high-humidity launch conditions may have led to the failure of the latch.[73][74]

Flight 22

On March 4 2016, Falcon 9 flight 22 launched the 5,271 kg (11,620 lb) heavy SES-9 communications satellite,[75][76] the rocket's largest payload yet targeting a highly-energetic geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO). Consequently, the Falcon 9 first stage followed a ballistic trajectory after separation and re-entered the atmosphere at high velocity with very little fuel to mitigate potential aerodynamic damage.

Therefore, SpaceX did not expect to successfully land its Falcon 9 booster on its sea barge, the Of Course I Still Love You, positioned in the Atlantic Ocean. Elon Musk confirmed in a tweet that the landing attempt had failed.[77][78]

Flight 23: first landing on a drone ship

On April 8, 2016, Falcon 9 flight 23, the third flight of the full-thrust version, delivered the SpaceX CRS-8 cargo on its way to the International Space Station while the first stage conducted a boostback and re-entry maneuver over the Atlantic Ocean. Nine minutes after liftoff, the booster landed vertically on the drone ship Of Course I Still Love You, 300 km (190 mi) from the Florida coastline, achieving a long-sought-after milestone for the SpaceX reusability development program.[44]

This stage, serial number B1021, was refurbished and flown again in March 2017 for the SES-10 mission, setting another milestone in the development of reusable rockets.

Flight 24: first return from GTO mission

On May 6, 2016, Falcon 9 flight 24 delivered the JCSAT-14 satellite on a geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) while the first stage conducted a re-entry burn under ballistic conditions without prior boostback. Following the controlled descent through the atmosphere, the booster executed a short landing burn as it approached the drone ship Of Course I Still Love You, and succeeded in landing vertically. This second landing at sea was more difficult than the previous one because the booster at separation was traveling about 8,350 km/h (5,190 mph) compared to 6,650 km/h (4,130 mph) on the CRS-8 launch to low Earth orbit.[79] Pursuing their experiments to test the limits of the flight envelope, SpaceX opted for a shorter landing burn with three engines instead of the single-engine burns seen in earlier attempts; this approach consumes less fuel by leaving the stage in free fall as long as possible and decelerating more sharply, thereby minimizing the amount of energy expended to counter gravity.[80] Elon Musk indicated this first stage may not be flown again and will instead be used as a life leader for ground tests to confirm future first stage rockets are good.[81]

Flight 25

On May 27, 2016, Falcon 9 flight 25 delivered THAICOM 8 to a supersynchronous transfer orbit; despite high re-entry speed, the first stage again landed successfully on the SpaceX drone ship.[82] The landing crushed a "crush core" in one leg, leading to a notable tilt to the stage as it stood on the drone ship.[83]

Flight 26

On June 15, 2016, Falcon 9 flight 26 successfully delivered the Eutelsat 117W B[84] and ABS 2A[85] satellites into GTO. The first stage conducted a re-entry burn and successfully deployed its grid fins, before attempting a landing on the barge. The landing failed in its final moments due to low thrust on one of the first stage engines, caused by the exhaustion of its liquid oxygen fuel supply. That caused the engines to shut down early while the first stage was just above the drone's deck, causing a landing failure.[86][87]

Flight 27

In the early hours of July 18, 2016, Falcon 9 flight 27, carrying the Dragon spacecraft for the CRS-9 mission was followed by a successful landing of the first stage at Landing Zone 1, Cape Canaveral.[88]

Flight 28

On August 14, 2016, the Falcon 9 flight 28 successfully propelled the Japanese JCSAT-16 telecommunications satellite to a geosynchronous transfer orbit. The first stage re-entered the atmosphere and landed vertically on the Of Course I Still Love You drone ship that was located in the Atlantic Ocean.[89]

Transition to routine reuse
Further information: List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches § Future launches

SpaceX continued to return a number of first stages in both ground and sea landings to clarify the procedures needed to re-use flown boosters. The company had hoped to begin offering pre-flown Falcon 9 rocket stages commercially by the end of 2016,[90][91] but the first re-used booster eventually took off on March 30, 2017 with the SES-10 mission. The booster performed well and was recovered a second time.

