International System of Units

	SI base units
	SI defining constants

The International System of Units (SI, abbreviated from the French Système international (d'unités)) is the modern form of the metric system. It is the only system of measurement with an official status in nearly every country in the world. It comprises a coherent system of units of measurement starting with seven base units, which are the second (the unit of time with the symbol s), metre (length, m), kilogram (mass, kg), ampere (electric current, A), kelvin (thermodynamic temperature, K), mole (amount of substance, mol), and candela (luminous intensity, cd). The system allows for an unlimited number of additional units, called derived units, which can always be represented as products of powers of the base units.[Note 1] Twenty-two derived units have been provided with special names and symbols.[Note 2] The seven base units and the 22 derived units with special names and symbols may be used in combination to express other derived units,[Note 3] which are adopted to facilitate measurement of diverse quantities. The SI system also provides twenty prefixes to the unit names and unit symbols that may be used when specifying power-of-ten (i.e. decimal) multiples and sub-multiples of SI units. The SI is intended to be an evolving system; units and prefixes are created and unit definitions are modified through international agreement as the technology of measurement progresses and the precision of measurements improves.

The SI logo, produced by the BIPM, showing the seven SI base units and the seven defining constants.[1]

Since 2019, the magnitudes of all SI units have been defined by declaring exact numerical values for seven defining constants when expressed in terms of their SI units. These defining constants are the speed of light in vacuum, $c$ , the hyperfine transition frequency of caesium $Δ ν$ _Cs, the Planck constant $h$ , the elementary charge $e$ , the Boltzmann constant $k$ , the Avogadro constant $N$ _A, and the luminous efficacy $K$ _cd. The nature of the defining constants ranges from fundamental constants of nature such as $c$ to the purely technical constant $K$ _cd. Prior to 2019, $h$ , $e$ , $k$ , and $N$ _A were not defined a priori but were rather very precisely measured quantities. In 2019, their values were fixed by definition to their best estimates at the time, ensuring continuity with previous definitions of the base units. One consequence of the redefinition of the SI is that the distinction between the base units and derived units is in principle not needed, since any unit can be constructed directly from the seven defining constants.[2]^:129

The current way of defining the SI system is a result of a decades-long move towards increasingly abstract and idealised formulation in which the realisations of the units are separated conceptually from the definitions. A consequence is that as science and technologies develop, new and superior realisations may be introduced without the need to redefine the unit. One problem with artefacts is that they can be lost, damaged, or changed; another is that they introduce uncertainties that cannot be reduced by advancements in science and technology. The last artefact used by the SI was the International Prototype of the Kilogram, a cylinder of platinum-iridium.

The original motivation for the development of the SI was the diversity of units that had sprung up within the centimetre–gram–second (CGS) systems (specifically the inconsistency between the systems of electrostatic units and electromagnetic units) and the lack of coordination between the various disciplines that used them. The General Conference on Weights and Measures (French: Conférence générale des poids et mesures – CGPM), which was established by the Metre Convention of 1875, brought together many international organisations to establish the definitions and standards of a new system and to standardise the rules for writing and presenting measurements. The system was published in 1960 as a result of an initiative that began in 1948, so it is based on the metre–kilogram–second system of units (MKS) rather than any variant of the CGS.

Introduction

Countries using the metric (SI), imperial and US customary systems as of 2019.

The International System of Units, or SI,[2]^:123 is a decimal[Note 4] and metric[Note 5] system of units established in 1960 and periodically updated since then. The SI has an official status in most countries,[Note 6] including the United States,[Note 8] Canada, and the United Kingdom, although these three countries are amongst a handful of nations that, to various degrees, also continue to use their customary systems. Nevertheless, with this nearly universal level of acceptance, the SI system “has been used around the world as the preferred system of units, the basic language for science, technology, industry and trade.”[2]^:123

The only other types of measurement system that still have widespread use across the world are the Imperial and US customary measurement systems, and they are legally defined in terms of the SI system.[Note 9] There are other, less widespread systems of measurement that are occasionally used in particular regions of the world. In addition, there are many individual non-SI units that don't belong to any comprehensive system of units, but that are nevertheless still regularly used in particular fields and regions. Both of these categories of unit are also typically defined legally in terms of SI units.[Note 10]

Controlling body

The SI was established and is maintained by the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM[Note 11]).[4] In practice, the CGPM follows the recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), which is the actual body conducting technical deliberations concerning new scientific and technological developments related to the definition of units and the SI. The CCU reports to the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM[Note 12]), which, in turn, reports to the CGPM. See below for more details.

All the decisions and recommendations concerning units are collected in a brochure called The International System of Units (SI)[Note 13], which is published by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM[Note 14]) and periodically updated.

SI base units

The SI selects seven units to serve as base units, corresponding to seven base physical quantities.[Note 15] They are the second, with the symbol s, which is the SI unit of the physical quantity of time; the metre, symbol m, the SI unit of length; kilogram (kg, the unit of mass); ampere (A, electric current); kelvin (K, thermodynamic temperature); mole (mol, amount of substance); and candela (cd, luminous intensity).[2] Note that 'the choice of the base units was never unique, but grew historically and became familiar to users of the SI'.[2]^:126 All units in the SI can be expressed in terms of the base units, and the base units serve as a preferred set for expressing or analysing the relationships between units.

SI derived units

The system allows for an unlimited number of additional units, called derived units, which can always be represented as products of powers of the base units, possibly with a nontrivial numeric multiplier. When that multiplier is one, the unit is called a coherent derived unit.[Note 16] The base and coherent derived units of the SI together form a coherent system of units (the set of coherent SI units).[Note 17] Twenty-two coherent derived units have been provided with special names and symbols.[Note 18] The seven base units and the 22 derived units with special names and symbols may be used in combination to express other derived units,[Note 19] which are adopted to facilitate measurement of diverse quantities.

SI metric prefixes and the decimal nature of the SI system

Like all metric systems, the SI uses metric prefixes to systematically construct, for the same physical quantity, a set of units that are decimal multiples of each other over a wide range.

For example, while the coherent unit of length is the metre,[Note 20] the SI provides a full range of smaller and larger units of length, any of which may be more convenient for any given application – for example, driving distances are normally given in kilometres (symbol km) rather than in metres. Here the metric prefix 'kilo-' (symbol 'k') stands for a factor of 1000; thus, 1 km = 1000 m.[Note 21]

The current version of the SI provides twenty metric prefixes that signify decimal powers ranging from 10⁻²⁴ to 10²⁴.[2]^:143–4 Apart from the prefixes for 1/100, 1/10, 10, and 100, all the other ones are powers of 1000.

