List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

This is a partial chronological list of cases decided by the United States Supreme Court during the Roberts Court, the tenure of Chief Justice John Roberts from September 29, 2005 to the present.

Supreme Court of the United States

Roberts Court
Rehnquist Court ← → Current
Since September 29, 2005 – 15 years, 126 days
Seat	Supreme Court Building Washington, D.C.
No. of positions	9
Roberts Court decisions

Roberts Court 2005 term

Case name	Citation	style="background:#6699ry
Gonzales v. Oregon	546 U.S. 243 (2006)	Attorney General did not permissibly construe Controlled Substances Act to prohibit the distribution of drugs for physician-assisted suicide
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England	546 U.S. 320 (2006)	Invalidating statute and lower courts rendering narrower declaratory and injunctive relief
Rice v. Collins	546 U.S. 333 (2006)	Habeas corpus relief may not be granted on the basis of debatable inferences used to overturn the trial court's finding vis-á-vis peremptory challenges
Central Virginia Community College v. Katz	546 U.S. 356 (2006)	state sovereign immunity under the 11th Amendment and the Bankruptcy Clause
Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal	546 U.S. 418 (2006)	Federal government could not bar religious use of hallucinogenic tea
Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna	546 U.S. 440 (2006)	Arbitrator must decide legality of contract unless arbitration clause is itself being challenged
Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald	546 U.S. 470 (2006)	agent of a party to a contract cannot state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 because he himself does not have rights to make or enforce under the contract
Dolan v. United States Postal Service	546 U.S. 481 (2006)	scope of immunity of the United States Postal Service under the Federal Tort Claims Act
Arbaugh v. Y & H Corporation	546 U.S. 500 (2006)	"Employee-numerosity" requirement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is substantive, rather than jurisdictional in nature
Oregon v. Guzek	546 U.S. 517 (2006)	States may constitutionally limit the evidence of innocence a defendant convicted of a capital offense may present at his sentencing hearing to the evidence already presented at his trial.
Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher	547 U.S. 1 (2006)	joint venture was not a price-fixing scheme under antitrust law
Scheidler v. National Organization for Women	547 U.S. 9 (2006)	physical violence unrelated to robbery or extortion falls outside the scope of the Hobbs Act
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.	547 U.S. 28 (2006)	patented products involved in product tying arrangements are not presumed to have market power under antitrust law
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights	547 U.S. 47 (2006)	law schools receiving federal funds may not ban military recruiters
United States v. Grubbs	547 U.S. 90 (2006)	anticipatory search warrant did not violate the particularity clause of the 4th Amendment
Georgia v. Randolph	547 U.S. 103 (2006)	police cannot conduct a warrantless search in a home where one occupant consents and the other objects
Day v. McDonough	547 U.S. 198 (2006)	A State's unintentional failure to object to the filing of a habeas corpus petition after the statute of limitations has expired does not prevent a district court from dismissing the petition on its own initiative
Northern Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Chatham County	547 U.S. 268 (2006)	sovereign immunity does not apply to admiralty suit against county
Jones v. Flowers	547 U.S. 220 (2006)	sufficiency of notice for tax sale
Hartman v. Moore	547 U.S. 250 (2006)	A plaintiff in a retaliatory-prosecution action against federal officials must plead and show the absence of probable cause for pressing the underlying criminal charges.
Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Ahlborn	547 U.S. 268 (2006)	state liens on personal injury settlements
Marshall v. Marshall	547 U.S. 293 (2006)	federal bankruptcy court binding state court on inheritance question
Holmes v. South Carolina	547 U.S. 319 (2006)	limitations on exclusion of evidence in murder case, 6th Amendment
