Homosexuality in society

Homosexuality, as a phenomenon and as a behavior, has existed throughout the eras in human societies.

Main article: Homosexuality
Part of a series on
LGBT topics
      
lesbian ∙ gay ∙ bisexual ∙ transgender
Sexual orientation
History
Culture
Rights
Health
Social attitudes
Issues
Academic fields and discourse
LGBT portal

Demographics
Main article: Demographics of sexual orientation

Reliable data as to the size of the gay and lesbian population is of value in informing public policy.[1] For example, demographics would help in calculating the costs and benefits of domestic partnership benefits, of the impact of legalizing gay adoption, and of the impact of the U.S. military's Don't ask, don't tell policy.[1] Further, knowledge of the size of the "gay and lesbian population holds promise for helping social scientists understand a wide array of important questions—questions about the general nature of labor market choices, accumulation of human capital, specialization within households, discrimination, and decisions about geographic location."[1]

Measuring the prevalence of homosexuality may present difficulties.[2] The research must measure some characteristic that may or may not be defining of sexual orientation. The class of people with same-sex desires may be larger than the class of people who act on those desires, which in turn may be larger than the class of people who self-identify as gay/lesbian/bisexual.[1]

In 1948 and 1953, Alfred Kinsey reported that nearly 46% of the male subjects had "reacted" sexually to persons of both sexes in the course of their adult lives, and 37% had had at least one homosexual experience.[3] Kinsey's methodology was criticized.[4][5] A later study tried to eliminate the sample bias, but still reached similar conclusions.[6]

Estimates of the occurrence of exclusive homosexuality range from one to twenty percent of the population, usually finding there are slightly more gay men than lesbians.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]

Estimates of the frequency of homosexual activity also vary from one country to another. A 1992 study reported that 6.1% of males in Britain had had a homosexual experience, while in France the number was 4.1%.[22] According to a 2003 survey, 12% of Norwegians have had homosexual sex.[16] In New Zealand, a 2006 study suggested that 20% of the population anonymously reported some homosexual feelings, few of them identifying as homosexual. Percentage of persons identifying homosexual was 2–3%.[18] According to a 2008 poll, while only 6% of Britons define their sexual orientation as homosexual or bisexual, more than twice that number (13%) of Britons have had some form of sexual contact with someone of the same sex.[17]

In the United States, according to exit polling on 2008 Election Day for the 2008 Presidential elections, 4% of electorate self-identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, the same percentage as in 2004."[23] An estimated 34,000 homosexuals who are in a relationship are employed by the federal government.[24]

Law
Further information: Sodomy law, LGBT rights by country or territory, and LGBT rights opposition
Worldwide laws regarding same-sex intercourse, unions and expression
Same-sex intercourse illegal. Penalties:
  Death
  Death, not enforced
  Prison
  Prison, not enforced1
  Death under militias
  Detention w/o prosecution
Same-sex intercourse legal. Recognition of unions:
  Marriage2
  Extraterritorial marriage3
  Civil unions
  Limited domestic
  Limited foreign
  Optional certification
  None
  Restrictions of expression
Rings indicate local or case-by-case application.
1No arrests in the past three years or moratorium on law.
2For some jurisdictions the law may not yet be in effect.
3Marriage not available locally. Some jurisdictions may perform other types of partnerships.

Most nations do not impede consensual sex between unrelated persons above the local age of consent. Some jurisdictions further recognize identical rights, protections, and privileges for the family structures of same-sex couples, including marriage. Some nations mandate that all individuals restrict themselves to heterosexual relationships; that is, in some jurisdictions homosexual activity is illegal. Offenders can face the death penalty in some fundamentalist Muslim areas such as Iran and parts of Nigeria. There are, however, often significant differences between official policy and real-world enforcement. See Violence against LGBT people.

