British Rail Class 143

The British Rail Class 143 is a diesel multiple unit, part of the Pacer family of trains introduced between 1985 and 1986.

British Rail Class 143 Pacer
GWR 143603 at Dawlish
Refurbished interior as used in service by Great Western Railway.
In service1985 – present
ManufacturerHunslet-Barclay and Walter Alexander
Order no.
  • 31005 (DMS)
  • 31006 (DMSL)[1]
Family namePacer
ReplacedFirst generation DMUs
Constructed1985–1986[1]
Entered service1985
Refurbished1990s/2001–2002/2015-2016[2]
Number built25 sets
Number in service15 sets
Number scrapped2 sets (both due to fire)
Formation
  • 2 cars per set
  • DMS+DMSL[2]
Diagram
Fleet numbers
  • 143001-143025 (sets, as built)
  • 55642-55666 (DMS)
  • 55667-55691 (DMSL)[4]
Capacity
  • 62S (DMS)
  • 60S (DMSL)[1]
Operator(s)
Depot(s)
Line(s) served
Specifications
Car body constructionSteel[2] underframe. Aluminium alloy body and roof.
Car length15.546 m (51 ft 0 in)[3]
Width2.695 m (8 ft 10 1⁄8 in)[3]
Height3.515 m (11 ft 6 3⁄8 in)[3]
DoorsTwin leaf pivot[2]
Articulated sections2
Wheelbase9.000 m (29 ft 6 3⁄8 in)[3]
Maximum speed75 mph (121 km/h)
Weight
  • 24 t (24 long tons; 26 short tons) (DMS)
  • 24.5 t (24.1 long tons; 27.0 short tons) (DMSL)[1]
Prime mover(s)
Engine type10-litre[6] turbo-Diesel
Cylinder count6
Power output
  • Cummins: 225 hp (168 kW) at 2100 rpm[6]
    Leyland: 205 hp (153 kW)[1] at 1950 rpm
Transmission
Train heatingEngine waste heat, ducted warm air[3]
BogiesNone, Ax1[3] fixed axle
Braking system(s)Air[3]
Safety system(s)
Coupling systemBSI[7]
Multiple workingClasses 14x, 15x and 170[2]
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in) standard gauge

During the 1980s, British Rail (BR) was interested in replacing its first generation diesel multiple units, particularly in the use of railbuses to service its lightly used branch lines. It was decided to develop such a vehicle with a high level of commonality with the widely used Leyland National bus, leading to its modular design serving as the basis for the design. Several single and two-car prototypes were constructed and evaluated, leading to an initial production batch by British Leyland, designated as the Class 141 units. BR, seeking to procure improved derivatives of the Class 141, placed an order with the manufacturers Hunslet-Barclay and Walter Alexander to construct their own variant, the Class 143.

Entering operational service during the mid 1980s, the Class 143 embodied several advances over the original model in terms of ride quality and reliability. During its operating lives, the type was tasked with various passenger services across the United Kingdom; being initially operated in the North-East of England, all units were subsequently transferred to other regions, including Wales and South-West England.

Due to their non-compliance with the Rail Vehicle Accessibility (Interoperable Rail System) Regulations 2008, the Pacer family began to be withdrawn during the late 2010s ahead of the 1 January 2020 deadline. Some fleets were given dispensation to operate until 31 December 2020.[8][9] While modifications for compliance were proposed by rolling stock companies, no train operator took up the option. Great Western Railway retired their Class 143 fleet in December 2020[10] while Transport for Wales were granted an extension until May 2021[9]

Background

By the beginning of the 1980s, British Rail (BR) operated a large fleet of first generation DMUs, which had been constructed in prior decades to various designs.[11] While formulating its long term strategy for this sector of its operations, British Rail planners recognised that there would be considerable costs incurred by undertaking refurbishment programmes necessary for the continued use of these aging multiple units, particularly due to the necessity of handling and removing hazardous materials such as asbestos. In light of the high costs involved in retention, planners examined the prospects for the development and introduction of a new generation of DMUs to succeed the first generation.[12]