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno	547 U.S. 332 (2006)	taxpayer standing in a Dormant Commerce Clause case
Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.	547 U.S. 356 (2006)	fiduciary's recovery of personal injury settlement under ERISA
eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.	547 U.S. 388 (2006)	nature of patent injunctions - revisiting Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Env. Protection	547 U.S. 370 (2006)	interpreting scope of activities covered by the Clean Water Act
Brigham City v. Stuart	547 U.S. 398 (2006)	reasonableness of officers' warrantless entry into a home to stop a fight under the "emergency aid exception"
Garcetti v. Ceballos	547 U.S. 410 (2006)	extent of public employees' First Amendment right to free speech in the workplace
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.	547 U.S. 451 (2006)	activities subject to RICO
Zedner v. United States	547 U.S. 489 (2006)	a criminal defendant may not prospectively waive his rights under the Speedy Trial Act
House v. Bell	547 U.S. 518 (2006)	Post-conviction DNA forensic evidence can be considered in death penalty appeals
Hill v. McDonough	547 U.S. 573 (2006)	a challenge to lethal injection as violating the Eighth Amendment properly raised a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is not barred by previous habeas corpus petition
Hudson v. Michigan	547 U.S. 586 (2006)	evidence obtained with a search warrant is admissible even when police violate 'knock-and-announce' rule
Rapanos v. United States	547 U.S. 715 (2006)	whether wetlands are part of the "navigable waters of the United States" and thus regulated by the Clean Water Act
Davis v. Washington	547 U.S. 813 (2006)	whether a 911 call is "testimonial" under Crawford v. Washington
Samson v. California	547 U.S. 843 (2006)	evidence obtained in a suspicionless search of parolees is admissible, and not prohibited under the Fourth Amendment
Dixon v. United States	548 U.S. 1 (2006)	burden of proof for duress as a defense to Federal firearms law violations
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White	548 U.S. 53 (2006)	a job reassignment which is dirtier and more strenuous may constitute retaliatory discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as may a month of suspension without pay even when the employee receives back pay
Woodford v. Ngo	548 U.S. 81 (2006)	the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires proper exhaustion of administrative remedies before an inmate can file a lawsuit
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez	548 U.S. 140 (2006)	trial court's erroneous deprivation of a criminal defendant's choice of counsel entitles him to reversal of his conviction
Kansas v. Marsh	548 U.S. 163 (2006)	statute allowing the death penalty in cases where the aggravating and mitigating evidence are equal does not violate the Eighth Amendment
Randall v. Sorrell	548 U.S. 230 (2006)	campaign finance laws which limit expenditures violate the First Amendment, and the anticorruption benefits of contribution limits must be weighed against their First Amendment costs
Arlington Central School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Murphy	548 U.S. 291 (2006)	The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act does not authorize the award of experts' fees to prevailing plaintiffs
Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon	548 U.S. 331 (2006)	informing a suspect of his rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry	548 U.S. 399 (2006)	Texas's 2003 redistricting of District 23 constituted a violation of Latinos' rights under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, however mid-decade redistricting is constitutional as long as it is not solely motivated by partisan gain
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld	548 U.S. 557 (2006)	Guantanamo Bay detainees may not be tried by a military commission under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005; the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions both apply to the detainees
Clark v. Arizona	548 U.S. 735 (2006)	constitutionality of Arizona's insanity defense statute