Although homosexual acts were decriminalized in some parts of the Western world, such as Poland in 1932, Denmark in 1933, Sweden in 1944, and the United Kingdom in 1967, it was not until the mid-1970s that the gay community first began to achieve limited civil rights in some developed countries. On July 2, 2009, homosexuality was decriminalized in India by a High Court ruling.[25] A turning point was reached in 1973 when the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, thus negating its previous definition of homosexuality as a clinical mental disorder. In 1977, Quebec became the first state-level jurisdiction in the world to prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. During the 1980s and 1990s, most developed countries enacted laws decriminalizing homosexual behavior and prohibiting discrimination against lesbian and gay people in employment, housing, and services. On the other hand, many countries today in the Middle East and Africa, as well as several countries in Asia, the Caribbean and the South Pacific, outlaw homosexuality. In six countries, homosexual behavior is punishable by life imprisonment; in ten others, it carries the death penalty.[26]

  • Employment discrimination refers to discriminatory employment practices such as bias in hiring, promotion, job assignment, termination, and compensation, and various types of harassment. In the United States there is "very little statutory, common law, and case law establishing employment discrimination based upon sexual orientation as a legal wrong."[27] Some exceptions and alternative legal strategies are available. President Bill Clinton's Executive Order 13087 (1998) prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation in the competitive service of the federal civilian workforce,[28] and federal non-civil service employees may have recourse under the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.[29] Private sector workers may have a Title VII action under a quid pro quo sexual harassment theory,[30] a "hostile work environment" theory,[31] a sexual stereotyping theory,[32] or others.[27]
  • Housing discrimination refers to discrimination against potential or current tenants by landlords. In the United States, there is no federal law against such discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, but at least thirteen states and many major cities have enacted laws prohibiting it.[33]
  • Hate crimes (also known as bias crimes) are crimes motivated by bias against an identifiable social group, usually groups defined by race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, gender identity, or political affiliation. In the United States, 45 states and the District of Columbia have statutes criminalizing various types of bias-motivated violence or intimidation (the exceptions are AZ, GA, IN, SC, and WY). Each of these statutes covers bias on the basis of race, religion, and ethnicity; 32 of them cover sexual orientation, 28 cover gender, and 11 cover transgender/gender-identity.[34] In October 2009, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which "...gives the Justice Department the power to investigate and prosecute bias-motivated violence where the perpetrator has selected the victim because of the person's actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability," was signed into law and makes hate crime based on sexual orientation, amongst other offenses, a federal crime in the United States.[35]

Political activism
Demonstration for gay rights in London in 1972.
Further information: LGBT social movements

Since the 1960s, many LGBT people in the West, particularly those in major metropolitan areas, have developed a so-called gay culture. To many, gay culture is exemplified by the gay pride movement, with annual parades and displays of rainbow flags. Yet not all LGBT people choose to participate in "queer culture", and many gay men and women specifically decline to do so. To some it seems to be a frivolous display, perpetuating gay stereotypes. To some others, the gay culture represents heterophobia and is scorned as widening the gulf between gay and non-gay people.

With the outbreak of AIDS in the early 1980s, many LGBT groups and individuals organized campaigns to promote efforts in AIDS education, prevention, research, patient support, and community outreach, as well as to demand government support for these programs. Gay Men's Health Crisis, Project Inform, and ACT UP are some notable American examples of the LGBT community's response to the AIDS crisis.

The bewildering death toll wrought by the AIDS epidemic at first seemed to slow the progress of the gay rights movement, but in time it galvanized some parts of the LGBT community into community service and political action, and challenged the heterosexual community to respond compassionately. Major American motion pictures from this period that dramatized the response of individuals and communities to the AIDS crisis include An Early Frost (1985), Longtime Companion (1990), And the Band Played On (1993), Philadelphia (1993), and Common Threads: Stories from the Quilt (1989), the last referring to the NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt, last displayed in its entirety on the Mall in Washington, D.C., in 1996.

Publicly gay politicians have attained numerous government posts, even in countries that had sodomy laws in their recent past. Examples include Guido Westerwelle, Germany's Vice-Chancellor; Peter Mandelson, a British Labour Party cabinet minister and Per-Kristian Foss, formerly Norwegian Minister of Finance.