In January 2016 Musk evaluated the likelihood of success to approximately 70 percent for landing attempts in 2016, hopefully rising to 90 percent in 2017; he also cautioned that the company expected "a few more RUDs", referring to the term Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly, a humorous euphemism for destruction of the vehicle.[92] Musk's prediction were close to the actual numbers, as five out of eight flown boosters (63%) were recovered in 2016, and 14 out of 14 (100%) in 2017. Three GTO missions for heavy payloads were flown in an expendable configuration, not equipped for landing. Five boosters were flown a second time in 2017, marking the beginning of routine reuse of boosters. In 2018 and 2019, more than half of the missions were flown with reused boosters.

  • Falcon 9 first-stage attempts landing on the Autonomous spaceport drone ship, the landing legs are in the midst of deploying
  • Falcon 9 Flight 17's first-stage attempting a controlled landing on the drone ship following the successful launch of CRS-6
  • Falcon 9 flight 20's first-stage moments before touchdown on Landing Zone 1
  • Falcon 9 flight 20's first-stage after landing
  • Falcon 9 flight 21's landing approach before it soft-landed and tipped over due to a leg lock failure
  • Falcon 9 flight 23's first-stage was the first successful landing on the drone ship
  • Falcon 9 flight 24's first stage on the drone ship
  • Falcon 9 flight 25 first-stage approached the drone ship with a tilt