Roberts Court 2006 term

Case name	Citation	Summary
Lopez v. Gonzales	549 U.S. 47 (2006)	misdemeanor drug crimes as aggravated felonies
Carey v. Musladin	549 U.S. 70 (2006)	spectator publicity and the right to a fair trial; "clearly established" law under the AEDPA
BP America Production Co. v. Burton	549 U.S. 84 (2007)	Statute of limitations on contract actions by the Federal Government under 28 U.S.C. § 2415 is not applicable to administrative proceedings
Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.	549 U.S. 118 (2007)	enforceability of patents before infringement
Cunningham v. California	549 U.S. 270 (2007)	applicability of Blakely v. Washington to California's determinate sentencing law
Philip Morris USA v. Williams	549 U.S. 346 (2007)	constitutional limitations on punitive damages
Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts	549 U.S. 365 (2007)	bad-faith exception to the right to convert Chapter 7 bankruptcy case to a Chapter 13 case
Sinochem International Co., Ltd. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corporation	549 U.S. 422 (2007)	District Court may respond immediately to defendant's forum non conveniens motion before resolving jurisdictional or other threshold concerns
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency	549 U.S. 497 (2007)	power to regulate carbon dioxide emissions
Davenport v. Washington Education Association	550 U.S. 117 (2007)	A state may require that its public-sector unions receive authorization from nonmembers before spending their agency fees for election-related purposes
Gonzales v. Carhart	550 U.S. 124 (2007)	Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act
James v. United States	550 U.S. 192 (2007)	attempted burglary as a predicate crime under the Armed Career Criminal Act
Scott v. Harris	550 U.S. 372 (2007)	Fourth Amendment seizure in a high-speed chase, qualified immunity
KSR v. Teleflex	550 U.S. 398 (2007)	Patent law, nonobviousness
Microsoft v. AT&T	550 U.S. 437 (2007)	copying software in a foreign country cannot violate U.S. patent law
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.	550 U.S. 618 (2007)	statute of limitations on employment discrimination claims
Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York	551 U.S. 193 (2007)	whether a municipality can sue other countries to collect unpaid taxes
Bowles v. Russell	551 U.S. 205 (2007)	Federal Courts of Appeals lack jurisdiction to hear habeas appeals that are filed late, even if the district court said the petitioner had additional time to file
Brendlin v. California	551 U.S. 249 (2007)	whether a passenger in an automobile is "detained" so that he may assert a Fourth Amendment violation stemming from the traffic stop itself
Credit Suisse v. Billing	551 U.S. 264 (2007)	Whether Congress's creation of the SEC implicitly exempted regulated industries from antitrust lawsuits
Rita v. United States	551 U.S. 338 (2007)	"reasonableness" of a federal prison sentence under United States v. Booker; continuing application of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.	551 U.S. 308 (2007)	The proper standard for determining whether a plaintiff has alleged a "strong inference" of scienter under the PSLRA
Morse v. Frederick	551 U.S. 393 (2007)	free speech rights of high school students ("Bong Hits 4 Jesus")
CBOCS West v. Humphries	551 U.S. 442 (2008)	race retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.	551 U.S. 449 (2007)	Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act's restriction on issue ads in election campaigns
Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation	551 U.S. 587 (2007)	taxpayer standing to pursue an Establishment Clause claim against President Bush's faith-based initiative
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education (companion case)	551 U.S. 701 (2007)	affirmative action; using race as a tie-breaker in assigning students to public schools
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.	551 U.S. 877 (2007)	applying rule of reason under Section 1 of the Sherman Act
Panetti v. Quarterman	551 U.S. 930 (2007)	executing the mentally ill

