ON TV (TV network)

ON TV was an American subscription television (STV) service that operated in eight markets between 1977 and 1985. Originally established by National Subscription Television, a joint venture of Oak Industries and Chartwell Communications, ON TV was part of a new breed of STV operations that broadcast premium programming—including movies, sporting events and concerts—over an encrypted signal on a UHF television station and leased decoders to subscribing customers. At its peak in 1982, ON TV boasted more than 700,000 customers—more than half of them in Los Angeles, its most successful market. However, the rapidly expanding availability of cable television, coupled with a recession, caused the business to quickly lose subscribers at the same time that Oak Industries was experiencing severe financial difficulties. Between March 1983 and June 1985, all eight operations closed.

For other uses, see ONTV.
ONTV
CountryUnited States
Programming
Language(s)English
Ownership
OwnerNational Subscription Television, a joint venture of Oak Industries and Chartwell Communications
(each market had individual ownership)
History
LaunchedApril 1, 1977 (1977-04-01)
ClosedJune 30, 1985 (1985-06-30)

History

Los Angeles launch

In 1973,[1] Oak Industries, a maker of cable television equipment and other electronic components, and Chartwell Communications, a company majority owned by Jerry Perenchio and Norman Lear, founded a joint venture initially known as World Pay Television, Inc. to create and operate a subscription television system in the Los Angeles market.[2] The connection was made when Everitt A. Carter, an executive at Oak Industries, attended a tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs in Houston, organized by Perenchio; Perenchio approached Carter and asked if the company could build a system to scramble over-the-air signals for pay distribution. While Oak was initially resistant to the idea, it ultimately agreed to develop the equipment if Perenchio fronted $200,000 for research and development, which he did.[3] In 1976, Oak president Frank A. Astrologes was named chairman of the new venture, with Carter succeeding him at Oak.[2] The company intended to open franchises in 14 different states, per Federal Communications Commission (FCC) filings at the time.[4]

The system, which would use scrambling of a standard UHF television station, required a carrier. That was secured by the venture in 1976 when, under the name of Oak Broadcasting Systems, Oak and Perenchio purchased Los Angeles television station KBSC-TV (channel 52) for $1.2 million as part of the liquidation of its parent company, Kaiser Industries.[5] After changing its name to National Subscription Television (NST), the service launched under the brand name ON TV on April 1, 1977,[1] offering unedited, uninterrupted motion pictures, as well as limited slates of Los Angeles Dodgers, California Angels, Los Angeles Lakers and Los Angeles Kings games, during evening hours. The first 500 subscribers lived in the San Fernando Valley, as part of a soft launch of the new system.[6] It was the second subscription television system in operation, with Wometco Home Theater having launched in New York City the previous month.[7]

Ambitions to expand ON TV beyond Los Angeles were immediate. When the first system went live, Carter claimed "firm contracts" to move forward in eight cities—five of which would eventually be home to ON TV-branded subscription television operations—but stated he wanted to see if the Los Angeles system was a success first.[3] In January 1978, Oak reached a deal with Sears to market ON TV service in the Los Angeles and Orange County area.[8] The next year, ON TV got a competitor: SelecTV, which pioneered a pay-per-program model and only showed movies.[9]

Expansion beyond LA
An ON TV decoder box

In October 1978, Oak and Chartwell, the partners in the Los Angeles system, reached an agreement to each develop six ON TV markets on their own; the Oak markets would be Chicago, Phoenix, Miami, Philadelphia, Minneapolis, and Dallas.[10] In Philadelphia, NST had reached a deal with Radio Broadcasting Corporation, which in 1977 was awarded a construction permit for a channel 57 TV station there.[11] The next year, the company announced it would license its equipment and technology in cities where it did not intend to operate itself.[12]

The first of the Oak expansion cities firmed up considerably in November 1978 when Oak announced it would begin operating in Phoenix in July 1979 in a joint venture with the New Television Corporation, which held the construction permit for KNXV-TV (channel 15); New Television would program the station during the day as a free independent, while ON TV would air in the evenings.[13] Oak announced at that time that it would be on the air in Philadelphia and Miami by 1980.[13]

Meanwhile, the ON TV system in Los Angeles grew to more than 100,000 subscribers by the end of 1978 and 200,000 by August 1979, earning it the title of the world's largest single pay-TV operation.[14][15] Oak's increasing involvement with the entertainment business spurred the entire company, previously headquartered in Crystal Lake, Illinois, to move to southern California, where the company built a new headquarters building in the planned community of Rancho Bernardo.[16] As very large cities, like Philadelphia, saw years-long delays in cable television wiring due to political disputes over franchises, the specter of services like ON TV loomed over the horizon and served as an impetus to consider more rapid action.[17]

Chartwell, too, began the task of developing markets. As early as 1977, NST had an agreement to run an STV service on WXON in Detroit,[18] and the two parties aimed for a July 1, 1979, launch.[19] In 1979, the company, through affiliate Tandem Productions, acquired New York City-area station WNJU-TV, and Tandem was waiting in the wings to buy Washington, D.C.'s WDCA-TV if the FCC had rescinded its approval of that station's sale to Taft Broadcasting.[20] Chartwell also explored buying a station in Sacramento, California, in 1980, going so far as to enter into advanced negotiations to purchase that city's KMUV-TV.[21]

As 1979 continued, activity accelerated. Oak announced its intention to open subscription television in Miami at the end of the year from Fort Lauderdale-based WKID-TV, which it had purchased.[22] In Chicago, it reached an agreement with Video 44, owner of UHF station WSNS-TV, to use Oak equipment and technology in its service.[23] (While Video 44 then attempted to sell 50 percent of the company to American Television and Communications, a subsidiary of Time, Inc. and owner of the Preview STV services which had a deal with Zenith to produce its equipment,[24] the company pulled out of the deal in October when major movie studios protested the potential for a monopoly on pay-TV programming between Time's STV holdings and Home Box Office cable network.[25]) The Dallas–Fort Worth market entered the picture when Oak reaffirmed a 1976 deal with Channel 21, Inc., the Sidney Shlenker and Milton Grant–led consortium that held the construction permit for Fort Worth television station KTXA, to bring ON TV to the Metroplex.[26] Oak also filed for construction permits in various cities around the United States, including channel 38 in St. Petersburg, Florida;[27] channel 38 in New Orleans;[28] and channel 20 in Denver.[29] Those applications were joined by a 1981 filing for channel 16 at Everett, Washington, near Seattle.[30]

The Phoenix operation began September 9 when KNXV-TV began broadcasting,[31] and WKID-TV in the Miami–Fort Lauderdale market commenced subscription television broadcasts on January 11, 1980.[32][33] The first licensed ON TV system, owned by Home Entertainment Network—a division of Buford Television—went live on that company's WBTI-TV in Cincinnati on February 1; the station itself took to the air on January 28.[34][35] Oak went on air with ON TV in Chicago on September 22,[36] after having bought a 49 percent stake in the licensee of WSNS,[37][38] and in Dallas–Fort Worth on February 28, 1981.[39] Just eight months after going live in Chicago, ON TV was profitable in that market—said to be unprecedented in the STV industry, and by October 1981, it was joined by all of the Oak-owned operations except Dallas–Fort Worth.[40]

