Closed graph theorem (functional analysis)
In mathematics, particularly in functional analysis and topology, the closed graph theorem is a fundamental result stating that a linear operator with a closed graph will, under certain conditions, be continuous. The original result has been generalized many times so there are now many theorems referred to as "closed graph theorems."
Definitions
Graphs and closed graphs
The graph of a function f : X → Y is the set
- Gr f ≝ { (x, f(x)) : x ∈ X } = { (x, y) ∈ X × Y : y = f(x) }.
- Assumption: If X and Y are topological spaces then X × Y will always be endowed with the product topology.
If X and Y are topological spaces, D ⊆ X, and f : D → Y is a function, then f has a closed graph (resp. sequentially closed graph) in X × Y if the graph of f, Gr f, is a closed (resp. sequentially closed) subset of X × Y. If D = X or if X is clear from context then "in X × Y" may be omitted from writing.
Linear operators
A partial map,[1] denoted by f : X ↣ Y, if a map from a subset of X, denoted by dom f, into Y. If f : D ⊆ X → Y is written then it is meant that f : X ↣ Y is a partial map and dom f = D.
A map f : D ⊆ X → Y is closed (resp. sequentially closed) or has a closed graph (resp. has a sequentially closed graph) if the graph of f is closed (resp. sequentially closed) in X × Y (rather than in D × Y).
A map f : D ⊆ X → Y is a linear or a linear operator if X and Y are vector spaces, D ⊆ X is a vector subspace of X, f : D → Y is a linear map.
Closed linear operators
- Assumption: This article will henceforth assume that X and Y are topological vector spaces (TVSs).
A linear operator f : D ⊆ X → Y is called closed or a closed linear operator if its graph is closed in X × Y.
- Closable maps and closures
A linear operator f : D ⊆ X → Y is closable in X × Y if there exists a vector subspace E ⊆ X containing S and a function (resp. multifunction) F : E → Y whose graph is equal to the closure of the set Gr f in X × Y. Such an F is called a closure of f in X × Y, is denoted by f, and necessarily extends f.
If f : D ⊆ X → Y is closable linear operator then a core or essential domain of f is a subset C ⊆ D such that the closure in X × Y of the graph of the restriction f |C : C → Y of f to C is equal to the closure of the graph of f in X × Y (i.e. the closure of Gr f in X × Y is equal to the closure of Gr f |C in X × Y).
- Closed maps vs. closed linear operators
When reading literature in functional analysis, if f : X → Y is a linear map between topological vector spaces (TVSs) then "f is closed" will almost always mean that its graph is closed. However, "f is closed" may, especially in literature about point-set topology, instead mean the following:
A map f : X → Y between topological spaces is called a closed map if the image of a closed subset of X is a closed subset of Y.
These two definitions of "closed map" are not equivalent. If it is unclear, then it is recommended that a reader check how "closed map" is defined by the literature they are reading.
Characterizations of closed graphs (general topology)
Throughout, let X and Y be topological spaces.
- Function with a closed graph
If f : X → Y is a function then the following are equivalent:
- f has a closed graph (in X × Y);
- (definition) the graph of f, Gr f, is a closed subset of X × Y;
- for every x ∈ X and net x• = (xi)i ∈ I in X such that x• → x in X, if y ∈ Y is such that the net f(x•) := (f(xi))i ∈ I → y in Y then y = f(x);[2]
- Compare this to the definition of continuity in terms of nets, which recall is the following: for every x ∈ X and net x• = (xi)i ∈ I in X such that x• → x in X, f(x•) → f(x) in Y.
- Thus to show that the function f has a closed graph, it may be assumed that f(x•) converges in Y to some y ∈ Y (and then show that y = f(x)) while to show that f is continuous, it may not be assumed that f(x•) converges in Y to some y ∈ Y and instead, it must be proven that this is true (and moreover, it must more specifically be proven that f(x•) converges to f(x) in Y).
and if Y is a Hausdorff compact space then we may add to this list:
- f is continuous;[3]
and if both X and Y are first-countable spaces then we may add to this list:
- f has a sequentially closed graph in X × Y;
- Function with a sequentially closed graph
If f : X → Y is a function then the following are equivalent:
- f has a sequentially closed graph in X × Y;
- Definition: the graph of f is a sequentially closed subset of X × Y;
- For every x ∈ X and sequence x• = (xi)∞
i=1 in X such that x• → x in X, if y ∈ Y is such that the net f(x•) ≝ (f(xi))∞
i=1 → y in Y then y = f(x).[2]
Basic properties of maps with closed graphs
Suppose f : D(f) ⊆ X → Y is a linear operator between Banach spaces.
