Cyclogenesis

Cyclogenesis is the development or strengthening of cyclonic circulation in the atmosphere (a low-pressure area).[1] Cyclogenesis is an umbrella term for at least three different processes, all of which result in the development of some sort of cyclone, and at any size from the microscale to the synoptic scale.

• Tropical cyclones form due to latent heat driven by significant thunderstorm activity, developing a warm core.
• Extratropical cyclones form as waves along weather fronts before occluding later in their life cycle as cold core cyclones.
• Mesocyclones form as warm core cyclones over land, and can lead to tornado formation. Waterspouts can also form from mesocyclones, but more often develop from environments of high instability and low vertical wind shear.

This collage of GOES 13 satellite images shows the development of the nor'easter over several days.

The process in which an extratropical cyclone undergoes a rapid drop in atmospheric pressure (24 millibars or more) in a 24-hour period is referred to as explosive cyclogenesis, and is usually present during the formation of a nor'easter.[2] The anticyclonic equivalent, the process of formation of high pressure areas, is anticyclogenesis.[3] The opposite of cyclogenesis is cyclolysis.

Meteorological scales

There are four main scales, or sizes of systems, dealt with in meteorology: the macroscale, the synoptic scale, the mesoscale, and the microscale.[4] The macroscale deals with systems with global size, such as the Madden–Julian oscillation. Synoptic scale systems cover a portion of a continent, such as extratropical cyclones, with dimensions of 1,000–2,500 km (620–1,550 mi) across.[5] The mesoscale is the next smaller scale, and often is divided into two ranges: meso-alpha phenomena range from 200–2,000 km (120–1,240 mi) across (the realm of the tropical cyclone), while meso-beta phenomena range from 20–200 km (12–124 mi) across (the scale of the mesocyclone). The microscale is the smallest of the meteorological scales, with a size under two kilometers (1.2 miles) (the scale of tornadoes and waterspouts).[6] These horizontal dimensions are not rigid divisions but instead reflect typical sizes of phenomena having certain dynamic characteristics. For example, a system does not necessarily transition from meso-alpha to synoptic scale when its horizontal extent grows from 2,000 to 2,001 km (1,243 to 1,243 mi).

Extratropical cyclones

The initial frontal wave (or low pressure area) forms at the location of the red dot on the image. It is usually perpendicular (at a right angle) to the leaf-like cloud formation (baroclinic leaf) seen on satellite during the early stage of cyclogenesis. The location of the axis of the upper level jet stream is in light blue.

Norwegian cyclone model

An upper level jet streak. DIV areas are regions of divergence aloft, which will lead to surface convergence and aid cyclogenesis.

The Norwegian cyclone model is an idealized formation model of cold-core cyclonic storms developed by Norwegian meteorologists during the First World War.[7] The main concept behind this model, relating to cyclogenesis, is that cyclones progress through a predictable evolution as they move up a frontal boundary, with the most mature cyclone near the northeast end of the front and the least mature near the tail end of the front.[8]

Precursors for development

A preexisting frontal boundary, as defined in surface weather analysis, is required for the development of a mid-latitude cyclone. The cyclonic flow begins around a disturbed section of the stationary front due to an upper level disturbance, such as a short wave or an upper-level trough,[9][10] near a favorable quadrant of the upper level jet.[11] However, enhanced along-frontal stretching rates in the lower troposphere can suppress the growth of extratropical cyclones.[12][13]

Vertical motion affecting development

Cyclogenesis can only occur when temperature decreases polewards (to the north, in the northern hemisphere), and pressure perturbation lines tilt westward with height. Cyclogenesis is most likely to occur in regions of cyclonic vorticity advection, downstream of a strong westerly jet.[14] The combination of vorticity advection and thermal advection created by the temperature gradient and a low pressure center cause upward motion around the low.[lower-alpha 1] If the temperature gradient is strong enough, temperature advection will increase, driving more vertical motion. This increases the overall strength of the system. Shearwise updrafts[lower-alpha 2] are the most important factor in determining cyclonic growth and strength.[16]

