Northern Lights Express

The Northern Lights Express (NLX) is a planned higher-speed rail service that would run 155 miles (249 km) between Minneapolis and Duluth primarily in the U.S. state of Minnesota. A portion of the proposed line would run through neighboring Wisconsin to serve Duluth's "Twin Port" of Superior. Plans are to upgrade an existing BNSF Railway freight line to allow trains to travel at up to 90 miles per hour (145 km/h).[1] The train service is said to provide an alternative to traveling Interstate 35 between Duluth and the Twin Cities or to other destinations along the line such as the casino in Hinckley.

Northern Lights Express
Overview
Status	Planning (pending preliminary engineering phase)
Owner	BNSF
Locale	Minnesota and Wisconsin, United States
Termini	Minneapolis, Minnesota Duluth, Minnesota
Stations	6 (proposed)
Service
Type	Inter-city/commuter rail, higher-speed rail
Services	4
Operator(s)	Amtrak (?)
Ridership	700,000 annually (projected)
History
Opened	2022 (proposed)
Technical
Line length	155 miles (249 km)
Character	Surface
Track gauge	4 ft 8 ^1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Operating speed	Maximum: 90 mph (145 km/h) Average: 60 mph (97 km/h)
Route map North Shore Scenic Railroad Duluth Union Depot I-35 I-535 Grassy Point Bridge over the Saint Louis Bay MN WI Superior WI MN Kettle River High Bridge over the Kettle River Sandstone (Layover and maintenance facility) I-35 Hinckley Cambridge Empire Builder and Northstar Commuter Rail Coon Rapids Foley Boulevard I-694 Empire Builder Minneapolis BNSF Rail Bridge over the Mississippi River Minneapolis Target Field Northstar and METRO Blue and Green Lines all stations accessible

The proposed service's trains would mostly follow the same route as Amtrak's former North Star, except that it would originate in Minneapolis rather than neighboring Saint Paul, and it is planned to stop at a suburban Twin Cities station (probably constructed at Metro Transit's Foley Boulevard bus station). The proposed route follows part of the Northstar commuter rail route which opened in 2009, and would contain the entirety of the proposed Bethel Corridor commuter route, although that service is not expected to be operational by the time recent estimates of when NLX might open.

History

The Northern Lights Express would be the first passenger rail service to Duluth since 1986, when Amtrak discontinued the 50-mile-per-hour (80 km/h) North Star.[1] Alternatives analysis and a corridor assessment report were complete as of summer 2010.[2] The line had initially been projected to open as early as 2012,[3][4][5] though more recent sources had stated 2013 or 2014 as start dates.[6] As of 2010, the project was entering either an 18-month Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process or a shorter Environmental Assessment (EA) review,[2] but it was unclear which path was to be taken. The shorter EA process was strongly advocated by former Rep. James Oberstar, former chairman of the U.S. House Transportation Committee, who represented northern Minnesota.[7]

Discussion about the Northern Lights Express dates back at least a decade. A preliminary feasibility study was conducted around the year 2000, followed by a comprehensive feasibility study in 2006–2007.[3] A joint powers board was established in 2007 consisting of the regional rail authorities for counties along the corridor along with representatives from Minneapolis, Duluth, and the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe.[8] The name was given to the line in March 2008 by a vote of the corridor's stakeholders.[9]

A feasibility study was completed in late 2007 which evaluated service at speeds of 79 mph (127 km/h), 110 mph (177 km/h), and 125 mph (201 km/h), and service of 8 round trips per day at 110 mph was recommended. The 79 mph option was discarded because it wouldn't attract enough riders to cover operating costs. NLX supporters hope to receive funds from the Federal Railroad Administration which requires new train projects to show they will operate at a surplus each year, unlike the Federal Transit Administration that funded the Hiawatha and Northstar lines in the Twin Cities.[1] Trains would also operate at a surplus at 125 mph, but higher capital costs and only a modest reduction in travel time made that option look less attractive. The study used the diesel-powered Talgo XXI as a reference, which has poor acceleration above 110 mph.[10]