Still more stations appeared to be in the pipeline: Oak had a deal with Baltimore's WBFF to enter that market,[41] and it owned 45 percent of an STV franchise for channel 29 at Minneapolis.[30] Meanwhile, Chartwell—after having attempted to nab rights to New York Yankees baseball—dropped its New York subscription television plans, opting not to scrap WNJU-TV's successful Spanish-language programming and battle the market's dominant STV provider, Wometco Home Theater.[42] (Perenchio would ultimately sell WNJU-TV in 1986.[43])

Oak in control

In Los Angeles—the largest ON TV market, where Oak and Chartwell remained partners—the arrangement came into doubt in March 1981. The two sides disagreed over Perenchio's appointment of William M. Siegel, the chief executive of Chartwell, as the general manager of National Subscription Television—Los Angeles. Oak refused to consent to the appointment and claimed that Chartwell and Perenchio had "surreptitiously" placed Siegel on the payroll; it was reported that Oak had no dispute with Siegel but wanted to affirm its authority as 51 percent owner of the venture.[44] Oak chairman Carter was surprised to learn that Siegel made more money than he did. Further, Perenchio drew Oak's ire when the Chartwell ON TV operation in Detroit ordered new decoder boxes from one of Oak's competitors.[45]

Oak and Chartwell settled in September; the suit was dropped, and Oak bought out Chartwell's 49 percent share of National Subscription Television for $55 million.[46] Oak now controlled the entire Los Angeles and Miami systems, as well as majority shares in the Chicago, Dallas–Fort Worth and Phoenix markets, while Chartwell continued to own and operate the Detroit ON TV system. Cincinnati was licensed, to be joined by another licensing agreement Oak made starting January 31, 1982 with Willamette Subscription Television, the STV franchisee for KECH-TV in the Portland, Oregon, market.[47]

By May 1982, ON TV in southern California had 400,000 subscribers.[48] Oak boasted some 600,000 subscribers in its five ON-TV markets, not counting Detroit, Cincinnati or Portland.[49] Additionally, it was looking to start up in Houston in 1983, broadcasting over KTXH (channel 20), the under construction sister station to KTXA.[50]

Headwinds
ON TV subscribers by market, June 1982[51]
StationMarketOwnerSubscribers
KBSC-TVLos AngelesOak379,000
WSNS-TVChicagoOak120,600
WXONDetroitChartwell61,900
WBTI-TVCincinnatiUnited Cable45,200
WKID-TVMiami–Fort LauderdaleOak44,700
KNXV-TVPhoenixOak38,500
KTXADallas–Fort WorthOak24,800
KECH-TVPortland–SalemWillamette12,000
Total726,700

Subscription television would prove to reach its zenith in 1982, however. That year, STV operations rapidly went from gaining subscribers to losing them. After seeing 65 percent growth in 1981, STV operators grew their subscriber rolls by just 0.8 percent the next year.[52] A worsening recession and faster-than-anticipated growth of cable television became hazards. As ON TV operations in some markets began to face headwinds, the financial picture of Oak Industries itself worsened. In October 1982, it revised down its earnings guidance due to declining sales of its 56-channel cable box, due to the recession and technical issues.[53] Even though one analyst described subscription television as "clearly just an interim business", the company remained "bullish about STV";[50] it struck a deal with Telstar to sublease two satellite transponders, opening the door to satellite delivery of ON TV's programming to local STV and MDS franchisees, low-power television stations, and cable companies.[54]

Another problem faced by subscription outlets was that they leased time from television stations, which in some cases were not owned by the STV operator. This led to several fights between station owners and franchisees, Oak-owned or otherwise. As early as 1980, WXON in Detroit was objecting to ON TV's airing of the movie Is There Sex After Death?.[55] KNXV-TV in Phoenix had threatened to stop airing ON TV's "adults only" late-night fare,[56] and ON TV took the station to court over its refusal to cede early evening hours, which generated 60 percent of the television station's revenue.[57] KTXA won a legal fight against ON TV in that market, taking away all its adult programming and prompting competitor VEU to run ads with headlines such as "For real adult entertainment, turn-on to VEU".[58]

The first ON TV service to close was Chartwell's Detroit system, which shuttered March 31, 1983.[59] It cited falling subscriber figures, from 68,000 to 42,000 in just a year; an inability to obtain more airtime from WXON; and competition from the it service that aired on Ann Arbor-based WIHT.[59] The operating hours that WXON allowed ON TV to have in the Detroit market continually hampered the service's ability to show sporting events, directly causing it to drop a package of Detroit Tigers baseball games it aired.[60]

Oak was next to announce casualties. On April 15, 1983, citing the situations in each market,[61] it announced it would shutter its Dallas–Fort Worth and Phoenix systems.[56] In Phoenix, the advance of cable and other factors had caused subscribers to drop from a peak of 39,000 in July 1982 to 25,000 at closure.[62] Besides the Dallas–Fort Worth conflict with KTXA, the company had been handicapped by a late entry into a market that at the time had two existing STV competitors—VEU and Preview, which merged their local operations in late 1982 into a service with more program hours—and was the nation's most crowded.[63] Anthony Cassara, president of the television division of VEU owner Golden West Broadcasters, had previously described that market as "total insanity" when it had three competing operators.[51] Expanded hours were crucial to keep services alive as cable companies grew: in June 1983, Cincinnati's WBTI axed hours of free programming and began taking satellite-fed ON TV programming from Oak in place of its local feed.[64]

In August, Willamette Subscription Television, the Portland licensee and also the operator of a microwave system transmitting HBO to customers, filed for bankruptcy; it owed $4.7 million to a group of 20 major creditors, including $1 million to Oak.[65] KECH-TV, which itself filed for bankruptcy in November 1983,[66] ceased ON TV broadcasts on August 19, 1984.[67]

Collapse and demise

As Oak Industries faced wider financial trouble, it sought to shift the operation of its three remaining directly owned ON TV systems. In October 1983, operation of the Los Angeles, Chicago and Miami–Fort Lauderdale systems shifted from Oak to a new company, Twin Arts Productions, led by former Playgirl magazine publisher Ira Ritter; the three services counted 370,000 total subscribers, down from 550,000 in October 1982.[68] In early 1984, Oak announced a revamped ON TV program lineup,[69] and its operations did score a victory when its direct competitor, Spectrum, opted to discontinue operating in Chicago and sell its subscriber base.[70] However, Oak's condition continued to deteriorate. Later that month, the company announced it was being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),[71] and it posted a loss of $166.1 million for 1983.[72] One of the company's auditors, Arthur Andersen, qualified its statement, fearing that Oak could not fully realize its $134 million investment in subscription television.[72]

As pressure increased on Oak's finances and the ON TV systems continued to lose subscribers during 1984, cuts were made. In mid-July, National Subscription Television of Fort Lauderdale laid off 41 employees—half its staff.[73] Less than two weeks later, Oak announced that it had sold WKID-TV to John Blair & Co. for $17.75 million; the new buyers intended to program it as a Spanish-language station.[74]

In August—after a year of speculation—it emerged that Oak was in talks to sell the Los Angeles system to SelecTV, which had competed alongside ON TV for six years in the southern California market.[75] A deal was initially reached, then collapsed;[76] In October, after a year, management of ON TV had been brought back in house after the Twin Arts arrangement was ended in order to cut costs; the company had also taken over its satellite distribution to some 140,000 subscribers after dissolving the Telstar joint venture.[77]

