Historic Preservation Fund

The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) envisioned a funding source to provide states with matching funds to implement the Act.[1] The Act was to be implemented through partnerships with states, Indian Tribes, Native Hawaiians, local governments, nonprofit organizations, and the private sector. It brought forth state programs to implement much of the Act; a National Register of Historic Places encompassing a wide range of sites and structures deemed historic; partnerships at all levels of government; incentives; assistance; and reviews. The NHPA endorsed the use of federal financial support for the national preservation program[2] and called for two basic categories of assistance, both of which provide funding, rather than technical assistance, for historic preservation projects and to individuals for the preservation of properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Since enactment in 1966, repeated efforts to fund the HPF was realized after a 10-year campaign when consistent funding was authorized on September 28, 1976, through Public Law 94-422.[3] The law amended the National Historic Preservation Act to establish a funding source known as the Historic Preservation Fund for a historic preservation grant program to provide assistance to non-federal entities.[4]

Source of funding

Administered by the National Park Service within the U.S. Department of the Interior, the Historic Preservation Fund is not funded through tax revenue. Rather, it is funded by royalties accumulated by the Office of Natural Resources Revenue through payments, rentals, bonuses, fines, penalties, and other revenue from the leasing and production of natural resources from federal and Indian lands onshore and in the Outer Continental Shelf.[5] For example, in FY 2015, $9.87 billion in revenues were disbursed to seven funds: American Indian Tribes (8.6 percent), the Land and Water Conservation Fund (9 percent), Reclamation Fund (14.1 percent), Historic Preservation Fund (1.5 percent or $150 million), State Share (18.6 percent), and the U.S. Treasury (48.1 percent).[6] The legislation dedicates an allowable amount to these special funds, but their actual appropriation depends upon the annual congressional appropriations process. As a result, though legislation authorizes that these revenues go toward these funds, their actual appropriation for these purposes has seldom, if ever, occurred.

The fully authorized amount of $150 million, to be drawn from federal oil and gas proceeds, has never been appropriated for the intended purposes. The fund has made disbursements every year as far back as 1991, documented in available charts, yet half of the amount has never been allocated or appropriated to the intended programs. Rather than allocating the full amount or royalty revenues to the seven funds, these revenues stay in the U.S. Treasury and are, in effect, used in a 'bookkeeping exercise" to achieve annual appropriations spending levels.[7] Over the years, the appropriated amount for the HPF has received over half of what has been authorized.

Reauthorization history
NCSHPO Board President Elizabeth Hughes (SHPO for Maryland) testifying before the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee on the reauthorization of the Historic Preservation Fund on Feb. 11, 2016.

The Historic Preservation Fund has been reauthorized six times since establishment in 1976 for periods between five and ten years.

P.L. 94-422[8] (1976).

P.L. 96-422, (Dec 12, 1980) for seven years as part of significant amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act.[9][10]

P.L 100-127 (Oct 9, 1987) for five years as a stand-alone piece of legislation.[11]

P.L. 102–575, Title XL[12] (Oct 30, 1992) for five years as part of a larger Reclamation bill also known as the 1992 NHPA amendments.[13]

P.L. 106-208[14] (May 26, 2000) as a stand-alone piece of legislation reauthorizing the HPF for five years.

P.L 109-453[15] (Dec 22, 2006) a stand-alone piece (in addition to ACHP amendments) for ten years that expired September 30, 2015.

H.R. 2817 was introduced on June 17, 2015 by Representative Mike Turner.[16] It became law on December 16, 2016 when President Obama signed H.R. 4680, the National Park Service Centennial Act, for a seven-year reauthorization through 2023 within P. L. 114–289.

State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO)

As part of P.L. 89-665, Section 101 implemented the designation of the State Historic Preservation Program. State Liaison Officers, which later became known as State Historic Preservation Officers, were established to manage historic preservation grants for the National Park Service (NPS). In the 1970s, these SHPOs experienced a growth in power as they became more organized, efficient and professional, and clarified their relationships with NPS. They also formed a National Conference of Historic Preservation Officers (NCSHPO) to represent them on a National level, particularly in Washington. The SHPO continued to gain an increasingly specific role, taking on the position of the advising consultant for the Section 106 review process. In 1980 with the amendment to the NHPA, the SHPO's exact duties were finally identified, defining its role, which remains today.[17]

State historic preservation officers (SHPOs), appointed by their Governor, are a key component of implementing the national historic preservation program. SHPOs manage the annual HPF appropriation to perform the federal preservation responsibilities required by the NHPA and match what they receive by at least 40 percent. Established in 1966 by the National Historic Preservation Act, SHPOs administer federal programs at the state and local levels and also administer their own state historic preservation programs. These programs help communities identify, evaluate, preserve, and revitalize their historic, archeological, and cultural resources. SHPOs also work with federal agencies, state and local governments, the public and educational and not-for-profit organizations to raise historic preservation awareness and to instill in Americans a sense of pride in their unique history. This awareness builds communities, encourages heritage tourism and increases economic development, all of which is best accomplished at the state and local level.