- If A is closed then A − λIdD(f) is closed where λ is a scalar and IdD(f) is the identity function.
- If f is closed, then its kernel (or nullspace) is a closed vector subspace of X.
- If f is closed and injective then its inverse f −1 is also closed.
- A linear operator f admits a closure if and only if for every x ∈ X and every pair of sequences x• = (xi)∞
i=1 and y• = (yi)∞
i=1 in D(f) both converging to x in X, such that both f(x•) = (f(xi))∞
i=1 and f(y•) = (f(yi))∞
i=1 converge in Y, one has fxi = fyi.
Examples and counterexamples
Continuous but not closed maps
- Let X denote the real numbers ℝ with the usual Euclidean topology and let Y denote ℝ with the indiscrete topology (where Y is not Hausdorff and that every function valued in Y is continuous). Let f : X → Y be defined by f(0) = 1 and f(x) = 0 for all x ≠ 0. Then f : X → Y is continuous but its graph is not closed in X × Y.[2]
- If X is any space then the identity map Id : X → X is continuous but its graph, which is the diagonal Gr Id ≝ { (x, x) : x ∈ X }, is closed in X × X if and only if X is Hausdorff.[4] In particular, if X is not Hausdorff then Id : X → X is continuous but not closed.
- If f : X → Y is a continuous map whose graph is not closed then Y is not a Hausdorff space.
Closed but not continuous maps
- If (X, 𝜏) is a Hausdorff TVS and 𝜐 is a vector topology on X that is strictly finer than 𝜏, then the identity map Id : (X, 𝜏) → (X, 𝜐) a closed discontinuous linear operator.[5]
- Consider the derivative operator A = d/dx where X = Y = C([a, b]) is the Banach space of all continuous functions on an interval [a, b]. If one takes its domain D(f) to be C1([a, b]), then f is a closed operator, which is not bounded.[6] On the other hand if {{math|1=D(f) = [[smooth function|C∞([a, b])]]}}, then f will no longer be closed, but it will be closable, with the closure being its extension defined on C1([a, b]).
- Let X and Y both denote the real numbers ℝ with the usual Euclidean topology. Let f : X → Y be defined by f(0) = 0 and f(x) = 1/x for all x ≠ 0. Then f : X → Y has a closed graph (and a sequentially closed graph) in X × Y = ℝ2 but it is not continuous (since it has a discontinuity at x = 0).[2]
- Let X denote the real numbers ℝ with the usual Euclidean topology, let Y denote ℝ with the discrete topology, and let Id : X → Y be the identity map (i.e. Id(x) := x for every x ∈ X). Then Id : X → Y is a linear map whose graph is closed in X × Y but it is clearly not continuous (since singleton sets are open in Y but not in X).[2]
Closed graph theorems
The closed graph theorem can be generalized from Banach spaces to more abstract topological vector spaces in the following ways:
Theorem — A linear operator from a barrelled space X to a Fréchet space Y is continuous if and only if its graph is closed.
and there are versions that does not require Y to be locally convex:
We restate this theorem and extend it with some conditions that can be used to determine if a graph is closed:
Theorem — If T : X → Y is a linear map between two F-spaces, then the following are equivalent:
- T is continuous;
- T has a closed graph;
- If (xi)∞
i=1 → x in X and if (T(xi))∞
i=1 converges in Y to some y ∈ Y, then y = T(x);[9] - If (xi)∞
i=1 → 0 in X and if (T(xi))∞
i=1 converges in Y to some y ∈ Y, then y = 0
Theorem[10] — Suppose that T : X → Y is a linear map whose graph is closed. If X is an inductive limit of Baire TVS and Y is a webbed space then T is continuous.
Closed Graph Theorem[11] — A closed surjective linear map from a complete pseudometrizable TVS onto a locally convex ultrabarrelled space is continuous.
Also, a closed linear map from a locally convex ultrabarrelled space into a complete pseudometrizable TVS is continuous.