SelecTV ultimately acquired the Los Angeles operation, by then with just 156,000 subscribers, in February 1985.[78] That same month, Oak reached a deal to sell KBSC-TV to an investor group, Estrella Communications, headed by Joe Wallach, in a $30 million transaction.[79] That station formally relaunched as Spanish-language KVEA in November.[80] On June 1, 1985, WBTI—which had been sold and relaunched as WIII at the start of the year—dropped ON TV, with just 3,200 remaining subscribers, when Oak ceased providing programming by satellite.[81]

Oak had one last portion of its subscription television business to dismantle, in Chicago, where WSNS ceased broadcasting as a subscription station on June 30 and began broadcasting programming from the Spanish International Network the next day.[82] However, WSNS's years as a subscription television station had left a legacy that impeded Oak's ability to sell its stake in channel 44 for years. In 1982, Monroe Communications Corporation filed a challenge to WSNS's license renewal and a competing application to establish a channel 44 TV station in Chicago, charging that, as an STV station between 1979 and 1982, WSNS failed to serve the public interest and severely cut back on public affairs programming.[83] An FCC administrative law judge found against WSNS licensee Video 44 and in favor of Monroe in 1985.[84] The FCC later granted the renewal, only for a federal appeals court to rule in Monroe's favor in April 1990.[85] After the FCC officially denied the license renewal in September 1990,[86] however, Chicago's Hispanic community and civic leaders rallied around WSNS.[87] Video 44 and Monroe reached an $18 million settlement agreement in 1993,[88] and Oak and fellow Video 44 partner Harriscope sold their stake in the station to Telemundo in 1995.[89]

Service and programming

Subscribers were charged $40 to $50 installation and $19.95 to $22.50 per month, depending on the market, in the first three ON TV launches (Los Angeles, Phoenix and Detroit).[7]

ON TV programming consisted of four basic components: movies, sporting events, special events such as concerts and boxing matches, and adult programming. Though there was variance between ON TV operations—particularly with regard to sports programming in each market—after 1983, when it established the Telstar joint venture, Oak was able to supply much of this programming directly to affiliates and home satellite dish owners.[64][54]

The ON TV decoder supported additional program tiers and pay-per-view events on top of the normal service, for which subscribers would have to pay additional money. This functionality was used to broadcast pay-per-view events including boxing matches—consistently the most successful PPV offering[90]—as well as an "adults only" service of late-night movies.[91] Among the notable pay-per-view presentations provided by ON TV (and other STV systems) was the first television screening of Star Wars in 1982, for which subscribers paid an additional $7.95.[92] However, the nature of the system meant that viewers who did not pay simply received no STV programming—just a blank screen.[92] While more than 30 percent of customers in Oak's ON TV territory paid for Star Wars,[93] conversion rates had surpassed 60 percent in some cases for boxing matches.[94]

Adult programming had high uptake in STV operations nationwide, and ON TV was no exception. In early 1983, 48 percent of subscribers across all ON-TV systems paid an extra fee to subscribe to it.[95] In Dallas–Fort Worth—despite being the last Oak market to offer the "Adults Only" tier[96]—89 percent of subscribers opted in;[95] it was 70 percent in Miami.[97] Uptake ranged from 50 to 90 percent at other STV operations nationwide, including Wometco Home Theater and SelecTV Milwaukee.[98]

Equipment
An ON TV decoder without its rear plate, showing the serial number and barcode, part of the addressability function

With the notable exception of Chartwell's operation in Detroit, which used equipment from rival Blonder-Tongue,[7] ON TV systems, including all five owned by Oak itself, used scrambling technology and decoder hardware developed and manufactured by Oak, known as the "Model I".[99] The boxes, connected to a standard UHF television antenna, decoded the encrypted STV signal for paying subscribers and output it to their sets. Each decoder was individually addressable, which meant they could be controlled centrally from the transmitter; addressability allowed for electronic connections and disconnections, as well as the ability to offer pay-per-view services,[91] and allowed Oak to implement a theft deterrent where any disconnected decoder box stopped providing service after eight minutes.[100] The decoders also supported an optional key module that served as a form of parental control.[101] When ON TV entered into a partnership to start SportsVision, a second STV service, in Chicago, Oak manufactured special two-channel decoders that supported both services.[102]

The last two new Oak STV installations—Dallas–Fort Worth and Portland—utilized a newer and more secure version of the Sigma scrambling system.[103]

Piracy

A problem that would be a constant for all subscription television operators was signal piracy. As early as late 1978, the Los Angeles Times described the Oak ON TV decoder as one that "reportedly can be built at home by handy TV technicians".[104]

In 1980, a trio of lawsuits against manufactuers of pirate decoders converged. Oak won a case in Phoenix, as did Chartwell in Detroit.[100][105] In a case involving pirate decoders in Los Angeles, however, a Los Angeles federal judge ruled against Oak and ruled that ON TV did not hold a monopoly on decoding its signals.[106] Two months later, California governor Jerry Brown signed a new law prohibiting the sale of unauthorized STV decoding equipment.[107] For Oak, piracy became a serious threat—and one not easily remediated, given the extensive install base of decoders and the inability to pinpoint where pirate decoders were located.[100] Further, in Los Angeles, ON TV had begun turning on disconnected decoders regularly to restore service to subscribers affected by power failures in neighborhoods.[100]

Affecting all STV operations, but particularly Chartwell in Detroit, was the cottage industry that sprang up in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, across the Detroit River. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's then-ongoing study of pay television services prompted the company to halt any plans to start its own business operations there;[108] when asked about the possibility of ON TV being legal in Canada, communications minister David MacDonald replied that the idea "would appear to fly in the face of every statement that's ever been made about Canadian broadcasting".[109]

It was legal, however, for Windsor residents to build decoders to receive ON TV—and some 10,000 existed within two years of beginning STV operation in Detroit—but when those decoders started to enter the United States and pose a challenge to Chartwell's operation, the company moved to take action. In late May 1981, the company stationed process servers outside of the Windsor offices of one decoder manufacturer, Video Gallery, to dissuade potential U.S. buyers.[110] Chartwell then took Video Gallery and its American clients to U.S. federal court, seeking an injunction,[111] and got it, preventing Americans from importing its products.[112][113] In response, Video Gallery obtained an injunction in an Ontario court preventing ON TV representatives from interfering with customers entering its store.[108]

However, Chartwell would gain the upper hand. After winning its initial injunction,[113] the government closed the border to Canadian decoders in August.[114] Video Gallery closed at the end of the year,[115] and Chartwell won a $618,000 judgment against it in March 1982.[116] Even then, it was estimated that some 10,000 additional households received ON TV in southwestern Ontario, including on master antenna systems in apartment complexes—none of them making money for Chartwell.[117]

ON TV companies responded to piracy by modifying pulse signals and introducing new scrambling techniques.[118] In Detroit, Chartwell began migrating to a new generation of decoder boxes.[117] In 1984, ON TV Chicago, also afflicted by heavy pirating, offered "amnesty" to pirate users ahead of the launch of new scrambling equipment.[119]

Stations

Among the stations that broadcast ON TV were:

Market Station Launch date Closure date Current status
Los Angeles, CaliforniaKBSC-TV 52April 1, 1977February 1985Telemundo owned-and-operated station KVEA
Detroit, MichiganWXON 20July 1, 1979March 31, 1983MyNetworkTV affiliate WMYD
Phoenix, ArizonaKNXV-TV 15September 9, 1979May 4, 1983ABC affiliate
Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FloridaWKID-TV 51January 11, 1980November 1984Telemundo owned-and-operated station WSCV
Cincinnati, OhioWBTI 64February 1, 1980May 31, 1985MyNetworkTV affiliate WSTR-TV
Chicago, IllinoisWSNS 44September 15, 1980June 30, 1985Telemundo owned-and-operated station
Dallas–Fort Worth, TexasKTXA 21February 28, 1981April 30, 1983Independent station
Portland–Salem, OregonKECH 22January 31, 1982August 19, 1984Ion Television owned-and-operated station KPXG-TV

Los Angeles

The first ON TV service launched in the Los Angeles market on April 1, 1977, on KBSC-TV (channel 52), licensed to Corona; ON TV's offices were in Glendale.[120] Channel 52 shuffled its ethnic programming lineup in favor of carrying ON TV during evening hours beginning at 8:00 pm.[121] (KBSC-TV changed its commercial program format to Spanish-language shows in 1980.[122])

By April 1979, the service was signing up 12,000 subscribers a month.[123] By that year, it had grown its sports portfolio beyond the Dodgers, Angels, Lakers and Kings to include USC Trojans college sports and Los Angeles Aztecs soccer, as well as horse racing from Santa Anita Park.[120] After the FCC repealed a rule in late 1982 that required television stations offering a subscription service to broadcast at least 20 hours a week of unencrypted programming, KBSC began running ON TV 24 hours a day and displaced its existing Spanish-language daytime programming.[124]

However, as Oak dismantled its former STV empire, it quickly sold the ON TV subscriber base, by then dwindling, and KBSC-TV to separate parties weeks apart.[78][79] SelecTV continued to broadcast over KBSC-TV for several more months until the new, Spanish-language KVEA was ready to debut.[80]

Detroit

In the only system Chartwell controlled outright, ON TV came to Detroit on July 1, 1979, broadcasting on WXON (channel 20);[19] it had 15,000 subscribers within three months.[125] The service quickly snared the rights to Detroit Red Wings hockey, Detroit Tigers baseball (consisting of 20 weeknight games a year from Tiger Stadium), and Michigan Wolverines athletics (including tape-delayed football games).[126] In the case of the Wolverines, it even ran one experimental 1979 telecast live, a presentation spearheaded by Michigan athletic director Don Canham with the blessing of the NCAA.[125]

WXON, however, proved to be a poor partner for ON TV. After rejecting one R-rated movie in 1980, the station then ordered ON TV to screen all movies it aired for WXON executives.[60] More critically, however, the station refused to cede any time before 8:00 p.m. and aired reruns in that time slot, severely crippling it as a sports broadcaster. Midweek Red Wings and Tigers games regularly began before ON TV was on the air, forcing the station to join games in progress (as with the Red Wings) or tape delay them (which it did for the Tigers). The flaw became highly visible when the Red Wings played the Calgary Flames in a game on October 29, 1981, in which the Red Wings scored five goals in the first period before ON TV picked up the game.[127] After the 1982 season, ON TV dropped its Tigers deal because it could not secure the air time it needed to telecast games in their entirety.[60]

In a bid to stem the Windsor piracy problem that had dogged it for nearly its entire existence, upgrade from its original Blonder-Tongue decoders and support addressable pay-per-view, Chartwell began the conversion to a new generation of decoders in 1982.[118][117] It would not be enough. When ON TV closed in Detroit on March 31, 1983, Chartwell shuttered a business in which it had invested $13 million but never turned a profit.[60] The system—which was vigorously competing against it, the subscription service on Ann Arbor-based WPXD, and Livonia-based MDS service MORE-TV, in addition to rapidly proliferating cable services—had lost 26,000 of the 68,000 subscribers it claimed at its peak.[59]

Phoenix

In Phoenix, ON TV launched on a new UHF television station, KNXV-TV (channel 15), which signed on September 9, 1979 and immediately began carrying subscription television programming.[31] The company immediately secured top-tier sports: in Phoenix, ON TV held telecast rights at various times to ASU sports, the Phoenix Suns,[128][129] Phoenix Giants minor league baseball and Los Angeles Kings hockey. By July 1982, it had 39,000 subscribers in Phoenix, but signs of trouble were emerging. In 1981, the Suns signed a 13-year agreement to telecast games through American Cable[130] (resulting in the launch of the Arizona Sports Programming Network), which sub-licensed games to ON TV in part because they had not wired all of the metropolitan area.[131] Late in 1982, KNXV resisted a request to expand ON TV to start before 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and 5:00 p.m. on weekends, while the station also wanted the subscription service to stop screening adult movies.[56]

Phoenix was one of the first markets to show serious subscriber erosion. By April 1983, its subscriber base had dipped below 25,000, a drop of more than 35 percent. Oak Communications ultimately shuttered ON TV in Phoenix on May 4, 1983, resulting in the loss of 140 jobs.[62]

Miami–Fort Lauderdale
A 1980 newspaper advertisement for ON TV service in South Florida with Sears available for installation.

In 1979, Oak bought Fort Lauderdale television station WKID-TV (channel 51), for $4.1 million, with the intention of using it to bring ON TV to south Florida.[132] ON TV then began operating January 11, 1980, broadcasting subscription programming from 7:00 p.m. to midnight on weekdays and 5:00 p.m. to midnight on weekends.[32] Operating in a market with few professional sporting franchises, one of the immediate draws was a package of games of the Fort Lauderdale Strikers.[33] 5,200 subscribers were signed up in the service's first two months,[133] and it claimed 15,000 by July.[134]

In September 1981, ON TV added further hours, starting at 6:00 p.m. on weekdays.[135] It expanded again in July 1982.[136]

By July 1984, when ON TV laid off half its staff, subscriptions had fallen from a 1982 high of 44,700[51] to 28,500,[73] making it the smallest of Oak's STV operations at the time.[137] At the time that John Blair & Co. acquired WKID-TV, it was broadcasting from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. and from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. on weekends.[138]

Blair completed the acquisition in December.[139] Channel 51 then went off the air as Blair prepared to implement the station's relaunch as WSCV, south Florida's second Spanish-language television station.[140]

Cincinnati
For more information on other STV operations owned by Buford Television/United Cable, see Spectrum (TV channel).