Planning for the line received a big boost at the end of September 2008 when U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters announced that the federal government would contribute $30 million to passenger rail projects across the country. The contribution included $1.1 million for the Northern Lights Express.[11] On September 9, 2011, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced a grant of $5 million to fund environmental and engineering studies for the project.[12] On March 18, 2013, the Environmental Assessment was completed and released on the Minnesota Department of Transportation website.[13]

In 2015 a press conference revealed an updated look at the NLX plan. The train would operate at 90mph and use the Siemens Charger locomotive instead of the Talgo. This proposal included 6 stations served by 4 daily trains in each direction. Tier 2 studies of the line would continue until 2017. As of June 2019, the project had failed to secure funding.[14] However in February 2020, a proposal was made to grant $40 million in funding for the project.[15]

Required track improvements

The Northern Lights Express is planned to use several segments of BNSF track. Starting from the south, it would run along the Wayzata Subdivision from Target Field to Minneapolis Junction, the Midway Subdivision to Northtown Yard, and then enter the Staples Subdivision—the same as the current Northstar commuter line. However, the NLX would turn north at Coon Creek Junction in Coon Rapids to enter the Hinckley Subdivision, which it would follow to Boylston Junction between Foxboro and Superior, Wisconsin. From Boylston, the train would use BNSF's Lakes Subdivision to reach Superior. From Superior to Duluth, the train would be on BNSF again, crossing the Grassy Point swing bridge back into Minnesota and then turning northeast to travel along the shore of St. Louis Bay. The train would exit BNSF rails at Rice's Point and would then run along the North Shore Scenic Railroad for a short segment into the Duluth Union Depot.

A preliminary study from around the year 2000 projected a cost of $79 million to purchase rolling stock and upgrade track along the existing line, though this apparently only anticipated 79 miles per hour (127 km/h) service.[3] The cost projection grew to $320 million in 2008, and $615 million in 2009, with a "worst-case scenario" number of $990 million.[16][17] Up to 80% of the cost may be covered by the federal government, only requiring 20% from state and local sources. This is comparable to highway projects which often receive 80% or 90% funding from the federal government,[18][19] and is in contrast to the Hiawatha light rail and Northstar commuter lines which received 50% matching federal funds.

The wide range of cost estimates relates to how much of the 140 mi (230 km) line between Coon Creek Junction and Duluth would need to be upgraded from the current single-track configuration to a double-track corridor. Running double track all the way to Duluth may bring the cost to $990 million, but the NLX organization has preferred to only run double track north to Sandstone. It was also considered key to upgrade the rails to let trains make the trip in two hours or less. At that pace, the trains could do more than one round trip per day, reducing the number of trainsets needed to provide frequent service. However, the NLX organization revisited some slower options in 2010, and is now leaning toward "Option 2" that would mostly run at 90 mph north of the Twin Cities, but would support speeds up to 110 mph between Cambridge and Hinckley. This would significantly reduce the cost and lead to better benefit-cost calculations, but would also reduce the operating margin to barely better than break-even.[20][21] Option 2 would have trains take 2 hours and 17 minutes to make the trip, and drop the average speed from about 78 miles per hour (126 km/h) to about 68 mph (109 km/h). This still compares favorably with the scheduled 3 hours 35 minutes scheduled for the North Star in 1985—a mere 43 mph (69 km/h) average.[22]

As of 2009, the line hosted 12 to 15 freight trains per day.[23] It had at least some Class 4 track[24] which limits freight 50 mph (80 km/h) and passenger traffic to 79 mph (127 km/h), but this would need to be upgraded to Class 5 and Class 6 in order to support 90 mph and 110 mph speeds, respectively.[10] There are more than 150 grade crossings and 12 bridges on this segment which would need to be improved (or eliminated, in the case of some grade crossings). The line has automatic block signaling, but needs centralized traffic control and positive train control installed to support speeds above 79 mph.[25] There are also several sidings along the route which only have manual switches and would need to be automated.[10]

The double-track main line south of Coon Creek Junction is the busiest rail corridor in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. In July 2009, before the Northstar commuter line began operation, this segment hosted 63 trains per day.[23] There are already plans for BNSF to construct a third main line in the area from the junction south to East Interstate (the bridge over Interstate 694). BNSF would then allow 22 more passenger trains per day for Northstar, NLX, Amtrak, and possibly other services.[26] The Northstar's Fridley station was built with the future third main in mind, and was initially built as an island platform with track only on the east side, requiring the Northstar train to be on that track when traveling inbound to or outbound from Minneapolis.