Roberts Court 2007 term

Case name	Citation	Summary
Watson v. United States	552 U.S. 74 (2007)	whether trading drugs for a gun constitutes use of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 924 and Bailey v. United States
Kimbrough v. United States	552 U.S. 85 (2007)	whether the 100:1 ratio between powder and crack cocaine imposed by the United States Sentencing Commission yields "reasonable" sentences
Gall v. United States	552 U.S. 38 (2007)	"reasonableness" of a federal prison sentence under United States v. Booker; continuing application of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta	552 U.S. 147 (2008)	third parties, such as investment banks, accounting firms and suppliers, can be shielded from liability if they engage in business with companies that are involved in securities fraud.
Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons	552 U.S. 214 (2008)	Case upholding the United States's sovereign immunity against tort claims brought when "any law enforcement officer" loses a person's property.
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.	552 U.S. 312 (2008)	Medical Device Amendment's preemption clause bars common-law claims challenging the safety or effectiveness of a medical device marketed in a form that received premarket approval from the FDA.
Preston v. Ferrer	552 U.S. 346 (2008)	the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws declaring that certain disputes must be resolved by a state administrative agency
Snyder v. Louisiana	552 U.S. 472 (2008)	racial discrimination in jury selection; playing the "O.J. card"
Medellín v. Texas	552 U.S. 491 (2008)	whether the president may direct state courts to obey an order of the World Court ruling regarding the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
New Jersey v. Delaware	552 U.S. 597 (2008)	boundary dispute between New Jersey and Delaware involving the Twelve-Mile Circle
MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue	553 U.S. 16 (2008)	determination of state tax liability for corporation operating in multiple states according to the "unitary business rule"
Baze v. Rees	553 U.S. 35 (2008)	constitutionality of lethal injection protocols under the Eighth Amendment
Virginia v. Moore	553 U.S. 164 (2008)	whether the Fourth Amendment requires suppression of evidence discovered in a search conducted in violation of state law
Crawford v. Marion County Election Board	553 U.S. 181 (2008)	constitutionality of requiring voters to show ID before voting
Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis	553 U.S. 328 (2008)	Kentucky statute providing a preferential tax break to Kentucky residents who invest in bonds issued by the state and its municipalities does not discriminate against interstate commerce
United States v. Williams	553 U.S. 285 (2008)	constitutionality of the PROTECT Act, a 2003 law intended to bolster federal restriction against child pornography, in the wake of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
Gomez-Perez v. Potter	553 U.S. 474 (2008)	Federal employees who face retaliation after filing an age discrimination claim are authorized to sue under the federal-sector provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.
Quanta v. LG Electronics	553 U.S. 617 (2008)	patent exhaustion and its applicability to certain types of method patents
Boumediene v. Bush	553 U.S. 723 (2008)	whether the Military Detainee Treatment Act of 2006 unconstitutionally suspends the writ of habeas corpus
Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders	553 U.S. 662 (2008)	Plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must demonstrate that the defendants intended to deceive the government, not simply that government money was used to pay the claim.
Munaf v. Geren	553 U.S. 674 (2008)	habeas corpus statute extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command
Indiana v. Edwards	554 U.S. 164 (2008)	may a criminal defendant be competent to stand trial yet simultaneously not competent to represent himself at that trial?
Greenlaw v. United States	554 U.S. 237 (2008)	may a federal appeals court sua sponte increase a defendant's sentence on appeal, without a formal appeal by the government?
Rothgery v. Gillespie County	554 U.S. 191 (2008)	does a criminal defendant have a right to counsel at an ex parte arraignment?
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker	554 U.S. 471 (2008)	legality of punitive damages award under federal maritime law for the Exxon Valdez oil spill
Kennedy v. Louisiana	554 U.S. 407 (2008)	does the Eighth Amendment forbid the death penalty for rape of a child?
Giles v. California	554 U.S. 353 (2008)	the forfeiture by wrongdoing exception to out of court statements by a witness only applies where the defendant caused the witness's absence in order to eliminate their testimony at trial
District of Columbia v. Heller	554 U.S. 570 (2008)	does the Second Amendment allows a state or local government to outlaw the private possession of handguns?
Davis v. Federal Election Commission	554 U.S. 724 (2008)	"Millionaire's amendment" to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 violates the First Amendment

Roberts Court 2008 term

Case name	Citation	Summary
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council	555 U.S. 7 (2008)	military preparedness outweighs environmental concerns, as Navy needs to train its crews to detect modern, silent submarines
Altria Group, Inc. v. Good	555 U.S. 70 (2008)	federal law does not preempt the states' prerogative to regulate the advertisement of tar and nicotine rates in cigarettes
Herring v. United States	555 U.S. 135 (2009)	evidence obtained during a search the police conducted as a result of an isolated act of negligence not related to the search is not subject to the exclusionary rule
Oregon v. Ice	555 U.S. 160 (2009)	the facts necessary for imposing consecutive prison terms need not be submitted to a jury in accordance with Apprendi v. New Jersey
Waddington v. Sarausad	555 U.S. 179 (2009)	on federal habeas review, courts must accept state court determinations that jury instructions fully and correctly set out state law with regard to accomplice liability
Pearson v. Callahan	555 U.S. 223 (2009)	Saucier v. Katz is overruled; courts need not determine whether a civil-rights plaintiff's constitutional rights were violated if they determine that the right was not clearly established at the time of the injury