ON TV began airing on independent station WBTI (channel 64) on February 1, 1980, airing alongside commercial general-entertainment programming that aired until 7:00 p.m. on weekdays.[34] In 1982, Buford Television, which built WBTI and owned the ON TV operation through its Home Entertainment Network unit, sold an 80 percent stake to United Cable for a reported $20 million;[141] the television station itself was then sold in April 1983.[142] Unusually for a subscription television operation, WBTI expanded its reach through the construction of a channel 66 translator in Dayton, approved in September 1980 and launched in May 1981; the station had already signed up some customers in that area.[143][144]

By 1983, Warner-Amex cable was spreading throughout the Cincinnati market, causing interest in ON TV to decline considerably. In June, WBTI dropped most of its commercial programming, with the exception of The 700 Club at 10:00 a.m. on weekdays as well as a couple of religious programs on Sunday mornings, to expand ON TV's hours; it laid off staff and began relying on Oak's new satellite feed to program the subscription service.[64] That October, United Cable, which had acquired 80 percent of Buford's three STV operations (the other of two of which operated as Spectrum in Chicago and Minneapolis), wrote down the entire unit and offered the systems for sale.[145]

United sold 90 percent of WBTI in November 1984 to Channel 64 Joint Venture for $9.4 million, at which time ON TV had just 12,500 local subscribers (75 percent of which subscribed to adult programming),[146] compared to 45,200 in June 1982.[51] The station relaunched as WIII on January 1, 1985; it restored a general-entertainment schedule, with ON TV programming being relegated to overnight hours only.[146] With a mere 3,200 subscribers remaining and Oak shutting down its satellite feed, ON TV in Cincinnati ended on June 1, 1985, at which time WIII converted into a full-time general-entertainment independent station.[81]

Chicago
We were rarely profitable in the year before we went into subscription television. We're not making a lot of money now, but we're making more than we were then.

Ed Morris, general manager of WSNS, at the station's full-time conversion to subscription television in 1982[147]

Chicago was the second-to-last Oak market to launch—WSNS (channel 44) did not begin airing STV until September 22, 1980[36]—but would prove to be among the company's longest-lasting markets. Initially, WSNS–then operating as an independent station–continued unscrambled, commercial programming until 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and on weekends until 5:00 pm.[148]

A year after ON TV began broadcasting, it got competition when Spectrum, originally owned by Buford Television, began airing over Focus Broadcasting-owned WFBN (channel 66) on September 29, 1981.[149] At the same time, WSNS extended its transmission of ON TV programming by two hours on weekdays (now starting at 5:00 pm) and by three hours on weekends (to 12:00 pm). In January 1982, WSNS began carrying ON TV for 20 hours per day, and after the repeal of the limits on STV operating hours, it went round-the-clock—resulting in the dismissal of WSNS's own sales unit and other station staffers.[147]

Further information: FSN Chicago

At the same time that ON TV was gaining subscribers, SportsVision International,[150] a consortium of four Chicago sports franchises—the White Sox, Bulls, Blackhawks and Sting—had reached a deal to set up a new subscription television station on channel 60 (the shared time WPWR/WBBS), which would carry their games. Both Oak and Buford competed for the right to manage the service,[151] and Oak won out; ON TV subscribers could receive SportsVision for an extra $14.95 a month,[152] and a special run of two-channel decoders was made.[102]

SportsVision finally launched May 25, 1982,[153][154] having been delayed due to issues with the new decoders[155] and then again due to low uptake, airing as a free preview for two extra weeks.[156]

The second STV operation, however, did not reach the subscriber base needed to maintain its viability. By March 1983, it had 25,000 subscribers, half of the amount needed to break even,[157] not helped by the poor performance of the White Sox in the 1982 season.[158] In November, still at just 35,000 subscribers and losing $300,000 a month, it was announced that SportsVision would be folded into ON TV on January 1, 1984, with channel 44's STV service televising a significant number of games and SportsVision continuing as a premium cable channel in suburban areas and outside of Chicagoland;[159] the remaining service was then sold to SportsChannel.[160]

ON TV entered 1984 battered by piracy problems, which had also been cited by White Sox owner Eddie Einhorn as a reason for the end of SportsVision as a separate STV service.[159] In January, the service's operations director estimated that, for every paying subscriber, another was pirating its programming.[161] Subscriber figures had dropped from 89,500 in August 1983 to 80,000 in August 1984, of which 18,000 were previous clients of Spectrum.[162] The service was also instituting program cutbacks. In November 1984, non-professional sports, children's programs and some other low-rated programming were axed to emphasize movies and a reduced schedule of events from SportsVision.[163] By year's end, Oak had put its remaining STV services up for sale, and Chicago had fallen to 75,000 subscribers.[164]

In February 1985, as Oak's financial condition continued to worsen, it emerged that the company was taking writedowns related to the termination of its STV businesses; Burt Harris, owner of WSNS owner Harriscope, stated that he didn't see the service making it to the end of the year.[165] It would not, ceasing operations June 30, 1985, and bringing to a close Oak's eight-year venture into subscription television.[82]

Dallas–Fort Worth

ON TV on KTXA (channel 21) was a late entrant into the most competitive subscription television market in the nation. By the time ON TV signed on in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, the area had two competing STV services: VEU and Preview.[39] In September 1982, VEU bought the Preview Dallas operation.[166] VEU, aside from being the leader in subscribers, also had the two largest sports attractions in the market, airing Dallas Mavericks and Texas Rangers games;[167][168] ON TV, by contrast, aired weekly Southwest Conference basketball during the season.[169]

An operation already struggling for position in a contested media market and with fewer broadcast hours than VEU was then kneecapped by KTXA's vigorous opposition to adult programming—objecting to expansion and blocking the showing of adult movies—which produced a frosty relationship between station and STV franchisee.[61][63] The competitive market and contentious relationship contributed to the service discontinuing operations on April 30, 1983.[62]

Portland

Like in Phoenix, ON TV began operations on a new station, KECH-TV channel 22, which began telecasting from Salem, Oregon on November 21, 1981. Willamette Subscription Television, the local ON TV company which was commonly owned with the station by Arnold Brustin and Chris Desmond, rented evening airtime from KECH, but the operation never turned a profit. In its first year of operation, Willamette had lost $6.6 million, and by December 1982, the station was owed $300,000.[170] The state of the operation was such that the limited partners in Willamette Subscription Television sued Brustin and Desmond for mismanagement in a case that was settled out of court.[170] In 1982, Willamette acquired Premier Home Box Office, a microwave system delivering HBO to 10,000 subscribers, from Canadian company Rogers; Premier had more subscribers at the time than ON TV in the area, which had 6,000.[171]

Willamette filed bankruptcy in the summer of 1983, and a court ordered Desmond to create a debt repayment schedule for more than $4.7 million owed to 20 major creditors; meanwhile, the HBO microwave service battled signal piracy of its own.[65] That November, KECH joined it in bankruptcy reorganization.[66]

On August 19, 1984, the ON TV service ended, with KECH programming older movies in prime time; the station at the time stated its plans to transmit adults-only subscription television programming in late nights under the name "Cascade Entertainment Network" after that date.[67]

