1912 United States presidential election in Alabama
The 1912 United States presidential election in Alabama took place on November 5, 1912, as part of the 1912 United States presidential election. Alabama voters chose twelve representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County Results
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Alabama |
---|
Government |
Alabama was won by Princeton University President Woodrow Wilson (D–New Jersey), running with governor of Indiana Thomas R. Marshall, with 69.94% of the popular vote, against the 26th president of the United States Theodore Roosevelt (P–New York), running with governor of California Hiram Johnson, with 19.24% of the popular vote and the 27th president of the United States William Howard Taft (R–Ohio), running with Columbia University President Nicholas Murray Butler, with 8.24% of the popular vote.[1]
Results
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Woodrow Wilson | 82,438 | 69.94% | |
Progressive | Theodore Roosevelt | 22,680 | 19.24% | |
Republican | William Howard Taft | 9,717 | 8.24% | |
Socialist | Eugene V. Debs | 3,029 | 2.57% | |
Independent | Write-in | 5 | 0.00% | |
Total votes | 117,869 | 100% |
Results by county
County | Thomas Woodrow Wilson[2] Democratic |
William Howard Taft[2] Republican |
Theodore Roosevelt[3] Progressive |
Eugene Victor Debs[4] Socialist |
Margin[lower-alpha 1] | Total votes cast | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
Autauga | 622 | 73.35% | 43 | 5.07% | 127 | 14.98% | 56 | 6.60% | 495 | 58.37% | 848 |
Baldwin | 623 | 67.28% | 37 | 4.00% | 141 | 15.23% | 125 | 13.50% | 482 | 52.05% | 926 |
Barbour | 1,155 | 90.38% | 18 | 1.41% | 88 | 6.89% | 17 | 1.33% | 1,067 | 83.49% | 1,278 |
Bibb | 820 | 71.87% | 40 | 3.51% | 178 | 15.60% | 103 | 9.03% | 642 | 56.27% | 1,141 |
Blount | 1,121 | 48.74% | 567 | 24.65% | 580 | 25.22% | 32 | 1.39% | 541 | 23.52% | 2,300 |
Bullock | 736 | 99.19% | 4 | 0.54% | 2 | 0.27% | 0 | 0.00% | 732[lower-alpha 2] | 98.65% | 742 |
Butler | 903 | 83.00% | 86 | 7.90% | 80 | 7.35% | 19 | 1.75% | 817[lower-alpha 2] | 75.09% | 1,088 |
Calhoun | 1,666 | 70.62% | 238 | 10.09% | 423 | 17.93% | 32 | 1.36% | 1,243 | 52.69% | 2,359 |
Chambers | 1,486 | 90.83% | 28 | 1.71% | 113 | 6.91% | 9 | 0.55% | 1,373 | 83.92% | 1,636 |
Cherokee | 814 | 46.57% | 88 | 5.03% | 799 | 45.71% | 47 | 2.69% | 15 | 0.86% | 1,748 |
Chilton | 880 | 39.18% | 140 | 6.23% | 1,154 | 51.38% | 72 | 3.21% | -274 | -12.20% | 2,246 |
Choctaw | 489 | 86.40% | 7 | 1.24% | 66 | 11.66% | 4 | 0.71% | 423 | 74.73% | 566 |
Clarke | 1,024 | 95.34% | 13 | 1.21% | 12 | 1.12% | 25 | 2.33% | 999[lower-alpha 3] | 93.02% | 1,074 |
Clay | 1,109 | 52.46% | 64 | 3.03% | 939 | 44.42% | 2 | 0.09% | 170 | 8.04% | 2,114 |
Cleburne | 691 | 51.72% | 133 | 9.96% | 510 | 38.17% | 2 | 0.15% | 181 | 13.55% | 1,336 |
Coffee | 1,277 | 70.67% | 68 | 3.76% | 395 | 21.86% | 67 | 3.71% | 882 | 48.81% | 1,807 |