In general, given any coherent unit with a separate name and symbol,[Note 22] one forms a new unit by simply adding an appropriate metric prefix to the name of the coherent unit (and a corresponding prefix symbol to the unit's symbol). Since the metric prefix signifies a particular power of ten, the new unit is always a power-of-ten multiple or sub-multiple of the coherent unit. Thus, the conversion between units within the SI is always through a power of ten; this is why the SI system (and metric systems more generally) are called decimal systems of measurement units.[6][Note 23]

The grouping formed by a prefix symbol attached to a unit symbol (e.g. 'km', 'cm') constitutes a new inseparable unit symbol. This new symbol can be raised to a positive or negative power and can be combined with other unit symbols to form compound unit symbols.[2]^:143 For example, g/cm³ is an SI unit of density, where cm³ is to be interpreted as (cm)³.

Coherent and non-coherent SI units

When prefixes are used with the coherent SI units, the resulting units are no longer coherent, because the prefix introduces a numerical factor other than one.[2]^:137 The one exception is the kilogram, the only coherent SI unit whose name and symbol, for historical reasons, include a prefix.[Note 24]

The complete set of SI units consists of both the coherent set and the multiples and sub-multiples of coherent units formed by using the SI prefixes.[2]^:138 For example, the metre, kilometre, centimetre, nanometre, etc. are all SI units of length, though only the metre is a coherent SI unit. A similar statement holds for derived units: for example, kg/m³, g/dm³, g/cm³, Pg/km³, etc. are all SI units of density, but of these, only kg/m³ is a coherent SI unit.

Moreover, the metre is the only coherent SI unit of length. Every physical quantity has exactly one coherent SI unit, although this unit may be expressible in different forms by using some of the special names and symbols.[2]^:140 For example, the coherent SI unit of linear momentum may be written as either kg⋅m/s or as N⋅s, and both forms are in use (e.g. compare respectively here[7]^:205 and here[8]^:135).

On the other hand, several different quantities may share same coherent SI unit. For example, the joule per kelvin is the coherent SI unit for two distinct quantities: heat capacity and entropy. Furthermore, the same coherent SI unit may be a base unit in one context, but a coherent derived unit in another. For example, the ampere is the coherent SI unit for both electric current and magnetomotive force, but it is a base unit in the former case and a derived unit in the latter.[2]^:140[Note 26]

Permitted non-SI units

There is a special group of units that are called 'non-SI units that are accepted for use with the SI'.[2]^:145 See Non-SI units mentioned in the SI for a full list. Most of these, in order to be converted to the corresponding SI unit, require conversion factors that are not powers of ten. Some common examples of such units are the customary units of time, namely the minute (conversion factor of 60 s/min, since 1 min = 60 s), the hour (3600 s), and the day (86400 s); the degree (for measuring plane angles, 1° = $π$ /180 rad); and the electronvolt (a unit of energy, 1 eV = 1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ J).

New units

The SI is intended to be an evolving system; units[Note 27] and prefixes are created and unit definitions are modified through international agreement as the technology of measurement progresses and the precision of measurements improves.

Defining magnitudes of units

Since 2019, the magnitudes of all SI units have been defined in an abstract way, which is conceptually separated from any practical realisation of them.[2]^:126[Note 28] Namely, the SI units are defined by declaring that seven defining constants[2]^:125–9 have certain exact numerical values when expressed in terms of their SI units. Probably the most widely known of these constants is the speed of light in vacuum, $c$ , which in the SI by definition has the exact value of $c$ = 299792458 m/s. The other six constants are $\Delta \nu _{\text{Cs}}$ , the hyperfine transition frequency of caesium; $h$ , the Planck constant; $e$ , the elementary charge; $k$ , the Boltzmann constant; $N$ _A, the Avogadro constant; and $K$ _cd, the luminous efficacy of monochromatic radiation of frequency 540×10¹² Hz.[Note 29] The nature of the defining constants ranges from fundamental constants of nature such as $c$ to the purely technical constant $K$ _cd.[2]^:128–9 Prior to 2019, $h$ , $e$ , $k$ , and $N$ _A were not defined a priori but were rather very precisely measured quantities. In 2019, their values were fixed by definition to their best estimates at the time, ensuring continuity with previous definitions of the base units.

As far as realisations, what are believed to be the current best practical realisations of units are described in the so-called 'mises en pratique',[Note 30] which are also published by the BIPM.[11] The abstract nature of the definitions of units is what makes it possible to improve and change the mises en pratique as science and technology develop without having to change the actual definitions themselves.[Note 33]

In a sense, this way of defining the SI units is no more abstract than the way derived units are traditionally defined in terms of the base units. Consider a particular derived unit, for example, the joule, the unit of energy. Its definition in terms of the base units is kg⋅m²/s². Even if the practical realisations of the metre, kilogram, and second are available, a practical realisation of the joule would require some sort of reference to the underlying physical definition of work or energy—some actual physical procedure for realising the energy in the amount of one joule such that it can be compared to other instances of energy (such as the energy content of gasoline put into a car or of electricity delivered to a household).

The situation with the defining constants and all of the SI units is analogous. In fact, purely mathematically speaking, the SI units are defined as if we declared that it is the defining constant's units that are now the base units, with all other SI units being derived units. To make this clearer, first note that each defining constant can be taken as determining the magnitude of that defining constant's unit of measurement;[2]^:128 for example, the definition of $c$ defines the unit m/s as 1 m/s = $c$ /299792458 ('the speed of one metre per second is equal to one 299792458th of the speed of light'). In this way, the defining constants directly define the following seven units: the hertz (Hz), a unit of the physical quantity of frequency (note that problems can arise when dealing with frequency or the Planck constant because the units of angular measure (cycle or radian) are omitted in SI.[12][13][14][15][16]); the metre per second (m/s), a unit of speed; joule-second (J⋅s), a unit of action; coulomb (C), a unit of electric charge; joule per kelvin (J/K), a unit of both entropy and heat capacity; the inverse mole (mol⁻¹), a unit of a conversion constant between the amount of substance and the number of elementary entities (atoms, molecules, etc.); and lumen per watt (lm/W), a unit of a conversion constant between the physical power carried by electromagnetic radiation and the intrinsic ability of that same radiation to produce visual perception of brightness in humans. Further, one can show, using dimensional analysis, that every coherent SI unit (whether base or derived) can be written as a unique product of powers of the units of the SI defining constants (in complete analogy to the fact that every coherent derived SI unit can be written as a unique product of powers of the base SI units). For example, the kilogram can be written as kg = (Hz)(J⋅s)/(m/s)².[Note 34] Thus, the kilogram is defined in terms of the three defining constants $Δ ν Cs$ , $c$ , and $h$ because, on the one hand, these three defining constants respectively define the units Hz, m/s, and J⋅s,[Note 35] while, on the other hand, the kilogram can be written in terms of these three units, namely, kg = (Hz)(J⋅s)/(m/s)².[Note 36] True, the question of how to actually realise the kilogram in practice would, at this point, still be open, but that is not really different from the fact that the question of how to actually realise the joule in practice is still in principle open even once one has achieved the practical realisations of the metre, kilogram, and second.

