Grenfell Tower fire
On 14 June 2017, a fire broke out in the 24-storey Grenfell Tower block of flats in North Kensington, West London, at 00:54 BST; it caused 72 deaths, including those of two victims who later died in hospital. More than 70 others were injured and 223 people escaped. It was the deadliest structural fire in the United Kingdom since the 1988 Piper Alpha disaster and the worst UK residential fire since the Second World War.
.jpg.webp) The fire during the early morning of 14 June 2017 | |
  Grenfell Tower Grenfell Tower's location within the Kensington and Chelsea borough  Grenfell Tower Grenfell Tower's location within London  Grenfell Tower Grenfell Tower's location within the United Kingdom | |
| Date | 14 June 2017 |
|---|---|
| Time | 00:54 BST (first emergency call) |
| Duration | 24 hours (under control) Over 60 hours (fully extinguished) |
| Location | Grenfell Tower, North Kensington, London, United Kingdom |
| Coordinates | |
| Type | Structure fire |
| Cause | Electrical fault in a refrigerator; spread of fire largely exacerbated by flammable exterior cladding on the building[1] |
| Outcome |
|
| Deaths | 72 |
| Non-fatal injuries | 74 hospitalised |
| Property damage | £200 million – £1 billion (estimated)[2] |
| Inquiries | Public inquiry hearings opened 14 September 2017 |
| Inquest | Open for all 72 victims; pending police investigation and public inquiry |
| Arrests | 6 |
| Website | www |
The fire was started by a malfunctioning fridge-freezer on the fourth floor.[note 1] It spread rapidly up the building's exterior, bringing fire and smoke to all the residential floors. This was due to the building's cladding, the external insulation and the air gap between which enabled the stack effect. The fire burned for about 60 hours before finally being extinguished. More than 250 London Fire Brigade firefighters and 70 fire engines were involved from stations across London in efforts to control the fire, and rescue residents. More than 100 London Ambulance Service crews on at least 20 ambulances attended, joined by specialist paramedics from the Ambulance Service's Hazardous Area Response Team. The Metropolitan Police and London's Air Ambulance also assisted the rescue effort.
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry began on 14 September 2017 to investigate the causes of the fire and other related issues. Findings from the first report of the inquiry were released in October 2019 and addressed the events of the night. It affirmed that the building's exterior did not comply with regulations and was the central reason why the fire spread. A second phase to investigate the broader causes began on the third anniversary in 2020.
As of June 2020, the fire is currently being investigated by the police, a public inquiry, and coroner's inquests. Among the issues being investigated are the management of the building by the Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council and Kensington and Chelsea TMO (or KCTMO, which was responsible for the borough's council housing) and the responses of the Fire Brigade, the council and other government agencies. In the aftermath of the fire, the council's leader, deputy leader and chief executive resigned, and the council took direct control of council housing from the KCTMO. The national government commissioned an independent review of building regulations and fire safety, which published a report in May 2018. Across the UK and in some other countries, local governments have investigated other tower blocks to find others that have similar cladding. Efforts to replace the cladding on these buildings are ongoing.
Background
Building and construction
Grenfell Tower was part of the Lancaster West Estate, a council housing complex in North Kensington. The 24-storey tower block was designed in 1967 in the Brutalist style of the era by Clifford Wearden and Associates, and the Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council approved its construction in 1970.[3][4][5][6] The building was constructed by contractors A E Symes of Leyton from 1972–74.[7]
The 220-foot-10-inch (67.30 m) tall building contained 120 one- and two-bedroom flats.[8] The upper 20 of 24 storeys were residential floors, with each having a communal lobby and six dwellings, with ten bedrooms between them.[8] The lower four storeys were originally used for non-residential purposes.[note 2] Later, two lower floors were converted to residential use, bringing the total to 129 apartments, housing up to 600 people.[9] The original lead architect for the building, Nigel Whitbread, said in 2016 that the tower had been designed with attention to strength following the 1968 Ronan Point disaster and "from what I can see could last another hundred years."[11]
Like many other tower blocks in the UK, Grenfell Tower was designed to be operated under a "stay put policy" in the event of fire. The idea was that if a fire broke out in one flat, thick walls and fire doors would contain the fire long enough for the fire service to bring it under control.[12] Only those in the affected dwelling would be expected to evacuate.[13] The building was designed under the assumption that a full evacuation would never be necessary. There was no centrally activated fire alarm and only a single central staircase.[14][15] Unlike in many other countries, UK regulations do not require a second.[15] In 2010, a fire broke out in a lobby and was quickly extinguished.[16]
Management
Until 1996, Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council managed its council housing directly. In 1996, the council created Kensington and Chelsea TMO (KCTMO), a tenant management organisation which would manage its council housing stock.[17] KCTMO had a board comprising eight residents (tenants or leaseholders), four council-appointed members and three independent members.[18] The tower was built as council housing, but fourteen of the flats had been bought under the Right to Buy policy. These were occupied by leaseholders, or were privately rented out by them on the open market.[19]
Renovation
Grenfell Tower underwent a major renovation, announced in 2012 and conducted over 2015–16.[9][20] The tower received new windows, a water-based heating system for individual flats and new aluminium composite rainscreen cladding.[21][22][23] According to the application, the purpose of the cladding was to improve heating and energy efficiency, and external appearance. Mark Harris, of Harley Facades, said, "from a selfish point of view", his company's preference was to use (cheaper) aluminium composite material.[24][20]
Two types of cladding were used: Arconic's Reynobond PE, which consists of two coil-coated aluminium sheets that are fusion bonded to both sides of a polyethylene core; and Reynolux aluminium sheets. Beneath these, and fixed to the outside of the walls of the flats, was Celotex RS5000 PIR thermal insulation.[25][26][27] An alternative cladding with better fire resistance was refused due to cost.[28] In 2020, it emerged that a key shareholder in Arconic at the time was also a major donor to the Conservative Party.[29]
The original contractor, Leadbitter, had been dropped by KCTMO because their price of £11.278 million was £1.6 million higher than the proposed budget. The contract was put out to competitive tender and won by Rydon, whose bid was £2.5 million less than Leadbitter's.[30] Rydon carried out the refurbishment for £8.7 million, with Artelia on contract administration and Max Fordham as specialist mechanical and electrical consultants.[30][31][32][33][34] The cladding was fitted by Harley Facades of Crowborough, East Sussex, at a cost of £2.6 million.[35]
Safety concerns
Residents had expressed significant safety concerns before the fire.[36] Twelve years earlier, a report had criticised the tower's emergency lighting.[37] The Grenfell Action Group (GAG) ran a blog in which it highlighted major safety problems, criticising the council and KCTMO for neglecting fire safety and building maintenance.
In 2013, the group published a 2012 fire risk assessment by a KCTMO Health and Safety Officer which recorded safety concerns. Firefighting equipment at the tower had not been checked for up to four years; on-site fire extinguishers had expired, and some had the word "condemned" written on them because they were so old. GAG documented its attempts to contact KCTMO management; they also alerted the council's cabinet member for Housing and Property but said they never received a reply.[38][39] In 2013 the council threatened one of the bloggers with legal action, saying that their posts amounted to "defamation and harassment".[40] Two women living in Grenfell Tower, Mariem Elgwahry and Nadia Choucair, were threatened with legal action by KCTMO after they campaigned for improved fire safety.[41] They later died in the fire, at the age of 27 and 33.
In January 2016, GAG warned that people might be trapped in the building if a fire broke out, pointing out that the building had only one entrance and exit, and corridors that had been allowed to fill with rubbish, such as old mattresses. GAG frequently cited other fires in tower blocks when it warned of the hazards at Grenfell.[42] In November 2016, GAG attacked KCTMO as an "evil, unprincipled, mini-mafia" and accused the council of ignoring health and safety laws. GAG suggested that "only a catastrophic event will expose the ineptitude and incompetence of [KCTMO]", adding, "[We] predict that it won't be long before the words of this blog come back to haunt the KCTMO management and we will do everything in our power to ensure that those in authority know how long and how appallingly our landlord has ignored their responsibility to ensure the heath [sic] and safety of their tenants and leaseholders. They can't say that they haven't been warned!"[43] The Grenfell Tower Leaseholders' Association had also raised concerns about exposed gas pipes in the months before the fire.[44] As with the majority of tower blocks in the UK, Grenfell Tower did not have fire sprinklers.[45]
Meanwhile, in June 2016, an independent assessor had highlighted 40 serious issues with fire safety at Grenfell Tower and recommended action to be taken within weeks. In October, the assessor asked the KCTMO why there had been no action taken for more than 20 issues in the June report. In November 2016, the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority served a fire deficiency notice, listing many fire safety issues at Grenfell Tower that required action from KCTMO by May 2017. Areas of concern identified included fire doors, the smoke venting system and the firefighters' lift controls.[46][47]
Previous cladding fires and responses
One of the earliest fires that involved cladding materials was the 1973 Summerland disaster on the Isle of Man, which caused 50 deaths. Part of the reason why the fire spread rapidly through the leisure centre was the acrylic sheeting on the exterior of the building.[48][49] In the 1991 Knowsley Heights fire, fire spread up the entire height of an 11-storey building due to its exterior cladding, though it did not enter the interior and nobody was injured.[50] In 2009, external composite panels also played a role in the spread of the Lakanal House fire in Southwark.[51] An article in The Guardian three days after the Grenfell Tower fire described it as a "tragedy foretold", highlighting that there had been previous cladding fires such as the 2015 fire at The Marina Torch in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.[52]
In 2016, a non-fatal fire at a Shepherd's Bush tower block spread to six floors via flammable external cladding. In May 2017, the London Fire Brigade (LFB) warned all 33 London councils to review the use of panels and "take appropriate action to mitigate the fire risk".[53][54][55][56]
Fire
Initial fire (00:50–01:15)
The fire started in the early hours of Wednesday 14 June 2017 at around 00:50 BST (UTC+1), when a fridge-freezer caught fire in Flat 16, on the fourth floor.[57] The flat's resident was woken by a smoke alarm. He entered the kitchen and discovered the fridge-freezer smoking. He alerted his lodgers and neighbours, then called the LFB at 00:54.[57][note 3] The first two fire engines ("pumps") arrived six minutes later.[59][60] The initial incident commander said that the fire was visible at this point as a "glow" in the window.[61] A further two pumps were also dispatched.[62][63] Any residents of the tower who called the fire service were told to remain in their flat unless it was affected, which is the standard policy for a fire in a high-rise building,[57] as each flat should be fireproofed from its neighbours. Also due to this policy, the building had no central fire alarm.
Most of the firefighters entered the building. They set up a bridgehead (internal base of operations) on the second floor and connected hoses to the dry riser. They first entered Flat 16 at 01:07. It was a further seven minutes before they began tackling the kitchen blaze. At approximately 01:08, the fire began to penetrate the window frame.[63] Within a few minutes, it was setting the surrounding cladding panels on fire. Observing this, the incident commander requested another two pumps and an aerial appliance at 01:13, which also triggered the dispatch of more senior officers, a fire investigation unit and two command vehicles.[63] Another firefighter was asked to try to prevent it spreading with a water jet, though this jet could not reach higher than the fourth floor, and due to fears of causing a dangerous build-up of steam on the inside, it was not aimed directly at the window.[64]
Rapid upward spread (01:15–01:30)
By the time the firefighters began extinguishing the kitchen fire, a column of flames was quickly advancing up the side of the building. At 01:15, a firefighter discovered smoke in Flat 26 (directly above Flat 16), another discovered residents who had fled smoke on the fifth and sixth floors, and large quantities of debris began falling from the burning façade.[63] The flames spread up the side at a "terrifying rate".[65] Attempts to fight the fire with an external jet were unsuccessful, as it was mostly burning behind the waterproof rainscreen.[63] By 01:30, a rising column of flames had reached the roof and the fire was out of control.[66][63] The fire on the eastern exterior spread sideways and brought smoke and flames into multiple flats.[67][65][68][69]
By 01:18, 34 of 293 residents had escaped.[57] The busiest phase of evacuations was between 01:18 and 01:38, when 110 escaped,[57] with many being woken up by their smoke alarms when smoke entered their flat. Due to Ramadan, many observing Muslim residents were awake for the pre-dawn meal of suhur, which enabled them to alert neighbours.[70][71]
LFB rapidly escalated its response during this time period. The number of pumps in attendance was raised from six to eight at 01:19, with a specialist fire-rescue unit, bulk breathing apparatus carrier and damage control unit being sent too. Pumps were made up to 10 at 01:24, then to 15 at 01:27 along with a second aerial platform. Two minutes later pumps were made 20 and two more fire-rescue units were mobilised, and pumps were made up to 25 at 01:35, also triggering the dispatch of an Assistant Commissioner.[63] Dany Cotton, the Commissioner of the London Fire Brigade, was also called out and began driving to the scene from her home in Kent.[note 4] The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) were called at 01:24 to manage the gathering crowd outside.[63] Five minutes later, the London Ambulance Service were also called.[63]
Trapped residents and rescue missions (01:30–02:04)
Due to fire doors not closing and sealing properly, smoke began to spread from affected flats into the lobbies.[62] By 01:33, LFB were receiving calls from residents who reported being trapped in their flats.[63] At some point between 01:30 and 01:40, smoke began to enter the stairwell.[57] The Inquiry later estimated that despite this, the stairs were still passable for over half an hour.[73] Evacuation rates slowed, with 20 escaping between 01:38 and 01:58.[57] More than half of those still trapped at 01:58 were killed, while 48 were rescued between 01:58 and 03:58.[57] The fire continued to spread sideways on the exterior, and by 01:42 had reached the north side.[62]
LFB call handlers collected information from trapped residents and this was relayed to the LFB's command unit that was parked outside. Communicating through radio proved difficult, due to noise, the sheer volume of talk and possibly the concrete building structure. Instead, details of trapped residents were written on slips of paper and ferried by runners from the command unit to the bridgehead on the second floor. At the bridgehead, incoming firefighters were assigned flats to go to and briefed on whom they would need to rescue.[74] They donned breathing apparatus and headed to the flat to search for its residents.
The firefighters encountered thick smoke, zero visibility and extreme heat when they climbed above the fourth floor.[60][75] Furthermore, some residents had moved location to escape the smoke. Three firefighters who went to rescue a 12-year old girl on the 20th floor were unable to find her. Unknown to them, she had moved up to a flat on the 23rd floor, was on the phone to a control operator who had no means of knowing what the firefighters were doing,[63] and later died in this location.[76] Another two firefighters were sent to a flat on the 14th floor with a single resident, only to find 8 people (four of them eventually escaped).[77]
Major incident declared (02:04–04:00)
Witnesses reported seeing people trapped inside the burning building, switching the lights in their flats on and off or waving from windows to attract help, some holding children. Eyewitnesses reported seeing some people jumping out, and four victims were later found to have died from "injuries consistent with falling from a height".[78][79] At least one person used knotted blankets to make a rope and escape from the burning building.[80] Frequent explosions that were reported to be from gas lines in the building were heard.[60]
Outside operations were hindered by falling debris, including burning pieces of cladding. Due to this danger, the police moved crowds away from the building as a safety precaution. The MPS Territorial Support Group was present; besides being a specialist unit for public order policing, they provided riot shields to protect firefighters from falling debris.[81]
Shortly after 02:00, a major incident was declared and the number of fire engines was raised from 25 to 40, the number of fire-rescue units increased to 10, command vehicles to six, aerial platforms to four, and operational support units to two.[62] Over the course of the operation, 250 firefighters attempted to control the blaze,[82] with more than 100 firefighters inside the building at a given time. Assistant Commissioner Andrew Roe assumed direct command of firefighting operations for the next 11 hours. Rather than command the operations directly, Commissioner Cotton served as a Monitoring Officer, overseeing Roe and providing moral support to firefighters. She admitted that LFB had broken their own safety protocols by entering a large building without knowing whether it was in danger of structural collapse.[72] It was not until the following afternoon that structural engineers were able to assess the structure and determine that it was not in danger of collapse.[60]
By 02:20, the level of smoke in the stairwell constituted a threat to life, although some survivors did escape beyond then.[73] At 02:47 the "stay put" policy, advising those residents in areas unaffected by the blaze to remain there, was abandoned in favour of general evacuation.[13] After this point only 36 further residents were able to escape. Experts on the subsequent inquiry into the disaster later said that the "stay put" policy should have been discarded an hour and twenty minutes before it eventually was.[83]
Final rescues (04:00–08:07)
By sunrise, firefighters were still busy fighting the fire and attempting rescues on the inside. At 04:14, police addressed the large crowd of onlookers and urgently instructed them to contact anyone they knew who was trapped in the building—if they are able to reach them via phone or Twitter—to tell them they must try to self-evacuate and not wait for the fire brigade.[84] By 04:44, all sides of the building had been affected.[62]
Only two further rescues took place, with one resident being rescued at 06:05 and the last being rescued at 08:07.[62] Firefighters rescued all remaining residents up to the 10th floor and all but two up to the 12th floor, but none got higher than the 20th floor during this time; only two people escaped from the highest two floors.[57]
Residual fire (08:07 – 16 June)
At a news conference in the afternoon of 14 June, LFB reported firefighters had rescued 65 people from the building and reached all 24 floors.[85] Seventy-four people were confirmed by the NHS to be in six hospitals across London with 20 of them in critical care.[86]
The fire continued to burn on the tower's upper floors. It was not brought under control until 01:14 on 15 June and firefighters were still damping down pockets of fire when the Brigade issued an update on 16 June.[87] The fire brigade also used a drone to inspect the building and search for casualties.[88] The fire was declared extinguished on the evening of 16 June.[89]
Reporting
Reporting of the disaster escalated as follows:
- By 05:00, police reported that several people were being treated for smoke inhalation.[90]
- By 06:30, it was reported that 50 people had been taken to five hospitals: Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, King's College Hospital, Royal Free, St Thomas's, and St Mary's Hospital.
