Tuscarora language

Tuscarora, sometimes called Skaròꞏrə̨ʼ, is an Iroquoian language of the Tuscarora people, spoken in southern Ontario, Canada, North Carolina and northwestern New York around Niagara Falls, in the United States. The historic homeland of the Tuscarora was in eastern North Carolina, in and around the Goldsboro, Kinston, and Smithfield areas. Some Tuscaroras still live in that region after they had migrated to what is now Robeson County, North Carolina.

Tuscarora
Ska꞉rù꞉ręʼ
Native toUnited States
RegionSix Nations of the Grand River First Nation in southern Ontario, Tuscarora Reservation in northwestern New York, and eastern North Carolina
Ethnicity17,000 Tuscarora people (1997)[1]
Native speakers
3 (2007)[2]
Iroquoian
  • Northern
    • Lake Iroquoian
      • Tuscarora–Nottoway
        • Tuscarora
Language codes
ISO 639-3tus
Glottologtusc1257
ELPTuscarora[3]
Pre-contact distribution of Tuscarora

The name Tuscarora (/ˌtʌskəˈrɔːrə/ tus-kə-ROHR-ə)[4] means "hemp people," after the Indian hemp or milkweed, which they use in many aspects of their society. Skarureh refers to the long shirt worn as part of the men's regalia, and so the name literally means "long shirt people."

Tuscarora is a severely endangered language. As of the mid-1970s, only about 52 people spoke it on the Tuscarora Reservation (Lewiston, New York) and the Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation (near Brantford, Ontario). The Tuscarora School in Lewiston has strived to keep the language alive by teaching children from pre-kindergarten to sixth grade. However, the language's only native speakers are older adults.

The language can appear complex to those unfamiliar with it more in terms of its grammar than its sound system. Many ideas can be expressed in a single word. Most words involve several components that must be considered. The language is written using mostly symbols from the Roman alphabet, with some variations, additions, and diacritics.

Phonology

Vowels

Tuscarora has four oral vowels, one nasal vowel, and no diphthongs. The vowels can be either short or long, which makes a total of eight oral vowels, /i ɛ ɔ u iː ɛː ɔː uː/, and two nasal vowels, /ə̃ ə̃ː/. Nasal vowels are indicated with an ogonek, long vowels with either a following colon ⟨ : ⟩ or an interpunct ⟨ · ⟩, and stressed vowels are marked with an acute accent ⟨ú⟩. The pronunciation of unstressed short vowels varies between dialects, as shown in the following tables:

Eastern dialect
Front Central Back
Close i /i/ i: /iː/ u /u/ u: /uː/
Close-mid ę /ə̃/ ę: /ə̃ː/
Open-mid e /ɛ/ e: /ɛː/ a /ɔ/ a: /ɔː/
Western dialect
Front Central Back
Close i /ɪ/ í /i/ i: /iː/
ę /ɪ̃/		 ú /u/ u: /uː/
Close-mid ę́ /ə̃/ ę: /ə̃ː/ u /o/
Open-mid e /ɛ/ e: /ɛː/ á /ɔ/ a: /ɔː/
Open é /æ/
a /a/

Thus in the official writing system of Tuscarora, the vowels are a e í u ę.[5]

Consonants

The Tuscarora language has ten symbols representing consonants, including three stops (/k/, /t/, and /ʔ/), three fricatives (/s/, /θ/, and /h/), a nasal (/n/), a rhotic (/ɾ/), and two glides (/w/ and /j/). These last four can be grouped together under the category of resonants. (Mithun Williams, 1976) The range of sounds, though, is more extensive, with palatalization, aspiration, and other variants of the sounds, that usually come when two sounds are set next to each other.

Dental Alveolar Palatal Velar Glottal
Nasal n [n]
Stop t [t] (č t͡ʃ) k [k] ′/ʔ [ʔ]
Fricative θ [θ] s [s] h [h]
Rhotic r [ɾ]
Approximant y [j] w [w]

There may also be the phonemes /b/ and /f/, although they probably occur only in loan words. The phonemic consonant cluster /sj/ is realized as a postalveolar fricative [ʃ].