Closed Graph Theorem — A closed and bounded linear map from a locally convex infrabarreled space into a complete pseudometrizable locally convex space is continuous.[11]
An even more general version of the closed graph theorem is
Theorem[12] — Suppose that X and Y are two topological vector spaces (they need not be Hausdorff or locally convex) with the following property:
- If G is any closed subspace of X × Y and u is any continuous map of G onto X, then u is an open mapping.
Under this condition, if T : X → Y is a linear map whose graph is closed then T is continuous.
Between Banach spaces
In functional analysis, the closed graph theorem states the following: If X and Y are Banach spaces, and T : X → Y is a linear operator, then T is continuous if and only if its graph is closed in X × Y (with the product topology).
The closed graph theorem can be reformulated may be rewritten into a form that is more easily usable:
Closed Graph Theorem for Banach spaces — If T : X → Y is a linear operator between Banach spaces, then the following are equivalent:
- T is continuous.
- T is a closed operator (i.e. the graph of T is closed).
- If (xi)∞
i=1 → x in X then (T(xi))∞
i=1 → T(x) in Y. - If (xi)∞
i=1 → 0 in X then (T(xi))∞
i=1 → 0 in Y. - If (xi)∞
i=1 → x in X and if (T(xi))∞
i=1 converges in Y to some y ∈ Y, then y = T(x). - If in X and if (T(xi))∞
i=1 converges in Y to some y ∈ Y, then y = 0.
The operator is required to be everywhere-defined, that is, the domain D(T) of T is X. This condition is necessary, as there exist closed linear operators that are unbounded (not continuous); a prototypical example is provided by the derivative operator on C([0,1]), whose domain is a strict subset of C([0,1]).
The usual proof of the closed graph theorem employs the open mapping theorem. In fact, the closed graph theorem, the open mapping theorem and the bounded inverse theorem are all equivalent. This equivalence also serves to demonstrate the importance of X and Y being Banach; one can construct linear maps that have unbounded inverses in this setting, for example, by using either continuous functions with compact support or by using sequences with finitely many non-zero terms along with the supremum norm.
Borel graph theorem
The Borel graph theorem, proved by L. Schwartz, shows that the closed graph theorem is valid for linear maps defined on and valued in most spaces encountered in analysis.[13] Recall that a topological space is called a Polish space if it is a separable complete metrizable space and that a Souslin space is the continuous image of a Polish space. The weak dual of a separable Fréchet space and the strong dual of a separable Fréchet-Montel space are Souslin spaces. Also, the space of distributions and all Lp-spaces over open subsets of Euclidean space as well as many other spaces that occur in analysis are Souslin spaces. The Borel graph theorem states:
Borel Graph Theorem — Let u : X → Y be linear map between two locally convex Hausdorff spaces X and Y. If X is the inductive limit of an arbitrary family of Banach spaces, if Y is a Souslin space, and if the graph of u is a Borel set in X × Y, then u is continuous.[13]
An improvement upon this theorem, proved by A. Martineau, uses K-analytic spaces.
A topological space X is called a Kσδ if it is the countable intersection of countable unions of compact sets.
A Hausdorff topological space Y is called K-analytic if it is the continuous image of a Kσδ space (that is, if there is a Kσδ space X and a continuous map of X onto Y).
Every compact set is K-analytic so that there are non-separable K-analytic spaces. Also, every Polish, Souslin, and reflexive Frechet space is K-analytic as is the weak dual of a Frechet space. The generalized Borel graph theorem states:
Generalized Borel Graph Theorem[14] — Let u : X → Y be a linear map between two locally convex Hausdorff spaces X and Y. If X is the inductive limit of an arbitrary family of Banach spaces, if Y is a K-analytic space, and if the graph of u is closed in X × Y, then u is continuous.
Related results
If F : X → Y is closed linear operator from a Hausdorff locally convex TVS X into a Hausdorff finite-dimensional TVS Y then F is continuous.[15]
See also
- Almost open linear map
- Banach space – Normed vector space that is complete
- Barrelled space – A topological vector space with near minimum requirements for the Banach–Steinhaus theorem to hold.
- Closed graph – A graph of a function that is also a closed subset of the product space
- Closed linear operator
- Continuous linear map
- Discontinuous linear map
- Kakutani fixed-point theorem
- Locally convex topological vector space – A vector space with a topology defined by convex open sets
- Open mapping theorem (functional analysis) – Theorem giving conditions for a continuous linear map to be an open map
- Topological vector space – Vector space with a notion of nearness
- Ursescu theorem – A theorem that simultaneously generalizes the closed graph, open mapping, and Banach–Steinhaus theorems.