Colbert | 946 | 63.28% | 228 | 15.25% | 242 | 16.19% | 79 | 5.28% | 704 | 47.09% | 1,495 |
Conecuh | 802 | 80.93% | 60 | 6.05% | 103 | 10.39% | 26 | 2.62% | 699 | 70.53% | 991 |
Coosa | 763 | 63.27% | 109 | 9.04% | 317 | 26.29% | 17 | 1.41% | 446 | 36.98% | 1,206 |
Covington | 1,251 | 73.54% | 110 | 6.47% | 147 | 8.64% | 193 | 11.35% | 1,058[lower-alpha 3] | 62.20% | 1,701 |
Crenshaw | 986 | 84.49% | 47 | 4.03% | 127 | 10.88% | 7 | 0.60% | 859 | 73.61% | 1,167 |
Cullman | 1,230 | 42.49% | 264 | 9.12% | 1,374 | 47.46% | 27 | 0.93% | -144 | -4.97% | 2,895 |
Dale | 1,059 | 66.02% | 99 | 6.17% | 443 | 27.62% | 3 | 0.19% | 616 | 38.40% | 1,604 |
Dallas | 1,461 | 96.69% | 16 | 1.06% | 18 | 1.19% | 16 | 1.06% | 1,443 | 95.50% | 1,511 |
DeKalb | 1,379 | 54.61% | 492 | 19.49% | 623 | 24.67% | 31 | 1.23% | 756 | 29.94% | 2,525 |
Elmore | 1,152 | 81.70% | 81 | 5.74% | 167 | 11.84% | 10 | 0.71% | 985 | 69.86% | 1,410 |
Escambia | 829 | 85.64% | 52 | 5.37% | 74 | 7.64% | 13 | 1.34% | 755 | 78.00% | 968 |
Etowah | 1,511 | 52.18% | 354 | 12.22% | 887 | 30.63% | 144 | 4.97% | 624 | 21.55% | 2,896 |
Fayette | 762 | 50.07% | 434 | 28.52% | 306 | 20.11% | 20 | 1.31% | 328[lower-alpha 2] | 21.55% | 1,522 |
Franklin | 849 | 47.09% | 309 | 17.14% | 570 | 31.61% | 75 | 4.16% | 279 | 15.47% | 1,803 |
Geneva | 891 | 57.93% | 99 | 6.44% | 511 | 33.22% | 37 | 2.41% | 380 | 24.71% | 1,538 |
Greene | 418 | 81.01% | 4 | 0.78% | 94 | 18.22% | 0 | 0.00% | 324 | 62.79% | 516 |
Hale | 720 | 98.50% | 4 | 0.55% | 7 | 0.96% | 0 | 0.00% | 713 | 97.54% | 731 |
Henry | 711 | 75.88% | 47 | 5.02% | 153 | 16.33% | 26 | 2.77% | 558 | 59.55% | 937 |
Houston | 1,160 | 70.18% | 82 | 4.96% | 366 | 22.14% | 45 | 2.72% | 794 | 48.03% | 1,653 |
Jackson | 1,597 | 70.82% | 229 | 10.16% | 406 | 18.00% | 23 | 1.02% | 1,191 | 52.82% | 2,255 |
Jefferson | 8,887 | 72.69% | 693 | 5.67% | 2,034 | 16.64% | 612 | 5.01% | 6,853 | 56.05% | 12,226 |
Lamar | 816 | 77.94% | 61 | 5.83% | 160 | 15.28% | 10 | 0.96% | 656 | 62.66% | 1,047 |
Lauderdale | 1,386 | 68.68% | 263 | 13.03% | 297 | 14.72% | 72 | 3.57% | 1,089 | 53.96% | 2,018 |
Lawrence | 643 | 56.70% | 198 | 17.46% | 261 | 23.02% | 32 | 2.82% | 382 | 33.69% | 1,134 |
Lee | 1,179 | 88.98% | 43 | 3.25% | 43 | 3.25% | 60 | 4.53% | 1,119[lower-alpha 3] | 84.45% | 1,325 |
Limestone | 1,012 | 83.02% | 90 | 7.38% | 83 | 6.81% | 34 | 2.79% | 922[lower-alpha 2] | 75.64% | 1,219 |
Lowndes | 583 | 97.00% | 4 | 0.67% | 10 | 1.66% | 4 | 0.67% | 573 | 95.34% | 601 |
Macon | 647 | 93.23% | 24 | 3.46% | 23 | 3.31% | 0 | 0.00% | 623[lower-alpha 2] | 89.77% | 694 |
Madison | 2,146 | 78.21% | 150 | 5.47% | 357 | 13.01% | 91 | 3.32% | 1,789 | 65.20% | 2,744 |
Marengo | 1,386 | 97.88% | 9 | 0.64% | 20 | 1.41% | 1 | 0.07% | 1,366 | 96.47% | 1,416 |
Marion | 1,098 | 65.05% | 378 | 22.39% | 205 | 12.14% | 7 | 0.41% | 720[lower-alpha 2] | 42.65% | 1,688 |
Marshall | 1,457 | 47.11% | 428 | 13.84% | 1,184 | 38.28% | 24 | 0.78% | 273 | 8.83% | 3,093 |