- By 09:30, London Fire Commissioner Dany Cotton reported that there were fatalities resulting from the fire, but she could not specify how many had been killed because of the size and complexity of the building.[90][91] Cotton said: "This is an unprecedented incident. In my 29 years of being a firefighter, I have never ever seen anything of this scale."[92][93]
- By 12:00 the Metropolitan Police announced there were six people confirmed dead, and more than 70 in hospital, with 20 in critical condition.[90] The first person announced dead was Mohammed al-Haj Ali, a Syrian refugee.[94] A large number of people were reported missing.
- At around 17:00, the number of confirmed deaths was increased to 12.[95]
False accounts
In the immediate aftermath of the fire, a number of unsubstantiated reports about casualties circulated online, which were to later be debunked, including that the government had covered up details of the fire and babies' miraculous survival stories.[96][97][98][99][100] A later investigation by BBC Panorama found no evidence that these survival accounts were credible: neither the Metropolitan Police, London Ambulance Service nor any A&E departments were able to find any record of this happening.[101][102]
Impact
Deaths
The fire caused 72 deaths, including one who died in hospital a day later and another who died in January 2018.[103][104][105] The latter occurred after an official death toll was announced by police in November 2017.[106] The incident ranks as the deadliest structural fire in the United Kingdom since the 1988 Piper Alpha disaster and the worst UK residential fire since the Second World War.[107]
Police examined the remains of Grenfell Tower and used "every imaginable source" of information "from government agencies to fast food companies" to identify casualties. Their analysis of CCTV evidence concluded that 223 people (of 293 present) had escaped.[108] This investigation took five months, with only 12 fatalities being identified on the actual day of the fire.[95] By the following week, police had estimated that 80 people had died.[109] This was the most widely quoted estimate in the media for several months.[110][111] On 19 September 2017, Metropolitan Police Commander Stuart Cundy suggested that the number of dead could be lower than 80 because eight people were being investigated for making fraudulent financial claims for non-existent victims.[110][111][112] By 1 June 2018, this had led to five people being convicted of fraud.[113][114] Obstacles to identifying fatalities included the fact there was no formal register of who was in the building,[115][116] and the number of undocumented subtenants, migrants and asylum seekers who were believed to have been living there.[117] Mayor Sadiq Khan called for an amnesty to ensure that people with pertinent information could come forward.[118]
Survivors came from 106 of the tower's 129 flats; eighteen people among the occupants of these flats were reported as dead or missing presumed dead, whereas most of those killed were said to have been in the remaining 23 flats between the 11th and 23rd floors.[119] Some people from lower floors may have tried to move up the building, and it is thought a number of people may have ended up in one flat.[120] Some victims were identified from 26 calls to 999 made from inside the 23 flats.[1]
The dead included many children,[121] five of whom were students at the nearby Kensington Aldridge Academy.[122] The youngest of those known killed, Leena Belkadi, was 6 months old. One victim died in hospital on 15 June 2017 due to inhalation of fire fumes.[104] Additionally, one then pregnant survivor lost her baby through stillbirth as a result of the fire.[123]
The first Coroner's Inquests opened on 23 August 2017[124] and all other inquests were opened by 23 November 2017.[125]
In the aftermath of the fire, members of the local community, including a residents group called Grenfell United,[126][127][128] stated that the official figures were far short of existing estimates, with some believing that the death toll was "in hundreds".[129] Ten days after the fire, only 18 deaths had yet been officially recorded, compared to the estimate of 80 and the eventual figure of 72.[130][131] Rumours that the toll was higher than official figures persisted after the official figures were confirmed.
Psychological health and human factors
On 26 July 2017, at the fourth public meeting of the Grenfell Response Team, a local volunteer reported that there had been at least 20 suicide attempts in north Kensington since the fire, one of which had been successful.[132][133][134] The mental health of many survivors was damaged.[135]
LFB Commissioner Dany Cotton defended the heroism of emergency service workers who themselves were affected by trauma.[82] An on-call counsellor was made available. Around 80 firefighters and Met Police officers were reported to be suffering from their experiences.[136] Cotton told LBC Radio that she too was undergoing counselling.[137][138]
An extra four full-time counsellors were employed (reversing previous staff reductions) and 60 volunteer counsellors were brought in. All firefighters who attended Grenfell were given a psychological health check. The BBC reported that LFB used its reserve budget to bring counselling staff back to 2008 levels.[139]
In July 2017, NHS England issued an open letter to GPs giving advice on symptoms for mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that those affected by this fire (or recent terrorism) may be experiencing.[140] It is estimated that 67% of people caught up in the fire, who lost relatives, were rescued or evacuated from the tower, need treatment for PTSD. Further between 26% and 48% of people living nearby who were not evacuated but witnessed the fire have PTSD. It is unclear how far this indicated reaction to the fire and how far previously existing psychiatric conditions were being uncovered.[141]
The Metropolitan Police Service assigned 250 detectives to the fire, placing additional workload and personal stress on a force that was also investigating recent terrorist incidents, including the London Bridge and Finsbury Park attacks.[142]
Psychologists worked at Kensington Aldridge Academy to support students returning to the original site. Measures have been taken to protect student welfare, such as shielding classroom windows overlooking the tower.[122]
Long-term physical health
On 21 September 2018, the coroner, Fiona Wilcox, expressed concern for the long term physical health of victims and emergency service workers exposed to smoke and dust inhaled during the fire, and its subsequent clear up. Those affected could be at increased risk of conditions such as cancer, asbestosis, COPD and asthma. The tower is known to have contained asbestos and other toxins. In her letter to NHS chief executive Simon Stevens, Wilcox notes that firefighters involved in the September 11 attacks suffered significant health problems from smoke inhalation. She asked for a physical health screening programme to be established to help prevent future deaths.[143][144]
Public Health England have been monitoring the quality of the air around the derelict tower. In a March 2019 report, they stated that "the risk to public health from air pollution remains low."[145] While the fire itself released many toxic chemicals, they were quickly dispersed in the wind.[146] There has not been a full assessment of the risk posed by soil contamination.[145] Also in March 2019, an independent study led by Professor Anna Stec reported in the journal Chemosphere that research had uncovered "significant environmental contamination" in the soil and buildings around the local area, including significant concentrations of benzene, benzo(a)pyrene, phosphorus and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.[146][145] Chemicals in the soil are unlikely to seep into the air, but could be uncovered through activities such as gardening.[145] Stec said her findings showed "the need for further in-depth, independent analysis to quantify any risks to residents."[145]
Costs
Grenfell Tower was insured by Protector Forsikring ASA for £20 million, but the direct costs of the fire are likely to be substantially higher. According to The Times, the financial impact of the fire could reach as high as £1 billion due to a combination of litigation, compensation for deaths and injuries, rehousing and rehabilitation, the cost of demolition and rebuilding and the possibility that other tower blocks may have to be improved or evacuated.[147]
Councils said the government is not releasing funds to increase fire safety in many other tower blocks after the Grenfell fire although they promised lack of finance would not prevent essential work. The government is not paying to put sprinklers into older tall buildings though sprinklers are required in new buildings over 30 metres tall.[148][149]
In the 22 November 2017 Budget, Chancellor Philip Hammond announced that an extra £28 million was being provided to help victims. He asked that local authorities without the means to make buildings safe should contact central government. Of the fire he said: "This tragedy should never have happened, and we must ensure that nothing like it ever happens again."[150]
On 4 January 2018, BBC News reported the Met Police were asking the Home Office to pay for the investigation, which was one of the largest, most complex and most expensive in its history. A figure of £38 million was quoted.[151]
On 9 May 2019, Housing Secretary James Brokenshire announced the £200m cost of replacing cladding on private tower blocks would be paid for by the Government, reversing the position of leaving costs to owners.[152]
Aftermath
A total of 151 homes were destroyed in the tower and surrounding area. People from surrounding buildings were evacuated due to concerns that the tower might collapse.[60]
The fire also severely affected three low-rise "finger blocks" adjoining Grenfell Tower. Their residents were evacuated due to the fire. The blocks, Barandon Walk, Testerton Walk and Hurstway Walk, also lost access to hot water as they shared a boiler beneath Grenfell Tower that was destroyed in the fire.[153]
Direct causes
Refrigerator
It was initially reported that the fire had been started by a faulty refrigerator.[154] Police confirmed on 23 June that a faulty fridge-freezer had initially started the fire and named the model as a FF175BP fridge-freezer produced under the Hotpoint brand for Whirlpool.[155] Owners of the types FF175BP and FF175BG were urged to register their appliance with the manufacturer to receive any updates. Sixty-four thousand of these models were made between March 2006 and July 2009, after which the model was discontinued. It is unknown how many are still in use.[156]
The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) commissioned a product safety investigation into the Hotpoint FF175B fridge-freezer. Independent experts examined the remains of the appliance recovered from Grenfell and exemplar models of the same type. They concluded that the design met all legal safety requirements, and there was no need to issue a recall of the model. Consumer group Which? complained that the legal requirements were inadequate.[157][158]
Tenants had repeatedly complained about electrical power surges causing appliances to smoke and such a surge may have set the fridge-freezer on fire. The local authority knew about complaints and had paid tenants compensation for damaged appliances. Judith Blakeman, a local Labour councillor, said the surges affected many appliances including fridges. Blakeman maintains that the cause of the surges was never solved.[159]
On 27 November 2018, evidence given to the Grenfell Tower inquiry by electrical investigating engineer Dr J. Duncan Glover suggested that in Flat 16 the fridge-freezer compressor relay wiring was not tightly fitted. In his view, this probably created additional electrical resistance leading to overheating and igniting the outer plastic insulation of the wire at 90°C. Glover described the state of the fusebox following a short circuit to the compressor. During questioning, he compared US and UK safety standards, noting that US regulations require a steel back to the fridge to help contain a fire, whereas UK fridges were allowed to have only a plastic backing.[160]
Exterior cladding and insulation
The newly renovated façade of the tower is believed to have been built as follows:[163]
- exterior cladding: aluminium sandwich plates (3 mm each) with polyethylene core
- a standard ventilation gap (50 mm) between the cladding and the insulation behind it
- an insulation made of PIR (polyisocyanurate) foam plates (150 mm) mounted on the existing facade
- the existing prefabricated reinforced-concrete facade
- new double-glazed windows of unknown type and material, mounted in the same vertical plane as the PIR foam insulation plates[164]
Both the aluminium-polyethylene cladding and the PIR insulation plates failed fire safety tests conducted after the fire, according to the police.[165]
Earlier in 2014, safety experts had cautioned that the planned insulation was only suitable for use with non-combustible cladding. The Guardian saw a certificate from the building inspectors' organisation, Local Authority Building Control (LABC), which stated that the chosen insulation for the refit should only be used on tall buildings with fibre cement panels, which do not burn. Combustible panels with polyethylene were put up on top of insulation known as Celotex RS5000, made from polyisocyanurate, which burns when heated, giving off toxic cyanide fumes. Despite the above, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea certified the Grenfell tower building work as allegedly conforming to "the relevant provisions". Council building inspectors visited the site 16 times from August 2014 to July 2016. Kooltherm, a phenolic insulation, was also used on Grenfell. Kooltherm was never tested with polyethylene core aluminium panels according to the manufacturer. The manufacturer, Kingspan, "would be very surprised if such a system [...] would ever pass the appropriate British Standard 8414 large-scale test". Kooltherm's LABC certificate states phenolic products, "do not meet the limited combustibility requirements" of building regulations.[166]
The combustible materials used on Grenfell Tower were considerably cheaper than non-combustible alternatives would have been. There appear to have been intense cost pressures over the Grenfell refurbishment. In June 2017, it was stated the project team chose cheaper cladding that saved £293,368, after the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation mentioned in an email the need for "good costs for Cllr Fielding Mellen [the council's former deputy leader]".[166]
A building control officer from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea reportedly passed the cladding on Grenfell Tower on 15 May 2015, though there was a nationwide warning that the combustible insulation used should only be used with cladding that does not burn.[167]
Aluminium-polyethylene cladding
Fire safety experts have said that the building's new external cladding was a possible cause of the rapid spread of the fire.[170] Experts said the gap between the cladding and the insulation worked like a chimney to spread the fire.[164] The cladding could be seen burning and melting, causing additional speculation that it was not made of fire-resistant material. One resident said: "The whole one side of the building was on fire. The cladding went up like a matchstick."[171]
Concerns about the dangers of external cladding were raised years before, following a fire in 1991 at flats in Knowsley Heights, Merseyside.[172][173] Recent major high-rise fires that have involved flammable cladding are listed below.[172][174][175][176]
Records show that a contractor had been paid £2.6 million to install an "ACM rainscreen over-clad" during the recent refurbishment at Grenfell Tower.[35] ACM stands for "aluminium composite material", also known as a sandwich panel, the combustibility of which depends on the choice of insulation core material.[172]
One of the products used was Arconic's Reynobond, which is available with different types of core material—polyethylene, as reportedly used in Grenfell Tower (Reynobond PE), or a more fire-resistant material (Reynobond FR).[33][177] The Reynobond cladding reportedly cost £24 per square metre for the fire-retardant version, and £22 for the combustible version.[177]
According to Arconic's website and brochure for the mainland European market at the time of the fire, the Reynobond PE cladding used was suitable only for buildings 10 metres or less tall; the fire-retardant Reynobond FR was suitable for buildings up to 30 metres tall; and above the latter height, such as the upper parts of Grenfell Tower, the non-combustible A2 version was supposed to be used ("As soon as the building is higher than the firefighters' ladders, it has to be conceived with an incombustible material").[178][179][180] After the fire, Arconic stopped sales of Reynobond PE worldwide for tower blocks.[181]
Similar cladding containing highly flammable insulation material is believed to have been installed on thousands of other high-rise buildings in countries including Britain, France, the UAE and Australia.[174][182] Advice published by the Centre for Window and Cladding Technology is that where such materials are used in buildings over 18m, the fire performance of the cladding system as a whole must be proven by testing.[183](p5)
In September 2014, a building regulations notice for the re-cladding work was submitted to the authority and marked with a status of "Completed—not approved".[184] The use of a "Building Notice" building control application is used to remove the need to submit detailed plans and proposals to a building control inspector in advance, where the works performed will be approved by the inspector during the course of their construction. Building inspector Geoff Wilkinson remarked that this type of application is "wholly inappropriate for large complex buildings and should only be used on small, simple domestic buildings".[185]
On 18 June, Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond stated that the cladding used on Grenfell Tower was banned in the United Kingdom.[186] Grenfell Tower was inspected 16 times while the cladding was being put on but none of these inspections noticed that materials effectively banned in tall buildings were being used. Judith Blakeman, local Labour councillor questioned the competence of the inspectors. Blakeman, representing the Grenfell residents, said, "This raises the question of whether the building regulations officers were sufficiently competent and did they know what they were looking at. It also begs a question about what they were actually shown. Was anything concealed from them?"[187]
The Department for Communities and Local Government stated that cladding with a polyethylene core "would be non-compliant with current Building Regulations guidance. This material should not be used as cladding on buildings over 18 metres (59 ft) in height."[188] On 31 July 2017, the Department released results of fire safety testing on the cladding panels used at Grenfell Tower, which were carried out by the Building Research Establishment and assigned the polyethylene filling a category three rating, designating a total lack of flame retardant properties.[189]
According to US-based Arconic, the polyethylene version of the material is banned in the United States for use in buildings exceeding 40 feet (12 m) in height, because of the risk of spreading fire and smoke.[190] NPR subsequently stated that nearly all jurisdictions in the US (except three states and the District of Columbia) have enacted the International Building Code (IBC) requirement that external wall assemblies (cladding, insulation, and wall) on high-rise buildings with combustible components must pass a rigorous real-world simulation test promulgated by the National Fire Protection Association under the name NFPA 285.[191][192][193]
To perform the test, the entire planned assembly is constructed on a standardised test rig two storeys tall, with a window opening in the middle, and is continuously ignited with gas burners from two different angles for 30 minutes.[194] The assembly must satisfy numerous performance criteria to pass, including a requirement that flames cannot spread more than 10 ft (3.0 m) vertically from the top of the window opening or 5 ft (1.5 m) horizontally.[192][194]
A single NFPA 285 test can cost over US$30,000, and it certifies only a particular assembly, meaning that any change to any part used requires a new test.[191][195] As of mid-2017 ACM cladding with a polyethylene core had not been able to pass the NFPA 285 test, and thus had been effectively banned on US high-rise buildings for decades.[192][196] The UK does not mandate the use of such simulations.[192][196]
Fire safety experts said the tests the government is doing on cladding only are insufficient, as the whole unit of cladding and insulation should be tested including fire stops. Fire safety experts maintain further that the testing lacks transparency, as the government has not described what tests are being carried out.[197]
Polyisocyanurate insulation
The refurbishment also used an insulation foam product named Celotex RS5000, installed behind the cladding.[198] Police said this insulation proved "more flammable than the cladding".[199]
According to its datasheet, the polyisocyanurate (PIR) product—charred pieces of which littered the area around Grenfell Tower after the fire—"will burn if exposed to a fire of sufficient heat and intensity".[33][200] PIR insulation foams "will, when ignited, burn rapidly and produce intense heat, dense smoke and gases which are irritating, flammable and/or toxic", among them carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide.[201] The fire toxicity of polyisocyanurate foams has been well understood for some time.[202]
At least three survivors were treated for cyanide poisoning.[203] Simultaneous exposure to carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide is more lethal than exposure to the gases separately.[204]
Celotex's Rainscreen Compliance Guide, when specifying Celotex RS5000 in buildings above 18 metres (59 ft),[205] sets out the conditions under which the product was tested and for which it has been certified as meeting the required fire safety standards. These include the use of (non-combustible) 12 mm fibre cement rainscreen panels, ventilated horizontal fire breaks at each floor slab edge and vertical non-ventilated fire breaks. It states that any changes from the tested configuration "will need to be considered by the building designer".