One consequence of the redefinition of the SI is that the distinction between the base units and derived units is in principle not needed, since any unit can be constructed directly from the seven defining constants. Nevertheless, the distinction is retained because 'it is useful and historically well established', and also because the ISO/IEC 80000 series of standards[Note 37] specifies base and derived quantities that necessarily have the corresponding SI units.[2]^:129

Specifying fundamental constants vs. other methods of definition

The current way of defining the SI system is the result of a decades-long move towards increasingly abstract and idealised formulation in which the realisations of the units are separated conceptually from the definitions.[2]^:126

The great advantage of doing it this way is that as science and technologies develop, new and superior realisations may be introduced without the need to redefine the units.[Note 31] Units can now be realised with ‘an accuracy that is ultimately limited only by the quantum structure of nature and our technical abilities but not by the definitions themselves.[Note 32] Any valid equation of physics relating the defining constants to a unit can be used to realise the unit, thus creating opportunities for innovation... with increasing accuracy as technology proceeds.’[2]^:122 In practice, the CIPM Consultative Committees provide so-called "mises en pratique" (practical techniques),[11] which are the descriptions of what are currently believed to be best experimental realisations of the units.[19]

This system lacks the conceptual simplicity of using artefacts (referred to as prototypes) as realisations of units to define those units: with prototypes, the definition and the realisation are one and the same.[Note 38] However, using artefacts has two major disadvantages that, as soon as it is technologically and scientifically feasible, result in abandoning them as means for defining units.[Note 42] One major disadvantage is that artefacts can be lost, damaged,[Note 44]

We shall in the first place describe the state of the Standards recovered from the ruins of the House of Commons, as ascertained in our inspection of them made on 1st June, 1838, at the Journal Office, where they are preserved under the care of Mr. James Gudge, Principal Clerk of the Journal Office. The following list, taken by ourselves from inspection, was compared with a list produced by Mr. Gudge, and stated by him to have been made by Mr. Charles Rowland, one of the Clerks of the Journal Office, immediately after the fire, and was found to agree with it. Mr. Gudge stated that no other Standards of Length or Weight were in his custody.

No. 1. A brass bar marked “Standard [G. II. crown emblem] Yard, 1758,” which on examination was found to have its right hand stud perfect, with the point and line visible, but with its left hand stud completely melted out, a hole only remaining. The bar was somewhat bent, and discoloured in every part.

No. 2. A brass bar with a projecting cock at each end, forming a bed for the trial of yard-measures; discoloured.

No. 3. A brass bar marked “Standard [G. II. crown emblem] Yard, 1760,” from which the left hand stud was completely melted out, and which in other respects was in the same condition as No. 1.

No. 4. A yard-bed similar to No. 2; discoloured.

No. 5. A weight of the form [drawing of a weight] marked [2 lb. T. 1758], apparently of brass or copper; much discoloured.

No. 6. A weight marked in the same manner for 4 lbs., in the same state.

No. 7. A weight similar to No. 6, with a hollow space at its base, which appeared at first sight to have been originally filled with some soft metal that had been now melted out, but which on a rough trial was found to have nearly the same weight as No. 6.

No. 8. A similar weight of 8 lbs., similarly marked (with the alteration of 8 lbs. for 4 lbs.), and in the same state.

No. 9. Another exactly like No. 8.

Nos. 10 and 11. Two weights of 16 lbs., similarly marked.

Nos. 12 and 13. Two weights of 32 lbs., similarly marked.

No. 14. A weight with a triangular ring-handle, marked "S.F. 1759 17 lbs. 8 dwts. Troy", apparently intended to represent the stone of 14 lbs. avoirdupois, allowing 7008 troy grains to each avoirdupois pound.
It appears from this list that the bar adopted in the Act 5th Geo. IV., cap. 74, sect. 1, for the legal standard of one yard, (No. 3 of the preceding list), is so far injured, that it is impossible to ascertain from it, with the most moderate accuracy, the statutable length of one yard. The legal standard of one troy pound is missing. We have therefore to report that it is absolutely necessary that steps be taken for the formation and legalising of new Standards of Length and Weight.

</ref> or changed.[Note 45] The other is that they largely cannot benefit from advancements in science and technology. The last artefact used by the SI was the International Prototype Kilogram (IPK), a particular cylinder of platinum-iridium; from 1889 to 2019, the kilogram was by definition equal to the mass of the IPK. Concerns regarding its stability on the one hand, and progress in precise measurements of the Planck constant and the Avogadro constant on the other, led to a revision of the definition of the base units, put into effect on 20 May 2019.[23] This was the biggest change in the SI system since it was first formally defined and established in 1960, and it resulted in the definitions described above.[24]

In the past, there were also various other approaches to the definitions of some of the SI units. One made use of a specific physical state of a specific substance (the triple point of water, which was used in the definition of the kelvin[25]^:113–4); others referred to idealised experimental prescriptions[2]^:125 (as in the case of the former SI definition of the ampere[25]^:113 and the former SI definition (originally enacted in 1979) of the candela[25]^:115).

In the future, the set of defining constants used by the SI may be modified as more stable constants are found, or if it turns out that other constants can be more precisely measured.[Note 46]

History

The original motivation for the development of the SI was the diversity of units that had sprung up within the centimetre–gram–second (CGS) systems (specifically the inconsistency between the systems of electrostatic units and electromagnetic units) and the lack of coordination between the various disciplines that used them. The General Conference on Weights and Measures (French: Conférence générale des poids et mesures – CGPM), which was established by the Metre Convention of 1875, brought together many international organisations to establish the definitions and standards of a new system and to standardise the rules for writing and presenting measurements.