In the concept stage, two separate approaches were devised, one involving a so-called railbus that prioritised the minimisation of both initial (procurement) and ongoing (maintenance & operational) costs, while the second was a more substantial DMU that could deliver superior performance than the existing fleet, particularly when it came to long distance services.[12] While the more ambitious latter requirement would ultimately lead to the development of the British Rail Class 151 and the wider Sprinter family of DMUs, BR officials recognised that a cheaper unit was desirable for service on the smaller branch lines that would not be unduly impacted by lower performance specs or a high density configuration. As such, work to progress both approaches was undertaken by BR's research department during the early 1980s.[12]

During this period, a number of prototypes were constructed to explore different designs and approaches for implementing the railbus concept. One such vehicle was a single two-car unit, designated as the Class 140, that was constructed between 1979 and 1981.[13] This prototype was introduced with much fanfare during June 1981.[13] Initial testing with the Class 140 uncovered several issues, such as difficulty detecting the type via track circuits, this was reliably resolved by swapping the material of the brake blocks from a composite to iron.[12] Two less easily-addressable drawbacks were the high level of noise generated during transit, particularly on older jointed rails, which was a consequence of the railbus's direct connection between the underframe and suspension with the body that transmitted impact forces across the body. It was also observed that the inclusion of strengthening members in the mass-produced bus body added significantly to the overall production cost, which eliminated much of the cost advantage that was the primarily goal of the type.[12]

The Class 140 was viewed to be an overall success, and thus BR issued an order for an initial production model, designated Class 141, to British Leyland during 1984 with production commencing thereafter.[12] During its early years of service, the Class 141 experienced numerous issues, particularly with the transmission and ride quality; work undertaken at BR's direct resulted in the quick development of numerous improvements to at least partially address these shortcomings. When it came to ordering more railbuses, however, it was decided that instead of placing these follow-on orders for further Class 141, it would be more desirable to procure improved derivatives of the Class 141.[12] Accordingly, BR placed orders for two new models of the Pacer family, these being the Class 142 and Class 143 respectively.[12]

Design

The Class 143 shared a high degree of similarity to the design of the Class 141. However, one major area of change is that both the Class 142 and Class 143 featured a noticeably wider body, instead of adhering to the width of the standard bus as per the Class 141; specifically, the width was expanded to the maximum amount permissible to remain within the loading gauge.[12] This resulting in an increased internal area to accommodate passengers within, enabling a three-by-two seating arrangement to be installed for a total capacity of 121 seats. The increased seating was particularly useful as, in addition to their use on rural feeder services, the Class 143's use on short range urban services had been foreseen by BR planners.[12]

Both the bodies and underframes were designed for interchangeability, as had been specified by BR. To achieve this, they were manufactured upon jigs.[12] They had been designed so that the entire body could be replaced during a mid-life refurbishment/reconstruction, and that the replacement body would not be limited to the exact same dimensions either. The underframe area, in addition to its structural role, accommodated all of the propulsion apparatus along with the majority of electrical gear.[12] As a cost-saving measure, the manufacturers were directly to make use of road bus-standard equipment in several areas, including passenger fittings and the general cab layout, along with other areas wherever possible.[12] Unlike the Class 141, which featured automotive-standard wiring for the traction equipment with resulting poor performance, railway-grade wiring for the traction and braking circuits was mandated by BR for both the Class 142 and Class 143 to yield greater reliability.[12]

As originally built, the traction arrangement of the Class 143 consisted of a Leyland TL11 200 HP engine, a Self-Changing Gears mechanical automatic gearbox and a Gmeinder final drive unit on each car driving only a single axle.[14] This propulsion arrangement was in part taken from the Leyland National bus, as well as shared with the earlier Class 141.[12] Unlike the Class 141, a microprocessor-based controller for the automatic transmission was used from the onset, allowing the reliability issues posed by defective relay logic and poor earthing present on the predecessor to be entirely avoided. Another improvement was the installation of auto-couplers and auto-connectors that enabled the Class 143 to work in multiple with the Class 150 Sprinter DMUs.[12]