LGBT movements are opposed by a variety of individuals and organizations. Some social conservatives believe that all sexual relationships with people other than an opposite-sex spouse undermine the traditional family and that children should be reared in homes with both a father and a mother.[36][37] There is concern that gay rights may conflict with individuals' freedom of speech,[38][39] religious freedoms in the workplace,[40][41] the ability to run churches,[42] charitable organizations[43][44] and other religious organizations[45] in accordance with one's religious views, and that the acceptance of homosexual relationships by religious organizations might be forced through threatening to remove the tax-exempt status of churches whose views don't align with those of the government.[46][47][48][49]

Critics charge that political correctness has led to the association of sex between males and HIV being downplayed.[50]

Relationships

In 2006, the American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association and National Association of Social Workers stated in an Amicus Brief presented to the Supreme court of the State of California: "Gay men and lesbians form stable, committed relationships that are equivalent to heterosexual relationships in essential respects. The institution of marriage offers social, psychological, and health benefits that are denied to same-sex couples. By denying same-sex couples the right to marry, the state reinforces and perpetuates the stigma historically associated with homosexuality. Homosexuality remains stigmatized, and this stigma has negative consequences. California's prohibition on marriage for same-sex couples reflects and reinforces this stigma". They concluded: "There is no scientific basis for distinguishing between same-sex couples and heterosexual couples with respect to the legal rights, obligations, benefits, and burdens conferred by civil marriage."[51]

Military service
Barack Obama signing the repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell', a policy that forbid gay and lesbian people from openly serving in the United States armed forces.

Policies and attitudes toward gay and lesbian military personnel vary widely around the world. Some countries allow gay men, lesbians, and bisexual people to serve openly and have granted them the same rights and privileges as their heterosexual counterparts. Many countries neither ban nor support LGB service members. A few countries continue to ban homosexual personnel outright.

Most Western military forces have removed policies excluding sexual minority members. Of the 26 countries that participate militarily in NATO, more than 20 permit openly gay, lesbian and bisexual people to serve. Of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, three (United Kingdom, France, the United States) do so. The other three generally do not: China bans gay and lesbian people outright, Russia excludes all gay and lesbian people during peacetime but allows some gay men to serve in wartime (see below). Israel is the only country in the Middle East region that allows openly LGB people to serve in the military.

Prior to the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell, the question of homosexuality in the military was highly politicized in the United States. However, such politicization did not occur in many other countries, as sexuality in these cultures is considered a more personal aspect of one's identity than in the United States.

According to American Psychological Association empirical evidence fails to show that sexual orientation is germane to any aspect of military effectiveness including unit cohesion, morale, recruitment and retention.[52] Sexual orientation is irrelevant to task cohesion, the only type of cohesion that critically predicts the team's military readiness and success.[53]

On March 18, 2010, after U.S. President Obama announced that he wanted to put an end to the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, former U.S. general and high ranking NATO official John Sheehan blamed homosexuals serving in the Dutch military for the fall of Srebrenica to Serb militias in the Bosnian War fifteen years earlier, stating that homosexuals had weakened the Dutch UN battalion charged with protecting the enclave. In the U.S. Senate, Sheehan said that European countries had tried to "socialize" their armed forces by letting people serve in the army too easily, which according to him, left them weakened. He claimed that his opinion was shared by the leadership of the Dutch armed forces, mentioning the name "Hankman Berman", most probably referring to the then chief of the Dutch defence staff, Henk van den Breemen.[54] Dutch authorities dismissed Sheehan's statements as "disgraceful" and "total nonsense".[55][56][57][58][59]

Religion
Main article: Religion and homosexuality

Though the relationship between homosexuality and religion can vary greatly across time and place, within and between different religions and sects, and regarding different forms of homosexuality and bisexuality, current authoritative bodies and doctrines of the world's largest religions generally view homosexuality negatively. This can range from quietly discouraging homosexual activity, to explicitly forbidding same-sex sexual practices among adherents and actively opposing social acceptance of homosexuality. Some teach that homosexual orientation itself is sinful,[60] while others assert that only the sexual act is a sin. Some claim that homosexuality can be overcome through religious faith and practice. On the other hand, voices exist within many of these religions that view homosexuality more positively, and liberal religious denominations may bless same-sex marriages. Some view same-sex love and sexuality as sacred, and a mythology of same-sex love can be found around the world. Regardless of their position on homosexuality, many people of faith look to both sacred texts and tradition for guidance on this issue. However, the authority of various traditions or scriptural passages and the correctness of translations and interpretations are hotly disputed.