Adopted in 1889, use of the MKS system of units succeeded the centimetre–gram–second system of units (CGS) in commerce and engineering. The metre and kilogram system served as the basis for the development of the International System of Units (abbreviated SI), which now serves as the international standard. Because of this, the standards of the CGS system were gradually replaced with metric standards incorporated from the MKS system.[26]

In 1901, Giovanni Giorgi proposed to the Associazione elettrotecnica italiana (AEI) that this system, extended with a fourth unit to be taken from the units of electromagnetism, be used as an international system.[27] This system was strongly promoted by electrical engineer George A. Campbell.[28]

The International System was published in 1960, based on the MKS units, as a result of an initiative that began in 1948.

Controlling authority

The SI is regulated and continually developed by three international organisations that were established in 1875 under the terms of the Metre Convention. They are the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM[Note 11]), the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM[Note 12]), and the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM[Note 14]). The ultimate authority rests with the CGPM, which is a plenary body through which its Member States[Note 48] act together on matters related to measurement science and measurement standards; it usually convenes every four years.[29] The CGPM elects the CIPM, which is an 18-person committee of eminent scientists. The CIPM operates based on the advice of a number of its Consultative Committees, which bring together the world's experts in their specified fields as advisers on scientific and technical matters.[30][Note 49] One of these committees is the Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), which is responsible for matters related to the development of the International System of Units (SI), preparation of successive editions of the SI brochure, and advice to the CIPM on matters concerning units of measurement.[31] It is the CCU which considers in detail all new scientific and technological developments related to the definition of units and the SI. In practice, when it comes to the definition of the SI, the CGPM simply formally approves the recommendations of the CIPM, which, in turn, follows the advice of the CCU.

The CCU has the following as members:[32][33] national laboratories of the Member States of the CGPM charged with establishing national standards;[Note 50] relevant intergovernmental organisations and international bodies;[Note 51] international commissions or committees;[Note 52] scientific unions;[Note 53] personal members;[Note 54] and, as an ex officio member of all Consultative Committees, the Director of the BIPM.

All the decisions and recommendations concerning units are collected in a brochure called The International System of Units (SI)[2][Note 13], which is published by the BIPM and periodically updated.

Units and prefixes

The International System of Units consists of a set of base units, derived units, and a set of decimal-based multipliers that are used as prefixes.[25]^:103–106 The units, excluding prefixed units,[Note 55] form a coherent system of units, which is based on a system of quantities in such a way that the equations between the numerical values expressed in coherent units have exactly the same form, including numerical factors, as the corresponding equations between the quantities. For example, 1 N = 1 kg × 1 m/s² says that one newton is the force required to accelerate a mass of one kilogram at one metre per second squared, as related through the principle of coherence to the equation relating the corresponding quantities: $F = m \times a$ .

Derived units apply to derived quantities, which may by definition be expressed in terms of base quantities, and thus are not independent; for example, electrical conductance is the inverse of electrical resistance, with the consequence that the siemens is the inverse of the ohm, and similarly, the ohm and siemens can be replaced with a ratio of an ampere and a volt, because those quantities bear a defined relationship to each other.[Note 56] Other useful derived quantities can be specified in terms of the SI base and derived units that have no named units in the SI system, such as acceleration, which is defined in SI units as m/s².

Base units

The SI base units are the building blocks of the system and all the other units are derived from them.

SI base units[36]^:6[37][38]
Unit name	Unit symbol	Dimension symbol	Quantity name	Definition
second [n 1]	s	T	time	The duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.
metre	m	L	length	The distance travelled by light in vacuum in 1/299792458 second.
kilogram [n 2]	kg	M	mass	The kilogram is defined by setting the Planck constant $h$ exactly to 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ J⋅s (J = kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²), given the definitions of the metre and the second.[23]
ampere	A	I	electric current	The flow of exactly 1/1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ times the elementary charge $e$ per second. Equalling approximately 6.2415090744×10¹⁸ elementary charges per second.
kelvin	K	Θ	thermodynamic temperature	The kelvin is defined by setting the fixed numerical value of the Boltzmann constant $k$ to 1.380649×10⁻²³ J⋅K⁻¹, (J = kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²), given the definition of the kilogram, the metre, and the second.
mole	mol	N	amount of substance	The amount of substance of exactly 6.02214076×10²³ elementary entities.[n 3] This number is the fixed numerical value of the Avogadro constant, $N$ _A, when expressed in the unit mol⁻¹.
candela	cd	J	luminous intensity	The luminous intensity, in a given direction, of a source that emits monochromatic radiation of frequency 5.4×10¹⁴ hertz and that has a radiant intensity in that direction of 1/683 watt per steradian.
Notes Within the context of the SI, the second is the coherent base unit of time, and is used in the definitions of derived units. The name "second" historically arose as being the 2nd-level sexagesimal division (¹⁄_60²) of some quantity, the hour in this case, which the SI classifies as an "accepted" unit along with its first-level sexagesimal division the minute. Despite the prefix "kilo-", the kilogram is the coherent base unit of mass, and is used in the definitions of derived units. Nonetheless, prefixes for the unit of mass are determined as if the gram were the base unit. When the mole is used, the elementary entities must be specified and may be atoms, molecules, ions, electrons, other particles, or specified groups of such particles.

Derived units

The derived units in the SI are formed by powers, products, or quotients of the base units and are potentially unlimited in number.[25]^:103[36]^:14,16 Derived units are associated with derived quantities; for example, velocity is a quantity that is derived from the base quantities of time and length, and thus the SI derived unit is metre per second (symbol m/s). The dimensions of derived units can be expressed in terms of the dimensions of the base units.