Cavity barriers
It has been asserted that cavity barriers intended to prevent the spread of fire in the gap between the facade and the building (the chimney effect) were of insufficient size and, in some cases, incorrectly installed, facilitating the spread of fire.[206]
Windows
It has been asserted that windows and their surrounds installed as part of the refurbishment were less fire resistant than those they replaced due to the materials used and that the windows were of insufficient size necessitating larger surrounds. This would facilitate the spread of fire between the interior and exterior of the building.[206]
Emergency response
Despite this incident, the enquiry praised the "courage and devotion to duty" of ordinary firefighters. Media were quick to condemn firefighters however.
Stay put policy
| External image | |
|---|---|
 Public Fire Notice from nearby KCTMO tower indicating "Stay Put" policy[207] |
The fire safety policy for Grenfell Tower was that residents were advised to stay in their flats ("stay put") if a fire broke out in the building,[60] unless it was affecting their flat.[13] This is the standard policy for a high-rise building in the United Kingdom. It relies on the assumption that construction standards such as concrete and fire-resistant doors will allow firefighters to contain a fire within one flat and more importantly, that buildings meet safety regulations. This was not possible at Grenfell Tower, as the fire spread rapidly via the exterior.[12] Due to this policy, the building was not designed to be fully evacuated. There was only a single narrow staircase, and no centrally activated system of fire alarms that could alert residents.[14]
In a July 2014 Grenfell Tower regeneration newsletter, the KCTMO instructed residents to stay in their flat in case of a fire ("Our longstanding 'stay put' policy stays in force until you are told otherwise") and stated that the front doors for each unit could survive a fire for up to 30 minutes.[208] The May 2016 newsletter had a similar message, adding that it was on the advice of the Fire Brigade:
The smoke detection systems have been upgraded and extended. The Fire Brigade has asked us to reinforce the message that, if there is a fire which is not inside your own home, you are generally safest to stay put in your home to begin with; the Fire Brigade will arrive very quickly if a fire is reported.[209]
The advice was repeated to residents who called the fire service.[60] The policy was withdrawn at 02:47, when control room staff were instead told to advise residents to evacuate if possible.[210][211] At 04:14, the police told onlookers to contact anyone still trapped in the building and tell them to attempt to evacuate immediately.[84]
Many survivors argued that they would have died had they followed the "stay put" advice.[12][60] Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, also criticised the policy: "Thankfully residents didn't take that advice but fled". He added, "These are some of the questions that have to be answered. We have lots of people in London living in tower blocks ... We can't have people's lives being put at risk because of bad advice or lack of maintenance."[212][213] In her report, Barbara Lane concluded that the principles required for the "stay put" policy to work failed once the fire started spreading across the exterior.[214]
Dany Cotton said Grenfell was unique in terms of volume and behaviour of fire. She said it was a matter for the inquiry, but defended the general "stay put" policy for most high-rise buildings by reasoning that if residents all evacuate at once, they could block firefighters from entering. Furthermore, smoke and fire could be spread within a building by residents opening doors.[82] In her later witness statement to the Inquiry, she said that as the building did not have a central fire alarm system, evacuating the building "would physically require someone to go and knock on every single door and tell people to come out."[215] Since the Grenfell Tower fire, LFB's policy of high-rise buildings with flammable cladding has been changed so that until the cladding is removed, landlords should install alarm systems or have patrols in place so that the building can be evacuated.[215][216]
The initial incident commander Watch Manager Michael Dowden told the Inquiry that he was preoccupied and uncomfortable dealing with "a very, very dynamic situation" that he was not prepared to deal with, and that he did not consider evacuating the building. He added that in hindsight, he did not believe it would have been possible, as there were not enough firefighters present to evacuate 20 floors. Station Manager Andrew Walton, who was incident commander for a short period after, said that as smoke was spreading to the stairwell and many lobbies, residents could not have escaped and he believed they were safer staying in unaffected flats.[217] Watch Manager Brien O'Keeffe suggested it could have been a "catastrophe" to tell residents to evacuate unaided once the stairwell was filled with smoke.[218] On the other hand, Assistant Commissioner Andrew Roe said that due to the complete failure of the building, he made a decision to change the policy soon after taking over as incident commander.[219]
The Inquiry later concluded that lives had been lost because the policy had not been lifted while the stairs were still passable. It found that the fire officers had not been trained to deal with a situation where they might have to evacuate a tower block.[58]
Fire brigade resources
Research by John Sweeney for BBC Newsnight described several issues that hampered the response of the London Fire Brigade (LFB). There was insufficient mains water pressure for the hoses the fire service used and Thames Water had to be called to increase it.[66][220] Also, a high ladder did not arrive for 32 minutes, by which time the fire was out of control. Matt Wrack of the Fire Brigades Union said, "... having that on the first attendance might have made a difference because it allows you to operate a very powerful water tower from outside the building onto the building." Before the Grenfell fire, 70% of fire brigades would have automatically sent a high ladder to tower fires.[221]
An independent fire expert told the BBC having the ladder earlier could have stopped the fire getting out of control.[222] The LFB told Newsnight the first attendance procedure for tower fires has now been changed from four engines to five engines plus a high ladder unit. Firefighters said inside the building they lacked sufficient 'extended duration' breathing apparatus. They had difficulty getting vital radio messages through due to 'overuse of the system' and from the need to get the signal through layers of concrete. At the inquiry one firefighter described the radios as "useless."[223]
Another issue raised was the height of the aerial appliances. LFB's aerial appliances could reach 32 m (105 ft) high, whereas the tower was 67 m (220 ft) high. A 42 m (138 ft) firefighting platform was borrowed from Surrey, arriving only after the fire had been burning for several hours. Commissioner Dany Cotton said that the LFB had already been planning to buy higher ladders, and that the size of LFB's appliances has been limited by their need to fit on narrow London streets.[224] London mayor, Sadiq Khan promised to supply new equipment that the London Fire Brigade needed promptly and stated he would not wait for the public inquiry.[225]
Dany Cotton later said having more firefighters may not have helped as there would not have physically been enough room for them in the building. The single stairwell also restricted access.[82]
Smoke
One of the major obstacles to the firefighters was that the tower's only stairwell filled with smoke within an hour of the fire breaking out.[57] This made it very difficult for residents to escape unaided; Barbara Lane's report noted that the rate of evacuations slowed after 01:38, and again after 01:58.[57] Furthermore, firefighters were hindered by the near-zero visibility on the stairwell.[60] Crew Manager Aldo Diana said he was "surprised" by the amount of smoke in the stairwell, describing conditions as:
Basically you couldn't see your hand in front of your face. It was just thick black smoke. You didn't see anybody else. You literally had to bump into them.[47]
In section 19 of her report, Barbara Lane notes that smoke was reported in the lobbies of four floors as early as 01:18. By 01:58, the stairwell and seven lobbies were filled with smoke. She suggested that possible causes for this included inadequate fire doors, fire doors being propped open by hoses and problems with the ventilation system.[62]
In October 2018 the London Fire Brigade announced that it is to use specialist hoods to protect people from smoke and toxic fumes for up to 15 minutes. They were purchased from German company Drager with £90,000 for 650 hoods.[226]
Road access
Kensington and Chelsea Council was warned in 2010 that building a new secondary school very near Grenfell Tower could block access by emergency vehicles. A 2013 blog post by Grenfell Action Group stated, "There is barely adequate room to manoeuvre for fire engines responding to emergency calls, and any obstruction of this emergency access zone could have lethal consequences in the event of a serious fire or similar emergency in Grenfell Tower or the adjacent blocks." The council demolished a multi-storey car park to build the school. This added to congestion and parked cars in streets around Grenfell Tower that were already narrow and made it hard for fire engines to get to the fire.[227]
Lack of sprinklers
Like the vast majority of high-rise buildings in the UK, Grenfell Tower did not have sprinklers.[45] A BBC Breakfast investigation focusing on half of the UK's council- and housing association-owned tower blocks found that 2% of them had full sprinkler systems. Deaths were 87% lower when buildings with sprinklers caught fire. England, Wales and Scotland now require sprinklers to be installed in newly built tall buildings, since 2007, but there is no requirement to fit them in existing buildings.[228] Dany Cotton has called for sprinklers to be retrofitted in all social housing blocks.[229] David Siber, an advisor to the Fire Brigades Union, said that sprinklers could have prevented the fire from ever spreading beyond the kitchen where it started.[230] Geoff Wilkinson, the building regulations columnist for the Architects' Journal, said that once the fire starting spreading through cladding, sprinklers would have had little effect.[231]
A few days after the fire, the Conservative leader of the council Nicholas Paget-Brown was asked why sprinklers had not been installed in the tower during the recent renovation. Paget-Brown said that the Grenfell Tower residents did not have a collective view in favour of installing sprinklers during the recent renovations. He also said that if they had been installed, it would have delayed the refurbishment and been more disruptive.[232] ITV business editor Joel Hills stated that he had been told that the installation of sprinklers had not even been discussed.[30]
Criticism of fire safety regulation
Reinhard Ries, the fire chief in Frankfurt, Germany, was critical of lax fire regulations in the United Kingdom, contrasting the laws in Germany that ban flammable cladding on buildings higher than 22 m and require segregated fire-stairs and firefighting lifts which can be used by the fire brigade and injured or disabled people.[233]
Russ Timpson of the Tall Buildings Fire Safety Network told The Telegraph that "foreign colleagues are staggered" when they learn that UK regulations permit high-rise buildings to have only a single staircase, and called on government to review the relevant regulations.[15] New high-rise buildings in England, since 2007, are required to have sprinklers with no requirement to install them in older buildings, and as a result few have sprinklers.[229] Other notable criticisms of UK fire regulations included a change in the law in 1986 under a Conservative government that abolished a requirement that external walls should have at least one hour's fire resistance to prevent blazes from re-entering a building and spreading to other apartments.[15]
The New York Times reported that because of the Great Fire of London, UK building codes have historically been overly focused on containing horizontal fire spread between buildings or between units in larger buildings, as opposed to vertical fire spread in high-rise buildings.[196]
The Royal Institute of British Architects fears that flammable cladding will not be totally banned, and they further fear that sprinkler systems and extra escape staircases will not be required. These three measures could have saved lives in Grenfell, according to widespread beliefs.[234]
Reviews into fire safety in tower blocks
After the fatal Lakanal House fire in 2009, the coroner made a series of safety recommendations for the government to consider in order to improve safety in tower blocks. The report highlighted the flammable panels that covered part of the exterior, the lack of sprinklers, a lack of safety inspections, and that the stay put policy did not suit a building where compartmentalisation had failed.[51]
The Department for Communities and Local Government agreed to hold a review in 2013. Over subsequent years, four ministers were warned about tower block fire risks that had been highlighted by the Lakanal House fire.[235] Ronnie King, a former chief fire officer and secretary of the all-party parliamentary group on fire safety, said that ministers had stonewalled requests for meetings and discussions about tightening rules. King described his attempts to arrange meetings with housing minister Gavin Barwell: "We have had replies, but the replies were to the effect that you have met my predecessor [earlier housing minister James Wharton] and there were a number of matters that we are looking at and we are still looking at it."[236] In March 2014, the All-Party Parliamentary Fire Safety and Rescue Group sent a letter to then Minister for Communities Stephen Williams, warning that similar fires to the one at Lakanal House were possible, especially due to the lack of sprinklers in tower blocks.[237] After further correspondence, Williams replied: "I have neither seen nor heard anything that would suggest that consideration of these specific potential changes is urgent and I am not willing to disrupt the work of this department by asking that these matters are brought forward."[235] In March 2015, at the request of the Department for Communities and Local Government, fire experts at the Building Research Establishment (BRE) studies produced reports assessing the level of fire risk at tower blocks. The experts warned of fatalities unless the danger of flames passing through concealed cavities was addressed.[238]
Other political criticism and debate
There is a political tension between those who focus the blame on technical failures, such as the refrigerator fire and the installation of flammable cladding, and those who focus the blame on politically charged explanation, such as deregulation, spending cuts and neglect.