Heterosexism and homophobia
Further information: Heterosexism and Homophobia

In many cultures, homosexual people are frequently subject to prejudice and discrimination. Like members of many other minority groups that are the objects of prejudice, they are also subject to stereotyping, which further adds to marginalization. The prejudice, discrimination and stereotyping are all likely tied to forms of homophobia and heterosexism, which is negative attitudes, bias, and discrimination in favor of opposite-sex sexuality and relationships. Heterosexism can include the presumption that everyone is heterosexual or that opposite-sex attractions and relationships are the norm and therefore superior. Homophobia is a fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexual people. It manifests in different forms, and a number of different types have been postulated, among which are internalized homophobia, social homophobia, emotional homophobia, rationalized homophobia, and others.[61] Similar is lesbophobia (specifically targeting lesbians) and biphobia (against bisexual people). When such attitudes manifest as crimes they are often called hate crimes and gay bashing.

Negative stereotypes characterize LGB people as less romantically stable, more promiscuous and more likely to abuse children, but there is no scientific basic to such assertions. Gay men and lesbians form stable, committed relationships that are equivalent to heterosexual relationships in essential respects.[51] Sexual orientation does not affect the likelihood that people will abuse children.[62][63][64] Claims that there is scientific evidence to support an association between being gay and being a pedophile are based on misuses of those terms and misrepresentation of the actual evidence.[63]

Violence against gay and lesbian people
Main article: Violence against LGBT people

In the United States, the FBI reported that 15.6% of hate crimes reported to police in 2004 were based on perceived sexual orientation. Sixty-one percent of these attacks were against gay men.[65] The 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard, a gay student, is one of the most notorious incidents in the U.S.

Parenting
Main article: LGBT parenting

LGBT parenting is when lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people are parents to one or more children, either as biological or non-biological parents. Gay men face options which include: "foster care, variations of domestic and international adoption, diverse forms of surrogacy (whether "traditional" or gestational), and kinship arrangements, wherein they might coparent with a woman or women with whom they are intimately but not sexually involved."[66][67][68][69] LGBT parents can also include single people who are parenting; to a lesser extent, the term sometimes refers to families with LGBT children.

In the 2000 U.S. Census, 33 percent of female same-sex couple households and 22 percent of male same-sex couple households reported at least one child under eighteen living in their home.[70] Some children do not know they have an LGB parent; coming out issues vary and some parents may never come out to their children.[71][72] LGBT parenting in general, and adoption by LGBT couples may be controversial in some countries. In January 2008, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that same-sex couples have the right to adopt a child.[73][74] In the U.S., LGB people can legally adopt in all states except for Florida.[75]

Although it is sometimes asserted in policy debates that heterosexual couples are inherently better parents than same-sex couples, or that the children of lesbian or gay parents fare worse than children raised by heterosexual parents, those assertions find no support in the scientific research literature.[51][76] There is ample evidence to show that children raised by same-gender parents fare as well as those raised by heterosexual parents. More than 25 years of research have documented that there is no relationship between parents' sexual orientation and any measure of a child's emotional, psychosocial, and behavioral adjustment. These data have demonstrated no risk to children as a result of growing up in a family with 1 or more gay parents.[77] No research supports the widely held conviction that the gender of parents matters for child well-being.[78] It is well-established that both men and women have the capacity to be good parents, and that having parents of both genders does not enhance adjustment. The methodologies used in the major studies of same-sex parenting meet the standards for research in the field of developmental psychology and psychology generally. They constitute the type of research that members of the respective professions consider reliable.[62]

The family studies literature indicates that it is family processes (such as the quality of parenting and relationships within the family) that contribute to determining children's well-being and 'outcomes', rather than family structures, per se, such as the number, gender, sexuality and co-habitation status of parents.[79] If gay, lesbian, or bisexual parents were inherently less capable than otherwise comparable heterosexual parents, their children would evidence problems regardless of the type of sample. This pattern clearly has not been observed. Given the consistent failures in this research literature to disprove the null hypothesis, the burden of empirical proof is on those who argue that the children of sexual minority parents fare worse than the children of heterosexual parents.[80]