- Webbed space – Topological vector spaces for which the open mapping and closed graphs theorems hold
References
- Dolecki & Mynard 2016, pp. 4-5.
- Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 459-483.
- Munkres 2000, p. 171.
- Rudin 1991, p. 50.
- Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 480.
- Kreyszig, Erwin (1978). Introductory Functional Analysis With Applications. USA: John Wiley & Sons. Inc. p. 294. ISBN 0-471-50731-8.
- Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 78.
- Trèves (1995) , p. 173
- Rudin 1991, pp. 50-52.
- Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 479-483.
- Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 474-476.
- Trèves 2006, p. 169.
- Trèves 2006, p. 549.
- Trèves 2006, pp. 557-558.
- Narici & Beckenstein 2011, p. 476.
Bibliography
- Adasch, Norbert; Ernst, Bruno; Keim, Dieter (1978). Topological Vector Spaces: The Theory Without Convexity Conditions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 639. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-08662-8. OCLC 297140003.
- Banach, Stefan (1932). Théorie des Opérations Linéaires [Theory of Linear Operations] (PDF). Monografie Matematyczne (in French). 1. Warszawa: Subwencji Funduszu Kultury Narodowej. Zbl 0005.20901. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-01-11. Retrieved 2020-07-11.
- Berberian, Sterling K. (1974). Lectures in Functional Analysis and Operator Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 15. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-90081-0. OCLC 878109401.
- Bourbaki, Nicolas (1987) [1981]. Sur certains espaces vectoriels topologiques [Topological Vector Spaces: Chapters 1–5]. Annales de l'Institut Fourier. Éléments de mathématique. 2. Translated by Eggleston, H.G.; Madan, S. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-42338-6. OCLC 17499190.
- Conway, John (1990). A course in functional analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 96 (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-97245-9. OCLC 21195908.
- Edwards, Robert E. (1995). Functional Analysis: Theory and Applications. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-68143-6. OCLC 30593138.
- Dolecki, Szymon; Mynard, Frederic (2016). Convergence Foundations Of Topology. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing Company. ISBN 978-981-4571-52-4. OCLC 945169917.
- Dubinsky, Ed (1979). The Structure of Nuclear Fréchet Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 720. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09504-0. OCLC 5126156.
- Grothendieck, Alexander (1973). Topological Vector Spaces. Translated by Chaljub, Orlando. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. ISBN 978-0-677-30020-7. OCLC 886098.
- Husain, Taqdir; Khaleelulla, S. M. (1978). Barrelledness in Topological and Ordered Vector Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 692. Berlin, New York, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09096-0. OCLC 4493665.
- Jarchow, Hans (1981). Locally convex spaces. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner. ISBN 978-3-519-02224-4. OCLC 8210342.
- Köthe, Gottfried (1969). Topological Vector Spaces I. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. 159. Translated by Garling, D.J.H. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-642-64988-2. MR 0248498. OCLC 840293704.
- Kriegl, Andreas; Michor, Peter W. (1997). The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis (PDF). Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. 53. Providence, R.I: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-0780-4. OCLC 37141279.
- Munkres, James R. (2000). Topology (Second ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. ISBN 978-0-13-181629-9. OCLC 42683260.
- Narici, Lawrence; Beckenstein, Edward (2011). Topological Vector Spaces. Pure and applied mathematics (Second ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN 978-1584888666. OCLC 144216834.
- Robertson, Alex P.; Robertson, Wendy J. (1980). Topological Vector Spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. 53. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29882-7. OCLC 589250.
- Rudin, Walter (1991). Functional Analysis. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. ISBN 978-0-07-054236-5. OCLC 21163277.
- Schaefer, Helmut H.; Wolff, Manfred P. (1999). Topological Vector Spaces. GTM. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York Imprint Springer. ISBN 978-1-4612-7155-0. OCLC 840278135.
- Swartz, Charles (1992). An introduction to Functional Analysis. New York: M. Dekker. ISBN 978-0-8247-8643-4. OCLC 24909067.
- Trèves, François (2006) [1967]. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-45352-1. OCLC 853623322.
- Wilansky, Albert (2013). Modern Methods in Topological Vector Spaces. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc. ISBN 978-0-486-49353-4. OCLC 849801114.
- "Proof of closed graph theorem". PlanetMath.