Both axles (one driving per coach at the inner end) were fitted directly to the chassis rather than being mounted on bogies, unlike traditional DMUs. This uncommon arrangement has been attributed with resulting in the Class 141 units possessing a relatively rough ride, especially when traversing jointed track or points. Their combatively poor ride quality has been said to be a major factor in the type's general unpopularity amongst passengers. As a positive result from BR's experiences with the Class 141, the Class 143 featured an improved suspension arrangement to enhance passenger comfort, this consisted of a wider spring base and double dampers being installed, features that had been deemed necessary by BR to provide sufficient levels of performance, and had been retrofitted onto all of the older Class 141s as well.[12]

Operations

During their early years, the Class 143 was originally worked in the North-East of England. Subsequently, the fleet was entirely transferred from the region to both Wales and South-West England.[15]

The Rail Vehicle Accessibility (Interoperable Rail System) Regulations 2008[16] and the subsequent Persons of Reduced Mobility - Technical Specification for Interoperability (PRM-TSI) require that all public passenger trains must be accessible by 1 January 2020. As originally delivered, the Class 143 does not meets this requirement and has to be withdrawn without modifications to become compliant. During the 2010s, the rolling stock leasing company Porterbrook proposed an extensive refurbishment of both the Class 143 and 144 units with the purpose of satisfying the diverse needs of this requirement; it was noted that the envisioned modifications would necessitate a significant reduction in the number of seats available.[17]

Great Western Railway is one such operator of the Class 143. Its units have been mainly used on short distance services around Exeter, but had previously been common for various services in the Bristol area as well. At one point, as part of the franchise's plans to modernise its fleet, Great Western Railway planned to withdraw their remaining eight units by December 2019 via a cascade programme that would see the type being entirely replaced with Class 150s.[18] On 11 December 2019, the Department for Transport issued a dispensation, allowing Great Western Railway to continue to operate its Class 143 fleet up until 31 December 2020.[8] The Fleet was withdrawn in December 2020. [10]

Unlike most other stock on the UK network, Class 143s (in common with other Pacers) lack bogies, instead having single axles at each end of the vehicle (Red Boxes).

Incidents

On 17 October 2004, Wessex Trains unit 143613, forming a service from Bristol Temple Meads to Weston-super-Mare with 143621, caught fire between the site of the former Flax Bourton railway station and Nailsea and Backwell. Fire services took two hours to get the blaze under control. Of the 23 passengers and crew, three were treated on-site for the effects of smoke inhalation. One carriage was completely burnt out, and the other was badly damaged, causing the train to be written off.[19] The line through Nailsea was closed until 03:30 the following morning, when the train was hauled to St Philip's Marsh depot for examination.[20] The unit was later taken to Crewe Works where it was stored,[20][21] then later to Cardiff Canton TMD where it was scrapped.[22] The Rail Safety and Standards Board issued a report into the incident, concluding that the fire was caused by electrical arcing between the live starter motor cable (which had damaged insulation) and the unit's underframe, causing accumulated oily residues to ignite.[23]

On 16 January 2020, 143 603 had several windows smashed in by waves and sea debris while running along the sea wall at Dawlish during stormy weather, causing minor injuries to one passenger.[24]

Fleet details
Class Operator Number Year Built Cars per Set Unit nos. Notes
Class 143 Transport for Wales 15 1985-1986 2 143601–602/604–610/614/616/622–625
Stored 7 143603, 143611, 143617-621
Scrapped 2 143613, 143615 143613 & 615 destroyed after fire damage. 613 in 2004 & 615 in 2005.
Preserved 1 143612
Arriva Trains Wales livery
Great Western Railway livery
Table of withdrawals
YearQuantity in
service at
start of year		Quantity
withdrawn		Numbers
2004251143613
2005241143615

Named units

Several units formerly had names:

Liveries

Interiors
  • Arriva Trains Wales Cab
  • Wessex Trains
  • Wales and West 'Valley Lines'
  • Arriva Trains Wales
  • First Great Western
  • Great Western Railway