Unreported Cases

Case name	Opinion	Decided	Summary
Crawford v. Nashville	06-1595	2009-01-26	Employees who cooperate with an internal investigation of alleged sexual harassment are protected against retaliation under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein	07-854	2009-01-26	Prosecutors are immune from suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for improperly supervising the disclosures made by line prosecutors pursuant to Brady v. Maryland.
United States v. Hayes	07-608	2009-02-24	Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), people who have been convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence crimes may not possess firearms as long as the government proves that the underlying offense involved a domestic relationship.
Pleasant Grove City v. Summum	07-665	2009-02-25	A municipality that allows a privately donated Ten Commandments monument to be displayed on public property need not permit the religion of Summum to put up its own statue of similar size.
Negusie v. Mukasey	07-499	2009-03-03	Under Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the Board of Immigration Appeals (rather than a federal court) has the power to decide whether the so-called "persecutor bar" applies to asylum applicants applies to those who were forced to persecute others in their home country.
Wyeth v. Levine	06-1249	2009-03-04	Federal drug labeling requirements do not preempt state drug labeling requirements enacted to ensure that the public knew certain drugs are safe.
Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee	07-1125	2009-03-04	The petitioner parents had the right to sue a school committee under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failing to stop the sexual harassment their daughter endured. This decision reversed the Second Circuit's holding that Title IX provided the sole remedy the parents could seek.
14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett	07-581	2009-04-01	An employer and a union can agree, through a collective bargaining agreement, that the unionized employees must resolve discrimination claims in arbitration instead of court.
Harbison v. Bell	07-8521	2009-04-01	Under 18 U.S.C. § 3599, the federal government must provide lawyers to death row inmates seeking clemency in state proceedings.
Entergy v. Riverkeeper	07-588	2009-04-01	The Clean Water Act does not prevent the EPA from engaging in a cost-benefit analysis when setting standards for power plants that use large quantities of water for cooling.
Arizona v. Gant	07-542	2009-04-21	Police power to search an arrested person's vehicle is limited to safety concerns and evidence related to the actual arrest.
FCC v. Fox Television Stations	07-582	2009-04-28	The FCC may ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts.
Cone v. Bell	07-1114	2009-04-28	The petitioner death row inmate had not forfeited the opportunity to argue that prosecutors withheld evidence important to his defense.
Dean v. United States	08-5274	2009-04-29	Upheld sentence for discharging a firearm during a violent crime, Congress intended a defendant to be held strictly liable for such an offense.
Flores-Figueroa v. United States	08-108	2009-05-04	whether the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person
AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen	07-543	2009-05-18	The 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act is not retroactive, so maternity leave taken before it passed cannot be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal	07-1015	2009-05-18	whether top government officials can be held personally liable for allegedly knowing or condoning of racial and religious mistreatment of suspected terrorists
Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.	08-22	2009-06-08	Due process requirements for judges' recusal
United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York	08-660	2009-06-08	Where the Government has not intervened or actively participated, private plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must filed an appeal within 30 days of the judgment or order being appealed, according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
District Attorney's Office v. Osborne	08-6	2009-06-18	Found no due process, postconviction right to access to the state's evidence for DNA testing.
Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. Mukasey	08-322	2009-06-22	whether Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which gives the U.S. government authority to oversee state electoral-law changes, is no longer needed and is unconstitutional
Safford Unified School District v. Redding	08-479	2009-06-25	Strip search of a middle schooler violated the Fourth Amendment where the school lacked reasons to suspect either that the drugs presented a danger or that they were concealed in her underwear.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts	07-591	2009-06-25	Under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, the prosecution (if it plans to present a lab report as evidence in a criminal trial) must make the analyst who prepared it available for on-demand cross-examination by defense counsel.
Ricci v. DeStefano	07-1428	2009-06-29	White firefighters in New Haven suffered unfair discrimination because of their race when the city scrapped the results of a promotional exam.

Roberts Court 2009 term

Case name	Opinion	Decided	Summary
Citizens United v. FEC	08-205	2010-01-21	whether federal campaign finance laws apply to a critical film about Senator Hillary Clinton intended to be shown in theaters and on-demand to cable subscribers
Padilla v. Kentucky	08-651	2010-03-31	must a criminal defendant's lawyer advise him of the immigration-related consequences of a criminal conviction?
Salazar v. Buono	08-472	2010-04-28	First Amendment restrictions on displaying a cross on public property
Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick	08-103	2010-03-02	settlement of copyright infringement claims relating to an electronic database
Graham v. Florida	08-7412	2010-05-17	whether Roper v. Simmons should also apply to sentences of life without the possibility of parole
Ontario v. Quon	08-1332	2010-06-17	Privacy rights of public employees over text messages on employer-issued pagers.
McDonald v. Chicago	08-1521	2010-06-28	whether the Second Amendment should also apply against state and local governments