See also

References
  1. Amos, Jonathan (September 30, 2013). "Recycled rockets: SpaceX calls time on expendable launch vehicles". BBC News. Retrieved October 2, 2013.
  2. Boozer, R.D. (March 10, 2014). "Rocket reusability: a driver of economic growth". The Space Review. Retrieved March 25, 2014.
  3. Belfiore, Michael (March 13, 2014). "SpaceX Set to Launch the World's First Reusable Booster". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved March 14, 2014. SpaceX is counting on lower launch costs to increase demand for launch services. But Foust cautions that this strategy comes with risk. 'It's worth noting,' he says, 'that many current customers of launch services, including operators of commercial satellites, aren't particularly price sensitive, so thus aren't counting on reusability to lower costs.' That means those additional launches, and thus revenue, may have to come from markets that don't exist yet. 'A reusable system with much lower launch costs might actually result in lower revenue for that company unless they can significantly increase demand,' says Foust. 'That additional demand would likely have to come from new markets, with commercial human spaceflight perhaps the biggest and best-known example.'
  4. Wells, Jane (January 13, 2015). "SpaceX, Elon Musk and the reusable rocket dream". CNBC. Comcast. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
  5. Graham, William (March 30, 2017). "SpaceX conducts historic Falcon 9 re-flight with SES-10 - Lands booster again". NASASpaceFlight.com.
  6. Messier, Doug (March 28, 2013). "Dragon Post-Mission Press Conference Notes". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved March 30, 2013. Q. What is strategy on first stage recover? Musk: Initial recovery test will be a water landing. First stage continue in ballistic arc and execute a velocity reduction burn before it enters atmosphere to lessen impact. Right before splashdown, will light up the engine again. Emphasizes that we don’t expect success in the first several attempts. Hopefully next year with more experience and data, we should be able to return the first stage to the launch site and do a propulsion landing on land using legs. Q. Is there a flight identified for return to launch site of the first stage? Musk: No. Will probably be the middle of next year.
  7. Belfiore, Michael (September 30, 2013). "Musk: SpaceX Now Has "All the Pieces" For Truly Reusable Rockets". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved October 17, 2013.
  8. Kremer, Ken (April 19, 2014). "SpaceX Makes Strides Towards 1st Stage Falcon Rocket Recovery during Space Station Launch". Universe Today. Retrieved April 19, 2014.
  9. Klotz, Irene (February 24, 2014). "SpaceX Falcon Rocket to Test Landing Legs". Discovery News. Retrieved February 25, 2014.
  10. Bergin, Chris (November 24, 2014). "SpaceX's Autonomous Spaceport Drone Ship ready for action". NASASpaceFlight. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
  11. Messier, Doug (September 10, 2013). "A Preview of Falcon 9′s Flight From Vandenberg". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved September 11, 2013.
  12. Bergin, Chris (February 28, 2014). "SpaceX outlines CRS-3 landing legs plan toward first stage recovery ambitions". NASAspaceflight.com. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  13. Klotz, Irene (September 6, 2013). "Musk Says SpaceX Being "Extremely Paranoid" as It Readies for Falcon 9's California Debut". Space News. Retrieved September 13, 2013.
  14. de Selding, Peter B. (November 27, 2013). "Why the World's 2nd Largest Satellite Fleet Operator Agreed To Be SpaceX's 1st Customer for a Launch to Geo". Space News. Retrieved November 28, 2013.
  15. Szondy, David (April 18, 2014). "Fourth time lucky for SpaceX's CRS-3 Dragon launch". Gizmag. Retrieved November 27, 2014.
  16. "New Commercial Rocket Descent Data May Help NASA with Future Mars Landings, no. 14-287". NASA. October 17, 2014. Retrieved October 19, 2014.
  17. Morring, Frank Jr. (October 20, 2014). "NASA, SpaceX Share Data On Supersonic Retropropulsion : Data-sharing deal will help SpaceX land Falcon 9 on Earth and NASA put humans on Mars". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on October 27, 2014. Retrieved March 28, 2015. [The] partnership between NASA and SpaceX is giving the U.S. space agency an early look at what it would take to land multi-ton habitats and supply caches on Mars for human explorers, while providing sophisticated infrared (IR) imagery to help the spacecraft company develop a reusable launch vehicle. After multiple attempts, airborne NASA and U.S. Navy IR tracking cameras ... captured a SpaceX Falcon 9 in flight as its first stage [fell] back toward Earth shortly after second-stage ignition and then reignit[ed] to lower the stage toward a propulsive "zero-velocity, zero-altitude" touchdown on the sea surface.