Modes of development

A surface low can have a variety of causes for forming. Topography can force a surface low to form when an existing baroclinic wave moves over a mountain barrier; this is known as "lee cyclogenesis" since the low forms on the leeward side of the mountains.[17][18] Mesoscale convective systems can spawn surface lows which are initially warm core.[19] The disturbance can grow into a wave-like formation along the front and the low will be positioned at the crest. Around the low, flow will become cyclonic, by definition. This rotational flow will push polar air equator-ward west of the low via its trailing cold front, and warmer air will push poleward low via the warm front. Usually the cold front will move at a quicker pace than the warm front and “catch up” with it due to the slow erosion of higher density airmass located out ahead of the cyclone and the higher density airmass sweeping in behind the cyclone, usually resulting in a narrowing warm sector.[20] At this point an occluded front forms where the warm air mass is pushed upwards into a trough of warm air aloft, which is also known as a trowal (a trough of warm air aloft).[21] All developing low pressure areas share one important aspect, that of upward vertical motion within the troposphere. Such upward motions decrease the mass of local atmospheric columns of air, which lower surface pressure.[22]

Maturity

Maturity is after the time of occlusion when the storm has completed strengthening and the cyclonic flow is at its most intense.[23] Thereafter, the strength of the storm diminishes as the cyclone couples with the upper level trough or upper level low, becoming increasingly cold core. The spin-down of cyclones, also known as cyclolysis, can be understood from an energetics perspective. As occlusion occurs and the warm air mass is pushed upwards over a cold air airmass, the atmosphere becomes increasingly stable and the centre of gravity of the system lowers.[24] As the occlusion process extends further down the warm front and away from the central low, more and more of the available potential energy of the system is exhausted. This potential energy sink creates a kinetic energy source which injects a final burst of energy into the storm's motions. After this process occurs, the growth period of the cyclone, or cyclogenesis, ends, and the low begins to spin down (fill) as more air is converging into the bottom of the cyclone than is being removed out the top since upper-level divergence has decreased.

Occasionally, cyclogenesis will re-occur with occluded cyclones. When this happens a new low center will form on the triple-point (the point where the cold front, warm front, and occluded front meet). During triple-point cyclogenesis, the occluded parent low will fill as the secondary low deepens into the main weathermaker.

• 
  This image displays a dense cloud pattern and arcing band of convection, indicating a young, developing cyclone.
• 
  The diffuse cloud pattern in this image indicates an old, dissipating low pressure system.
• 
  This image illustrates the relative positions of two storm systems over the North-eastern Pacific.

Tropical cyclones

Tropical cyclones exist within a mesoscale alpha domain. As opposed to mid-latitude cyclogenesis, tropical cyclogenesis is driven by strong convection organised into a central core with no baroclinic zones, or fronts, extending through their center. Although the formation of tropical cyclones is the topic of extensive ongoing research and is still not fully understood, there are six main requirements for tropical cyclogenesis: sea surface temperatures that are warm enough, atmospheric instability, high humidity in lower to middle levels of the troposphere, enough Coriolis force to develop a low pressure center, a pre-existing low level focus or disturbance, and low vertical wind shear. These warm core cyclones tend to form over the oceans between 10 and 30 degrees of the equator.[25][26]

Mesocyclones

Mesocyclones range in size from mesoscale beta to microscale. The term mesocyclone is usually reserved for mid-level rotations within severe thunderstorms,[27] and are warm core cyclones driven by latent heat of its associated thunderstorm activity.

Tornadoes form in the warm sector of extratropical cyclones where a strong upper level jet stream exists.[28] Mesocyclones are believed to form when strong changes of wind speed and/or direction with height ("wind shear") sets parts of the lower part of the atmosphere spinning in invisible tube-like rolls. The convective updraft of a thunderstorm is then thought to draw up this spinning air, tilting the rolls' orientation upward (from parallel to the ground to perpendicular) and causing the entire updraft to rotate as a vertical column.

As the updraft rotates, it may form what is known as a wall cloud. The wall cloud is a spinning layer of clouds descending from the mesocyclone. The wall cloud tends to form closer to the center of the mesocyclone. The wall clouds do not necessarily need a mesocyclone to form and do not always rotate. As the wall cloud descends, a funnel-shaped cloud may form at its center. This is the first stage of tornado formation.[29] The presence of a mesocyclone is believed to be a key factor in the formation of the strong tornadoes associated with severe thunderstorms.

• 
  Vertical wind shear (red) sets air spinning (green).
• 
  The updraft (blue) 'tips' the spinning air upright.
• 
  The updraft then starts rotating.