Stops

Tuscarora has three stops: /t/, /k/, and /ʔ/; in their most basic forms: [t], [k], and [ʔ]. [kʷ] could be considered separate, although it is very similar to /k/+/w/, and can be counted as a variant phonetic realization of these two sounds. Each sound has specific changes that take place when situated in certain positions. These are among the phonetic (automatic) rules listed below. Since, in certain cases, the sounds [ɡ] and [d] are realized, a more extended list of the stops would be [t], [d], [k], [ɡ], and [ʔ]. In the written system, however, only t, k, and ′ are used. /k/ is aspirated when it directly precedes another /k/.

Fricatives and affricates

The language has two or three fricatives: /s/, /θ/, and /h/. /s/ and /θ/ are distinguished only in some dialects of Tuscarora.[6] Both are pronounced [s], but in some situations, /s/ is pronounced [ʃ]. /h/ is generally [h]. There is an affricate is /ts/.

Resonants

Resonants are /n/, /ɾ/, /w/, /j/. A rule (below) specifies pre-aspiration under certain circumstances. The resonants can also become voiceless fricatives (as specified below). A voiceless /n/ is described as "a silent movement of the tongue accompanied by an audible escape of breath through the nose."[7] When /ɾ/ becomes a voiceless fricative, it often sounds similar to /s/.

Automatic rules
  • V = a vowel
  • C = a consonant
  • R = a resonant
  • # = the beginning or end of a word
  • Ø = sound is dropped

/s/ followed by /j/ or sometimes /i/ often becomes [ʃ].

Used here is a type of linguistic notation. Aloud, the first bullet point would read, "/s/ becomes [ʃ] when preceded by /t/."

  • s → ʃ / t__
  • θ → ts / __{j, i}
  • k → ɡ / __{w, j, ɾ, V}
  • t → d / __{w, j, ɾ, V}
  • {h, ʔ} → Ø / #__C
  • V → Vh / __#
  • k → kʰ / __k
  • k → kj / __e
  • i → j / __V{C, #}
  • {h+ʔ, ʔ+h} / h
  • R → hR / __{ʔ, h, #}
  • R → Rᶠ / __{h, ʔ, s, #}

Morphology

Verbs

The basic construction of a verb consists of

  1. Prepronominal Prefixes
  2. Pronominal Prefixes
  3. The Verb Base
  4. Aspect Suffixes

in that order. All verbs contain at least a pronominal prefix and a verb base.

Prepronominal prefixes

These are the very first prefixes in a verb. Prepronominal prefixes can indicate

In addition, these can mark such distinctions as dualic, contrastive, partitive, and iterative. According to Marianne Mithun Williams, it is possible to find some semantic similarities from the functions of prepronominal prefixes, but not such that each morpheme is completely explained in this way.

Pronominal prefixes

As it sounds, pronominal prefixes identify pronouns with regards to the verb, including person, number, and gender. Since all verbs must have at least a subject, the pronominal prefixes identify the subject, and if the verb is transitive, these prefixes also identify the object. For example:

Tuscarora word: rà:weh
Translation: He is talking.
Breakdown: masculine + 'talk' + serial
The rà is the masculine pronominal prefix, indicating that a male person is the subject of the sentence.

On account of various changes in the evolution of the language, not all of the possible combinations of distinctions in person, number, and gender are made, and some pronominal prefixes or combinations thereof can represent several acceptable meanings.

Verb base

The verb base is, generally, exactly what it sounds like: it is the barest form of the verb. This is a verb stem that consists solely of one verb root.

Verb stems can be made of more than just a verb root. More complex stems are formed by adding modifiers. Roots might be combined with many different kinds of morphemes to create complicated stems. Possibilities include reflexive, inchoative, reversive, intensifier, and distributive morphemes, instrumental, causative, or dative case markers, and also incorporated noun stems. The base may be further complicated by ambulative or purposive morphemes.[8]

Aspect suffixes

Aspect suffixes are temporal indicators, and are used with all indicative verbs. "Aspect" is with respect to duration or frequency; "tense" is with respect to the point in time at which the verb's action takes place.[8] Three different aspects can be distinguished, and each distinguished aspect can be furthermore inflected for three different tenses. These are, respectively, punctual, serial, or perfective, and past, future, or indefinite.[8]

Nouns

Nouns, like verbs, are composed of several parts. These are, in this order:

  1. the pronominal prefix
  2. the noun stem
  3. the nominal suffix

Nouns can be divided two ways, formally and functionally, and four ways, into formal nouns, other functional nouns, possessive constructions, and attributive suffixes.