  18. Messier, Doug (September 29, 2013). "Falcon 9 Launches Payloads into Orbit From Vandenberg". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved September 30, 2013.
  19. Wall, Mike (October 17, 2013). "SpaceX Hit Huge Reusable Rocket Milestone with Falcon 9 Test". Space.com. Retrieved December 5, 2013.
  20. Vaughan, Adam (October 25, 2013). "12 interesting things we learned from Tesla's Elon Musk this week". The Guardian. Retrieved October 26, 2013. We managed to re-enter the atmosphere, not break up like we normally do, and get all way down to sea level.
  21. Belfiore, Michael (April 22, 2014). "SpaceX Brings a Booster Safely Back to Earth". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved April 25, 2014.
  22. Orwig, Jessica (November 25, 2014). "Elon Musk Just Unveiled A Game-Changing Ocean Landing Pad For His Reusable Rockets". Business Insider. Retrieved December 11, 2014. The first successful "soft landing" of a Falcon 9 rocket happened in April of this year
  23. Norris, Guy (April 28, 2014). "SpaceX Plans For Multiple Reusable first stage Tests". Aviation Week. Retrieved May 17, 2014. The April 17 F9R Dev 1 flight, which lasted under 1 min., was the first vertical landing test of a production-representative recoverable Falcon 9 v1.1 first stage, while the April 18 cargo flight to the ISS was the first opportunity for SpaceX to evaluate the design of foldable landing legs and upgraded thrusters that control the stage during its initial descent.
  24. "SpaceX CRS-3 Mission Press Kit: Cargo Resupply Services Mission" (PDF). NASA. March 2014. Retrieved March 15, 2014.
  25. Boyle, Alan (April 18, 2014). "Cargo Launch and Rocket Test Add Up to 'Happy Day' for SpaceX". NBC News. Retrieved April 20, 2014.
  26. Gwynne Shotwell (March 21, 2014). Broadcast 2212: Special Edition, interview with Gwynne Shotwell (audio file). The Space Show. Event occurs at 51;50–52;55. 2212. Archived from the original (mp3) on March 22, 2014. Retrieved March 22, 2014.
  27. Clark, Stephen (April 14, 2014). "Recovery crews positioned to retrieve Falcon 9 first stage". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved April 14, 2014.
  28. Amos, Jonathan (April 25, 2014). "SpaceX rocket stage in 'soft landing'". BBC News. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
  29. Musk, Elon (April 25, 2014). SpaceX Press Conference at the National Press Club. YouTube.com. National Press Club. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
  30. Bergin, Chris (July 28, 2014). "SpaceX Roadmap building on its rocket business revolution". NASAspaceflight. Retrieved July 28, 2014. At this point, we are highly confident of being able to land successfully on a floating launch pad or back at the launch site and refly the rocket with no required refurbishment
  31. "SpaceX Falcon Rocket Sends Up a Six-Pack of Satellites". NBC. July 14, 2014. Retrieved July 15, 2014. Musk: 'Rocket first stage reentry, landing burn & leg deploy were good, but lost hull integrity right after splashdown (aka kaboom) ... Detailed review of rocket telemetry needed to tell if due to initial splashdown or subsequent tip over and body slam.'
  32. Berger, Brian (July 21, 2014). "SpaceX Releases Footage of Falcon 9 First-stage Splashdown". SpaceNews. Retrieved July 23, 2014.
  33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvim4rsNHkQ&t=32s
  34. Graham, William (February 8, 2015). "SpaceX Falcon 9 ready for DSCOVR mission". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved February 8, 2015.
  35. Orwig, Jessica (February 5, 2015). "SpaceX will attempt a potentially historic rocket launch and landing this weekend". Business Insider. Retrieved February 7, 2015.
  36. Bergin, Chris (January 16, 2015). "DSCOVR and Recover: SpaceX chase the cigar with next Falcon 9 mission". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved January 17, 2015.
  37. Clark, Stephen (January 10, 2015). "Dragon successfully launched, rocket recovery demo crash lands". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved January 10, 2015.
  38. Wall, Mike (February 11, 2015). "SpaceX Won't Try Rocket Landing on Drone Ship After Satellite Launch Today". Space.com. Retrieved February 11, 2015.
  39. Hull, Dana (February 11, 2015). "SpaceX Launches Satellite as Rocket Recovery Is Scrapped". Bloomberg. Bloomberg. Retrieved February 12, 2015.
  40. Spaceflight, Mike Wall 2017-12-23T01:41:16Z. "Used SpaceX Rocket Launches 10 Communications Satellites Once Again". Space.com. Retrieved June 6, 2019.
  41. "SpaceX launches GovSat-1 with previously flown Falcon 9 booster". SpaceNews.com. January 31, 2018. Retrieved June 6, 2019.
  42. Kelly, Emre (February 9, 2018). "Full SpaceX statement on #GovSat1: "While the Falcon 9 first stage for the GovSat-1 mission was expendable, it initially survived splashdown in the Atlantic Ocean. However, the stage broke apart before we could complete an unplanned recovery effort for this mission."". @EmreKelly. Retrieved June 6, 2019.