Bagehot in The Economist[239] and Nick Ferrari[240] accused Labour Party politicians of exploiting the disaster for political gain. In turn, Suzanne Moore in The Guardian, Tanya Gold in the New Statesman and Owen Jones argued that trying to stop the fire from being politicized meant ignoring its causes.[241][242][243]
Government response
The government response was to eventually setup dedicated benefits line and a fund to support the survivors. [244]
Theresa May's personal response
On the day after the fire, May made a private visit to Grenfell Tower to speak with members of the emergency services, but did not meet with any of the survivors.[245] Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood stated this was due to security concerns. BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg commented that May's decision not to meet those who lived in the tower might be interpreted as indicative of a lack of empathy.[246] An editorial in The Guardian called it May's "Hurricane Katrina moment".[247] Former Conservative cabinet minister Michael Portillo described her meeting with members of the emergency services as "a good thing" but felt she "should have been there with the residents. She wanted an entirely controlled situation in which she didn't use her humanity".[248]
The following day, she visited survivors in hospital and a church that was serving as a relief centre; during the latter visit she was heckled by some of those present.[249][250] An article written by former Conservative MP Matthew Parris in The Times described her as "a good and moral person, who wants the best for her country, and is not privately unfeeling, ... in public is crippled by personal reserve".[251] Andrea Leadsom, the Leader of the House of Commons subsequently visited a relief centre at the Rugby Portobello Trust, where she was confronted by residents angered by May's response, and described the prime minister as being "absolutely heartbroken" over events at Grenfell Tower.[252]
In an article for the London Evening Standard on 11 June 2018, Prime Minister Theresa May wrote of her regret for the handling of the fire and its public perception.[253]
Council response
The local council's response to the Grenfell Tower fire has been subject to widespread criticism. Council member Emma Dent Coad, also the newly elected Labour MP for the area (Kensington constituency) and a former board member of KCTMO,[254] accused the council of having failed and betrayed its residents; characterising the fire as "entirely preventable", she added that "I can't help thinking that poor quality materials and construction standards may have played a part in this hideous and unforgivable event".[254][255] Sadiq Khan called on the government to appoint commissioners to run Kensington and Chelsea council until the May 2018 council elections.[256]
Edward Daffam of the Grenfell Action Group said, "They didn't give a stuff about us. We were the carcass and they were the vultures. North Kensington was like a goldmine, only they didn't have to dig for the gold. All they had to do was to marginalise the people who were living here, and that's what they were doing."[257]
In December 2020, it emerged that the building in which the council had re-housed Grenfell survivors was itself a severe fire hazard, requiring round-the-clock fire safety patrols.[258]
Social division
Grenfell Tower is in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, one of the wealthiest local authorities in the country, containing some of the most expensive houses in the world, and with the highest gap between rich and poor anywhere in the country.[259] Grenfell Tower was populated by poorer, mainly ethnic-minority residents. The Conservative-run council[260] was criticised for neglecting the borough's poorer residents, and some have blamed their neglect as a cause of the fire.[261]
In 2016, the council took £55 million in rent but only invested less than £40 million in council housing.[262] One journalist described the incident as an example of Britain's inequality.[263] Data released in June 2017 by Trust for London and New Policy Institute shows large divides between rich and poor in the borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The analysis found that it is a borough with some very high incomes, as well as the highest average incomes in London, but there are pockets of deprivation, particularly in the north end of the borough, including the ward in which Grenfell Tower is located.[264]
The philosophical difference of providing a high standard of public housing and providing the bare minimum to house only those most in need first occurred as the Lancaster West Estate was being built.[265] Grenfell and the finger blocks were built to Parker Morris standards;[265] the tower provided one- and two-bedroom flats for single occupiers or families without children. The incoming Conservative government revised the standards down, using the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 to replace the mandatory Space in the Home document.[266]
Underinvestment
After the fire, volunteer people and groups worked to help those made homeless and without possessions.[267] The volunteers criticised council officials for doing little to coordinate these efforts.[267] There were calls to jail those responsible for the fire.[268] Deborah Orr wrote, "We know that fire-safe cladding was available. The idea of being energy efficient and safe was not impossible, or even undesirable in theory. But fire-resistant cladding would have raised the cost for the whole building by an estimated £5,000. That sum may be what people died for."[269]
On 17 June 2017, MPs asked the council to describe why it had amassed £274 million of reserves, after years of underspending, and had not used any of its budget surplus to increase fire safety, given that residents had issued repeated warnings about the Grenfell Tower fire risk. The council actually used the surplus to pay top-rate council taxpayers a £100 rebate shortly before local elections which returned a Conservative council.[270][262] After the fire, some former residents of Grenfell Tower still had rent payment taken out of their bank account for the burnt-out property by the council.[271]
Residents approved initial plans for fire resistant zinc cladding but this was later changed to cheaper aluminium cladding with combustible polyethylene core which residents did not approve, saving nearly £300,000.[272]
Neglect
The council received further criticism for their lack of support on 18 June 2017.[273] Some families were reported to be sleeping on the floor in local centres four days after the event.[274] A leading volunteer in the relief effort said: "Kensington and Chelsea are giving £10 to the survivors when they go to the hotels – a tenner – there is money pouring in from all these amazing volunteers. We can't get access to this money."[274]
London mayor Sadiq Khan said "years of neglect" by the council and successive governments were responsible for what had been a "preventable accident".[275] There are calls for the council leader and some others to resign.[276]
Dawn Foster, contributing editor on housing for The Guardian, said that this was an "atrocity" that "was explicitly political" and "a symbol of the United Kingdom's deep inequality".[277]
Deregulation
Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn brought this to the attention of the House; he said these "terrible consequences of deregulation and cutting corners" stemmed from a "disregard for working-class communities".[278]
Sadiq Khan, London Mayor said:[236] "Those who mock health and safety, regulations and red tape need to take a hard look at the consequences of cutting these and ask themselves whether Grenfell Tower is a price worth paying." Patrick Cockburn of The Independent criticised deregulation of the building industry by the government, which he described as "cutting red tape". This was contrasted with the increasing complexity of processes faced by prospective benefits claimants including those with mental health issues. Cockburn said long inquiries were not necessary to establish what went wrong. Cockburn said that "The Government is clearly frightened that the burned bodies in Grenfell Towers will be seen as martyrs who died because of austerity, deregulation and outsourcing."[279] Writing in The Guardian, Alan Travis argued that fire safety had been compromised since the early 2000s by moving the responsibility for fire safety checks from the fire brigade to building owners and creating mandatory competition between Local Authority Building Control and private approved inspectors.[278]
Social murder
In his column on the disaster, Aditya Chakrabortty of The Guardian drew comparisons to the often lethal living and working conditions faced by the working classes and poor in Victorian Manchester, which Friedrich Engels characterised as social murder in his 1845 study The Condition of the Working Class in England. Chakrabortty stated that "those dozens of Grenfell residents didn't die: they were killed. What happened last week wasn't a 'terrible tragedy' or some other studio-sofa platitude: it was social murder . . . Over 170 years later, Britain remains a country that murders its poor."[280] The Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, John McDonnell also said that the fire amounted to social murder and that political decisions in recent decades led to it, and that those responsible should be held to account.[281]
Poor transparency
On 29 June 2017, Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council held its first full meeting since the fire. The council had tried to exclude the press and public from the meeting, citing safety concerns. Journalists sought an injunction to force the council to let them attend, which was granted. The meeting was adjourned shortly after it began, with members of the council's cabinet saying that to proceed would be prejudicial to the forthcoming public inquiry. Sadiq Khan and Robert Atkinson, Labour group leader on the council, both called for the council's entire cabinet to resign. Atkinson described the situation as "an absolute fiasco". Khan said that it beggared belief that the council was trying to hold meetings in secret when the meeting was the first chance the council had to provide some answers and show transparency. He said that some people were asking whether or not the council was involved in a cover up.[282][283] Conservative council leader Nicholas Paget-Brown resigned on 30 June 2017.[284]
Criticism of the media
Jon Snow, a veteran television journalist, used the MacTaggart Lecture at the Edinburgh International Television Festival to complain that the media was "comfortably with the elite, with little awareness, contact or connection with those not of the elite" and this lack of connection was "dangerous". He demanded "Why didn't any of us see the Grenfell action blog?"[285]
Fire and structural safety reviews
United Kingdom
In the days after the fire, UK local authorities undertook reviews of fire safety in their residential tower blocks, including Brighton and Hove,[289] Manchester, Plymouth, Portsmouth,[290] and Swindon.[291] Around 200 National Health Service trusts across the country were urged by NHS Improvement to check the cladding on their buildings, with particular attention being paid to those buildings housing in-patients.[292]
In London, councils affected included Brent,[290] Camden, Hounslow,[293] Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council,[294] Newham,[293] and Wandsworth.[295]
There are estimated to be about 600 high-rise blocks of flats in the UK that have similar cladding[296] and unspecified fire safety tests have been carried out on panels sent in by councils at the Building Research Establishment in Watford, on behalf of the Department for Communities and Local Government.[297] By 28 June 2017, 120 high-rise buildings in 37 different local authority areas were reported to have failed fire safety tests, a 100% failure rate of samples tested.[298] Councils had been instructed to begin with those buildings that caused the most concern, and every single one of those had failed the test.[299][300]
The government's fire safety tests were criticised for looking only at the cladding and not the insulation behind it, which had burned rapidly in the Grenfell Tower fire; testing the insulation is left to councils and landlords.[197][301] By 6 July 2017, only one of 191 samples tested had passed. It was announced that large-scale tests were to be done on a 9-metre (30 ft) high wall, simulating a fire breaking out of a window.[302]
In August 2017, it was announced that the 52-bed trauma unit at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford was to close for up to twelve months due to concerns over flammable cladding on the building and other "serious and embedded" fire safety issues.[303]
On 20 September 2017, it was revealed that combustible cladding had been identified on 57 buildings across Glasgow. It was also revealed that neither residents nor the fire service had been informed of this by Glasgow City Council. Scottish Housing Minister Kevin Stewart said that he expected Glasgow City Council to inform all relevant parties. MSP Bob Doris described the development as "deeply concerning".[304]
In October 2017, it was revealed that Slough Borough Council was hiring a fire appliance to be on standby at Nova House, a tower block which was deemed to have unsafe cladding and was privately owned. The council was negotiating with the building's owners to take possession as it was in a better position to deal with the issues affecting the safety of the building.[305]
Replacement of flammable cladding
Of 173 buildings tested, 165 have failed combustion tests conducted since the Grenfell fire.[306] There are calls for the government to give financial assistance to councils that have to carry out expensive building renovations. Councillor Simon Blackburn, chair of the LGA's Safer and Stronger Communities Board, said:[307]
The tragedy at Grenfell Tower has clearly exposed a systemic failure of the current system of building regulation. The government must commit to meet the full cost to councils of removing and replacing cladding and insulation systems. It is also imperative that this testing process moves quickly to identify what landlords should be replacing these systems with as soon as possible. With these latest test-fails affecting buildings owned by a range of different landlords across the country, the government also needs to make sure there is capacity within the housebuilding industry to take quick action to carry out the scale of remedial work that looks likely to be needed.
Leaseholders living in a tower block in Croydon have been told by a tribunal they must pay to remove Grenfell type cladding. This could lead some to financial ruin. The decision may be subject to appeal and could affect other properties where cladding failed fire tests. Steve Reed maintains faulty safety regulations were responsible for dangerous cladding being put up on many buildings and maintains the government should pay for replacement.[308]
On 29 June 2018, the government revealed that there were still 470 high rise apartment blocks with inflammable cladding. This is a rise of 156 on the previous total as private sector properties have been included; it is expected to rise by a further 170 when they have all been accounted for.[309]
In March 2019, it emerged that central government provisions for local councils to take charge of privately owned buildings to ensure safe cladding were failing in approximately 90% of cases, leaving tens of thousands of households stuck in buildings with unsafe cladding.[310]
In April 2019, the Department of Housing, Communities and Local Government published figures indicating that 40,000 people in the UK, including those in 16,600 homes across 163 private residential buildings, were currently living in tower blocks wrapped in the same kind of flammable cladding as Grenfell Tower.[311] A survey performed by the UK Cladding Action Group (UKCAG) found: many of these residents still face high bills to replace the cladding due to government funds being withheld; in some cases residents are running 24-hour fire watches; and residents' mental health in many cases has suffered.[312]
On 9 May 2019, James Brokenshire said £200m would be paid by the Government to replace cladding on privately owned blocks.[152]
Problems with replacement cladding
On 7 July 2018, BBC News reported that new cladding previously thought to be safe, which was to replace known flammable cladding similar to that used on Grenfell Tower, has itself failed fire safety tests in Dubai, Australia and the UK. The new cladding is composed of separate material components which individually are considered to be of "limited combustibility." As such, the cladding as a complete system had been presumed under BS8414 standards to not be a fire risk. The discovery that this new cladding has failed fire tests undermines existing testing policy.[313]
In 2019 a fire developed at Bolton University and eyewitnesses maintained the cladding helped spread the fire. 'Grenfell United', a group of survivors and bereaved people stated, “It brings back memories of Grenfell and we can’t believe that over two and a half years later this is happening. Our hearts go out to all the students affected. Hundreds of people go to bed scared every night in buildings covered with dangerous materials. When will this be treated as a national emergency? This cannot go on.”[314]
In February 2020 a survey of leaseholders from 117 housing developments by the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, a charity that supports leaseholders, 90 per cent of respondents said the government’s response to the ‘cladding crisis’ had been “no help at all.” [315]
Review of building regulations
Building regulations are currently under review in the light of the fire due to concerns with the rules and their enforcement.[316] There is concern over fire safety issues with many other buildings.[317]
On 30 August 2017, the Department for Communities and Local Government published the terms of reference for the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety. This independent review was led by Dame Judith Hackitt, who is a senior engineer and civil servant with experience as the Chair of the Health and Safety Executive. The review reported to both DCLG head, James Brokenshire (Sajid Javid at the time the report was commissioned) and Home Secretary, Sajid Javid (Amber Rudd at the time the report was commissioned). The two main aims of the review are firstly to develop improved building regulations for the future, with a focus on residential high-rise blocks, and secondly to provide reassurance to residents that their homes are safe.[318][319]
On 18 December 2017, Hackitt published her initial report. She described the entire building regulatory system as "not fit for purpose" and made interim recommendations for significant change.[316] The final report was published on 17 May 2018, outlining a number of key failings and recommendations.[320][321] The report did not recommend a ban on the use of combustible cladding on high rise buildings and Hackitt did say that she would support the government if it was to attempt to legislate a ban.[322][323] Recommendations will be reconsidered after the conclusion of the public inquiry. The government is consulting on a possible ban on combustible materials. It is unclear if this applies only to cladding or to insulation as well.[324]
In October 2018, the government announced plans to ban flammable cladding on newly built buildings that were over the height, as well as for those of certain types such as schools, care homes and student housing. The Fire Brigades Union have argued that it should be entirely banned, and that a ban should also apply to existing buildings.
Review of building materials
The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) commissioned "whole system" tests, which are designed to see how different cladding systems reacted in a fire. Seven combinations were tested, and six deemed dangerous. It reported in August 2017 that there were 228 buildings in the United Kingdom cladded using these methods. The seventh, a combination of aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding with a limited flammability filling and stone-wool insulation, was deemed safe. There are no existing buildings in the UK using this combination, but it could be used to reclad all the buildings that are currently using the other combinations. These findings will be used to help revise the Building Regulations.[325]
Other tower block risks
In August 2017, four 13-storey tower blocks, containing 242 flats, on the Ledbury estate in Peckham had their gas supplies cut off as a precaution. In the event of a gas explosion, they could be at risk of collapse. The four tower blocks, built between 1968 and 1970 using the same "large panel system" as Ronan Point; which partly collapsed in May 1968 after a small gas explosion in a flat knocked out a load-bearing exterior wall, causing a progressive collapse of one corner of the tower. There are fears that more tower blocks built using the same technique across the country may also be at risk.[326]
International
In Australia, authorities decided to remove similar cladding from all its tower blocks. It was stated that every tower block built in Melbourne in the previous 20 years had the cladding.[327][328] In Malta, the Chamber of Engineers and the Chamber of Architects urged the Maltese Government to update the building regulations with regards to fire safety.[329] On 27 June 2017, an 11-storey tower block in Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany was evacuated after it was found that the cladding was similar to that installed on Grenfell Tower.[330]
A month after the fire at Grenfell Tower the external cladding of the newly built 433-room Hilton Hotel at Schiphol airport in The Netherlands was partly removed, over concerns of fire safety.[331][332] Allegedly due to financial problems at the supplier, the material used did not meet the approved standards. Additional to the replacement, an external video system was installed specifically to detect fires. Also a university building in Rotterdam was found to have the same cladding and was subsequently closed and refurbished.[333] 'Dozens' of other buildings in The Netherlands allegedly suffer the same defects.[334]
In response to Grenfell Tower and similar high-rise fires in the Middle East involving exterior cladding, the United Arab Emirates updated its Fire and Life Safety Code in 2018 to mandate the use of the NFPA 285 fire safety test.[335]
Investigations
The local borough pledged to carry out a full investigation into the fire.[336] Prime Minister Theresa May ordered a full public inquiry, saying that people "deserve answers" to why the fire was able to spread as quickly as it did.[245]
In July 2017, the government offered an amnesty to those who had been illegally sub-letting[337] and a one-year immigration amnesty to those who came forward with information, though did not offer a full guarantee against deportation.[338] On 31 August 2017 Immigration Minister Brandon Lewis announced that the deadline to register for the one-year immigration amnesty for displaced undocumented residents of Grenfell Tower was to be extended by three months to 30 November 2017. Sir Martin Moore-Bick (who leads the public inquiry) wrote to the Prime Minister asking her to consider the long term future for these residents beyond their value as witnesses for the inquiry. These views were echoed by campaign groups BMELawyers4Grenfell and Justice4Grenfell.[339]
On 16 September 2019 it was reported that London Fire Brigade as a body have been interviewed by Metropolitan Police under caution in respect of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.[340] In a press statement, LFB Commissioner Dany Cotton said the Brigade had been subject to police investigation from just after the fire; hundreds of officers had given voluntary police interviews; and LFB would continue to assist investigators.[341]
Leilani Farha argued that the failings of Grenfell Tower were a breach of residents' human rights, because they were not sufficiently involved in the way the building was developed, notably safety issues, before the fire and are not sufficiently involved in the investigations after the fire.[342]
Criminal
On 15 June 2017, Metropolitan Police Commander Stuart Cundy announced that a criminal investigation had been opened to establish if there was any case for charges to be brought.[343] On 27 July 2017 Police issued a public notice to residents saying that they had "reasonable grounds" to suspect that both the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation "may have committed" corporate manslaughter. Senior representatives of both organisations are likely to face police interviews under caution. More than sixty companies and organisations are associated with Grenfell Tower, and police are keeping open all options for a range of possible charges.[344][345] These include manslaughter, corporate manslaughter, misconduct in public office and fire safety offences.[346]
In an interview with the London Evening Standard on 7 August 2017, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, said investigations are at an early stage and nothing is ruled out. Mrs Saunders said it was more important to build strong cases than to rush to court, and that the DPP had yet to see the evidence. Health and safety legislation and other criminal laws will be considered. If proven, the offence of Gross Negligence Manslaughter carries a maximum life sentence, with a guideline minimum of twelve years.[347][348] For such a charge the prosecution must show sufficient evidence to pass a four stage "Adomako Test" proving a reprehensible breach of duty of care which caused or contributed to the victims' death.[349]
On 7 June 2018, BBC News reported that the Met Police are investigating the London Fire Brigade for using the "Stay Put" policy. Possible criminal offences under the Health and Safety at Work Act are under consideration.[350]
As of 7 June 2019, thirteen interviews had been held under caution with more expected, and 7,100 statements had been taken from witnesses, family members, emergency service personnel and others.[351] In March 2019, it was revealed that no criminal charges are due to be brought before late 2021. The Metropolitan Police explained that all evidence had to be considered before a case could be put before the Crown Prosecution Service. Phase 2 of the public enquiry is unlikely to start before 2020, and no case can be brought until after the report has been published.[352]
Fraudulent claims
On 19 September 2017, Commander Stuart Cundy briefed that eight people were being investigated for allegedly making false claims to financial support in the name of fictitious victims.[110][111] By 1 June 2018, five people had been convicted for fraud offences after stating they were victims of the fire to claim financial support.[114][113]
New arrests were made in London on 7 June 2018 of a further nine people suspected of fraud.[353] Four were charged a day later. Three people were charged with fraud while one additional suspect was initially charged with drug and theft offences but was eventually charged with fraud on 19 July.[354][355] The other five were released under investigation.