References

Citations
  1. Fox 1987, p. 41
  2. "Class 143". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 9 March 2005.
  3. Vehicle Diagram Book No. 220 for Diesel Multiple Unit Trains (Railcars) (PDF). Barrowmore MRG. Derby: British Railways Board. 1982. DP236, DP237.
  4. Fox 1987, pp. 41-42
  5. Fox & Hughes 1994, p. 26
  6. Pritchard & Fox 2009, p. 14
  7. "System Data for Mechanical and Electrical Coupling of Rail Vehicles". Rail Safety and Standards Board. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 5 January 2009.
  8. Wilkinson, Peter. "The Railways (Interoperability) Regulations 2011 – Great Western Railway Class 143 - 2020 accessibility deadline" (PDF). Gov.UK. HM Government. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
  9. Heaton-Harris, Chris. "The Railways (Interoperability) Regulations 2011 – Transport for Wales Rail Services Class 143s - 2020 accessibility deadline" (PDF). Gov.UK. HM Government. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
  10. "2+3 HSTs help oust GWR Pacers". Modern Railways. January 2021. p. 103.
  11. St John Thomas, David; Whitehouse, Patrick (1990). BR in the Eighties. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-9854-7.
  12. Shore, A. G. L. (1987). "British Rail diesel multiple unit replacement programme". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1008.3291. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  13. Smith 2002, p. 3
  14. Smith 2002, p. 7
  15. "Class 143". The Railway Centre. Archived from the original on 8 March 2005.
  16. "The Rail Vehicle Accessibility (Interoperable Rail System) Regulations 2008". legislation.gov.uk.
  17. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  18. "Modernising the Great Western railway" (PDF). p. 49.
  19. "Commuters escape from train blaze". BBC News. 19 October 2004. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
  20. "December 2004 magazine". Cardiff & Avonside Railway Society. December 2004. Retrieved 27 April 2012. A serious incident just short of Nailsea & Backwell station (alongside the common), saw the 2W63 20.06 Temple Meads-Weston-super-Mare local Wessex Trains service, formed with 143613 + 143621, stopped and evacuated due to a fire which gutted coach 55654 and smoke damaged 55679 (both from set 143613). Fire services took two hours to get the blaze under control, the flames reaching around 20 feet in height, but there were no serious injuries, three persons being treated for smoke inhalation of the 23 passengers and crew travelling on the service. The mainline was closed until 03.30 the following day, the units being dragged back to Bristol and store at St.Phillips Marsh depot for examination. The fire was thought to have started due to a mechanical fault. 19/10 143613 was taken to St Phillips Marsh for an investigation into the fire. The main frame of 55654 was badly buckled and it is beyond repair. The unit was taken by road to Crewe Works later in the week.
  21. "November 2005". Cardiff & Avonside Railway Society. November 2005. Retrieved 17 June 2012. Stored: 143613/615 - ZC [Crewe Works]
  22. "September 2006". Cardiff & Avonside Railway Society. September 2006. Retrieved 17 June 2012. Disposals: Pullman : 143613 @CF [Cardiff Canton]
  23. "August 2005 section: "Miscellaneous"". Cardiff & Avonside Railway Society. August 2005. Retrieved 27 April 2012.
  24. "Passenger hurt when wave smashes Great Western Railway train windows". BBC News. 16 January 2020. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
  25. "DMU FORMATIONS". AbRail. Archived from the original on 29 October 2017. Retrieved 27 March 2015.
  26. "Class 143". Retrieved 22 August 2018.
  27. "Class 143". Retrieved 22 August 2018.
  28. "Class 143". Retrieved 22 August 2018.

Sources
  • Fox, Peter (1987). Multiple Unit Pocket Book. British Railways Pocket Book No.2 (Summer/Autumn 1987 ed.). Platform 5 Publishing Ltd. ISBN 0906579740. OCLC 613347580.
  • Fox, Peter; Hughes, Barry (1994). DMUs & Channel Tunnel Stock. British Railways Pocket Book No.3 (7th ed.). Platform 5. ISBN 9781872524597.
  • Pritchard, R.N.; Fox, Peter (2009). Diesel Multiple Units 2010. British Railways Pocket Book No.3. Platform 5. ISBN 978-1-902336-75-6. OCLC 614300319.
  • Smith, R.I. (2002). Class 140: The Past, The Present, The Future. Keith & Dufftown Railway Association. ISBN 0901845213.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.