  43. SpaceX (January 16, 2015). "Close, but no cigar. This time". Vine. Retrieved May 8, 2016.
  44. Drake, Nadia (April 8, 2016). "SpaceX Rocket Makes Spectacular Landing on Drone Ship". National Geographic. Retrieved April 8, 2016. To space and back, in less than nine minutes? Hello, future.
  45. Wall, Mike (December 21, 2015). "Wow! SpaceX Lands Orbital Rocket Successfully in Historic First". Space.com. Retrieved May 8, 2016.
  46. Foust, Jeff (October 25, 2014). "Next Falcon 9 Launch Could See First-stage Platform Landing". Space News. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  47. Bergin, Chris (November 18, 2014). "Pad 39A – SpaceX laying the groundwork for Falcon Heavy debut". NASA SpaceFlight. Retrieved November 21, 2014.
  48. Musk, Elon (January 23, 2015). "West Coast droneship under construction..." Twitter.com.
  49. Graham, William (January 5, 2015). "SpaceX set for Dragon CRS-5 launch and historic core return attempt". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved January 6, 2015. While the Falcon 9’s second stage continues to orbit with the Dragon spacecraft, its first stage will execute a series of maneuvers which SpaceX hope will culminate in a successful landing atop a floating platform off the coast of Florida. The demonstration follows successful tests during two previous launches where the first stage has been guided to a controlled water landing, however the stage has not been recoverable on either previous attempt. ... Achieving a precision landing on a floating platform is an important milestone for SpaceX as they attempt to demonstrate their planned flyback recovery of the first stage of the Falcon 9.
  50. "X MARKS THE SPOT: FALCON 9 ATTEMPTS OCEAN PLATFORM LANDING". SpaceX. December 16, 2014. Retrieved December 17, 2014. A key upgrade to enable precision targeting of the Falcon 9 all the way to touchdown is the addition of four hypersonic grid fins placed in an X-wing configuration around the vehicle, stowed on ascent and deployed on reentry to control the stage's lift vector. Each fin moves independently for roll, pitch and yaw, and combined with the engine gimbaling, will allow for precision landing – first on the autonomous spaceport drone ship, and eventually on land.
  51. "SpaceX CRS-% Mission: Cargo Resupply Services" (PDF). nasa.gov. NASA. December 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2015. Approximately 157 seconds into flight, the first-stage engines are shut down, an event known as main-engine cutoff, or MECO. At this point, Falcon 9 is 80 kilometers (50 miles) high, traveling at 10 times the speed of sound.
  52. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (January 10, 2015). "Rocket made it to drone spaceport ship, but landed hard. Close, but no cigar this time. Bodes well for the future tho" (Tweet). Retrieved January 10, 2015 – via Twitter.
  53. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (January 10, 2015). "Ship itself is fine. Some of the support equipment on the deck will need to be replaced..." (Tweet). Retrieved January 10, 2015 – via Twitter.
  54. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (January 10, 2015). "Didn't get good landing/impact video. Pitch dark and foggy. Will piece it together from telemetry and ... actual pieces" (Tweet). Retrieved January 10, 2015 – via Twitter.
  55. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (January 10, 2015). "Grid fins worked extremely well from hypersonic velocity to subsonic, but ran out of hydraulic fluid right before landing" (Tweet). Retrieved January 13, 2015 – via Twitter.
  56. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (April 14, 2015). "Ascent successful. Dragon enroute to Space Station. Rocket landed on droneship, but too hard for survival" (Tweet). Retrieved May 8, 2016 – via Twitter.
  57. Guy Norris (April 16, 2015). "SpaceX Checks Throttle Valve After Flawed Falcon 9 Recovery Attempt".
  58. CRS-6 First Stage Landing, SpaceX, April 15, 2015.
  59. SpaceX [@SpaceX] (December 22, 2015). "The Falcon 9 first stage landing is confirmed. Second stage continuing nominally" (Tweet). Retrieved May 8, 2016 – via Twitter.
  60. Dean, James (December 1, 2015). "SpacexSpaceX wants to land next first stage at Cape Canaveral". Florida Today. Retrieved December 2, 2015.
  61. Orwig, Jessica (December 19, 2015). "SpaceX will attempt a potentially historic rocket landing like never before this weekend". Business Insider. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  62. "SpaceX aims for Sunday launch and ground landing". Orlando Sentinel. December 20, 2015. Retrieved December 20, 2015.