By March 2020, twenty one people had been charged with fraud offences relating to the fire, with all of them being found guilty after twenty investigations by the Metropolitan Police and one investigation by the City of London Police Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department. They were given prison sentences totaling almost 90 years in total after fraudulently claiming around £1 million in pre-paid credit cards, hotel accommodation costs and other funds intended for the victims of the fire.
All of those convicted of fraud stated that they lived in the tower block and that their homes had been destroyed, and many said that members of their family had been killed. They spent their money on lavish holidays, expensive cars and gambling, and some even asked for more money after complaining about the food and WiFi in the hotels they were being housed in. Three of those convicted were also found to have been illegal immigrants living in the UK, and one man was caught with quantities of illegal drugs in his hotel room. Another man was also found to have committed a burglary. A woman who pretended to be a Grenfell victim was found to have made more than fifty false claims to insurers and to have also said she was present at the Manchester Arena bombing and the London Bridge attack just weeks earlier.[356][357][358][359][360][361][362][363][364][365]
Forensic search and recovery
Detailed investigations into the causes and possible criminal charges of manslaughter or breach of regulations are in progress. Search dogs, fingertip searches, DNA matching, fingerprinting, forensic dentistry and forensic anthropologists have been used. An external lift was fitted to the building to improve access.[1]
The scale of the search and recovery operation was challenging. Human remains were mixed within an estimated 15.5 tonnes (17.1 tons) of debris on every floor.[366] Time and care was taken to maintain a judicial standard and avoid mistaken identity, which could have caused further distress to surviving relatives. Disaster Victim Identification was expected by police to continue to 2018.[1]
Fire brigade
Following the Newsnight report of 7 July 2017, the LFB said issues encountered in its response to the fire would also form part of the police investigation.[66] LFB Commissioner Dany Cotton said in a Channel 4 News interview on 11 July 2017 that she expected reasonable criticism of the LFB response in the investigation and public inquiry.[82] Following criticism by surivors and victims families, Cotton retired early at the end of December 2019.[367] Her replacement from 1 January 2020 is Deputy Commissioner Andrew Roe.[368]
BBC Radio 4 reported on 16 August 2017 that the Fire Brigade was advised by KCTMO during the refurbishment and fire officers had been shown "fire safety features". Council opposition leader Robert Atkinson, structural engineer Paul Follows and building inspector Geoff Wilkinson all expressed shock that the fire had happened given prior consultation with LFB.[369]
London Fire Brigade said it had not given approval for the work, saying its legal powers are limited. It said firefighters regularly visit buildings to gain familiarity with the layout and equipment, but that this was not the same as a detailed inspection.[370]
Public inquiry
One day after the fire broke out, Prime Minister Theresa May announced a public inquiry into the causes of the fire. Two weeks later, Sir Martin Moore-Bick was appointed to lead it. He pledged that the inquiry would be "open, transparent and fair". The inquiry will run alongside the criminal investigations.
On 15 August 2017, Theresa May announced the terms of reference, accepting in full Moore-Bick's proposals. The inquiry plans to examine the cause and spread of the fire, the adequacy and enforcement of building regulations and fire protection measures, the actions of the council and KCTMO prior to the fire, and the responses of the London Fire Brigade, council and national government.[371] Labour Party politicians and some survivors called for the inquiry to include a broader examination of national social housing policy, which was not included in the terms of reference.[372][373][374] The Inquiry's public hearings started on 14 September 2017.[375]
The first report (Phase 1) from the inquiry was officially published on 30 October 2019, but had been leaked and publicised during the press embargo.[376] Originally due in spring 2019, the date was pushed back to October. Moore-Bick told survivors the timing disappointed him.[377]
Moore-Bick's report affirmed the exterior cladding was the primary reason the fire spread out of control, and that it did not comply with the building regulations. He praised the "courage and devotion to duty" of the firefighters but argued LFB suffered from "significant systemic failings" and that incident commanders were not trained to deal with a failure of compartmentalisation of this scale. The report was welcomed by survivors.[58] On 6 December, Dany Cotton announced she would retire earlier than planned. This followed calls from bereaved families and survivors of the disaster for her to quit.[378]
The inquiry resumed with Phase 2 on 28 January 2020.
Equality and Human Rights Commission report
The Equality and Human Rights Commission examined the response to the fire and found that authorities failed to put children’s best interests at the heart of their efforts, in breach of international obligations. It identified a lack of co-ordination among services, both in the immediate aftermath and a year later.
The Following Grenfell report (March 2019) observes that children who witnessed the fire, or who have lost a friend or part of their family, don't know where or how to access help because the services are not available. There are issues about the adequacy of training needed for public sector and other service providers to carry out their duties under the Equalities Act.[379]
The EHRC report expressed particular concern around the placing of disabled people, including wheelchair users, on upper storeys of tower blocks without any consideration about how they could escape in a fire or other emergency. The report considered disabled people had faced discriminatory treatment amounting to breaches of the right to life, the right to safe, adequate housing; and the right to freedom from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, further noting that degrading treatment continued after the fire with disabled people being housed in inaccessible premises.[380]
Civil lawsuit
On 11 June 2019, survivors and families of the victims of the fire filed a civil action complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia against Arconic and Celotex (both of which are headquartered in Pennsylvania), seeking an unspecified amount of money damages for various product liability claims.[381][382] The 420-page complaint alleges that the cladding and insulation were defective because they lacked fire retardant and were therefore combustible.[381][382] Whirlpool, the Michigan-based manufacturer of the Hotpoint refrigerator believed to have caused the fire, was also named as a defendant in the suit on the grounds that the refrigerator contained materials liable to catch fire.[381][382] Litigation is expected to take at least two and a half years due to the long process of discovery.[381]
By August, the defendants had exercised their right to remove the case to the appropriate federal court: the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.[383] In November 2019, Arconic resisted production of documents (already in the possession of its American lawyers at DLA Piper) on the basis that the cladding at issue had been manufactured by a French subsidiary, Arconic Architectural Products SAS, and that French law prohibits the production of commercial information in foreign legal proceedings without authorization by a French court.[384] According to its US corporate filings, as of November 2019, Arconic had already spent approximately £30 million on lawyers and advisers to respond to all the criminal and civil investigations, inquiries, and litigation arising out of the fire.[385]
Demolition
Grenfell Tower site manager Michael Lockwood told a public meeting on 26 July 2017 that the building would be covered in a protective wrap supported by scaffolding. This is to protect forensic evidence but would later allow the building to be taken down. The community will be consulted on how the space should be used after demolition.[386] As of September 2018, deconstruction is expected by 2022.[387]
Similar fires
The following are similar fires that spread through exterior wall assemblies (cladding, insulation, wall) containing combustible components. Most of them involved high-rise buildings.
United Kingdom and Isle of Man
- 1973 Summerland disaster – leisure centre fire in Douglas, Isle of Man, worsened by the ignition of flammable acrylic sheeting covering the building, led to at least 50 deaths.[49][48]
- 1991 Knowsley Heights fire – a fire in a tower block in Liverpool that had recently been fitted with rain screen cladding spread from the bottom to the top of the building via the 90 mm air gap behind the cladding.[388][389]
- 1999 Garnock Court fire – the fire in a tower block in Irvine, North Ayrshire, spread rapidly up combustible cladding,[175] resulting in one death and four injured.[390] The incident led to a parliamentary inquiry into the fire risk of external cladding and a change of the law in Scotland in 2005 requiring any cladding to inhibit the spread of fire.[391]
- 2005 Harrow Court fire – in a tower block in Stevenage, Hertfordshire, led to three deaths, 2 of them firefighters.[392]
- 2009 Lakanal House fire – in a tower block in Camberwell, South London, led to six deaths and at least twenty injured; an inquest "found the fire spread unexpectedly fast, both laterally and vertically, trapping people in their homes, with the exterior cladding panels burning through in just four and a half minutes."[393]
- 2010 Shirley Towers fire – two firefighters died after tower block fire rapidly escalated.[394]
- 2016 Shepherd's Court fire – in a tower block in Shepherd's Bush, West London, a faulty tumble-dryer caught fire on the seventh floor, 19 August 2016. The fire spread up six floors on the outside of the building, which is owned by Hammersmith and Fulham Council. There were no fatalities but some suffered smoke inhalation.[54][55][56][53]
- 2019 De Pass Gardens fire – a fire in a six-storey tower block in Barking, East London spread through all six floors.[395]
- 2019 The Cube fire – a fire in a six-storey student residence in Bolton, re-clad in 2018 with high-pressure laminate. The fire spread "extremely rapidly" through the top three floors of the building.[314][396]
Elsewhere
- 2007 fire at The Water Club (Atlantic City, New Jersey, US) – a fire that occurred as the building was nearing completion spread rapidly up aluminium composite panel cladding with a polyethylene core, from the 3rd floor to the top of the 41-floor building.[175][388]
- 2009 Beijing Television Cultural Center fire (China) – believed to have spread via insulating foam panels on the building's facade.[399][400]
- 2010 Wooshin Golden Suites fire (Marine City, South Korea) – spread within 20 minutes from the 4th floor to the top of the 38-storey building, which featured flammable aluminium composite cladding with a polyethylene core, along with insulation made of glass wool or polystyrene.[175][397][398][388]
- 2010 Shanghai fire (China) – destroyed a 28-storey high-rise apartment building, killing at least 58 people; flammable polyurethane insulation applied to the outside of the building was reported to have been a possible contributory factor.[401][402]
- 2012 Al Tayer Tower fire (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) – the rapid spread of the fire, which started in a first-floor balcony and spread to the top of the 40-storey (34 residential, six parking floors) tower, was attributed to aluminium sandwich panels featuring a thermo-plastic core.[175][403]
- 2012 Mermoz Tower fire (Roubaix, France) – saw fire spread rapidly up flammable cladding, resulting in one death and six injured.[233][404]
- 2012 Tamweel Tower fire (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) – spread across dozens of floors via flammable aluminium cladding.[52][405][403]
- 2014 Lacrosse Tower fire (Melbourne, Australia) – a fire started on an eighth-floor balcony took just 11 minutes to travel up 13 floors to the building's roof, spreading via the same type of aluminium composite cladding as was used in Grenfell Tower.[406]
- 2015 fire at The Marina Torch (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) – fire spreading up the cladding of several dozen storeys from the 50th floor to the top of the building.[52][407] A second fire occurred on 4 August 2017, again spreading rapidly up the exterior of the building.[408]
- 2015 fire at The Address Downtown Dubai (United Arab Emirates) – cladding fire in a supertall hotel and residential skyscraper.[174]
- 2016 Ramat Gan high-rise fire (Ramat Gan, Israel) – a small fire in a flat quickly spread to the top of a 13-storey tower block via combustible external insulation panelling.[409]
- 2016 Neo Soho fire (Jakarta, Indonesia) – the fire occurred while the building was still under construction and spread rapidly up dozens of floors via flammable cladding.[410][411][412][413]
- 2018 Employees Provident Fund building fire (Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia) – the fire occurred due to sparks from maintenance works on the building ignited the outer cladding of the building. This is the first fire involving cladding in Malaysia. No one was reported hurt. The fund stated that "there has been no compromise to the data integrity or members' savings in any manner".[414][415]
- 2018 Edifício Wilton Paes de Almeida in São Paulo, Brazil was devastated by fire and collapsed. Neighbouring buildings also caught fire.[416] The fire caused at least four deaths, with a further 40 people missing as of May 2018.[417]
- 2019 Neo200 apartment building fire – a fire ignited on the 22nd floor of the apartment building located at 200 Spencer Street, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and rapidly spread to the 29th floor. It was the second fire at the building; the first happened on 31 December 2015.[418] The tower was known to have the same type of cladding as the Grenfell Tower and the fire was found by a council inspection to have affected sprinkler systems and alarm systems. It was also reported that extra smoke alarms were installed just two weeks before the fire and that some residents had put plastic covers over their smoke alarms. Other residents refused to leave, complicating the evacuation process.[419][420][421]
See also
- Barking fire
- Building regulations in the United Kingdom § Part B. Fire safety
- The Dalmarnock fire tests – A televised highrise fire-test, conducted in Scotland 2006
- Fire escape
- Fire services in the United Kingdom
- History of fire safety legislation in the United Kingdom
- King's Cross fire – The 1987 London fire that likewise spread upward due to the trench effect, where hot gases will adhere to nearby surfaces and inclined planes
- Khadija Saye, a victim of the fire
- Skyscraper fire – List of notable tower block fires
- List of high-rise facade fires
Notes
- This article uses the post-renovation floor numbering scheme, except where noted.
- The floors were originally numbered Ground, Mezzanine, Walkway, Walkway + 1, Floor 1, Floor 2, ..., Floor 20.[9] After the 2015–16 renovation, the floors were numbered Ground, Floor 1, Floor 2, ..., Floor 23. The flat numbers followed a pattern in which the last digit indicated a flat's position on the floor, and the preceding digits indicated the original number of the floor. Thus Flat 16 was in the northeast corner of Floor 1, and Flat 26 was directly above it. The 2015–16 renovation changed the floor numbers but not the flat numbers. Therefore Flat 16 was now on Floor 4, the former Floor 1.[10]
- The inquiry ruled in 2019 that the resident was not to blame.[58]
- The most senior officers of the London Fire Brigade take it in turns to be on call at night, to respond to a major incident.[72]
References
- "LATEST: Grenfell Tower fire investigation". Mynewsdesk. Archived from the original on 20 June 2018. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
- "Insurance cost of Grenfell Tower fire". Retrieved 9 February 2019.
- Heathcote, Edwin (14 June 2017). "London tower block's refurbishment raises fire safety questions". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Planning Statement" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Proposed Sections" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Concerns raised about Grenfell Tower 'for years'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Buildings of London – Grenfell tower". emporis.com. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower floorplan shows how 120 flats were packed into highrise". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower regeneration Project – Planning Application, Design and Access Statement" (PDF). The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. October 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "The Grenfell Tower Inquiry with Eddie Mair – 61 Station Manager Walton – BBC Sounds". www.bbc.co.uk.