Roberts Court 2010 term

Case name	Opinion	Decided	Summary
Abbott v. United States	09-479	2010-11-15	Mandatory minimum sentences under federal sentencing law
Los Angeles County v. Humphries	09-350	2010-11-30	Section 1983 actions are limited to those caused by a municipality's "policy or custom" regardless of whether the plaintiff seeks monetary or prospective relief.
Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary v. Moore	09-658	2011-01-19	Habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state-court has found on the merits unless the state-court decision denying relief involves an "unreasonable application" of "clearly established federal law, as determined by" the Court.
Swarthout v. Cooke	10-333	2011-01-24	State prisoners have no constitutional right to parole.
Snyder v. Phelps	09-751	2011-03-02	The First Amendment protects from tort liability a person who speaks about a public issue on a public sidewalk, even if that speech is "outrageous."
Brown v. Plata	09-1233	2011-05-23	A three-judge panel of the District Court properly ordered the California prison system to release prisoners to resolve overcrowding.
Connick v. Thompson	09-571	2011-03-29	A prosecutor's office cannot be held liable for a single Brady violation by one of its members on the theory that the office provided inadequate training.
Williamson v. Mazda	08-1314	2011-02-23	A car accident victim can sue the manufacturer for failing to install a shoulder/lap seatbelt even where federal law permits it to install only a lap belt.
Arizona Christian School Tuition Org. v. Winn	09-987	2011-04-04	Taxpayers lack standing to challenge a tax credit program that provides dollar-for-dollar incentives to donations to school tuition groups, including those awarding tuition scholarships only to religious schools.
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting	09-115	2011-05-26	An Arizona law that sanctions employers who hire illegal immigrants is not preempted by federal immigration law.
J.D.B. v. North Carolina	09-11121	2011-06-16	Age is relevant in Miranda cases.
Bullcoming v. New Mexico	09-10876	2011-06-23	A defendant's Confrontation Clause rights cover a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to test results that the analyst transcribed from a machine.
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association	08-1448	2011-06-27	The Constitution prevents the state of California from banning the sale of violent video games to minors.

Roberts Court 2011 term

Case name	Opinion	Decided	Summary
Cavazos v. Smith	10-1115	2011-10-31	A jury found that a grandmother was guilty of assaulting her 7-week-old grandchild, which the jury found had died of shaken baby syndrome. The Supreme Court held that the Ninth Circuit exceeded its authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in reversing the verdict for insufficient evidence.
KPMG LLP v. Cocchi	10-1521	2011-11-07	Citing Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd, the Supreme Court remanded this case to a Florida appellate court for consideration of whether arbitration was required for some of the claims alleged.
Bobby v. Dixon	10-1540	2011-11-07	Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (28 U.S.C. § 2254) and Harrington v. Richter, the Sixth Circuit had erred in granting a state prisoner's petition for writ of habeas corpus. It was not clear the state court had erred at all, a prerequisite for granting a habeas petition.
Golan v. Holder		2012-01-18	Congress can restore copyright protection to works that were formerly in the public domain.
Southern Union Co. v. United States	11-94	2012-06-21	The rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey applies to the imposition of criminal fines.