Tornadoes

Tornadoes exist on the microscale or low end of the mesoscale gamma domain. The cycle begins when a strong thunderstorm develops a rotating mesocyclone a few miles up in the atmosphere, becoming a supercell. As rainfall in the storm increases, it drags with it an area of quickly descending air known as the rear flank downdraft (RFD). This downdraft accelerates as it approaches the ground, and drags the rotating mesocyclone towards the ground with it.[30]

As the mesocyclone approaches the ground, a visible condensation funnel appears to descend from the base of the storm, often from a rotating wall cloud. As the funnel descends, the RFD also reaches the ground, creating a gust front that can cause damage a good distance from the tornado. Usually, the funnel cloud begins causing damage on the ground (becoming a tornado) within minutes of the RFD reaching the ground.[31]

Waterspouts

Waterspouts exist on the microscale. While some waterspouts are strong (tornadic) like their land-based counterparts, most are much weaker and caused by different atmospheric dynamics. They normally develop in moisture-laden environments with little vertical wind shear along lines of convergence, such as land breezes, lines of frictional convergence from nearby landmasses, or surface troughs.[32] Their parent cloud can be as innocuous as a moderate cumulus, or as significant as a thunderstorm. Waterspouts normally develop as their parent clouds are in the process of development, and it is theorized that they spin up as they move up the surface boundary from the horizontal wind shear near the surface, and then stretch upwards to the cloud once the low level shear vortex aligns with a developing cumulus or thunderstorm. Weak tornadoes, known as landspouts, across eastern Colorado have been witnessed to develop in a similar manner.[33] An outbreak occurred in the Great Lakes in late September and early October 2003 along a lake effect band. September is the peak month of landspout and waterspout occurrence around Florida and for waterspout occurrence around the Great Lakes.[33][34]

Related terms

Cyclogenesis is the opposite of cyclolysis, which concerns the weakening of surface cyclones. The term has an anticyclonic (high pressure system) equivalent—Anticyclogenesis, which deals with the formation of surface high pressure systems.[3]

See also

• Atmospheric river
• European windstorm
• Hurricane dynamics and cloud microphysics
• Hybrid low
• Surface weather analysis
• Miller Classification

Notes

1. Using Q-Vectors, we can determine the direction of vertical motion.[15] Southerly flow and warm advection induce an upward motion while northerly flow and cold advection induce a downward motion. These vertical motions cause the low to be stretched and vorticity around the system is increased. This increase in system vorticity can be shown through the QG vorticity equation (a partial differential equation):

   ${\displaystyle {D\zeta \over Dt}+\beta v=f_{0}{\partial w \over \partial z}}$,

   where ${\displaystyle \zeta }$ is the relative vorticity, ${\displaystyle f=f_{0}+\beta y}$ is the Coriolis parameter under the beta-plane approximation, ${\displaystyle {\partial w \over \partial z}}$ is the partial derivative of vertical motion with respect to height, and ${\displaystyle {D\zeta \over Dt}}$ is a material derivative.[15] With planetary vorticity term staying constant, we can deduce that with an increase in stretching, vorticity must increase as well. The vertical motion also increases temperature advection, by the equation ${\displaystyle v_{g}=-{1 \over f_{0}}{\partial \Phi \over \partial x}}$, where ${\displaystyle v_{g}}$ is the geostrophic meridional wind and ${\displaystyle \Phi }$ represents geopotential.[15]
2. Shearwise updrafts are upward motions in a system of vertical movements which are changing in direction.