- Whitbread, Nigel. "Lancaster West Estate: An Ideal For Living?". Constantine Gras. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Dixon, Hayley; Swinford, Steven; Knapton, Sarah; Mendick, Robert (14 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower inferno a 'disaster waiting to happen' as concerns are raised for safety of other buildings". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
Many of those that survived only did so by ignoring official advice to stay in their rooms and close their front doors until the fire was over. ... All fire safety regulations are focused on containing a fire within a building, but this cannot happen if it is spreading along the outside.
- "Grenfell inquiry: Stay-put advice 'good' says firefighter". BBC. 4 September 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
- "Fire alarm at Grenfell Tower was never meant for residents". The Times. 7 July 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
- "Eight failures that left people of Grenfell Tower at mercy of the inferno". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2017.
- "Grenfell: previous fire in 2010 caused no injuries". Inside Housing. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 20 April 2019.
- MacErlean, Neasa (17 March 1996). "Councillors take back seat as tenants go it alone". The Observer. p. 9.
- "Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation – The Board". Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea TMO. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Turner, Camilla (9 July 2017). "We are just as important as everyone else, say Tower homeowners". Sunday Telegraph.
- "Grenfell Tower Regeneration Project Engagement Statement" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Subscribe to read | Financial Times". www.ft.com. Retrieved 14 June 2020. Cite uses generic title (help)
- "Grenfell Tower Q&As – remote heat metering". KCTMO / webcache.googleusercontent.com. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Harley Facades Limited" (PDF). web.archive.org. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2020.
- "Grenfell: Cladding firm suggested use of cheaper panels". BBC.
- Prynn, Jonathan (15 June 2017). "Revealed: 'Chimney' Grenfell Tower cladding is used on blocks across London". London Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) Order 2010 – Approval of Details Reserved by Condition(s)" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. 30 September 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Arconic Architectural Products/Arconic Inc. "Reynobond Europe ACM ACP Aluminium Composite Material". arconic.com. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
Reynobond aluminium composite panels is an aluminium panel consisting of two coil-coated aluminium sheets that are fusion bonded to both sides of a polyethylene core.
- Knapton, Sarah (16 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower refurbishment used cheaper cladding and tenants accused builders of shoddy workmanship". Retrieved 28 June 2017.
Omnis Exteriors said it had been asked to supply cheaper cladding to installer Harley Facades which did not meet strict fire-retardant specifications. The safer sheets were just £2 per square metre more expensive meaning that for an extra £5,000 the building could have been encased in a material which may have resisted the fire for longer. The cut-price version is banned from use in the US and Germany for tall buildings.
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/dec/23/tory-donor-was-key-shareholder-in-grenfell-cladding-firm-arconic
- Hills, Joe (15 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower: Original proposed contractor was dropped to reduce cost of refurbishment project". ITV News. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Waite, Richard. "Grenfell Tower: residents had predicted massive fire". The Architects Journal. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- "Rydon Maintenance Press Statement – Grenfell Tower". Rydon Maintenance. Rydon maintenance limited. Archived from the original on 24 June 2017.
- Davies, Rob (16 June 2017). "Complex chain of companies that worked on Grenfell Tower raises oversight concerns". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
- "Rydon lands Grenfell Tower refurbishment". rydon.co.uk. July 2016. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017.CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
- "Grenfell Tower, Notting Hill". Harley Facades. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Residents warned of 'catastrophic' Grenfell Tower block fire three years ago – but pleas 'fell on deaf ears'". The Telegraph. Press Association. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- Grenfell: report criticised 'inadequate' management 12 years before fire The Guardian
- Wahlquist, Calla (14 June 2017). "Fire safety concerns raised by Grenfell Tower residents in 2012". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Another Fire Safety Scandal". Grenfell Action Group. 21 February 2013. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Roberts, Rachel. "Grenfell Tower blogger threatened with legal action by council after writing about safety concerns". The Independent. Retrieved 7 June 2018.
- "Two women feared dead in Grenfell Tower were 'threatened with legal action' for raising alarm about fire safety". The Independent. 18 June 2017.
- "Residents warned of fire risk at London tower block gutted by blaze". ABC News. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Grenfell Action Group (20 November 2016). "KCTMO – Playing with fire!". wordpress.com. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower gas pipes left exposed, despite fire safety expert's orders". The Guardian. 27 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Reality Check: Why don't all high-rises have sprinklers?". BBC News. 15 June 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- Grenfell fire warnings issued months before blaze, documents show The Guardian
- Clarke, Tom. "The first documents that show there were official warnings about fire safety at Grenfell Tower months before tragedy". Independent Television News. Retrieved 7 August 2018.
- "Service to honour Summerland dead". BBC. 4 September 2006. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "'Chilling' similarity to 1973 fire tragedy". IOM Today. 20 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- Thorp, Liam (3 July 2017). "Should Knowsley Heights blaze have been a warning from history for Grenfell?". Liverpool Echo. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
- "Lakanal House tower block fire: deaths 'could have been prevented'". The Guardian. 28 March 2013. Retrieved 20 April 2019.
- "The chronicle of a tragedy foretold: Grenfell Tower". The Guardian. 17 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Faulty tumble dryer 'caused Shepherd's Bush tower block fire'". BBC News. 6 October 2016. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
- Grossman, David (21 August 2017). "Ministers 'must act on faulty white goods fire risk'". BBC News. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
- Smithers, Rebecca (21 August 2017). "London fire brigade calls for urgent action on electrical goods safety". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 August 2017.
- Hosken, Andrew (27 June 2017). "Fire brigade raised fears about cladding with councils". BBC. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Twenty-seven minutes and Grenfell Tower fire had taken hold: so why weren't residents told to get out?". The Daily Telegraph. 5 June 2018. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- Booth, Robert (30 October 2019). "Grenfell Tower fire survivors welcome damning inquiry report". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
- Malkin, Bonnie; Siddique, Haroon (14 June 2017). "What we know so far about the London tower block fire". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "London fire: Six killed as Grenfell Tower engulfed". BBC News. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Witness statements of Michael Dowden – Grenfell Tower Inquiry". Grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- "Dr Barbara Lane's expert report – Grenfell Tower Inquiry". Grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- "London Fire Brigade Operational Response – Grenfell Tower Inquiry". Grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- Inquiry, 26 June 2018, p86-90
- Millward, David (14 June 2017). "'The whole building has gone': Witnesses describe screams and tears at Grenfell Tower fire in London". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Sweeney, John (7 July 2017). "Grenfell firefighters 'hampered by equipment'". BBC. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
- Bulman, May (16 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower graphic: what we know about how the fire spread". The Independent. Independent Print. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- Erlanger, Steven; Castle, Stephen (13 June 2017). "Fire Engulfs Apartment Tower in London". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Everything we know about the Grenfell Tower blaze: Why did it happen and how many are injured?". The Daily Telegraph. 16 June 2017.
- Horton, Helena (14 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire: Muslims Awake for Ramadan Among Heroes Who Helped Save Lives". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
-
- "Muslims awake for Ramadan may have saved lives after raising alarm for horrific London tower blaze". The Independent. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "'Proud to be a Londoner': After deadly Grenfell Tower fire, people respond with acts of love and kindness". Washington Post. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- Doward, Jamie (17 June 2017). "London fire brigade boss: 'It was a massive risk, but it's our job to go in'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower report: Strip danger cladding off all tower blocks". Evening Standard. 30 October 2019. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
- "The Grenfell inquiry: tragic revelations of failure, buck-passing ... and bravery". The Guardian. 4 August 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
- "Four ministers were warned about tower block fire risks". BBC News. 19 June 2017. Archived from the original on 19 June 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2017.
- "Grenfell firefighter describes frantic search for 12-year-old girl who died in blaze". 29 June 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
- "Firefighters encountered panicked group of 14th floor of Grenfell Tower". ITV. 6 July 2018. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
- "London fire: Who are the victims?". BBC News. 3 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Who are the victims?". ITV.com.
- Hartley-Parkinson, Richard. "Video shows man making rope out of bed sheets to try and escape". Metro.co.uk. Associated Newspapers. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Tom Towers (14 June 2017). "Riot police protect firefighters from falling debris Grenfell tower block fire". Metro.co.uk. Associated Newspapers. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
- Long, Jackie (11 July 2017). "Dany Cotton: only a 'miracle' could have saved Grenfell". Channel 4 News. Retrieved 12 July 2017.
- Symonds, Tom (4 June 2018). "Grenfell Tower: Why was 'stay put' advice so disastrous?". BBC. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
- "Firefighters battle huge blaze in London". news.com.au. News. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "London fire: Police confirm 12 dead in Grenfell Tower blaze". The Independent. 15 June 2017. Retrieved 25 July 2017.
- Diwakar, Vinod (14 June 2017). "Statement on fire at Grenfell Tower". NHS.
- Brigade, London Fire. "London Fire Brigade – Latest Incidents". London-fire.gov.uk.
- Kutner, Max (16 June 2017). "London firefighters used drone to battle Grenfell tower blaze". Newsweek. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire updates: Victims identities, investigation". Business Insider. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2018.
- Hunt, Elle (13 June 2017). "London fire: fears of people trapped as major blaze engulfs tower block – latest". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017. Live coverage, frequently updated.
- Witte, Griff (14 June 2017). "London high-rise fire leaves multiple people dead, dozens injured and others missing". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "AP News: London fire latest: Grenfell Tower fatalities confirmed after residents trapped". The Telegraph. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Withnall, Adam (14 June 2017). "London Fire: Structural engineer is monitoring Grenfell Tower's stability after devastating blaze". Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Kensington and Chelsea: a wealthy but deeply divided borough". The Economist. 23 June 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- Murphy, Emma (14 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire: At least 12 dead after inferno engulfs London tower block with death toll set to rise". ITV. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
- Matthew Moore, Media Correspondent. "Corbynista site Skwawkbox published fake news about Grenfell death toll, Ipso rules". The Times. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- James Ball BuzzFeed Special Correspondent (16 June 2017). "No, There Isn't A "D-Notice" Banning The Media From Reporting Details Of The Grenfell Fire". Buzzfeed.com. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- "Corbyn supporters 'spread fake news' about Grenfell Tower death toll". The Daily Telegraph. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- Andrew Harrison. "Can you trust the mainstream media?". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- Weaver, Matthew; Hunt, Elle (14 June 2017). "London fire: six people confirmed dead after tower block blaze – latest updates". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Grossman, David; Newling, Dan (9 October 2017). "Dramatic Grenfell baby story probably never happened". BBC News.
- "Grenfell 'miracle baby': Why people invent fake victims of attacks and disasters – BBC News". Bbc.co.uk. 29 June 2017. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Who were the victims?". BBC News. 30 May 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
-
- May Bulman (16 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire: Met Police confirm 30 dead and 12 remain critical". The Independent. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Six-month-old baby 'found dead in mother's arms'". ITV News. 28 June 2017. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower Inquiry: 22 May 2018, p17 of pdf transcript". Grenfell Tower Inquiry. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower final death toll stands at 71". BBC News. 16 November 2017. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
- Brokenshire, James (11 June 2018). "Oral statement to Parliament – Grenfell one year on". GOV.UK. Retrieved 25 June 2018.
- "Commander Stuart Cundy updates on Grenfell Tower policing operation". Met Police. 16 November 2017. Archived from the original on 19 November 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Seventy-nine people feared dead". BBC News. BBC. 19 June 2017. Archived from the original on 19 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
- "Grenfell death toll 'may be below 80'". BBC. 19 September 2017. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
- Dixon, Hayley (19 September 2017). "Grenfell death toll may fall as 'fraudsters have invented missing loved ones'". The Telegraph. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
- Powell, Tom (19 September 2017). "Police probe 'fraud cases and thefts' following Grenfell Tower disaster". Evening Standard. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
- "Fraudster who claimed father died in Grenfell fire is jailed – BBC News". BBC. 1 June 2018. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower fraudster admits making up family deaths". BBC. 2 November 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2017.
- "UPDATE: Number of victims of Grenfell Tower fire formally identified". MPS. 27 September 2017. Archived from the original on 4 July 2017. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
- "Around 255 people escaped Grenfell Tower fire, police say". 10 July 2017.
- Bulman, May (20 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire: Undocumented migrants could still be missing". The Independent. Archived from the original on 20 June 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2017.
Underreporting of illegal subtenants could also mean the death toll is higher than currently assumed, it is feared. ... Members of the community have also raised concerns that large "swathes" of foreign nationals who lived in the block and may have been undocumented have simply "disappeared" and are not on any missing lists, raising concerns that they have either fled the site or are among the dead but unaccounted for.
- "Sadiq Khan Backs Amnesty On Grenfell Tower Illegal Immigrants". Archived from the original on 22 June 2017. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- Samuel Osborne (28 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire: Total death toll from devastating blaze may not be known until the end of the year, say police". The Independent. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
- "No final Grenfell Tower death toll this year, police say". BBC News. 28 June 2017. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: candlelit vigil for victims after grief turned to anger at earlier protests". The Daily Telegraph. 17 June 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "Grenfell: Back to the school". BBC. 19 September 2018. Retrieved 19 September 2018.
- "Stillborn baby believed to be youngest victim of blaze".
- Sherwood, Harriet (23 August 2017). "Inquests open into deaths of four Grenfell Tower fire victims". Guardian. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- "All the victims of the Grenfell Tower fire named so far". The Guardian. 23 November 2017. Retrieved 23 November 2017.
- Amelia Gentleman (28 June 2017). "Grenfell residents' groups compile lists of victims and survivors". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
-
- "London fire: What happened at Grenfell Tower?". BBC. 1 July 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
- "'Hundreds' died in Grenfell Tower fire, says shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott". The Independent. 24 June 2017. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
- "Video: Locals claim Grenfell Tower fire death toll 'in hundreds'". BelfastTelegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- "Lily Allen: 'What people would like is a more honest count of how many people have actually died'". Archived from the original on 20 June 2017. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: Inquiry opens with tribute to stillborn baby". BBC. 21 May 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- "UPDATE: Number of victims of Grenfell Tower fire formally identified is 18". Metropolitan Police Service. Archived from the original on 4 July 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "London fire: Sense of community shines through". BBC online. 15 June 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
- "Kensington And Chelsea Councillor Kim Taylor-Smith Forced To Apologise After Bereaved Father Walks Out Of Grenfell Meeting". Huffington Post. 27 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
- "'At least 20 suicide attempts' after Grenfell Tower fire, faith leader claims". The Independent. 27 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
- Razzall, Katie (24 August 2017). "Grenfell Tower: The mental health toll". BBC News. British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 23 December 2020.
- Evans, Martin (23 July 2017). "Emergency service workers suffering post-traumatic stress following terror attacks and Grenfell fire". The Telegraph. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
- Ferrari, Nick (21 August 2017). "London Fire Chief Says She Has Received Counselling Since Grenfell". LBC Radio. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
- Siddique, Haroon (21 August 2017). "London fire chief says she has had counselling for Grenfell Tower trauma". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
- Clare, Sean (9 August 2017). "Grenfell Tower: 60 trauma counsellors brought in for firefighters". BBC. Retrieved 10 August 2017.
- "NHS issues advice on mental health care for people affected by terror attacks and Grenfell". NHS. NHS. 6 July 2017. Retrieved 5 August 2017.
- Most Grenfell Tower survivors show signs of PTSD – council study The Guardian
- Sawer, Patrick (21 June 2017). "New laws on van hire may be needed to counter terror, says Met Commissioner". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 21 June 2017. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: 'Asbestos particles in smoke' could be risk for survivors". BBC. 21 September 2018. Retrieved 21 September 2018.
- Cockerell, Jennifer (21 September 2018). "Grenfell Tower: Coroner leading inquest calls on NHS to set up long term screenings for survivors". The Independent. Retrieved 21 September 2018.
- Hopkins, Nick (28 March 2019). "Grenfell: toxic contamination found in nearby homes and soil". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
- Sample, Ian (28 March 2019). "From benzene to BaP: the toxins strewn across Grenfell". the Guardian. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
- Evans, Steve (22 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire insurance loss estimated at up to £1 billion". Reinsurance News. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
- Booth, Robert (6 October 2017). "Ministers 'refusing to pay for fire safety measures' after Grenfell". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 July 2019.