Combinations of base and derived units may be used to express other derived units. For example, the SI unit of force is the newton (N), the SI unit of pressure is the pascal (Pa)—and the pascal can be defined as one newton per square metre (N/m²).[39]

SI derived units with special names and symbols[36]^:15
Name	Symbol	Quantity	In SI base units	In other SI units
radian[N 1]	rad	plane angle	m/m	1
steradian[N 1]	sr	solid angle	m²/m²	1
hertz	Hz	frequency	s⁻¹
newton	N	force, weight	kg⋅m⋅s⁻²
pascal	Pa	pressure, stress	kg⋅m⁻¹⋅s⁻²	N/m²
joule	J	energy, work, heat	kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²	N⋅m = Pa⋅m³
watt	W	power, radiant flux	kg⋅m²⋅s⁻³	J/s
coulomb	C	electric charge	s⋅A
volt	V	electrical potential difference (voltage), emf	kg⋅m²⋅s⁻³⋅A⁻¹	W/A = J/C
farad	F	capacitance	kg⁻¹⋅m⁻²⋅s⁴⋅A²	C/V
ohm	Ω	resistance, impedance, reactance	kg⋅m²⋅s⁻³⋅A⁻²	V/A
siemens	S	electrical conductance	kg⁻¹⋅m⁻²⋅s³⋅A²	Ω⁻¹
weber	Wb	magnetic flux	kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²⋅A⁻¹	V⋅s
tesla	T	magnetic flux density	kg⋅s⁻²⋅A⁻¹	Wb/m²
henry	H	inductance	kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²⋅A⁻²	Wb/A
degree Celsius	°C	temperature relative to 273.15 K	K
lumen	lm	luminous flux	cd⋅sr	cd⋅sr
lux	lx	illuminance	cd⋅sr⋅m⁻²	lm/m²
becquerel	Bq	radioactivity (decays per unit time)	s⁻¹
gray	Gy	absorbed dose (of ionising radiation)	m²⋅s⁻²	J/kg
sievert	Sv	equivalent dose (of ionising radiation)	m²⋅s⁻²	J/kg
katal	kat	catalytic activity	mol⋅s⁻¹
Notes The radian and steradian are defined as dimensionless derived units.

Examples of coherent derived units in terms of base units[36]^:17
Name	Symbol	Derived quantity	Typical symbol
square metre	m²	area	$A$
cubic metre	m³	volume	$V$
metre per second	m/s	speed, velocity	$v$
metre per second squared	m/s²	acceleration	$a$
reciprocal metre	m⁻¹	wavenumber	$σ$ , $ṽ$
reciprocal metre	m⁻¹	vergence (optics)	$V$ , 1/ $f$
kilogram per cubic metre	kg/m³	density	$ρ$
kilogram per square metre	kg/m²	surface density	$ρ$ _A
cubic metre per kilogram	m³/kg	specific volume	$v$
ampere per square metre	A/m²	current density	$j$
ampere per metre	A/m	magnetic field strength	$H$
mole per cubic metre	mol/m³	concentration	$c$
kilogram per cubic metre	kg/m³	mass concentration	$ρ$ , $γ$
candela per square metre	cd/m²	luminance	$L$ _v

Examples of derived units that include units with special names[36]^:18
Name	Symbol	Quantity	In SI base units
pascal-second	Pa⋅s	dynamic viscosity	m⁻¹⋅kg⋅s⁻¹
newton-metre	N⋅m	moment of force	m²⋅kg⋅s⁻²
newton per metre	N/m	surface tension	kg⋅s⁻²
radian per second	rad/s	angular velocity, angular frequency	s⁻¹
radian per second squared	rad/s²	angular acceleration	s⁻²
watt per square metre	W/m²	heat flux density, irradiance	kg⋅s⁻³
joule per kelvin	J/K	entropy, heat capacity	m²⋅kg⋅s⁻²⋅K⁻¹
joule per kilogram-kelvin	J/(kg⋅K)	specific heat capacity, specific entropy	m²⋅s⁻²⋅K⁻¹
joule per kilogram	J/kg	specific energy	m²⋅s⁻²
watt per metre-kelvin	W/(m⋅K)	thermal conductivity	m⋅kg⋅s⁻³⋅K⁻¹
joule per cubic metre	J/m³	energy density	m⁻¹⋅kg⋅s⁻²
volt per metre	V/m	electric field strength	m⋅kg⋅s⁻³⋅A⁻¹
coulomb per cubic metre	C/m³	electric charge density	m⁻³⋅s⋅A
coulomb per square metre	C/m²	surface charge density, electric flux density, electric displacement	m⁻²⋅s⋅A
farad per metre	F/m	permittivity	m⁻³⋅kg⁻¹⋅s⁴⋅A²
henry per metre	H/m	permeability	m⋅kg⋅s⁻²⋅A⁻²
joule per mole	J/mol	molar energy	m²⋅kg⋅s⁻²⋅mol⁻¹
joule per mole-kelvin	J/(mol⋅K)	molar entropy, molar heat capacity	m²⋅kg⋅s⁻²⋅K⁻¹⋅mol⁻¹
coulomb per kilogram	C/kg	exposure (x- and γ-rays)	kg⁻¹⋅s⋅A
gray per second	Gy/s	absorbed dose rate	m²⋅s⁻³
watt per steradian	W/sr	radiant intensity	m²⋅kg⋅s⁻³
watt per square metre-steradian	W/(m²⋅sr)	radiance	kg⋅s⁻³
katal per cubic metre	kat/m³	catalytic activity concentration	m⁻³⋅s⁻¹⋅mol

Prefixes

Prefixes are added to unit names to produce multiples and submultiples of the original unit. All of these are integer powers of ten, and above a hundred or below a hundredth all are integer powers of a thousand. For example, kilo- denotes a multiple of a thousand and milli- denotes a multiple of a thousandth, so there are one thousand millimetres to the metre and one thousand metres to the kilometre. The prefixes are never combined, so for example a millionth of a metre is a micrometre, not a millimillimetre. Multiples of the kilogram are named as if the gram were the base unit, so a millionth of a kilogram is a milligram, not a microkilogram.[25]^:122[40]^:14 When prefixes are used to form multiples and submultiples of SI base and derived units, the resulting units are no longer coherent.[25]^:7

The BIPM specifies 20 prefixes for the International System of Units (SI):