References

1. Arctic Climatology and Meteorology (2006). "Cyclogenesis". National Snow and Ice Data Center. Archived from the original on 2006-08-30. Retrieved 2006-12-04.
2. Sanders, F.; J. R. Gyakum (1980-06-12). "Synoptic-dynamic climatology of the "Bomb"" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Retrieved 2012-01-21.
3. "Cyclogenesis". Glossary of Meteorology. American Meteorological Society. 26 January 2012. Retrieved 2016-07-23.
4. Mesoscale Dynamics and Modeling Laboratory (2006-09-08). "Part I: Introduction to Mesoscale Dynamics". Archived from the original on 2006-09-08. Retrieved 2006-12-04.
5. Arctic Climatology and Meteorology (2006). "Synoptic Scale". Archived from the original on 2006-08-27. Retrieved 2006-10-25.
6. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. Definition of Mesoscale. Retrieved on 2006-10-25.
7. JetStream (2009-09-01). "Norwegian Cyclone Model". National Weather Service Southern Region Headquarters. Archived from the original on 2016-01-04. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
8. "The Norwegian Cyclone Model" (PDF). University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 1, 2006.
9. Glossary of Meteorology (June 2000). "Definition of Short Wave". American Meteorological Society. Archived from the original on 2009-06-09. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
10. Glossary of Meteorology (June 2000). "Definition of Upper-Level Trough". American Meteorological Society. Archived from the original on 2009-06-09. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
11. Carlyle H. Wash, Stacey H. Heikkinen, Chi-Sann Liou, and Wendell A. Nuss. A Rapid Cyclogenesis Event during GALE IOP 9. Retrieved on 2008-06-28.
12. Schemm, S.; Sprenger, M. (2015). "Frontal-wave cyclogenesis in the North Atlantic –a climatological characterisation". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 141 (693): 2989–3005. Bibcode:2015QJRMS.141.2989S. doi:10.1002/qj.2584. hdl:1956/11634.
13. Bishop, Craig H. and Thorpe, Alan J. (1994). "Frontal Wave Stability during Moist Deformation Frontogenesis. Part II: The Suppression of Nonlinear Wave Development". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 51 (6): 874–888. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<0874:FWSDMD>2.0.CO;2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
14. Wallace, John M.; Peter V. Hobbs (2006). Atmospheric Science An Introductory Survey. University of Washington, Seattle.
15. Holton, James R. (2004). An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. University of Washington, Seattle.
16. Martin, Jonathon E. (2006-10-10). "American Meteorological Society". Monthly Weather Review. 135 (7): 2803–2809. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.529.5005. doi:10.1175/MWR3416.1.
17. "Flow Interaction With Topography". COMET Program. Archived from the original on 8 May 2002.
18. "Lee cyclogenesis". Glossary of Meteorology. American Meteorological Society. 25 April 2012.
19. Raymond D. Menard1, and J.M. Fritsch A Mesoscale Convective Complex-Generated Inertially Stable Warm Core Vortex
20. Chu, Rachel (2006). "Density of Air". The Physics Factbook.
21. St. Louis University What is a trowal? Archived September 16, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
22. Joel Norris (2005-03-19). "QG Notes". University of California, San Diego. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
23. Joan Von Ahn; Joe Sienkiewicz; Greggory McFadden (April 2005). "Hurricane Force Extratropical Cyclones Observed Using QuikSCAT Near Real Time Winds". Mariners Weather Log. 49 (1). Retrieved 2009-10-26.
24. Steve W. Woodruff (2008-06-12). "About Atmospheric Stability". Pierce College. Archived from the original on June 12, 2008. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
25. Chris Landsea (2009-02-08). "Subject: A15) How do tropical cyclones form?". National Hurricane Center. Archived from the original on 2009-08-27. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
26. Environment Canada (2003-09-18). "Tropical Cyclone Formation". Archived from the original on 2006-09-27. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
27. Thomas Allen Jones (2007-03-11). "Mesocyclone Formation and Maintenance: A Review of Conceptual Models". Archived from the original on March 11, 2007. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
28. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (September 2000). "How a Tornado Forms". Archived from the original on 2007-10-17. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
29. Michael Branick (2008-06-11). "A Comprehensive Glossary of Weather". Geographic.org. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
30. Timothy P. Marshall; Erik N. Rasmussen (January 1982). "The Mesoscale Evolution of the Warren, Oklahoma Tornadoes". 12th Conference on Severe Local Storms. Archived from the original on 2009-09-21. Retrieved 2009-10-26.
31. Storm Prediction Center. The Online Tornado FAQ. Archived 2006-09-29 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 2006-10-25.
32. Barry K. Choy and Scott M. Spratt. A WSR-88D Approach to Waterspout Forecasting. Archived October 5, 2006, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 2006-12-04.
33. Barry K. Choy and Scott M. Spratt. Using the WSR-88D to Predict East Central Florida Waterspouts. Archived June 17, 2008, at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on 2006-10-25.
34. "The Great Waterspout Outbreak of 2003". Mariners Weather Log. 48 (3). December 2004. Retrieved 2006-10-25.