Professor Judith Stacey, of New York University, stated: “Rarely is there as much consensus in any area of social science as in the case of gay parenting, which is why the American Academy of Pediatrics and all of the major professional organizations with expertise in child welfare have issued reports and resolutions in support of gay and lesbian parental rights".[81] These organizations include the American Academy of Pediatrics,[77] the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,[82] the American Psychiatric Association,[83] the American Psychological Association,[84] the American Psychoanalytic Association,[85] the National Association of Social Workers,[51] the Child Welfare League of America,[86] the North American Council on Adoptable Children,[87] and Canadian Psychological Association (CPA). CPA is concerned that some persons and institutions are mis-interpreting the findings of psychological research to support their positions, when their positions are more accurately based on other systems of belief or values.[88]

The vast majority of families in the United States today are not the "middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children" that has been viewed as the norm. Since the end of the 1980s, it has been well established that children and adolescents can adjust just as well in nontraditional settings as in traditional settings.[62]

See also

References
  1. "Demographics of the Gay and Lesbian Population in the United States: Evidence from Available Systematic Data Sources", Dan Black, Gary Gates, Seth Sanders, Lowell Taylor, Demography, Vol. 37, No. 2 (May, 2000), pp. 139–154 (available on JSTOR).
  2. LeVay, Simon (1996). Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality. Cambridge: The MIT Press ISBN 0-262-12199-9
  3. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, p. 656
  4. David Leonhardt (July 28, 2000). "John Tukey, 85, Statistician; Coined the Word 'Software'". The New York Times.
  5. "Biography 15.1, John W. Tukey (1915-2000)". Retrieved 2009-05-19. John Tukey criticizes sample procedure
  6. "Book Review by Martin Duberman, The Nation, November 3, 1997". Archived from the original on January 11, 2009. Martin Duberman on Gebhart's "cleaning" of data
  7. ACSF Investigators (1992). "AIDS and sexual behavior in France". Nature. 360 (6403): 407–409. Bibcode:1992Natur.360..407A. doi:10.1038/360407a0. PMID 1448162.
  8. Billy JO, Tanfer K, Grady WR, Klepinger DH (1993). "The sexual behavior of men in the United States". Family Planning Perspectives. 25 (2): 52–60. doi:10.2307/2136206. JSTOR 2136206. PMID 8491287.
  9. Binson, Diane; Michaels, Stuart; Stall, Ron; Coates, Thomas J.; Gagnon, John H.; Catania, Joseph A. (1995). "Prevalence and Social Distribution of Men Who Have Sex with Men: United States and Its Urban Centers". The Journal of Sex Research. 32 (3): 245–54. doi:10.1080/00224499509551795. JSTOR 3812794.
  10. Bogaert, A. F. (2004). The prevalence of male homosexuality: The effect of fraternal birth order and variation in family size. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 230, 33–37.
  11. Fay RE, Turner CF, Klassen AD, Gagnon JH (January 1989). "Prevalence and patterns of same-gender sexual contact among men". Science. 243 (4889): 338–48. Bibcode:1989Sci...243..338F. doi:10.1126/science.2911744. PMID 2911744.
  12. Johnson AM, Wadsworth J, Wellings K, Bradshaw S, Field J (December 1992). "Sexual lifestyles and HIV risk". Nature. 360 (6403): 410–2. Bibcode:1992Natur.360..410J. doi:10.1038/360410a0. PMID 1448163.
  13. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Sell RL, Wells JA, Wypij D (June 1995). "The prevalence of homosexual behavior and attraction in the United States, the United Kingdom and France: results of national population-based samples". Arch Sex Behav. 24 (3): 235–48. doi:10.1007/BF01541598. PMID 7611844.
  15. Wellings, K., Field, J., Johnson, A., & Wadsworth, J. (1994). Sexual behavior in Britain: The national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles. London, UK: Penguin Books.
  16. "Norway world leader in casual sex, Aftenposten". Archived from the original on February 24, 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  17. "Sex uncovered poll: Homosexuality". The Guardian. 25 October 2008.
  18. McConaghy et al., 2006
  19. S. Hite, The Hite Report on Male Sexuality, New York, A. Knopf, 1991.
  20. S. S. et C. L. Janus, The Janus Report on Sexual Behavior, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
  21. Alfred C. Kinsey, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, 1948, ISBN 0-7216-5445-2(o.p.), ISBN 0-253-33412-8(reprint).
  22. TERESA L. WAITE, December 8, 1992 "Sexual Behavior Levels Compared in Studies in Britain and France" in the New York Times