SI prefixes
Prefix		Base 10	Decimal	English word		Adoption[nb 1]
Name	Symbol	Base 10	Decimal	Short scale	Long scale	Adoption[nb 1]
yotta-	Y-	10²⁴	1000000000000000000000000	septillion	quadrillion	1991
zetta-	Z-	10²¹	1000000000000000000000	sextillion	trilliard	1991
exa-	E-	10¹⁸	1000000000000000000	quintillion	trillion	1975
peta-	P-	10¹⁵	1000000000000000	quadrillion	billiard	1975
tera-	T-	10¹²	1000000000000	trillion	billion	1960
giga-	G-	10⁹	1000000000	billion	milliard	1960
mega-	M-	10⁶	1000000	million		1873
kilo-	k-	10³	1000	thousand		1795
hecto-	h-	10²	100	hundred		1795
deca-	da-	10¹	10	ten		1795
		10⁰	1	one		–
deci-	d-	10⁻¹	0.1	tenth		1795
centi-	c-	10⁻²	0.01	hundredth		1795
milli-	m-	10⁻³	0.001	thousandth		1795
micro-	μ-	10⁻⁶	0.000001	millionth		1873
nano-	n-	10⁻⁹	0.000000001	billionth	milliardth	1960
pico-	p-	10⁻¹²	0.000000000001	trillionth	billionth	1960
femto-	f-	10⁻¹⁵	0.000000000000001	quadrillionth	billiardth	1964
atto-	a-	10⁻¹⁸	0.000000000000000001	quintillionth	trillionth	1964
zepto-	z-	10⁻²¹	0.000000000000000000001	sextillionth	trilliardth	1991
yocto-	y-	10⁻²⁴	0.000000000000000000000001	septillionth	quadrillionth	1991
Prefixes adopted before 1960 already existed before SI. The introduction of the CGS system was in 1873.

Non-SI units accepted for use with SI

Many non-SI units continue to be used in the scientific, technical, and commercial literature. Some units are deeply embedded in history and culture, and their use has not been entirely replaced by their SI alternatives. The CIPM recognised and acknowledged such traditions by compiling a list of non-SI units accepted for use with SI:[25]

While not an SI-unit, the litre may be used with SI units. It is equivalent to (10 cm)³ = (1 dm)³ = 10⁻³ m³.

Some units of time, angle, and legacy non-SI units have a long history of use. Most societies have used the solar day and its non-decimal subdivisions as a basis of time and, unlike the foot or the pound, these were the same regardless of where they were being measured. The radian, being 1/2π of a revolution, has mathematical advantages but is rarely used for navigation. Further, the units used in navigation around the world are similar. The tonne, litre, and hectare were adopted by the CGPM in 1879 and have been retained as units that may be used alongside SI units, having been given unique symbols. The catalogued units are given below:

Non-SI units accepted for use with SI units
Quantity	Name	Symbol	Value in SI units
time	minute	min	1 min = 60 s
	hour	h	1 h = 60 min = 3600 s
	day	d	1 d = 24 h = 86400 s
length	astronomical unit	au	1 au = 149597870700 m
plane and phase angle	degree	°	1° = (π/180) rad
	minute	′	1′ = (1/60)° = (π/10800) rad
	second	″	1″ = (1/60)′ = (π/648000) rad
area	hectare	ha	1 ha = 1 hm² = 10⁴ m²
volume	litre	l, L	1 l = 1 L = 1 dm³ = 10³ cm³ = 10⁻³ m³
mass	tonne (metric ton)	t	1 t = 1 000 kg
mass	dalton	Da	1 Da = 1.660539040(20)×10⁻²⁷ kg
energy	electronvolt	eV	1 eV = 1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ J
logarithmic ratio quantities	neper	Np	In using these units it is important that the nature of the quantity be specified and that any reference value used be specified.
	bel	B
	decibel	dB

These units are used in combination with SI units in common units such as the kilowatt-hour (1 kW⋅h = 3.6 MJ).

Common notions of the metric units

The basic units of the metric system, as originally defined, represented common quantities or relationships in nature. They still do – the modern precisely defined quantities are refinements of definition and methodology, but still with the same magnitudes. In cases where laboratory precision may not be required or available, or where approximations are good enough, the original definitions may suffice.[Note 57]

A second is 1/60 of a minute, which is 1/60 of an hour, which is 1/24 of a day, so a second is 1/86400 of a day (the use of base 60 dates back to Babylonian times); a second is the time it takes a dense object to freely fall 4.9 metres from rest.[Note 58]
The length of the equator is close to 40000000 m (more precisely 40075014.2 m).[41] In fact, the dimensions of our planet were used by the French Academy in the original definition of the metre.[42]
The metre is close to the length of a pendulum that has a period of 2 seconds;[Note 59] most dining tabletops are about 0.75 metres high;[43] a very tall human (basketball forward) is about 2 metres tall.[44]
The kilogram is the mass of a litre of cold water; a cubic centimetre or millilitre of water has a mass of one gram; a 1-euro coin weighs 7.5 g;[45] a Sacagawea US 1-dollar coin weighs 8.1 g;[46] a UK 50-pence coin weighs 8.0 g.[47]
A candela is about the luminous intensity of a moderately bright candle, or 1 candle power; a 60 W tungsten-filament incandescent light bulb has a luminous intensity of about 64 candelas.[Note 60]
A mole of a substance has a mass that is its molecular mass expressed in units of grams; the mass of a mole of carbon is 12.0 g, and the mass of a mole of table salt is 58.4 g.
Since all gases have the same volume per mole at a given temperature and pressure far from their points of liquefaction and solidification (see Perfect gas), and air is about 1/5 oxygen (molecular mass 32) and 4/5 nitrogen (molecular mass 28), the density of any near-perfect gas relative to air can be obtained to a good approximation by dividing its molecular mass by 29 (because 4/5 × 28 + 1/5 × 32 = 28.8 ≈ 29). For example, carbon monoxide (molecular mass 28) has almost the same density as air.
A temperature difference of one kelvin is the same as one degree Celsius: 1/100 of the temperature differential between the freezing and boiling points of water at sea level; the absolute temperature in kelvins is the temperature in degrees Celsius plus about 273; human body temperature is about 37 °C or 310 K.
A 60 W incandescent light bulb rated at 120 V (US mains voltage) consumes 0.5 A at this voltage. A 60 W bulb rated at 240 V (European mains voltage) consumes 0.25 A at this voltage.[Note 61]

Lexicographic conventions

Unit names

The symbols for the SI units are intended to be identical, regardless of the language used,[25]^:130–135 but names are ordinary nouns and use the character set and follow the grammatical rules of the language concerned. Names of units follow the grammatical rules associated with common nouns: in English and in French they start with a lowercase letter (e.g., newton, hertz, pascal), even when the unit is named after a person and its symbol begins with a capital letter.[25]^:148 This also applies to "degrees Celsius", since "degree" is the beginning of the unit.[49][50] The only exceptions are in the beginning of sentences and in headings and publication titles.[25]^:148 The English spelling for certain SI units differs: US English uses the spelling deka-, meter, and liter, whilst International English uses deca-, metre, and litre.