- "Grenfell Tower: Safety cash not released, councils say". BBC. 7 October 2017. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: Extra £28m to help fire recovery". BBC News. 22 November 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Police ask for £38m to fund investigation". BBC News. 4 January 2018. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower: Government to pay £200m for safer cladding". BBC. 9 May 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
- Siddique, Haroon (2 July 2017). "Residents near Grenfell Tower will not have to pay rent, says council". The Observer. Retrieved 2 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire caused by faulty fridge on fourth floor, reports suggest". Independent. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower: Fire started in Hotpoint refrigerator, say police". BBC News. 23 June 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- Monaghan, Angela (23 June 2017). "Hotpoint tells customers to check fridge-freezers after Grenfell Tower fire". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- Clark, Greg (23 June 2017). "Department responds to police identification of Hotpoint fridge freezer involved in Grenfell Tower fire". GOV.UK. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: Safety clearance for fridge-freezer model". BBC. 15 May 2019. Retrieved 27 May 2018.
- Electricity problems at Grenfell Tower 'never resolved' BBC
- "Grenfell Tower inquiry: Expert says fridge-freezer started blaze". BBC. 27 November 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
-
- "Why is cladding banned in the US and Germany used on buildings in the UK?". Metro. 15 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: fire-resistant cladding is just £5,000 more expensive". The Times. 16 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower Regeneration Project" (PDF). Max Fordham. October 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 June 2017.
-
- Loeb, Josh (15 June 2017). "E&T Engineering and Technology – Grenfell Tower fire raises fears over lax building regulations". Archived from the original on 15 June 2017.
- Austin, Jon (18 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower refurbishers over insulated building to avoid repeat job". Express Newspapers. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- Griffin, Andrew (14 June 2017). "The fatal mistake made in the Grenfell Tower fire". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Siddique, Haroon, "Grenfell Tower fire: police considering manslaughter charges", The Guardian, 23 June 2017.
- Booth, Robert,"Grenfell Tower: insulation was not certified for use with flammable cladding", The Guardian, 13 July 2017.
- Booth, Robert, "Flammable Grenfell Tower cladding 'passed' by council officer in 2015", The Guardian, 14 July 2017.
- "Reynobond PE Colorweld 500" (PDF). Reynbond. October 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
- "Reynobond Aluminum Composite Material" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
- Watson, Leon (14 June 2017). "Did faulty fridge cause Grenfell Tower fire? The theories fire chiefs will examine". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Waugh, Rob (14 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower had just had an £8.7m refurb – but was new cladding to blame?". Metro.co.uk. Associated Newspapers. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Fire Risks From External Cladding Panels – A Perspective From The UK". Probyn Miers Ltd. 2016. Archived from the original on 11 November 2016.
-
- "Knowsley Heights (Fire)", Hansard, 20 January 1997.
- "Memorandum by the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (ROF 31)" Archived 18 September 2003 at the Wayback Machine, Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs, July 1999, p. 10.
- Brook, Benedict; Brennan, Rose. "London Fire: Melbourne skyscraper fire, caused by shoddy cladding, may have been a warning for London". news.com.au. News. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- Poh, Weng (26 October 2015). "Stop Fire Spreading Up, Up and Away". Sourceable. Archived from the original on 9 March 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- Foley, James M. (1 May 2010). "Modern Building Materials Are Factors in Atlantic City Fires". Fire Engineering. Archived from the original on 28 September 2015. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- "London fire latest: Grenfell Tower anger grows as death toll could soar above 100". 16 June 2016. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
- Bergin, Tom (16 June 2017). "Maker of panels at London Tower cautioned on high-rise fire risk". Reuters. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "Fire safety in high-rise buildings – Our fire solutions" (PDF). Arconic Europe. 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "Reynobond Europe – A2 fire solution". Arconic Europe. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: Cladding firm ends global sales for tower blocks", BBC News, 26 June 2017.
- "London fire: Grenfell Tower cladding 'linked to other fires'". BBC News. 15 June 2017. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- "Fire performance of facades – Guide to the requirements of UK Building Regulations" (PDF). Centre for Window and Cladding Technology. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 July 2019. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "FP/14/03563 – New floor areas, new overcladding & windows, new heating system, reconfigured podium and entrance. – Grenfell Tower, Grenfell Road, LONDON, W11 1TH". Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Building Control. Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- Wilkinson, Geoff (14 June 2017). "If regulations were followed, the Grenfell Tower inferno should have been impossible". The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- Rizzo, Alessandro. "Grenfell Tower cladding is banned in UK, Government says". Sky News. Sky UK. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
- Booth, Robert (21 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower: 16 council inspections failed to stop use of flammable cladding". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 June 2017.
- Davies, Rob; Sample, Ian (16 June 2017). "Experts urge ban on use of combustible materials in tower blocks". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017.
- Marrs, Colin (31 July 2017). "Grenfell Tower: shocking tests results revealed". Architects' Journal.
- Mitchell, Jonathan; Chaplain, Chloe (16 June 2017). "Residents furious over claims fire-resistant cladding would have cost just £5,000". Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Brady, Jeff (24 June 2017). "Some U.S. States Relax Restrictions On Cladding Suspected In Grenfell Tower Fire". NPR News. Washington, D.C.: National Public Radio. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
- Thomas-Peter, Hannah (28 June 2017). "Why the Grenfell Tower cladding is not used in the US". Sky News. Sky UK Limited. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "NFPA 285 – Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components". Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association. 2012.
- White, Nathan; Delichatsios, Michael (2015). Fire Hazards of Exterior Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components. New York: Springer. p. 62. ISBN 978-1-4939-2898-9.
- Geren, Ronald L. (2016). Applying the Building Code: Step-by-Step Guidance for Design and Building Professionals. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. p. 222. ISBN 978-1-118-92076-3. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
- Kirkpatrick, David D.; Hakim, Danny; Glanz, James (24 June 2017). "Why Grenfell Tower Burned: Regulators Put Cost Before Safety". The New York Times. New York: The New York Times Company. p. A1. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
- "Tower cladding tests after Grenfell fire lack transparency, say experts", The Guardian, 26 June 2017.
- "Update – Friday 16th June". Celotex. Archived from the original on 19 June 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
Our records show a Celotex product (RS5000) was purchased for use in refurbishing the building ... It is important to state that Celotex manufacture rigid board insulation only. We do not manufacture, supply or install cladding. Insulation is one component in a rainscreen system, and is positioned in that system behind the cladding material.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: police considering manslaughter charges". The Guardian. 23 June 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "Health & Safety Datasheet" (PDF). Celotex. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Fire Hazard of Polyurethane and Other Organic Foam Insulation Aboard Ships and in Construction". US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Archived from the original on 28 April 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- McKenna, Sean Thomas; Hull, Terence Richard (2016). "The fire toxicity of polyurethane foams". Fire Science Reviews. 5. doi:10.1186/s40038-016-0012-3.
- Boyle, Danny; Knapton, Sarah (22 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower victims 'poisoned by cyanide' after insulation 'released highly toxic gas'". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 22 June 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- Junod, Thomas L. (1976). "Gaseous Emissions and toxic hazards associated with plastics in fire situations – a literature review" (PDF). Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio. NASA. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 May 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- "Rainscreen Compliance Guide" (PDF). Celotex. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 August 2016. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- Cohen, David (16 April 2018). "Leaked Grenfell dossier reveals how disastrous refurbishment turned tower into a 'tinderbox'". The Evening Standard. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- Schraer, Rachel; Goodman, Jack (14 June 2017). "London fire: Why are people told to 'stay put'?". BBC News. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower regeneration newsletter July 2014" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower Regeneration Newsletter, May 2016" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea TMO. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 June 2017.
- Grenfell Tower 'stay put' advice lasted nearly two hours, BBC; accessed 14 November 2017.
- Grenfell Tower ‘stay put’ fire safety protocol ‘ditched after two hours’, Bournemouth Daily Echo; accessed 14 November 2017.
- Pasha-Robinson, Lucy (14 June 2017). "Residents inside 24-storey London flats on fire were told to stay inside in case of blaze". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Sadiq Khan condemns "bad advice" given to Grenfell Tower residents in the event of a fire, Harper's Bazaar, accessed 14 November 2017.
- Booth, Robert; Bowcott, Owen (4 June 2018). "What we learned from day eight of the Grenfell Tower inquiry". the Guardian. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower Inquiry – Witness Statement of Dany Cotton". 27 September 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
- "Grenfell: 'Stay put' advice suspended on 112 London housing blocks". Construction News. 14 June 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
- "Grenfell fire commander feared residents would die if evacuated". Belfast Telegraph. 20 September 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower Inquiry – 6 July 2018". 6 July 2018. Retrieved 2 August 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower Inquiry – 25 September 2018". 25 September 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
- Lack of equipment 'hampered Grenfell rescue effort' The Guardian
- London fire: Most services would have sent high ladder to Grenfell BBC
- Grenfell Tower fire: 'Half an hour' high ladder delay BBC
- "Grenfell inquiry: Firefighter recalls mission to save girl". BBC News. 29 June 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
- Furby, Gareth (23 June 2017). "London tower fire: Why were taller fire platforms not used?". BBC News. Retrieved 20 April 2019.
- Grenfell Tower fire: 'Urgent review' of firefighting resources requested BBC
- "London fire crews will use smoke hoods to save lives from toxic fumes in rescues". Evening Standard. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
- Grenfell Tower: Council knew of emergency access fears BBC
- Weaver, Matthew (13 September 2017). "Only 2% of UK's council tower blocks have full sprinkler system". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
- Greenwood, George; Langton, Katie (13 September 2017). "Grenfell fire chief calls for sprinklers in tower blocks". BBC. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
- Doward, Jamie (17 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower: the chronicle of a tragedy foretold". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
If the building had been provided with sprinklers then that fire, if it started in the kitchen, would never have got out of the kitchen and nobody except the firefighters who would have gone there to mop up would have known about it.
- Geoff Wilkinson (14 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower: residents had predicted massive fire". Architects' Journal. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "London fire: Tower victims 'may never be identified'". BBC News. 17 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
- Eder, Sebastian (14 June 2017). "Feuerwehr-Chef im Gespräch: Warum ein Feuer wie in London in Deutschland unwahrscheinlich ist" [Fire Department Chief in Interview: Why a Fire like the one in London is unlikely in Germany]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Architects fear Grenfell review will avoid ban on flammable cladding The Guardian
- "Four ministers were warned about tower block fire risks". BBC News. 19 June 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- Revealed: the tower block fire warnings that ministers ignored Archived 18 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian
- "Building Regulations - Approved Document B 2006 (Fire Safety) Volume 1 (Dwelling Houses)" (PDF). All-Party Parliamentary Fire Safety & Rescue Group. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
- Booth, Robert (4 February 2019). "Experts warned of fire-spread risks two years before Grenfell". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 February 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
- "The politics of a tragedy". The Economist. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- "Labour's politicisation of the Grenfell Tower disaster is sinister". Daily Express. 17 December 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- "Grenfell is political. The right can't make that fact go away". The Guardian. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- "Why we must politicise the tragedy of Grenfell Tower". 16 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- "Owen Jones: The old Tory order is crumbling – it's taken Grenfell for us to really see it". The Irish Times. 22 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: support for people affected - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "London fire: Prime minister orders full public inquiry". BBC News. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- Kuenssberg, Laura (15 June 2017). "Huge challenge of Grenfell will test fragile government". BBC News. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "The Guardian view on Grenfell Tower: Theresa May's Hurricane Katrina". The Guardian. 15 June 2017. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "PM criticised for failing to meet Grenfell Tower fire survivors". Sky News. Sky UK. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower latest: London fire death toll rises to 30 as anger grows over safety failings". The Telegraph. London, UK. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
- "Theresa May heckled by angry crowds". BBC News. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
- Parris, Matthew. "Matthew Parris on Theresa May". The Times. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Andrea Leadsom confronted over PM not meeting Grenfell Tower victims". Sky News. Sky UK. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- May, Theresa (11 June 2018). "I made mistakes but one year on I'm going Green for Grenfell, writes Theresa May". The Evening Standard. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
- Slawson, Nicola (9 June 2017). "Labour rounds off remarkable election with narrow victory in Kensington". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- Amelia Gentleman, "'Unforgivable': local Labour MP vents fury over Grenfell Tower fire" Archived 15 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine
- Grenfell Tower fire: Sadiq Khan calls on PM to appoint commissioners BBC
- Grenfell campaigner calls for return of local assets as reparation The Guardian
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/dec/18/fire-hazards-found-at-block-housing-grenfell-tower-survivors
- "London fire: A visual guide to what happened at Grenfell Tower". BBC News. BBC. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "LOCAL ELECTIONS 2014: Conservatives control Kensington and Chelsea for 50th year in a row". SW London. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
- "Notting Hill pastor blames 'disgusting' treatment of poor for inferno". London Evening Standard. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "Kensington and Chelsea council has £274m in reserves". The Guardian. 19 June 2017.
- "Look at Grenfell Tower and see the terrible price of Britain's inequality". The Guardian. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "New analysis of poverty in Kensington & Chelsea shows big divides between rich and poor". Trust for London.
- iNews.co.uk. "A perfect storm of disadvantage: the history of Grenfell Tower". Retrieved 5 June 2017.
- Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. "Wornington Green SPD – Second Draft Planning Brief: Parker Morris Standards". Archived from the original on 5 June 2018. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- Sabur, Rozina (17 June 2017). "Donations to fire victims may go to waste because council is failing to help co-ordinate efforts, volunteers say". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
- ‘Jail those responsible’: how Grenfell Tower residents’ grief turned to rage Archived 17 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian
- After Grenfell Tower unbridled anger won’t make our homes any safer Archived 17 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian
- "Council attacked for stockpiling £274m despite Grenfell Tower residents' calls for fire safety improvements". The Independent. 17 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower residents 'still having rent payments taken out of bank accounts'". Independent. 1 July 2017.
- Grenfell cladding approved by residents was swapped for cheaper version The Guardian
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Government staff sent in to Kensington and Chelsea Council". BBC News. BBC. 18 June 2017. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
- "MP: 'Charity is doing government's work after Grenfell. It's an outrage, it's appalling'". The Independent. 18 June 2017. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
- "London fire: Sadiq Khan says tragedy caused by years of neglect". BBC News. 18 June 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
- Macaskill, Ewen (18 June 2017). "Council sidelined in Grenfell Tower response as leader refuses to quit". The Observer. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
- Foster, Dawn (14 June 2017). "A Very Political Tragedy". Jacobin. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- Travis, Alan (28 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire: was Tory austerity to blame or do problems date back to Blair?". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower is Theresa May's Katrina moment – her political career cannot survive it". The Independent. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- Chakrabortty, Aditya (20 June 2017). "Over 170 years after Engels, Britain is still a country that murders its poor". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 June 2017. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- Press Association (16 July 2017). "John McDonnell says Grenfell Tower disaster was 'social murder'". The Guardian. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Kensington council halts meeting". BBC News Online. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Fury as council halts meeting in 'absolute fiasco'". Sky News. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- "Kensington and Chelsea council leader steps down over response to Grenfell Tower fire". Metro. Associated Newspapers. 30 June 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
- Ruddick, Graham (23 August 2017). "Jon Snow: reporting on Grenfell made me feel on wrong side of social divide". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
- "Backlash over Kensington Tories' Grenfell Tower leaflet". BBC News Online. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
- Chris Johnston (14 November 2017). "Tories ask rich voters to rate importance of Grenfell Tower fire". Guardian newspapers.
- Richard Vaughan (13 November 2017). "Tory activists condemned for asking residents to rate Grenfell Tower tragedy on scale of 0–10". i-news.
- James, Ben. "Sprinklers to be added to two high rise blocks in Brighton as safety review ordered". The Argus. Newsquest. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- "Cladding fire tests failed by 27 high-rise blocks". BBC News Online. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
- Haworth, Thomas. "Swindon tenants 'have no need to fear fire'". Swindon Advertiser. Newsquest. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
- Parker, Fiona (23 June 2017). "NHS urged to check buildings for flammable cladding following Grenfell blaze". Metro. Associated Newspapers. Retrieved 24 June 2017.