  23. "27% of Gay Voters Sided with McCain". The Advocate. 7 November 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-08.
  24. "New benefits for partners - gay and straight", Stephen Losey. Federal Times. June 20, 2010. Accessed June 13, 2011
  25. Mitta, Manoj; Singh, Smriti (July 2009). "India decriminalises gay sex". The Times of India.
  26. Ottosson, Daniel (November 2006). "LGBT world legal wrap up survey" (PDF). ILGA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-25. Retrieved 2007-09-21. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  27. Donovan, James M; American Association of Law Libraries Standing Committee on Lesbian and Gay Issues (2007). Sexual Orientation and the Law. William S. Hein & Co. ISBN 978-0-8377-0166-0. § 5:17
  28. "Executive Order 13087 of May 28, 1998" (PDF). Federal Register. 63 (105). June 2, 1998. Retrieved 2007-09-07.
  29. Ashton v. Civiletti, 613 F.2d 923, 20 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1601, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P 30297 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  30. Kelly v. City of Oakland, 198 F.3d 779, 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1455, 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P 46281 (9th Cir. 1999)
  31. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75, 118 S. Ct. 998, 1002 (1998)
  32. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989)
  33. "Renter's Rights Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination". Archived from the original on 2007-12-10. Retrieved 2007-09-07.
  34. "State Hate Crime Laws" (PDF). Anti-Defamation League. June 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-06-14. Retrieved 2007-05-04.
  36. Brownback, Sam (July 9, 2004). "Defining Marriage Down - We need to protect marriage". National Review.
  37. "The Family: A Proclamation to the World", lds.org.
  38. Gove, Michael (December 24, 2002). "I'd like to say this, but it might land me in prison". The Times. London.
  39. "Christian group likens Tory candidate review to witch hunt". CBC News. November 28, 2007.
  40. Moldover, Judith (October 31, 2007). "Employer's Dilemma: When Religious Expression and Gay Rights Cross". New York Law Journal.
  41. Ritter, Bob (January–February 2008). "Collision of religious and gay rights in the workplace". Humanist.
  42. "Bishop loses gay employment case". BBC News. July 18, 2007.
  43. Beckford, Martin (June 5, 2008). "Catholic adoption service stops over gay rights". Telegraph. London.
  44. LeBlanc, Steve (March 10, 2006). "Catholic Charities to halt adoptions over issue involving gays". Boston Globe.
  45. Mercer, Greg (April 24, 2008). "Christian Horizons rebuked: Employer ordered to compensate fired gay worker, abolish code of conduct". The Record. Archived from the original on July 6, 2008. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  46. Gallagher, Maggie (May 15, 2006). "Banned in Boston:The coming conflict between same-sex marriage and religious liberty". 011 (33).
  47. Capuzzo, Jill (August 14, 2007). "Church Group Complains of Civil Union Pressure". New York Times.
  48. Capuzzo, Jill (2007-09-18). "Group Loses Tax Break Over Gay Union Issue". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-03-31.
  49. Moore, Carrie (May 15, 2008). "LDS Church expresses disappointment in California gay marriage decision". Deseret News. Archived from the original on June 1, 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
  50. Chin, James (March 12, 2007). "The risks in hiding the HIV/AIDS truth". 9. Business Day. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016.
  51. "Site Has Moved" (PDF). 6 May 2020.
  52. American Psychological Association Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the legislative year 2004. Minutes of the meeting of the Council of Representatives July 28 & 30, 2004, Honolulu, HI. Retrieved November 18, 2004
  53. American Psychological Association: [Report of the APA Joint Divisional Task Force on Sexual Orientation & Military Service]
  54. txcraig75 (18 March 2010). "General Sheehan: gays responsible for Srebrenica massacre" – via YouTube.
  55. "Former US general: 'gays make Dutch military weak' - archief nrc.nl". Archived from the original on 2010-03-22. Retrieved 2010-06-17.
  56. Traynor, Ian; correspondent, Europe (19 March 2010). "US general: Gay Dutch soldiers caused Srebrenica massacre". The Guardian.
  57. Staff, by Our Foreign (19 March 2010). "Gay Dutch soldiers responsible for Srebrenica massacre says US general".
  58. "PM slams ´disgraceful´ Srebrenica gay comments - World Report - World - Dalje.com". Archived from the original on September 4, 2012. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  59. "BBC News - Dutch fury at US general's gay theory over Srebrenica". 19 March 2010.