Unit symbols and the values of quantities

Although the writing of unit names is language-specific, the writing of unit symbols and the values of quantities is consistent across all languages and therefore the SI Brochure has specific rules in respect of writing them.[25]^:130–135 The guideline produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)[51] clarifies language-specific areas in respect of American English that were left open by the SI Brochure, but is otherwise identical to the SI Brochure.[52]

General rules

General rules[Note 62] for writing SI units and quantities apply to text that is either handwritten or produced using an automated process:

The value of a quantity is written as a number followed by a space (representing a multiplication sign) and a unit symbol; e.g., 2.21 kg, 7.3×10² m², 22 K. This rule explicitly includes the percent sign (%)[25]^:134 and the symbol for degrees Celsius (°C).[25]^:133 Exceptions are the symbols for plane angular degrees, minutes, and seconds (°, ′, and ″, respectively), which are placed immediately after the number with no intervening space.
Symbols are mathematical entities, not abbreviations, and as such do not have an appended period/full stop (.), unless the rules of grammar demand one for another reason, such as denoting the end of a sentence.
A prefix is part of the unit, and its symbol is prepended to a unit symbol without a separator (e.g., k in km, M in MPa, G in GHz, μ in μg). Compound prefixes are not allowed. A prefixed unit is atomic in expressions (e.g., km² is equivalent to (km)²).
Unit symbols are written using roman (upright) type, regardless of the type used in the surrounding text.
Symbols for derived units formed by multiplication are joined with a centre dot (⋅) or a non-breaking space; e.g., N⋅m or N m.
Symbols for derived units formed by division are joined with a solidus (/), or given as a negative exponent. E.g., the "metre per second" can be written m/s, m s⁻¹, m⋅s⁻¹, or m/s. A solidus must not be used more than once in a given expression without parentheses to remove ambiguities; e.g., kg/(m⋅s²) and kg⋅m⁻¹⋅s⁻² are acceptable, but kg/m/s² is ambiguous and unacceptable.

In the expression of acceleration due to gravity, a space separates the value and the units, both the 'm' and the 's' are lowercase because neither the metre nor the second are named after people, and exponentiation is represented with a superscript '2'.

The first letter of symbols for units derived from the name of a person is written in upper case; otherwise, they are written in lower case. E.g., the unit of pressure is named after Blaise Pascal, so its symbol is written "Pa", but the symbol for mole is written "mol". Thus, "T" is the symbol for tesla, a measure of magnetic field strength, and "t" the symbol for tonne, a measure of mass. Since 1979, the litre may exceptionally be written using either an uppercase "L" or a lowercase "l", a decision prompted by the similarity of the lowercase letter "l" to the numeral "1", especially with certain typefaces or English-style handwriting. The American NIST recommends that within the United States "L" be used rather than "l".
Symbols do not have a plural form, e.g., 25 kg, but not 25 kgs.
Uppercase and lowercase prefixes are not interchangeable. E.g., the quantities 1 mW and 1 MW represent two different quantities (milliwatt and megawatt).
The symbol for the decimal marker is either a point or comma on the line. In practice, the decimal point is used in most English-speaking countries and most of Asia, and the comma in most of Latin America and in continental European countries.[53]
Spaces should be used as a thousands separator (1000000) in contrast to commas or periods (1,000,000 or 1.000.000) to reduce confusion resulting from the variation between these forms in different countries.
Any line-break inside a number, inside a compound unit, or between number and unit should be avoided. Where this is not possible, line breaks should coincide with thousands separators.
Because the value of "billion" and "trillion" varies between languages, the dimensionless terms "ppb" (parts per billion) and "ppt" (parts per trillion) should be avoided. The SI Brochure does not suggest alternatives.

Printing SI symbols

The rules covering printing of quantities and units are part of ISO 80000-1:2009.[54]

Further rules[Note 62] are specified in respect of production of text using printing presses, word processors, typewriters, and the like.

International System of Quantities

SI Brochure

Cover of brochure The International System of Units

The CGPM publishes a brochure that defines and presents the SI.[25] Its official version is in French, in line with the Metre Convention.[25]^:102 It leaves some scope for local variations, particularly regarding unit names and terms in different languages.[Note 63][36]

The writing and maintenance of the CGPM brochure is carried out by one of the committees of the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM). The definitions of the terms "quantity", "unit", "dimension" etc. that are used in the SI Brochure are those given in the International vocabulary of metrology.[55]

The quantities and equations that provide the context in which the SI units are defined are now referred to as the International System of Quantities (ISQ). The ISQ is based on the quantities underlying each of the seven base units of the SI. Other quantities, such as area, pressure, and electrical resistance, are derived from these base quantities by clear non-contradictory equations. The ISQ defines the quantities that are measured with the SI units.[56] The ISQ is formalised, in part, in the international standard ISO/IEC 80000, which was completed in 2009 with the publication of ISO 80000-1,[57] and has largely been revised in 2019–2020 with the remainder being under review.

Realisation of units

Silicon sphere for the Avogadro project used for measuring the Avogadro constant to a relative standard uncertainty of 2×10⁻⁸ or less, held by Achim Leistner[58]

Metrologists carefully distinguish between the definition of a unit and its realisation. The definition of each base unit of the SI is drawn up so that it is unique and provides a sound theoretical basis on which the most accurate and reproducible measurements can be made. The realisation of the definition of a unit is the procedure by which the definition may be used to establish the value and associated uncertainty of a quantity of the same kind as the unit. A description of the mise en pratique[Note 64] of the base units is given in an electronic appendix to the SI Brochure.[59][25]^:168–169

The published mise en pratique is not the only way in which a base unit can be determined: the SI Brochure states that "any method consistent with the laws of physics could be used to realise any SI unit."[25]^:111 In the current (2016) exercise to overhaul the definitions of the base units, various consultative committees of the CIPM have required that more than one mise en pratique shall be developed for determining the value of each unit.[60] In particular:

At least three separate experiments be carried out yielding values having a relative standard uncertainty in the determination of the kilogram of no more than 5×10⁻⁸ and at least one of these values should be better than 2×10⁻⁸. Both the Kibble balance and the Avogadro project should be included in the experiments and any differences between these be reconciled.[61][62]
When the kelvin is being determined, the relative uncertainty of the Boltzmann constant derived from two fundamentally different methods such as acoustic gas thermometry and dielectric constant gas thermometry be better than one part in 10⁻⁶ and that these values be corroborated by other measurements.[63]

Evolution of the SI

Changes to the SI

The International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) has described SI as "the modern form of metric system".[25]^:95 Changing technology has led to an evolution of the definitions and standards that has followed two principal strands – changes to SI itself, and clarification of how to use units of measure that are not part of SI but are still nevertheless used on a worldwide basis.