Pronominal prefix and noun gender

The pronominal prefix is very much like that in verbs. It refers to who or what is being identified. The prefixes vary according to the gender, number, and "humanness" of the noun. Genders include:

  • Neuter
  • Masculine Singular
  • Feminine-Indefinite Human Singular
  • Indefinite Human Dual
  • Indefinite Human Plural

The prefixes are:

  • Neuter
    • ò-
    • à:w-
  • Masculine Singular
    • ra-
    • r-
  • Feminine-Indefinite Human Singular
    • e-
    • ę́-
  • Indefinite Human Dual Nouns
    • neye-
  • Indefinite Human Plural Nouns
    • kaye-
Noun stem

Most stems are simple noun roots that are morphologically unanalyzable. These can be referred to as "simplex stems." More complex stems can be derived from verbs this is commonly done as:
(verb stem) + (nominalizing morpheme).
The process can be repeated multiple times, making more complex stems, but it is rarely the case that it is repeated too many times.

Nominal suffix

Most nouns end in the morpheme -eh. Some end in -aʔ, -ęʔ, or -ʔ.

Other functional nominals

In addition to the formal nouns mentioned above, clauses, verbs, and unanalyzable particles can also be classified as nominals. Clausal nominals are such things as sentential subjects and compliments. Verbal nominals usually describe their referents.

Unanalyzable particles arise from three main sources which overlap somewhat.

  • onomatopoeia
  • onomatopoeia from other languages
  • other languages
  • verbal descriptions of referents

Onomatopoeia, from Tuscarora or other languages, is less common than other words from other languages or verbal descriptions that turned to nominals. In many cases a pronominal prefix has dropped off, so that only the minimal stem remains.

Possessive constructions

Ownership is divided into alienable and inalienable possession, each of which type has its own construction. An example of inalienable possession would be someone's body part—this cannot be disputed. An example of alienable possession would be a piece of paper held by someone.

Attributive suffixes

Attributive suffixes come in many forms:

A diminutive indicates something smaller; an augmentive makes something bigger. A simple example would be a diminutive suffix added to the word "cat" to form a word meaning "small cat." A more abstract example would be the diminutive of "trumpet" forming "pipe." Both diminutives and augmentives have suffixes that indicate both smallness and plurality. A (certain) diminutive can be added to any functional nominal. Augmentives usually combine with other morphemes, forming more specific stems.

Attributive suffixes can be added to any word that functions as a nominal, even if it is a verb or particle.


Syntax

Word order

The basic word order in Tuscarora is SVO (subject–verb–object), but this can vary somewhat and still form grammatical sentences, depending on who the agents and patients are. For example:[9] If two nouns of the same relative "status" are together in a sentence, the SVO word order is followed. Such is the case, for example, in a Noun-Predicate-Noun sentence in which both nouns are third person zoic (non-human) singular. If one is of a "superior" status, it can be indicated by a pronominal prefix, such as hra, and as such SVO, VSO, and OSV are all grammatically correct. The example given in Grammar Tuscarora is:

  • SVO

wí:rę:n wahrákęʔ tsi:r
(William he-saw-it dog.)

  • VSO

wahrákęʔ wí:rę:n tsi:r
(he-saw-it William dog.)

  • OSV

tsi:r wí:rę:n wahrákęʔ
(dog William he-saw-it.)

In all cases, the translation is "William saw a dog." Mithun writes: "[I]t is necessary but not sufficient to consider the syntactic case roles of major constituents. In fact, the order of sentence elements is describable in terms of functional deviation from a syntactically defined basic order." (Emphasis added.)

A sentence that is ambiguous on basis of its containing too many ambiguous arguments is:
tsya:ts wahrá:nę:t kę:tsyęh
George he-fed-it fish
This could be translated either as "George fed the fish" or "George fed it fish."

Case

Tuscarora appears to be a nominative-accusative language. Tuscarora has a case system in which syntactic case is indicated in the verb. The main verb of the sentence can indicate, for example, "aorist+1st-person+objective+human+'transitive-verb'+punctual+dative." (In this case, a sentence could be a single word long, as below in Noun Incorporation.) Objective and dative are indicated by morphemes.