  60. "Charge No. 1 and specifications preferred by the Presbytery of Southern California against The Rev. C. Lee Irons" (PDF). Presbytery of Southern California of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-07-23. Retrieved 2008-06-27. claiming that homosexuality is an unchosen "condition," rather than a sin of the heart, [...] contradicts the teaching of Scripture that both the desire and the act are sin.
  61. The Riddle Homophobia Scale from Allies Committee website, Department of Student Life, Texas A&M University
  62. Michael Lamb, PhD: Affidavit - United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (2009)
  63. Gregory M. Herek, PhD: Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation Archived 2010-04-19 at the Wayback Machine
  64. American Psychological Association: Lesbian & Gay Parenting
  65. "Crime in the United States 2004: Hate Crime". FBI. Archived from the original on 2007-04-11. Retrieved 2007-05-04.
  66. Berkowitz, D & Marsiglio, W (2007). Gay Men: Negotiating Procreative, Father, and Family Identities. Journal of Marriage and Family 69 (May 2007): 366–381
  67. Butler, Katy (March 7, 2006). "Many Couples Must Negotiate Terms of 'Brokeback' Marriages". New York Times.
  68. Büntzly G (1993). "Gay fathers in straight marriages". Journal of Homosexuality. 24 (3–4): 107–14. doi:10.1300/J082v24n03_07. PMID 8505530.
  69. Bozett, Frederick W. (1987-08-19). "The Heterosexually Married Gay and Lesbian Parent". Gay and Lesbian Parents. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-275-92541-3.
  70. APA Policy Statement on Sexual Orientation, Parents & Children, American Psychological Association, July 28 & 30, 2004. Retrieved on 2007-04-06.
  71. Dunne EJ (1987). "Helping gay fathers come out to their children". Journal of Homosexuality. 14 (1–2): 213–22. doi:10.1300/J082v14n01_16. PMID 3655343.
  72. Francis, Thomas Jeatt for Taylor &. "Home - Taylor & Francis Group".
  73. "EMRK is for the LGBT adoption". Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  74. "Latest breaking news available as free video on demand | Euronews". Archived from the original on February 17, 2012. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  75. "Adoption Laws: State by State". Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved 2008-07-09.
  76. Canadian Psychological Association: Brief presented to the Legislative House of Commons Committee on Bill C38 By the Canadian Psychological Association June 2, 2005. Archived October 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  77. Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM, et al. (July 2006). "The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children". Pediatrics. 118 (1): 349–64. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1279. PMID 16818585.
  78. Biblarz, Timothy J.; Stacey, Judith (1 February 2010). "How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?". Journal of Marriage and Family. 72 (1): 3–22. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.593.4963. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x.
  79. "Elizabeth Short, Damien W. Riggs, Amaryll Perlesz, Rhonda Brown, Graeme Kane: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Parented Families - A Literature Review prepared for The Australian Psychological Society" (PDF). Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  80. Herek GM (September 2006). "Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: a social science perspective" (PDF). The American Psychologist. 61 (6): 607–21. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.607. PMID 16953748. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-10.
  81. cited in Cooper & Cates, 2006, p. 36; citation available on http://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/LGBT-Families-Lit-Review.pdf
  82. "Children with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Parents". Archived from the original on June 15, 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  83. Adoption and Co-parenting of Children by Same-sex Couples
  84. "Object moved". www.apa.org. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  85. "Position Statement on Gay and Lesbian Parenting". Archived from the original on September 28, 2011. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  86. "Position Statement on Parenting of Children by Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adults". Archived from the original on June 13, 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2020.
  87. "NACAC - Public Policy". 28 April 2017.
  88. "Canadian Psychological Association > - www.cpa.ca" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-13. Retrieved 2016-12-14.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.