The responsibilities of the State Historic Preservation Office, according to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, include running the State Historic Preservation Program and, as stated in the Act:

  • (A) – In cooperation with Federal and State agencies, local governments, and private organizations and individuals, direct and conduct a comprehensive statewide survey of historic properties and maintain inventories of such properties;
  • (B) – Identify and nominate eligible properties to the National Register and otherwise administer applications for listing historic properties on the National register;
  • (C) – Prepare and implement a comprehensive statewide historic preservation plan;
  • (D) – Administer the State program of Federal assistance for historic preservation within the State;
  • (E) – Advise and assist, as appropriate, Federal and State agencies and local governments in carrying out their historic preservation responsibilities;
  • (F) – Cooperate with the Secretary, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and other Federal and State agencies, local governments, and organizations and individuals to ensure historic properties are taken into consideration at all levels of planning and development;
  • (G) – Provide public information, education and training, and technical assistance relating to the Federal and State Historic Preservation Programs; and
  • (H) – Cooperate with local governments in the development of the local historic preservation programs and assist local governments in becoming certified pursuant to subsection (C).[18]

Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO)

A designated officer of a Native American Indian Tribe with responsibility for the administration of certain National Historic Preservation Act,(NHPA), State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) responsibilities as amended in 1992 pursuant to Section 101 (d) (2), and listed in Section 101 (b) (3) of the act for which the tribe has assumed by request to the Secretary of the Interior. A tribe submits its request to the National Park Service for processing which has administrative oversight of other NHPA programs as well. The THPO application process is detailed in a proposed rule, currently under final rule processing, encoded at 36 CFR 61.8. For more information about the THPO program history, funding, a listing of tribes that have assumed SHPO responsibilities and an application, please visit the National Park Service's website at:

References
  1. 54 U.S.C. 300101 – 307108, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665, 80 Stat. 915), establishes a variety of historic preservation programs, including the historic preservation grant program to provide assistance to non-federal entities for the preservation of their cultural heritage, the National Register of Historic Places, and the designation of National Historic Landmarks. The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to carry out these programs; the National Park Service implements these programs and responsibilities for the Secretary.
  2. 16 U.S.C. sec. 470a(e)(1)
  3. Amends the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 to establish a historic preservation fund in the United States Treasury. Stipulates that $24,400,000 for fiscal year 1977, $75,000,000 annually for fiscal years 1978 and 1979 and $100,000,000 annually for each fiscal year thereafter until fiscal year 1989 be covered into the fund from revenues due and payable to the United States under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and other Federal Mining laws. Stipulates that such moneys shall remain available until appropriated to carry out the purposes of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
  4. Bill Summary for S. 327. 94th Congress. Congress.gov
  5. "Office of Natural Resources Revenue".
  6. Office of Natural Resources Revenue. U.S. Department of the Interior. Chart: Total Disbursement by Fund Fiscal Year 2015. For production near coasts, states directly share in the revenue generated under three programs. The (1) Outer Continental Lands Act (OCS Lands Act) provides that 27 percent of all revenues from production within three miles seaward of the federal/state boundary be given to the states hosting production. (2) For the Gulf Coast region through the Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP) revenue sharing extends beyond the three-mile zone. (3) In 2006, Congress passed the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMESA) to allocate 37.5 percent of all royalties from new oil and natural gas development in federal waters adjacent to the states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. The intent is to ensure states have adequate resources to fund coastal restoration and conservation initiatives and hurricane protection projects.
  7. Jorjani, Aimee (2012). Seeking and Determining Impacts: Justifying Federal Competitive Historic Preservation Grant Programs. Goucher College. p. 18.
  8. 54 U.S.C. 300101 – 307108, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-665, 80 Stat. 915), establishes a variety of historic preservation programs, including the historic preservation grant program to provide assistance to non-federal entities for the preservation of their cultural heritage, the National Register of Historic Places, and the designation of National Historic Landmarks. The Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to carry out these programs; the National Park Service implements these programs and responsibilities for the Secretary.
  9. "P.L. 96-422" (PDF). GPO.
  10. Report 96-1457 states, "H.R. 5496 represents 14 years of experience in developing a broad national historic preservation program. It recognizes the management needs of a program for identification and protection of over 15,000 years of American life in prehistoric hunting camps, frontier homesteads and towns, early 20th-century working-class neighborhoods, as well as major public buildings and monuments." The 1980 efforts were the result of a 5-year effort.
  11. "P.L. 100-127" (PDF).
  12. "P.L. 102-575".
  13. National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1992 opened the program to tribal and Native Hawaiian organizations. It amended the National Historic Preservation Act to: (1) require the Secretary of the Interior to report, at least once every four years, to the President and to the Congress, on a review of threats to properties included in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places; (2) revise requirements for Federal and State historic preservation programs; (3) provide for tribal and Native Hawaiian organizations historic preservation programs; (4) provide for matching grants to States and direct grants to Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations to carry out this Act; (5) require development of a comprehensive preservation education and training program; (6) revise requirements for awarding and apportioning grants under this Act; (7) extend the authorization for the Historic Preservation Fund; (8) require adaptive use alternatives for Federal agency historic properties; and (9) provide for professional standards with respect to historic preservation activities.
  14. "P.L. 106-208" (PDF).
  15. "P.L. 109-453" (PDF).
  16. "H.R. 2817, to reauthorize the HPF".
  17. King, Thomas F. Cultural Resource: Laws & Practice, 2nd Edition. Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press, 2004, 27.
  18. National Trust for Historic Preservation [and] Special Committee on Historic Preservation, United States Conference of Mayors ; Albert Rains, chairman ; Laurance G. Henderson, director, With Heritage So Rich, (Washington, D.C.: Preservation Books, (1999), 203.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.