Roberts Court 2012 term

Case name	Opinion	Decided	Summary
Lefemine v. Wideman	12-168	2012-11-05	Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, a plaintiff who obtained only a permanent injunction against government officials (but no money damages) was a "prevailing party," so the government must pay his attorney fees.
United States v. Bormes	11-192	2012-11-13	The Little Tucker Act does not waive the government's sovereign immunity with respect to Fair Credit Reporting Act damages actions.
Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. Howard	11-1377	2012-11-26	The Oklahoma Supreme Court was wrong in preventing arbitration of a dispute over the scope of noncompete agreements in employment contracts.
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States	11-597	2012-12-04	Repeated, temporary flooding caused by the government is not automatically exempt from the Takings Clause, so the case was remanded for the lower court to decide if the government has to pay owners for using their land.
Kloeckner v. Solis	11-184	2012-12-10	A federal employee who claims that an agency action appealable to the Merit Systems Protection Board violates an antidiscrimination statute listed in 5 U.S.C. § 7702(a)(1) should seek judicial review in district court, not the Federal Circuit, regardless whether the MSPB decided her case on procedural grounds or on the merits.
Ryan v. Valencia Gonzales Tibbals v. Carter (companion case)	10-930	2013-01-08	The federal law at issue, 18 U.S.C. § 3599, does not provide a state prisoner with the right to suspend his federal habeas proceedings when he is adjudged incompetent.
Los Angeles County Flood Control Dist. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.	11-460	2013-01-08	The flow of water from an improved portion of a navigable waterway into an unimproved portion of the same waterway does not qualify as a "discharge of a pollutant" under the Clean Water Act.
Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.	11-982	2013-01-09	Nike's irrevocable promise not to enforce its trademark against its competitor mooted the competitor's lawsuit to invalidate the trademark.
Smith v. United States (2013)	11-8976	2013-01-09	A defendant bears the burden of proving a defense of withdrawal from conspiracy.
Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida	11-626	2013-01-15	Petitioner's floating home was not a "vessel" for purposes of 1 U.S.C. § 3, and therefore federal maritime jurisdiction was not triggered, because—except for the fact that it floats—nothing about it suggested that it was intended to transport people or things over water.
Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center	11-1231	2013-01-22	The 180-day statutory time limit for a hospital to appeal a final Medicare reimbursement is not "jurisdictional," but it is also not subject to equitable tolling.
Chafin v. Chafin	11-1347	2013-02-19	The return of a child to a foreign country pursuant to an order under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction does not render an appeal of that order moot; that is, the losing party can still appeal.
Bailey v. United States (2013)	11-770	2013-02-19	In Michigan v. Summers, the Supreme Court held that police officers executing a search warrant were allowed to detain people on the premises while they conducted the search. This case limits that to the "immediate vicinity" of the place being searched, so police searching a basement apartment couldn't search a man leaving from near the apartment in a car.
FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.	11-1160	2013-02-19	The state of Georgia was not immune from an antitrust lawsuit challenging the competition-reducing acquisitions of a state-owned hospital.
Florida v. Harris	11-817	2013-02-19	Because the police provided evidence showing the dog did well at training, a dog sniff provided probable cause for a search of a vehicle.
Gunn v. Minton	11-1118	2013-02-20	The federal law giving federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases, 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), does not deprive state courts of the authority to hear a state law claim alleging legal malpractice in an underlying patent case.
Henderson v. United States	11-9307	2013-02-20	Regardless whether a legal question was settled or unsettled at the time of trial, an error is "plain" within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) so long as the error was plain at the time of appellate review.
Johnson v. Williams	11-465	2013-02-20	Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, a federal court hearing a habeas petition from a state prisoner must presume that the state court decided the prisoner's federal claim on the merits, even if the state court did not expressly address that federal claim.
Evans v. Michigan	11-1327	2013-02-20	The Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial following a court-directed acquittal, even if the acquittal was erroneous.
Chaidez v. United States	11-820	2013-02-20	The Court's decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires defense attorneys to inform criminal defendants of the deportation risks of guilty pleas, does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review (that is, non-habeas appeals).
Marx v. General Revenue Corp.	11-1175	2013-02-26	Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1), a prevailing defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act suit may be awarded costs even where the lawsuit was not brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment.
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA	11-1025	2013-02-26	Petitioners, a group of journalists and lawyers, did not have standing to challenge a federal law expanding the government's ability to engage in secret wiretapping because they could not prove they had been, or were about to be, wiretapped.
Gabelli v. SEC	11-1274	2013-02-27	The five-year statute of limitations for the SEC to bring a civil suit seeking penalties for securities fraud against investment advisers begins to tick when the fraud occurs, not when it is discovered.
Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds	11-1085	2013-02-27	In a private securities fraud class action, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and an SEC rule, plaintiff class members do not need to prove that the fraud was "material" to their purchase of the securities.