References
  1. Margulies, Lee (March 29, 1977). "Just the Ticket for Pay TV". Los Angeles Times. p. View 1, 7. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  2. "Oak President moving to LA". Crystal Lake Herald. February 11, 1976. p. 17. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  3. Darby, Frank (April 1, 1977). "Pay-TV gets first test". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Chicago Sun-Times. p. 1D. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  4. Adams, Jim (February 11, 1976). "Subscription TV is a tantalizing unknown for three investors". The Minneapolis Star. p. 20B. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  5. "Changing Hands" (PDF). Broadcasting. September 20, 1976. p. 43. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  6. "Oak Industries gets into LA TV market". Crystal Lake Herald. April 11, 1977. p. 3. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  7. "FCC letting STV out of the closet" (PDF). Broadcasting. October 1, 1979. pp. 23–24. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  8. "Sears, Roebuck plans to market pay TV in the Los Angeles area". Los Angeles Times. January 31, 1978. p. 8. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  9. Margulies, Lee (July 22, 1978). "New Pay TV Service to Debut". Los Angeles Times. p. 3. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  10. "Pay-TV for Chicago". Chicago Tribune. October 21, 1978. p. 6. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  11. "Philadelphia STV approved" (PDF). Broadcasting. September 19, 1977. p. 126. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  12. "Subscription TV". Chicago Tribune. March 27, 1979. p. 6. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  13. "Subscription TV will begin in July". The Arizona Republic. November 28, 1978. p. B-6. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  14. "New pay TV leads world". Crystal Lake Herald. December 11, 1978. p. 9. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  15. "National Subscription Television's over-air..." (PDF). Broadcasting. August 27, 1979. p. 22. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  16. "Pay-TV Firm Will Move To Rancho Bernardo Site". Los Angeles Times. January 28, 1979. p. 28. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  17. Frump, Bob (January 30, 1978). "City urged to pass cable TV provisions quickly". The Philadelphia Inquirer. p. 3-B. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  18. "What's This? Scrambled TV That You Pay For?". Detroit Free Press. April 3, 1977. p. 7C. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  19. McMahon, Tom (February 13, 1979). "Pay-TV is getting closer". The Windsor Star. p. 15. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  20. "Buying urge" (PDF). Broadcasting. October 1, 1979. p. 5 (17). Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  21. "Channel 31 Sale in Talk Stage". Sacramento Bee. February 12, 1980. p. C7. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  22. DuBocq, Tom (April 13, 1979). "Subscription TV tunes in South Florida". The Miami News. p. 6A. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  23. "Oak, WSNS agree on subscription TV". Crystal Lake Herald. June 8, 1979. p. 9. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  24. O'Shea, James (July 20, 1979). "Channel 44 owner to sell half-interest". Chicago Tribune. p. 3. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  25. "Time out in Chicago" (PDF). Broadcasting. October 15, 1979. p. 72. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  26. Millenson, Michael (September 15, 1979). "Pay-TV effort revived". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. p. 5B. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  27. Bowden, Robert (August 25, 1979). "Four firms vie for Channel 38". St. Petersburg Times. p. 6B. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  28. "New Stations" (PDF). Broadcasting. March 24, 1980. p. 70. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  29. "New Stations" (PDF). Broadcasting. June 11, 1979. p. 59. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  30. Chachkin, Anthony (November 2, 1982). "Initial Decision (FCC 82D-72)". FCC Reports, Second Edition. p. 929. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
  31. "Today the UHF station..." The Arizona Republic. September 9, 1979. p. TV Digest 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  32. "This week". The Miami News. January 12, 1980. p. TV & Radio 3. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  33. Silver, Michael (January 12, 1980). "New Pay TV Service Is ON the Air". Miami Herald. p. 8-B. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  34. "Here's Some New And Different TV". Cincinnati Enquirer. January 13, 1980. p. F-10. Retrieved January 9, 2021 – via Newspapers.com.
  35. Hoffman, Steve (February 12, 1980). "Channel 64 Going Strong With Reruns". Cincinnati Enquirer. p. B-11. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  36. Preston, Marilynn (September 16, 1980). "STV: Another option in a changing market". Chicago Tribune. p. 6. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  37. Potts, Mark (March 8, 1980). "Owners plan to sell 49% of Channel 44". Chicago Tribune. p. 7. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  38. "Oak, Video 44 deal". Chicago Tribune. March 20, 1980. p. 7. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  39. Steinert-Threlkeld, Tom (February 1, 1981). "Blossom of fee-TV in area about to reach full flower". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. pp. 1H, 3H, 4H, 5H. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  40. Shanahan, Basil (October 19, 1981). "Oak Industries' future tightly knotted to cable" (PDF). CableAge. pp. 35-36 (103-104). Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  41. Carter, Bill (March 12, 1981). "Channel 45 seeking the pay-TV option". Baltimore Sun. p. B6. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  42. Botta, Mike (January 30, 1981). "Ch. 47 to remain free, ABC wants to charge". The Herald News. p. C-12. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  43. "For the Record" (PDF). Broadcasting. November 10, 1986. p. 98. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  44. Harris, Kathryn (March 21, 1981). "2 Partners Go to Court Over ON-TV Dispute". Los Angeles Times. pp. 15, 18. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  45. Crook, David; Harris, Kathryn (December 13, 1981). "Jerry Perenchio: Hollywood's Consummate Deal Maker". Los Angeles Times. pp. 3, 15. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  46. "Oak Industries said it will buy the remainder of ON-TV". Los Angeles Times. September 9, 1981. p. 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  47. "Oak Industries Inc. announced..." Los Angeles Times. February 9, 1982. p. B. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  48. Anderson, Claude (May 4, 1982). "Holmes vs. Cooney gets few takers". p. B-5. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  49. Ramirez, Anthony (July 9, 1982). "Oak Industries Poises for a Boom". Los Angeles Times. pp. 1, 5. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  50. Harris, Kathryn (October 11, 1982). "Pay-TV Firm's Picture Gets Fuzzier". pp. 1, 4. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  51. "Special Report: Subscription Television" (PDF). Broadcasting. August 16, 1982. p. 32–45. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  52. Harris, Kathryn (April 3, 1983). "Subscription television is falling on difficult times in some places". Indianapolis Star. L.A. Times News Service. p. TV Week 25. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  53. Manjikian, Tamara (October 12, 1982). "Oak Industries won't make as much as it expected". Times-Advocate. p. D8. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  54. Ramirez, Anthony (October 19, 1982). "Oak Seeks to Sublease Two Telstar Channels". Los Angeles Times. p. 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  55. Stoehr, Chris (March 26, 1980). "The movie was too sexy for Channel 20". Detroit Free Press. p. 8D. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  56. Wilkinson, Bud (April 14, 1983). "ON TV planning to halt programming to Valley". The Arizona Republic. pp. A1, A12. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  57. Wilkinson, Bud (February 17, 1983). "ON TV, Channel 15 to air differences on contract in court". Arizona Republic. pp. D11, D15. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  58. "For real adult entertainment, turn-on to VEU". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. February 8, 1983. p. 5E. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  59. Duffy, Mike (March 8, 1983). "ON-TV will switch off on March 31". Detroit Free Press. pp. 3A, 4A. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  60. Duffy, Mike (March 10, 1983). "ON staff blames fall on Channel 20". Detroit Free Press. p. 12B. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  61. "Another TV service down the tube". Odessa American. Associated Press. April 23, 1983. p. 11B. Retrieved August 25, 2019 – via Newspapers.com.