Mobile | 3,009 | 79.98% | 140 | 3.72% | 445 | 11.83% | 168 | 4.47% | 2,564 | 68.16% | 3,762 |
Monroe | 878 | 97.12% | 2 | 0.22% | 21 | 2.32% | 3 | 0.33% | 857 | 94.80% | 904 |
Montgomery | 3,047 | 94.10% | 43 | 1.33% | 131 | 4.05% | 17 | 0.53% | 2,916 | 90.06% | 3,238 |
Morgan | 1,686 | 71.11% | 241 | 10.16% | 362 | 15.27% | 82 | 3.46% | 1,324 | 55.84% | 2,371 |
Perry | 731 | 93.84% | 3 | 0.39% | 31 | 3.98% | 14 | 1.80% | 700 | 89.86% | 779 |
Pickens | 815 | 88.01% | 22 | 2.38% | 73 | 7.88% | 16 | 1.73% | 742 | 80.13% | 926 |
Pike | 1,293 | 95.14% | 13 | 0.96% | 48 | 3.53% | 5 | 0.37% | 1,245 | 91.61% | 1,359 |
Randolph | 1,177 | 64.99% | 268 | 14.80% | 366 | 20.21% | 0 | 0.00% | 811 | 44.78% | 1,811 |
Russell | 1,553 | 96.22% | 4 | 0.25% | 35 | 2.17% | 22 | 1.36% | 1,518 | 94.05% | 1,614 |
Shelby | 1,181 | 44.45% | 201 | 7.56% | 1,233 | 46.41% | 42 | 1.58% | -52 | -1.96% | 2,657 |
St. Clair | 787 | 43.50% | 260 | 14.37% | 687 | 37.98% | 75 | 4.15% | 100 | 5.53% | 1,809 |
Sumter | 701 | 97.09% | 9 | 1.25% | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 1.39% | 691[lower-alpha 3] | 95.71% | 722 |
Talladega | 1,312 | 72.49% | 111 | 6.13% | 386 | 21.33% | 1 | 0.06% | 926 | 51.16% | 1,810 |
Tallapoosa | 1,586 | 86.06% | 84 | 4.56% | 151 | 8.19% | 22 | 1.19% | 1,435 | 77.86% | 1,843 |
Tuscaloosa | 1,695 | 85.22% | 87 | 4.37% | 158 | 7.94% | 49 | 2.46% | 1,537 | 77.28% | 1,989 |
Walker | 2,063 | 57.71% | 881 | 24.64% | 504 | 14.10% | 127 | 3.55% | 1,182[lower-alpha 2] | 33.06% | 3,575 |
Washington | 405 | 90.20% | 14 | 3.12% | 18 | 4.01% | 12 | 2.67% | 387 | 86.19% | 449 |
Wilcox | 878 | 97.77% | 7 | 0.78% | 7 | 0.78% | 6 | 0.67% | 871 | 96.99% | 898 |
Winston | 508 | 29.88% | 292 | 17.18% | 893 | 52.53% | 7 | 0.41% | -385 | -22.65% | 1,700 |
Totals | 82,438 | 69.89% | 9,717 | 8.24% | 22,770[lower-alpha 4] | 19.30% | 3,029 | 2.57% | 59,668 | 50.59% | 117,954 |
Notes
- Because Roosevelt finished ahead of Taft in Alabama as a whole, all margins given are Wilson minus Roosevelt unless stated in the total for the county in question.
- In this county where Taft did run second ahead of Roosevelt, the margin given is that between Wilson and Taft.
- In this county where Debs ran second ahead of both Roosevelt and Taft, the margin given is that between Wilson and Debs.
- For the Roosevelt ticket only, there are differences between the Géoelections/Edgar Eugene Robinson figure and that from Dave Leip’s atlas, with the former used only for the county table.
References
- "1912 Presidential Election Results – Alabama". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
- Robinson, Edgar Eugene; The Presidential Vote; 1896-1932 (second edition); pp. 226-227 Published 1947 by Stanford University Press
- Géoelections; 1912 Presidential Election Popular Vote Archived 2018-06-13 at the Wayback Machine (.xlsx file for €15)
- Géoelections; 1912 Presidential Election Popular Vote for Eugene Debs (.xlsx file for €15)