Noun incorporation

Tuscarora definitely incorporates nouns into verbs, as is evident from many examples on this page. This is typical of a polysynthetic language. In Tuscarora, one long verb can be an entire sentence, including subject and object. In fact, theoretically any number of arguments could be incorporated into a verb. It is done by raising nominals realized as noun stems. Datives are not incorporated.

Examples are as follows:[8] nękheyaʔtsiʔrá:’nihr
Breakdown: n + ę + k + h + ey + aʔ + tsiʔr + aʔn + ihr
dualic + future + 1st-person + objective + human + reflexive + 'fire' + 'set'
Translation: I'll set my fire on him. or I'll sting him.

waʔkhetaʔnaratyáʔthahθ
Breakdown: waʔ + k + h + e + taʔnar + a + tyáʔt + hahθ
aorist + 1st-person + objective + human + 'bread' + joiner + 'buy' + dative-punctual
Translation: I bought her some bread.

yoʔnaʔtshárhę
Breakdown: yo + ʔn-aʔ-tshár + h + ę
non-human-objective + 'door' + 'cover' + perfective
Translation: The door is closed.


Vocabulary examples

(From Grammar Tuscarora by Marianne Mithun Williams.)

tswé:ʔn
[tʃwæʔṇ]
'hello'

stá:kwi:ʔ
[stɒ´ːkwiːʔ]
'high'

kè:rih
[kjæ´ːrih]
'I think'

ótkwareh
'blood'

otá:ʔnareh
'bread'

Relations

Tuscarora is a Northern Iroquoian language. This branch of Iroquois includes Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Seneca, and Cayuga along with Tuscarora and its historic neighbor, Nottoway.

Wallace Chafe posits that a larger language, reconstructed as "Proto-Northern-Iroquois," broke off into "Proto-Tuscarora-Cayuga," and then broke off onto its own, having no further contact with Cayuga or any of the others.[10]

However, Lounsbury (1961:17) classed Tuscarora, along with Laurentian, Huron-Wyandot, and Cherokee as the "peripheral" Iroquoian languages — in distinction to the five "inner languages" of the Iroquois proper. Blair Rudes, who did extensive scholarship on Tuscarora and wrote a Tuscarora Dictionary, concurred with Lounsbury, adding Nottoway and Susquehannock (which Lounsbury ignored in his comparisons) to the list of "peripheral" Iroquoian languages.[11]

Bibliography
  • Rudes, Blair A. (1999). Tuscarora-English / English-Tuscarora Dictionary. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Rudes, Blair A., and Dorothy Crouse (1987). The Tuscarora Legacy of J. N. B. Hewitt: Materials for the Study of Tuscarora Language and Culture. Canadian Museum of Civilization, Mercury Series, Canadian Ethnology Service Paper No. 108.
  • Williams, Marianne Mithun (1976). A Grammar of Tuscarora. Garland studies in American Indian Linguistics.

See also

References
  1. Tuscarora language at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
  2. "UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in danger". www.unesco.org. Retrieved 2018-05-20.
  3. Endangered Languages Project data for Tuscarora.
  4. "Tuscarora". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  5. Rudes, Blair A. (1999). Tuscarora-English/English-Tuscarora Dictionary. University of Toronto Press. pp. xxxvi–xxxvii. ISBN 0802043364. Retrieved 21 September 2019.
  6. A Grammar of Tuscarora, by Marianne Mithun Williams, VI.C.1.b
  7. A Grammar of Tuscarora, by Marianne Mithun Williams, VI.C.1.c
  8. Grammar Tuscarora by Marianne Mithun Williams
  9. A Grammar of Tuscarora by Marianne Mithun (Williams)
  10. Chafe, Wallace. "How To Say They Drank In Iroquois". Extending the Rafters: Interdisciplinary Approaches To Iroquoian Studies, ch. 17. State University of New York Press, 1984.
  11. Rudes, Blair A. (January 1981). "A Sketch of the Nottoway Language from a Historical-Comparative Perspective". International Journal of American Linguistics. 47 (1): 27–49. doi:10.1086/465672. S2CID 145679705.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.