- Mills, Jen (15 June 2017). "How many more buildings in London have the same cladding as Grenfell Tower?". Metro.co.uk. Associated Newspapers. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "London fire: Protests held as fire anger increases". BBC News. 17 June 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
- "Council statement following Grenfell Tower fire". Wandsworth London Borough Council. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- Patrick Grafton-Green (22 June 2017). "Six hundred high rise blocks in UK have 'similar' cladding to Grenfell Tower". Standard.co.uk. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
- Robert Booth (26 June 2017). "Tower cladding tests after Grenfell fire lack transparency, say experts". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: More high-rises fail fire safety tests". BBC. 28 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Grenfell death toll cover-up claim is rejected by Michael Fallon". Yahoo! News. 27 June 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "More high-rises fail fire safety tests". BBC. 25 June 2017. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
- "Government not testing tower blocks for the same deadly insulation as Grenfell, amid accusations of a 'quick fix'". The Telegraph. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "Grenfell fire: Cladding faces large-scale fire tests". BBC News Online. Retrieved 6 July 2017.
- "Hospital trauma patients in Oxford relocated over 'serious' cladding and fire safety issues". Sky News. Retrieved 1 August 2017.
- "'Combustible cladding' found on 57 blocks in Glasgow". BBC News Online. Retrieved 20 September 2017.
- "Fire crew watches Slough tower block 24/7 because of unsafe cladding". Sky News. Retrieved 21 October 2017.
- Walker, Peter (5 September 2017). "Eight out of 173 social housing blocks pass fire safety tests on cladding". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
- Press Association, "Grenfell Tower: cladding system in 111 buildings fails the latest round of tests", The Guardian, 2 August 2017.
- Tower residents told to pay £500,000 to replace Grenfell-style cladding The Guardian
- Booth, Robert (28 June 2018). "Grenfell Tower-style cladding identified in 470 high-rise blocks". the Guardian. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
- Booth, Robert (21 March 2019). "Councils' powers to remove Grenfell-style cladding 'useless'". the Guardian. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
- Rahim, Zamira (8 April 2019). "40,000 people still live in deadly Grenfell-style tower blocks". The Independent. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
- Booth, Robert (26 April 2019). "Mental health toll on people in flats with Grenfell-style cladding revealed". the Guardian. Retrieved 26 April 2019.
- Cook, Chris (7 July 2018). "Replacement cladding fails fire safety test". BBC News. Retrieved 7 July 2018.
- Robert Booth; Mattha Busby (16 November 2019). "Grenfell United raises concerns over cladding after Bolton student fire". The Guardian. Retrieved 16 November 2019.
- "Predatory investors exploit leaseholders' cladding dilemma". amp.ft.com.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Building safety cuts corners, says review". BBC. 18 December 2017. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- Grenfell Tower: Government to review building regulations BBC
- Javid, Sajid (30 August 2017). "Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: publication of terms of reference". GOV.UK. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
- Javid, Sajid (30 August 2017). "Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: terms of reference". GOV.UK. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- "Subscribe to read". Financial Times. Retrieved 17 May 2018. Cite uses generic title (help)
- Booth, Robert (17 May 2018). "Grenfell review condemns 'race to the bottom' in building safety practices". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
- "Hackitt says she would support government ban on combustible cladding". Building. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
- "Government will consult on cladding ban". BBC News. 17 May 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
- Grenfell-style cladding could be banned on tower blocks, government says The Guardian
- Association, Press (25 August 2017). "Grenfell fire: 228 buildings at risk across UK". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
- London tower blocks residents ordered out over gas safety fears The Guardian
- Lagan, Bernard (19 June 2017). "Australia rushes to strip dangerous cladding after Grenfell disaster". The Times.
- Knaus, Christopher (16 June 2017). "South Australia to audit Adelaide buildings for flammable cladding". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2017.
-
- "London inferno: engineers urge updating of regulations". Times of Malta. 19 June 2017. Archived from the original on 21 June 2017.
- "London fire: Architects back call for holistic review of building regulations". Times of Malta. 21 June 2017. Archived from the original on 21 June 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: German flats cleared amid cladding fears". BBC News Online. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "Brandgevaar dwingt Hilton Schiphol tot nieuwe gevel". Retrieved 8 May 2018.
- "FIRE HAZARD MAKES HILTON A'DAM TO RE-CLAD – Tweha -the bonding people-". Tweha.com. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
- "Onderzoek bevestigt: gevelplaten bouwdeel C voldoen niet aan huidige normen voor brandveiligheid". 17 January 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
- "Door heel Nederland staan gebouwen met brandgevaarlijke gevelpanelen". Trouw.nl. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
- Rousseau, Oscar (3 March 2019). "Focus on façade R&D as UAE's updated fire code protects buildings". Construction Week Online. ITP Media Group. Retrieved 29 December 2019.
- "Council 'threatened blogger with legal action' over Grenfell Tower warnings". Metro. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower illegal subletting amnesty announced by Sajid Javid". Sky News. 2 July 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower survivors could be deported in 12 months despite government immigration amnesty". The Independent. 5 July 2017. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
- Snowdon, Kathryn (31 August 2017). "Grenfell Tower Immigration Amnesty For Residents Slammed As 'Travesty' By BMELawyers4Grenfell". Huffington Post. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: Fire brigade interviewed by police". BBC. 16 September 2019. Retrieved 16 September 2019.
- Cotton, Dany (16 September 2019). "London Fire Brigade police interview". LFB. Retrieved 17 September 2019.
- UK may have breached human rights over Grenfell Tower, says UN The Guardian
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Police open criminal investigation into blaze that killed 17 as fears grow death toll could reach 100". The Independent. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Police say Grenfell manslaughter charges possible". BBC online. 27 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
- "Met says Grenfell Tower Council may have committed corporate manslaughter". The Guardian. 28 July 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Police considering manslaughter, corporate manslaughter and misconduct charges, hearing told". Retrieved 14 December 2017.
- Bentham, Martin (7 August 2017). "People responsible for Grenfell Tower disaster may face criminal charges, says prosecutor". Standard. Retrieved 7 August 2017.
- Grenfell fire: criminal charges with long prison terms not ruled out The Guardian
- "Homicide: Murder and Manslaughter". CPS. 7 August 2017. Retrieved 7 August 2017.
- "Police probing fire service over Grenfell Tower disaster". BBC. 7 June 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2018.
- "Grenfell fire: Police carry out 13 interviews under caution". BBC. 7 June 2019. Retrieved 7 June 2019.
- Dibelius, Georgina (6 March 2019). "Investigation into Grenfell fire 'criminal offences' unlikely to pass findings until 2021". Metro. Associated Newspapers. Retrieved 6 March 2019.
- "Nine new arrests re Grenfell Tower fraud". Met Police. 7 June 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2018.
- "Grenfell Tower investigation: Three charged with fraud and another with drug offences". Mynewsdesk. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- "Man charged with fraud in relation to Grenfell Tower". Mynewsdesk. Retrieved 19 July 2018.
- "The fraudsters who took advantage of Grenfell". Sky News. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- "Woman jailed for three years over fraudulent Grenfell and terror attack insurance claims". Sky News. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- "Grenfell fire fraudster jailed for scam". 18 December 2018. Retrieved 28 February 2019.
- "Man jailed for fraud in relation to Grenfell Tower". Mynewsdesk. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
- "Three further people charged with fraud linked to the Grenfell Tower fire". Mynewsdesk. Retrieved 1 May 2019.
- "Man charged with fraud offence". Mynewsdesk. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
- "Man jailed for £75,000 Grenfell handouts fraud". 5 September 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2019.
- "Grenfell Tower: Man who falsely claimed he survived fire jailed for £96k fraud". Sky News. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
- "Two jailed for Grenfell Tower-related fraud". Mynewsdesk. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
- "Grenfell Fraudster Who Wrote 'Glenfell' as Address Jailed for Five Years over £32,000 con | The Crown Prosecution Service". CPS.gov.uk. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
- "Police start fingertip search of Grenfell Tower rubble in hunt for 'hidden victims'". Evening Standard. 5 July 2017. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
- "Dany Cotton: London Fire Brigade chief to quit early". BBC. 6 December 2019. Retrieved 6 December 2019.
- Clifton, Katy (10 December 2019). "Sadiq Khan appoints Andy Roe as London's new fire commissioner after Dany Cotton resigns". Evening Standard. Retrieved 10 December 2019.
- Hosken, Andrew (16 August 2017). "London Fire Brigade advised on Grenfell refurbishment". BBC. Retrieved 16 August 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower: London Fire Brigade denies it signed off on refurbishment work". The Independent. 17 August 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2017.
- "Grenfell fire: Terms of reference published". BBC. 15 August 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- "Grenfell fire inquiry to consider cause and council response". The Guardian. 15 August 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2017.
- "Grenfell inquiry could be 'too narrow', Jeremy Corbyn warns". The Guardian. 30 June 2017. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower fire: Inquiry 'can and will provide answers'". BBC. 14 September 2017. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
- Grenfell inquiry accused of focusing on junior firefighters The Guardian, 2019
- Grenfell survivors fear inquiry judge will side with establishment The Guardian
- Booth, Robert (6 December 2019). "London fire chief Dany Cotton resigns after Grenfell criticism". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 December 2019.
- Doward, Jamie (10 March 2019). "Grenfell children 'didn't know where to turn', says damning report". The Observer. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
- "Disabled people had rights breached before and after Grenfell fire, says watchdog". 14 March 2019.
- Wood, Sam (11 June 2019). "London high-rise inferno that killed 72 people blamed on Pa. companies in Philly lawsuit". The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved 12 June 2019.
- Gorman, Steve (11 June 2019). "U.S. companies sued over London's deadly Grenfell Tower fire". Reuters. Retrieved 14 June 2019.
- Murrell, David (7 August 2019). "Why a Group of British Plaintiffs From a London Apartment Fire Are Suing in Philly Court". Philadelphia. Metro Corp.
- Evans, Judith (19 November 2019). "Grenfell cladding manufacturer declines to release documents". Financial Times. FT Group. Retrieved 23 May 2020.
- Booth, Robert (27 November 2019). "Grenfell cladding firm has spent £30m defending its role in disaster". The Guardian. Guardian News & Media Limited. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
- "Grenfell Tower to be covered in protective wrapping". BBC. 27 July 2017. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
- "Grenfell Tower's shell will haunt the skyline until 2022". The Times. 9 September 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
- Nathan White; Michael Delichatsios (20 July 2015). Fire Hazards of Exterior Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components. Springer. pp. 37–40. ISBN 978-1-4939-2898-9.
-
- "Warnings over 'deathtrap' high-rise building cladding 'ignored' for decades". The Telegraph. 17 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "How might we avert another tragedy like the Grenfell Tower fire?". The Guardian. 15 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Man dies in tower block inferno". Scotland Herald. 12 June 1999. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
-
- Vevers, Dan (15 June 2017). "London tower fire: Concerns over cladding stretch back years". STV. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "How 1999 Scottish tower block fire led to regulation change – BBC News". BBC News. Bbc.co.uk. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "Errors revealed in fire report". BBC News. 18 May 2006. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
- Wainwright, Oliver; Walker, Peter (14 June 2017). "'Disaster waiting to happen': fire expert slams UK tower blocks". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
- "Fatal Fire Investigation, Shirley Towers". Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service. 8 April 2013. p. 12. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- "Barking fire: Blaze breaks out in east London flats". BBC News Online. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
- Hardy, Jack (30 July 2020). "Grenfell-style tragedy averted at tower block after fire brigade stopped stay-put advice, report finds". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 1 August 2020.
- "Fire guts high-rise building in Busan". The Korea Times. 1 October 2010. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "High-rise apartments defenseless against fire". The Korea Times. 3 October 2010. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- Andrew Jacobs, China TV Network Apologizes for Fire, The New York Times, 10 February 2009
- "What Sparked TVCC? Experts and architects weigh in on how one of Beijing's most modern buildings took flame so quickly". caijing.com.cn. 19 February 2009. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "What made the London highrise fire so horrific? Tower's cladding may have helped spread blaze". Toronto Star. 15 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Deadly Fire Shows Risks of China's Building Boom". TIME. 18 November 2010. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "The Torch blaze reignites concerns over cladding used for Dubai towers". The National. 9 March 2015. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "London fire: Grenfell Tower 'renovated with deadly cladding'". The Sydney Morning Herald. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Cladding issue causes further headache for fire-hit Tamweel Tower". Arabian Business. 10 October 2016. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Cladding in London high-rise fire also blamed for 2014 Melbourne blaze". The Guardian. 15 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Hundreds evacuated after fire engulfs Dubai tower". Al Jazeera. 21 February 2015. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- "Large fire rips through Dubai's Torch Tower". BBC News Online. Retrieved 4 August 2017.
- "Hundreds of Israeli buildings 'as vulnerable' as London's Grenfell Tower". Times of Israel. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "A Perspective On High Rise Building Fires Involving The Façade". Asia Pacific Fire & MDM Publishing Ltd. 10 April 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Massive fire crawls up multiple floors in uninhabited Neo Soho apartment building, one worker injured – Coconuts Jakarta". 10 November 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "pinfa – N-75-09 Jakarta high-rise cladding fire". Pinfa.org. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- "Apartemen Neo Soho Terbakar". Detik. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
- Zolkepli, Farik (13 February 2018). "EPF building catches fire – Nation | The Star Online". www.thestar.com.my. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
- hermesauto (13 February 2018). "Fire in Malaysia's EPF building caused by flammable cladding: Official". The Straits Times. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
- Hartley-Parkinson, Richard. "Block of flats collapses in Sao Paulo, Brazil, after fire rips through building". Metro. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
- Xinhua (14 May 2018). "Sao Paulo fire: search for victims' bodies discontinued".
- Schetzer, Bianca Hall, Aisha Dow, Alana (31 December 2015). "Spencer Street apartment fire: CBD building known to have illegal rooming houses". The Age. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- "Subscribe to The Australian – Newspaper home delivery, website, iPad, iPhone & Android apps". Myaccount.news.com.au. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
- Mannix, Simone Fox Koob, Robyn Grace, Liam (4 February 2019). "'Same as Grenfell Tower': Cladding fears as fire rips through Melbourne CBD apartment building". The Age. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
- Grace, Simone Fox Koob, Robyn (4 February 2019). "Extra fire alarms put in a fortnight before blaze ripped through tower". The Age. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
Further reading
- O'Hagan, Andrew (7 June 2018). "The Tower". London Review of Books.
- Hilton, Matthew. What colour was the smoke? A tragedy of Errors.
External links
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Grenfell Tower fire. |
- Official website
- London Fire Brigade Operational Response | Grenfell Tower Inquiry Transcripts of logs
- Justice4Grenfell campaign group
- Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: interim report
- Firefighter gives first-hand account of Grenfell Tower rescue mission
- Rydon Construction case study on the refurbishment
- BBC news reports
- CTBUH Skyscraper Center – Grenfell House
- Kensington Planning Application for renovation works
- Kensington Building Regulations record for Grenfell Tower
- West London Grenfell Tower on fire, multiple casualties confirmed (Recorded LIVE FEED) on YouTube
- Potton, Edward; Ares, Elena; Wilson, Wendy (August 2017). "Tackling fire risk in high rise blocks". House of Commons Library, UK Parliament. Cite journal requires
|journal=(help) Provides an overview of the legal framework under which fire risks in tower blocks are managed in England - London Fire Brigade – Grenfell Tower fire update
- Met Police – UPDATE: Grenfell Tower fire investigation
- NHS Statement on fire at Grenfell Tower
- Police Public Appeal For Photos and Videos
- London fire: Who are the victims? (BBC News)
- Product Notice – Hotpoint Fridge Freezer at hotpointservice.co.uk
- Dany Cotton interview Channel 4 News 11 July 2017
- LFB Video of plastic backed fridge fire
- Grenfell Tower fire (The Guardian)
- GOV.UK Grenfell Tower Documents Collection
- James MacTaggart Memorial Lecture: Jon Snow
- Grenfell Tower: The 21st floor – BBC Newsnight (TV report)
- The 21st floor – Katie Razzall – BBC Newsnight (article)
- The victims of the Grenfell Tower fire (The Guardian)
- Graphics, photographs and timeline of fire spread (BBC)
- Grenfell Tower Wall (BBC)
- Reality Check: Money promised to survivors (BBC)
- Grenfell Tower: What happened (BBC)
- Grenfell Tower Inquiry Daily Podcast (BBC)
- Grenfell Tower Inquiry hearing videos (YouTube)
- Reynobond Aluminum Composite Material (PDF), Alcoa Architectural Products, November 2012 – brochure for the cladding used and other claddings made by the same company, quoting their safety ratings with respect of flame spread and smoke developed.
- Two Years on from Grenfell – Two Years on from Grenfell, Carl Hunter looks at Document B the core fire safety document underpinning the industry.
.svg.png.webp){kind=small}
.svg.png.webp){kind=small}