Levin v. United States	11-1351	2013-03-04	The Gonzalez Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1089(e), waives some of the government's immunity, and so allowed a plaintiff to sue the United States for alleged medical battery inflicted by a Navy doctor during a cataracts surgery.
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.	11-697	2013-03-19	The first-sale doctrine applies to copyrighted works made lawfully overseas.
Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles	11-1450	2013-03-19	Class representative of plaintiff class cannot defeat federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act by stipulating that he will seek less than $5 million in damages. His stipulation does not bind the rest of the class.
Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center	11-338	2013-03-20	The Clean Water Act does not require a permit before channeled stormwater runoff from logging roads can be discharged into rivers and other bodies of water. Reversing the Ninth Circuit, the Court held that the lawsuit was not barred, but that the EPA's interpretation of its own regulation (not requiring permits) was entitled to deference.
Wos v. E.M.A.	12-98	2013-03-20	A part of the federal Medicaid statute known as the "anti-lien provision" preempted a North Carolina law. That state law had required Medicaid beneficiaries who received money from a tort judgment or settlement to give one-third of that money to the state to reimburse it for the free medical care it had provided to the person.
Florida v. Jardines	11-564	2013-03-26	A dog sniff at the front door of a house constitutes a "search" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment.
Comcast Corp. v. Behrend	11-864	2013-03-27	The Third Circuit improperly certified a class action against cable company Comcast under Rule 23(b). The damages model the class proposed was not adequate.
Millbrook v. United States	11-10362	2013-03-27	The petitioner, a prisoner, was raped by federal prison guards. The so-called "law enforcement proviso" of the Federal Tort Claims Act allowed the petitioner to sue the federal government for the guards' conduct.
Marshall v. Rodgers	12-382	2013-04-01	The petitioner, convicted in state court of gun-related crimes, claimed the courts had violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by declining to appoint him a lawyer to assist him in filing a motion for a new trial, though he had waived this right three times already. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the petitioner, but the Supreme Court reversed and remanded.
Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk	11-1059	2013-04-16	A nurse brought a collective action against her former employer for violating the Fair Labor Standards Act. The employer offered the nurse a settlement under Rule 68 for her own damages, but not those of other potential class members. The Supreme Court held that the offer mooted her claim.
US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen	11-1285	2013-04-16	The terms of an ERISA plan governed when an ERISA claim was brought under the statutory provision authorizing "appropriate equitable relief . . . to enforce . . . the terms of the" plan. But when there are gaps in the plan, equitable doctrines may be used to construe it.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.	10-1491	2013-04-17	The Court unanimously agreed (albeit for different reasons) that the Alien Tort Statute did not allow a foreign citizen to sue a foreign corporation in an American court for aiding and abetting the commission of human rights abuses on foreign soil.
Missouri v. McNeely	11-1425	2013-04-17	In drunk-driving investigations, the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not constitute an exigency in every case sufficient to justify conducting a blood test without a warrant.
Moncrieffe v. Holder	11-702	2013-04-23	If a noncitizen's conviction for a marijuana distribution offense fails to establish that the offense involved either payment or more than a small amount of marijuana, it is not an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
McBurney v. Young	12-17	2013-04-29	Virginia's Freedom of Information Act, which grants Virginia citizens access to all public records, but grants no such right to non-Virginians, violates neither the Privileges and Immunities Clause nor the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
Boyer v. Louisiana	11-9953	2013-04-29	A majority of the Supreme Court dismissed this writ of certiorari as "improvidently granted." The question presented had been: Under the Sixth Amendment's speedy trial guarantee, if delay in a criminal defendant's trial is caused by inadequate state funding for indigent defense counsel, should that delay be counted against the State? Because this case was dismissed, the answer (from Vermont v. Brillion) remains "yes, but not much."
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics	12-398	2013-06-13	The Court held in favor of Petitioners, that naturally occurring sequences of DNA cannot be patented, however artificially created "cDNA" is patent eligible.
Fisher v. University of Texas	11-345	2013-06-24	The Fifth Circuit failed to apply strict scrutiny when it affirmed the University of Texas's affirmative action policy. The decision is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration.
United States v. Windsor	12-307	2013-06-26	Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, as it violates due process and equal protection.
Hollingsworth v. Perry	12-144	2013-06-26	The Court held that the Petitioners did not have standing in the matter under Article III, § 2 of the Constitution. The decision of the circuit court is vacated and the case is remanded to the Ninth Circuit under instructions that the appeal be dismissed.

Roberts Court 2013 term

Roberts Court 2014 term

Roberts Court 2015 term

Roberts Court 2016 term

Roberts Court 2017 term

Roberts Court 2018 term

Roberts Court 2019 term

Roberts Court 2020 term

References

• Opinions-Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of the United States, retrieved September 13, 2016.

Further reading

• Marcia Coyle, The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution (2013) ISBN 978-1451627510

External links

• Supreme Court's website - contains recent decisions, oral argument transcripts, and argument schedule