References

1. Bodley, Peter (January 22, 2008). "Passenger rail service gets green light from consultant". ABC Newspapers.
2. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (July 2010). "NLX Open House Boards" (PDF). Northern Lights Express. Retrieved September 22, 2010.
3. Kelleher, Bob (December 12, 2006). "Duluth ponders commuter rail". Minnesota Public Radio.
4. Kelleher, Bob (February 22, 2008). "Another push for Duluth to Minneapolis rail service". Minnesota Public Radio.
5. "Proposed Passenger Train 'On Track'". KDLH News 3. February 20, 2008.
6. "Transportation Interchange" (PDF). Hennepin County. November 2009. Retrieved September 22, 2010.
7. "Meeting Minutes" (PDF). Minnesota Department of Transportation. April 6, 2009. Retrieved December 21, 2009.
8. "History of the NLX". Northern Lights Express. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
9. "Proposed Minneapolis-Duluth Rail Line Given Name". WCCO.com. March 14, 2008.
10. Minneapolis–Duluth/Superior: Restoration of Intercity Passenger Rail Service Comprehensive Feasibility Study and Business Plan (ch. 1–2, ch 3, ch 4–10, appendices). Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc., December 2007. Accessed December 18, 2009.
11. "Duluth-Twin Cities Rail Line On Federal Money List". wcco.com. September 30, 2008.
12. "Minnesota's Northern Lights high speed rail project receives $5m grant". Rail.co. September 9, 2011. Archived from the original on September 12, 2011. Retrieved September 12, 2011.
13. "Northern Lights Express: Proposed passenger rail service between Minneapolis and Duluth, MN". April 9, 2013. Retrieved April 9, 2012.
14. Slater, Brady (June 1, 2019). "Twin Ports to Twin Cities rail regroups, aims at 2020". www.duluthnewstribune.com. Retrieved June 4, 2019.
15. Moffett, Kaitlyn (2020-02-10). "NLX project leaders request $40 million in state funding". KBJR. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
16. Levy, Paul (November 29, 2009). "Mpls.-to-Duluth rail price tag climbs to $1 billion". StarTribune. Retrieved December 15, 2009.
17. Levy, Paul (December 13, 2009). "MnDOT getting a line on Twin Cities-Duluth rail". StarTribune. Retrieved December 15, 2009.
18. "Value Engineering in the Federal-Aid Highway Program" (PDF). Federal Highway Administration. March 28, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 4, 2009. Retrieved December 21, 2009.
19. "Interstate FAQ". Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved December 21, 2009.
20. TEMS, Inc. "Corridor Speed Options: 110-mph vs. 90-mph Evaluation" (PDF). Northern Lights Express.
21. Mike Gainor (May 4, 2010). "NLX board studies train speed choices". Retrieved 2010-05-21.
22. "National Train Timetables, Effective April 28, 1985 through October 26, 1985". 1985. Retrieved September 23, 2010.
23. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metro Area 2009 Railroad Volume and Speed Map Archived 2011-05-19 at the Wayback Machine. Minnesota Department of Transportation, July 2009
24. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (July 31, 2009). "Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan: Freight Rail Supply and Demand (Draft Technical Memorandum 2)" (PDF). Minnesota Department of Transportation. Retrieved September 21, 2010.
25. "Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan: Freight and Passenger Rail System Planning (Draft Technical Memorandum 4)" (PDF). Cambridge Systematics. August 2009. Retrieved January 6, 2010.
26. BNSF Easement Rights and Passenger Rail Capacity Improvements Archived 2012-09-02 at the Wayback Machine. Minnesota Department of Transportation, September 15, 2009

External links

• Northern Lights Express