Gringo: The Dangerous Life of John McAfee

Gringo: The Dangerous Life of John McAfee is a 2016 American documentary film about the portion of John McAfee's life spent in Belize. The film was directed by Nanette Burstein and had its world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 11, 2016, before airing on Showtime on September 24, 2016.[1]

Gringo: The Dangerous Life
of John McAfee
Promotional poster
Directed byNanette Burstein
Produced byChi-Young Park
StarringJohn McAfee
Music byDana Kaproff
CinematographyRobert Chappell
Edited by
  • Lars Woodruffe
  • Matt Colbourn
  • Kenneth Levis
Production
company
Ish Entertainment
Distributed byShowtime
Release date
  • September 11, 2016 (2016-09-11) (TIFF)
  • September 24, 2016 (2016-09-24) (United States)
Running time
97 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish

Synopsis

McAfee became a multi-millionaire after creating a prominent antivirus software, and later relocated to Belize. In April 2012, national police raided McAfee's estate based on suspicions of drug manufacture or trafficking. Later that year McAfee's neighbor Greg Faull was murdered and McAfee went into hiding before crossing the border to Guatemala and being deported back to the United States. The documentary suggests that McAfee was involved in the murder due to a feud between him and Faull over McAfee's dogs. McAfee was never charged with any crime in Belize.[2][3]

McAfee described the documentary as fiction.[4]

Reception

John DeFore of The Hollywood Reporter praised the film, stating, "Though she says she began the documentary trying to understand how McAfee's likely guilt was so quickly forgotten by the media as they covered his latest political aspirations, Burstein seems to have wound up conducting an investigation more thorough, or at least more fruitful, than any local authority."[5] Jacob Brogan of Slate said of the film, "Even when Burstein's questions don't prompt easy answers, it's thrilling to consider the possibilities that arise in their wake",[6] while Steve Greene of IndieWire said, "This film works best as an indictment of a sensationalist, tunnel-vision brand of media coverage that confuses eccentricity for legitimacy and eschews reporting in favor of the face-value testimony of a strong personality."[7]

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.