  62. Wilkinson, Bud (April 15, 1983). "Channel 15 readies lineup to replace ON TV programming". The Arizona Republic. pp. E1, E6. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  63. Coffey, Jerry (April 15, 1983). "ON TV pay service is calling it quits in the Metroplex". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. p. 6C. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  64. Cannon, Angie (June 10, 1983). "WBTI Trades Free Programming For Profitable Cable Service". Cincinnati Enquirer. p. B-2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  65. "Financial state of subscription TV worsens". Statesman-Journal. Associated Press. October 28, 1983. p. 10. Retrieved April 24, 2019 – via Newspapers.com.
  66. Cowan, Ron (November 9, 1983). "Kech-22 owners file for bankruptcy". Statesman-Journal. p. 5C. Retrieved April 24, 2019 – via Newspapers.com.
  67. Cowan, Ron (August 12, 1984). "KECH to broadcast movies in prime-time". Statesman-Journal. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  68. Harris, Kathryn (October 12, 1983). "New Firm to Run 3 ON TV Services". Los Angeles Times. p. 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  69. O'Reiley, Tim (January 23, 1984). "Year of extremes in videoland". San Diego Union. p. X-28. As a result, Oak hired an outside consulting firm to completely redesign the programming.
  70. Storch, Charles (March 1, 1984). "ON TV pushes rival out of picture". Chicago Tribune. p. 3. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  71. Ritter, Bill (March 20, 1984). "Oak Industries Under Investigation by the SEC". Los Angeles Times. pp. A, B. Retrieved October 20, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  72. Ritter, Bill (March 24, 1984). "Auditors Qualify Opinion: Oak Industries Posts $166-Million '83 Loss". Los Angeles Times. pp. 1, 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  73. Woodlee, Yolanda W. (July 18, 1984). "ON TV lays off half its staff to save service". Miami Herald. p. 2BR. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  74. Mitchell, Cyndi (July 31, 1984). "Oak Industries to Sell TV Station in Florida". Los Angeles Times. p. A. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  75. Farley, Ellen (August 15, 1984). "ON-TV Discussing Sale of Its L.A. System to SelecTV". Los Angeles Times. pp. 1, 10. Retrieved October 12, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  76. Sahagun, Louis (October 5, 1984). "Talks to Sell ON-TV's L.A. Unit to SelecTV Canceled". Los Angeles Times. pp. 1, 2. Retrieved October 12, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  77. Kinsman, Michael; Clifford, Jane (December 20, 1984). "OAK Industries Inc. - An uncertain future - FIRM MIRED IN RED INK - Leadership vacuum sets company adrift". San Diego Union-Tribune. p. C-7.
  78. Farley, Ellen (February 5, 1985). "Oak Industries Sells Its ON-TV Service to SelecTV". pp. 1, 3. Retrieved October 12, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  79. Muir, Frederick M. (February 7, 1985). "Oak Plans to Sell KBSC to Investors for $30 Million". Los Angeles Times. p. 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  80. Margulies, Lee (November 22, 1985). "Channel 52 Getting a Spanish Accent". Los Angeles Times. p. 28. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  81. "ON TV Pulls the Plug". Cincinnati Enquirer. May 7, 1985. p. D-10. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  82. "ON TV off air, Ch. 44 returns". Chicago Tribune. June 30, 1985. p. TV Week 6. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  83. Lazarus, George (August 2, 1983). "Bid for Channel 44 license". Chicago Tribune. p. 5. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  84. Saville Hodge, Sally (February 23, 1985). "Owners of Channel 44 in danger of losing license". Chicago Tribune. p. 7. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  85. Warren, James (April 14, 1990). "Court ruling to test TV license policy". Chicago Tribune. pp. 1, 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  86. Morris, Steven (September 20, 1990). "FCC denies WSNS-TV new broadcast license". Chicago Tribune. pp. 1, 2. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  87. Montaña, Constanza (November 23, 1990). "Political leaders rally behind Channel 44". Chicago Tribune. p. 16. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  88. Feder, Robert (June 15, 1993). "Channel 44 Settles 11-Year License War". Chicago Sun-Times. p. 33. Monroe Communications Corp., a group formed in 1982 to challenge Channel 44's current ownership, agreed to drop its case despite favorable rulings by the Federal Communications Commission and federal courts. In exchange for dropping its claim on the license, Monroe accepted an $18 million settlement from Channel 44's parent company, Harriscope Corp., sources said.
  89. "WSNS-TV Chicago" (PDF). Broadcasting & Cable. December 4, 1995. p. 48. Retrieved October 25, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  90. Michals, Bob (September 6, 1984). "'Pay-Per-View' TV Going Down Tubes". Palm Beach Post. p. B19. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  91. "Oak makes its software move" (PDF). Broadcasting. April 13, 1981. p. 120. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  92. Peterson, Bettelou (July 30, 1982). "'Star Wars' on TV – for a price". Detroit Free Press. p. 6B. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  93. Teets, John (October 14, 1982). "Previewing fine cable programming". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. p. 13. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  94. Jicha, Tom (October 8, 1982). "Station attempts to pull the plug on FP&L rate hike". The Miami News. p. 4B. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  95. "Firm Drops 2 ON-TV Sites". Tyler Morning Telegraph. Associated Press. April 19, 1983. p. 7. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  96. Coffey, Jerry (June 25, 1981). "'Adults only' movies on way—for extra fee". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. p. 5F. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  97. Michals, Bob (February 2, 1982). "Closed-Circuit TV Debate Brewing". Palm Beach Post. p. B4. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  98. "Pay-television is concerned with ratings, too: X-ratings". Philadelphia Inquirer. Los Angeles Times. June 14, 1981. pp. 1-L, 17-L. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  99. "Has the day arrived for over-the-air pay television?" (PDF). Broadcasting. October 11, 1976. pp. 34–37. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  100. Ray, Nancy (November 17, 1980). "Pay-TV Firm Battles Pirates". Los Angeles Times. pp. 1, 10. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  101. "If ON-TV were only G-rated movies you wouldn't need the key". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. March 1, 1981. p. 6E. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  102. "Oak and SportsVision plan all-sports pay TV". Crystal Lake Herald. November 20, 1981. p. 8. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  103. Wechselberger, Anthony J. (September 1987). "Encryption-based security" (PDF). Communications Technology. p. 54–64. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  104. Watson, John G. "Pay TV: Battle of Airwaves Looms". Los Angeles Times. pp. View 1, 23. Retrieved March 12, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  105. "TV Battle To Play On in Court". Cincinnati Enquirer. December 30, 1980. p. D-1. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  106. Soble, Ronald L. (August 6, 1980). "Pay TV Company Loses Bid to Stop Decoder Makers". Los Angeles Times. pp. 1, 25. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  107. Harris, Kathryn (October 2, 1980). "Sale of 'Pirate' TV Decoders in State Outlawed". Los Angeles Times. pp. 1, 27. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  108. "Tune in for more ON-TV drama". Windsor Star. June 10, 1981. pp. 3, 4. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  109. McMahon, Tom (November 17, 1979). "It's a first-run freebie". Windsor Star. p. 30. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  110. "TV decoders upset firm". Windsor Star. June 1, 1981. pp. 3, 4. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  111. "Notice to United States Residents..." Detroit Free Press. June 5, 1981. p. 10C. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  112. "TV firms battles sales of decoders". Windsor Star. June 9, 1981. p. 4. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  113. Kohn, Martin F. (June 12, 1981). "Pay-TV firm wins order barring sale of pirating device". Detroit Free Press. pp. 3A, 10A. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  114. "U.S. pulls the plug on decoder imports". Windsor Star. August 6, 1981. p. 5. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  115. "The plug is pulled on pay-TV decoder business". Detroit Free Press. January 1, 1982. p. 3A. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  116. McMahon, Tom (March 25, 1982). "ON-TV shows on cable lines may be illegal". Windsor Star. pp. A1, A8. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  117. McMahon, Tom (April 29, 1982). "ON-TV installing new decoders". Windsor Star. p. C17. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  118. "ON-TV's changed signal hits Windsor decoders". Windsor Star. November 20, 1982. p. A4. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  119. "ON-TV offers amnesty to area video pirates". The Daily Sentinel. Associated Press. March 23, 1984. p. 10. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  120. Manna, Sal (September 18, 1979). "Tuning in". Los Angeles Times. p. 4. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  121. "Channel 52 to Begin On-air Equipment Test". Los Angeles Times. March 12, 1977. p. 3. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  122. "KBSC-TV to Begin Spanish Format". Los Angeles Times. July 23, 1980. p. 8. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  123. Bry, Barbara (April 29, 1979). "Oak Industries Deeply Rooted in Pay TV". Los Angeles Times. p. 3. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  124. Crook, David; Margulies, Lee (August 27, 1982). "ON TV Plans 24-Hour-a-Day Programming". Los Angeles Times. p. 2. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  125. Lapointe, Joe (September 29, 1979). "Canham plugs Michigan into pay-television circuit". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  126. Lapointe, Joe (January 27, 1980). "Pay TV buys two-year Tiger game package". Detroit Free Press. p. 1G. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  127. Lapointe, Joe (October 30, 1981). "ON-TV, Channel 20 feud costs Wings fans 5 TV goals". Detroit Free Press. pp. 1D, 6D. Retrieved October 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  128. Frauenheim, Norm (October 17, 1979). "Suns top poor-shooting Sonics". The Arizona Republic. p. E1. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  129. "Another ON TV Exclusive!". The Arizona Republic. October 12, 1980. p. TV Digest 40. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  130. Frauenheim, Norm (August 8, 1981). "Suns, American Cable TV sign 13-year contract". The Arizona Republic. p. G1. Retrieved June 21, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  131. Frauenheim, Norm (October 23, 1981). "ON-TV to carry 10 Suns games this season". The Arizona Republic. p. F1. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  132. "Changing Hands" (PDF). Broadcasting. September 10, 1979. p. 84. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via World Radio History.
  133. "California-based Oak Industries..." Miami Herald. March 26, 1980. p. 7-BW. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  134. Anderson, Jack (July 16, 1980). "Firms Offer Films On Closed Circuit TV". Miami Herald. p. 9D. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  135. Evans, Luther (September 18, 1981). "TV's Let's See the Races to end". Miami Herald. p. 13F. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  136. Moran, Paul (June 22, 1982). "ON-TV expansion whips horseplayers' TV friend". Fort Lauderdale News. p. 6C. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  137. Jicha, Tom (July 26, 1984). "Prospective sale could turn ON-TV into Spanish outlet". The Miami News. p. 4C. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  138. Smart, Tim (July 31, 1984). "WKID-TV is sold for $17 million". Miami Herald. p. 4B. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  139. "Blair & Co. acquires Channel 51". The Miami News. December 7, 1984. p. 10A. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  140. "WSCV to schedule new local programs". Miami Herald. December 6, 1984. p. 9D. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  141. "TV Service Being Sold". Cincinnati Enquirer. January 5, 1982. p. D-11. Retrieved October 17, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  142. Hopkins, Tom (April 13, 1983). "Ch. 66 gets first permit". Dayton Daily News. p. 44. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  143. Hopkins, Tom (September 16, 1980). "Cincinnati subscription TV station coming to Dayton". Dayton Daily News. p. 1, 11. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  144. Schumacher, Bob (May 7, 1981). "News media get critical look". The Journal Herald. p. 43. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  145. Storch, Charles (August 27, 1983). "Spectrum TV up for sale". Chicago Tribune. p. 6. Retrieved October 17, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  146. Brinkmoeller, Tom (December 5, 1984). "Channel 64 Expands To 17 Free Hours In '85". Cincinnati Enquirer. pp. G-1, G-8. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  147. Alridge, Ron (September 2, 1982). "Loss of WSNS to pay-TV is costly to local viewers". Chicago Tribune. p. 8. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  148. "Chicago station using pay-TV format". South Bend Tribune. October 7, 1980. p. 27. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  149. Alridge, Ron (September 30, 1981). "NBC is adamant: 'Sidney' won't be gay! Tony Randall is adamant: Yes, he will!". Chicago Tribune. p. 14. Retrieved October 17, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  150. Wiedrich, Bob (August 6, 1981). "Sox, three other teams near pay-TV package deal". Chicago Tribune. pp. 1, 2. Retrieved January 26, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  151. Gold, Aaron (August 7, 1981). "Tower Ticker". Chicago Tribune. p. 10 – via Newspapers.com.
  152. Kay, Linda (October 11, 1981). "City's teams plug in to pay TV". Chicago Tribune. pp. 1, 6. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  153. Markus, Robert (May 26, 1982). "New 'baby' delights Einhorn". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  154. Kay, Linda (March 21, 1983). "SportsVision is arriving late, but its package will be big". p. 4. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  155. "Inc". Chicago Tribune. January 10, 1982. p. 1. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  156. Alridge, Ron (May 4, 1982). "Pioneering SportsVision postpones its startup date". Chicago Tribune. p. 12. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  157. Storch, Charles (March 4, 1983). "Cable, recession dimming the picture of the pay-TV industry". Chicago Tribune. p. 9. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  158. "White Sox cable hype is backfiring". Waterloo Courier. August 1, 1982. p. 6-D. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  159. Kay, Linda (November 22, 1983). "SportsVision merges with ON TV Jan. 1". Chicago Tribune. p. 3. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  160. Myslenski, Skip (December 11, 1984). "WGN banking on Cubs' success". Chicago Tribune. p. 3. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  161. Enstad, Robert (January 15, 1984). "Video piracy law runs into static". Chicago Tribune. pp. 1, 4. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  162. Storch, Charles (August 18, 1984). "ON TV fading as Oak to sell out in 2 areas". Chicago Tribune. p. 6. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  163. Anderson, Jon (November 5, 1984). "ON TV installs movies in place of kids' shows". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  164. Storch, Charles (December 5, 1984). "ON TV units for sale here and in L.A." Chicago Tribune. p. 6. Retrieved October 29, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  165. "Uncertainty grows over ON TV". Chicago Tribune. February 2, 1985. p. 6. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  166. Coffey, Jerry (September 2, 1982). "2 subscription TV systems to merge". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. p. 3E. Retrieved March 7, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  167. Maiuro, Greg (July 29, 1983). "Channel 5 hires replacement for departing Thulin". Fort Worth Star-Telegram. p. 5C. Retrieved October 13, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  168. Horn, Barry (March 29, 2008). "Birth of a station - Forerunner to FSNSW changed the game for area viewers". Dallas Morning News. p. 2C.
  169. Stafford, Jim (January 19, 1983). "Abe Lemons: Former UT coach still has humor". New Braunfels Herald-Zeitung. Southwest Times Record. p. 8C. Retrieved October 27, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
  170. Cowan, Ron (August 25, 1983). "New owners being sought for Salem KECH-TV". Statesman-Journal. p. 1. Retrieved April 24, 2019 – via Newspapers.com.
  171. "ON-TV owner buys Home Box Office". Statesman-Journal. June 24, 1982. p. 3B. Retrieved April 24, 2019 – via Newspapers.com.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.