  63. Foust, Jeff (December 18, 2015). "FAA Moves Closer to Approving Falcon 9 Landings at Cape Canaveral". SpaceNews. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  64. Bergin, Chris (December 18, 2015). "SpaceX Falcon 9 Static Fires ahead of OG2 RTF mission". NASASpaceFlight. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  65. ShantiUniverse (December 21, 2015). "SpaceX Falcon 9 1st Successful Launch/Landing on Target" – via YouTube.
  66. O'Kane, Sean (December 21, 2015). "SpaceX's 'reusable' Falcon 9 rocket won't fly again, Elon Musk says". The Verge. Retrieved December 26, 2015.
  67. "SpaceX Reports No Damage to Falcon 9 First Stage After Landing". January 3, 2016. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
  68. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (December 31, 2015). "Falcon 9 back in the hangar at Cape Canaveral. No damage found, ready to fire again" (Tweet). Retrieved January 2, 2016 – via Twitter.
  69. "SpaceX Tests Recovered Falcon 9 Stage and Prepares for Next Launch". January 15, 2016. Retrieved January 15, 2016.
  70. Bergin, Chris (April 3, 2015). "SpaceX preparing for a busy season of missions and test milestones". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved April 4, 2015.
  71. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (January 17, 2016). "However, that was not what prevented it being good. Touchdown speed was ok, but a leg lockout didn't latch, so it tipped over after landing" (Tweet). Retrieved January 17, 2016 – via Twitter.
  72. SpaceX [@SpaceX] (January 17, 2016). "After further data review, stage landed softly but leg 3 didn't lockout. Was within 1.3 meters of droneship center" (Tweet). Retrieved January 17, 2016 – via Twitter.
  73. Elon Musk (January 17, 2016). "Elon Musk on Instagram: Falcon lands on droneship". Instagram. Archived from the original on January 18, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2016. Falcon lands on droneship, but the lockout collet doesn't latch on one the four legs, causing it to tip over post landing. Root cause may have been ice buildup due to condensation from heavy fog at liftoff.
  74. Boyle, Alan (January 17, 2016). "SpaceX rocket launches satellite, but tips over during sea landing attempt". GeekWire. Retrieved January 18, 2016.
  75. Clark, Stephen (February 24, 2016). "Falcon 9 rocket to give SES 9 telecom satellite an extra boost". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved March 7, 2016.
  76. Klotz, Irene (February 23, 2016). "Satellite operator SES says interested in used SpaceX rocket". Reuters. Retrieved February 24, 2016.
  77. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (March 4, 2016). "Rocket landed hard on the droneship. Didn't expect this one to work (v hot reentry), but next flight has a good chance" (Tweet). Retrieved May 8, 2016 – via Twitter.
  78. David Szondy (March 4, 2016). "SES-9 mission launch successful, but Falcon 9 landing less so". Gizmag. Retrieved March 4, 2016.
  79. SpaceX (April 8, 2016). "CRS-8 Dragon Hosted Webcast" – via YouTube.
  80. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (May 6, 2016). "Yeah, this was a three engine landing burn, so triple deceleration of last flight. That's important to minimize gravity losses" (Tweet). Retrieved May 8, 2016 – via Twitter.
  81. "SpaceX Falcon 9 first stage booster suffered 'max' damage on landing".
  82. Kramer, Miriam (May 27, 2016). "SpaceX does it again: Company lands third rocket on drone ship in the ocean". Mashable. Retrieved May 28, 2016.
  83. Wall, Mike (June 7, 2016). "SpaceX's Leaning Rocket Tower Comes Ashore (Photos)". Retrieved June 7, 2016.
  84. "SpaceX on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
  85. "SpaceX on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
  86. "Elon Musk on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
  87. "Elon Musk on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
  88. SpaceX launches space station docking port for NASA, The Associated Press, July 18, 2016
  89. Clark, Stephen (August 14, 2016). "Falcon 9 rocket launches Japanese satellite, then nails bullseye landing". Spaceflight Now.
  90. "Returned Falcon 9 Booster fires up for Static Fire Test". Spaceflight 101. January 15, 2016. Retrieved January 18, 2016.
  91. Money, Stewart (April 9, 2016). "Musk: SpaceX Plans to Re-Fly Falcon 9 in June". Innerspace.net. Retrieved May 8, 2016. Having previously suggested that SpaceX would like to re-fly a Falcon 9 first stage by the end of the year, Musk surprised nearly everyone by confidently asserting that the time frame was instead late May or more realistically June. Moreover, the odds were favorable that it would be a paying launch.
  92. Elon Musk [@elonmusk] (January 19, 2016). "My best guess for 2016: ~70% landing success rate (so still a few more RUDs to go), then hopefully improving to ~90% in 2017" (Tweet). Retrieved May 8, 2016 – via Twitter.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.