Since 1960 the CGPM has made a number of changes to the SI to meet the needs of specific fields, notably chemistry and radiometry. These are mostly additions to the list of named derived units, and include the mole (symbol mol) for an amount of substance, the pascal (symbol Pa) for pressure, the siemens (symbol S) for electrical conductance, the becquerel (symbol Bq) for "activity referred to a radionuclide", the gray (symbol Gy) for ionising radiation, the sievert (symbol Sv) as the unit of dose equivalent radiation, and the katal (symbol kat) for catalytic activity.[25]^:156[64][25]^:156[25]^:158[25]^:159[25]^:165

The range of defined prefixes pico- (10⁻¹²) to tera- (10¹²) was extended to 10⁻²⁴ to 10²⁴.[25]^:152[25]^:158[25]^:164

The 1960 definition of the standard metre in terms of wavelengths of a specific emission of the krypton 86 atom was replaced with the distance that light travels in vacuum in exactly 1/299792458 second, so that the speed of light is now an exactly specified constant of nature.

A few changes to notation conventions have also been made to alleviate lexicographic ambiguities. An analysis under the aegis of CSIRO, published in 2009 by the Royal Society, has pointed out the opportunities to finish the realisation of that goal, to the point of universal zero-ambiguity machine readability.[65]

2019 redefinitions

Reverse dependencies of the SI base units on seven physical constants, which are assigned exact numerical values in the 2019 redefinition. Unlike in the previous definitions, the base units are all derived exclusively from constants of nature. Arrows are shown in the opposite direction compared to typical dependency graphs, i.e.

a\rightarrow b

in this chart means

b

depends on

a

.

After the metre was redefined in 1960, the International Prototype of the Kilogram (IPK) was the only physical artefact upon which base units (directly the kilogram and indirectly the ampere, mole and candela) depended for their definition, making these units subject to periodic comparisons of national standard kilograms with the IPK.[66] During the 2nd and 3rd Periodic Verification of National Prototypes of the Kilogram, a significant divergence had occurred between the mass of the IPK and all of its official copies stored around the world: the copies had all noticeably increased in mass with respect to the IPK. During extraordinary verifications carried out in 2014 preparatory to redefinition of metric standards, continuing divergence was not confirmed. Nonetheless, the residual and irreducible instability of a physical IPK undermined the reliability of the entire metric system to precision measurement from small (atomic) to large (astrophysical) scales.

A proposal was made that:

In addition to the speed of light, four constants of nature – the Planck constant, an elementary charge, the Boltzmann constant, and the Avogadro number – be defined to have exact values
The International Prototype of the Kilogram be retired
The current definitions of the kilogram, ampere, kelvin, and mole be revised
The wording of base unit definitions should change emphasis from explicit unit to explicit constant definitions.

The new definitions were adopted at the 26th CGPM on 16 November 2018, and came into effect on 20 May 2019.[67] The change was adopted by the European Union through Directive (EU) 2019/1258.[68]

History

Stone marking the Austro-Hungarian/Italian border at Pontebba displaying myriametres, a unit of 10 km used in Central Europe in the 19th century (but since deprecated)[69]

The improvisation of units

The units and unit magnitudes of the metric system which became the SI were improvised piecemeal from everyday physical quantities starting in the mid-18th century. Only later were they moulded into an orthogonal coherent decimal system of measurement.

The degree centigrade as a unit of temperature resulted from the scale devised by Swedish astronomer Anders Celsius in 1742. His scale counter-intuitively designated 100 as the freezing point of water and 0 as the boiling point. Independently, in 1743, the French physicist Jean-Pierre Christin described a scale with 0 as the freezing point of water and 100 the boiling point. The scale became known as the centi-grade, or 100 gradations of temperature, scale.

The metric system was developed from 1791 onwards by a committee of the French Academy of Sciences, commissioned to create a unified and rational system of measures.[70] The group, which included preeminent French men of science,[71]^:89 used the same principles for relating length, volume, and mass that had been proposed by the English clergyman John Wilkins in 1668[72][73] and the concept of using the Earth's meridian as the basis of the definition of length, originally proposed in 1670 by the French abbot Mouton.[74][75]

Carl Friedrich Gauss

In March 1791, the Assembly adopted the committee's proposed principles for the new decimal system of measure including the metre defined to be 1/10,000,000 of the length of the quadrant of Earth's meridian passing through Paris, and authorised a survey to precisely establish the length of the meridian. In July 1792, the committee proposed the names metre, are, litre and grave for the units of length, area, capacity, and mass, respectively. The committee also proposed that multiples and submultiples of these units were to be denoted by decimal-based prefixes such as centi for a hundredth and kilo for a thousand.[76]^:82

Thomson

Maxwell

William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and James Clerk Maxwell played a prominent role in the development of the principle of coherence and in the naming of many units of measure.[77][78][79][80][81]

Later, during the process of adoption of the metric system, the Latin gramme and kilogramme, replaced the former provincial terms gravet (1/1000 grave) and grave. In June 1799, based on the results of the meridian survey, the standard mètre des Archives and kilogramme des Archives were deposited in the French National Archives. Subsequently, that year, the metric system was adopted by law in France.[82] [83] The French system was short-lived due to its unpopularity. Napoleon ridiculed it, and in 1812, introduced a replacement system, the mesures usuelles or "customary measures" which restored many of the old units, but redefined in terms of the metric system.

During the first half of the 19th century there was little consistency in the choice of preferred multiples of the base units: typically the myriametre (10000 metres) was in widespread use in both France and parts of Germany, while the kilogram (1000 grams) rather than the myriagram was used for mass.[69]

In 1832, the German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss, assisted by Wilhelm Weber, implicitly defined the second as a base unit when he quoted the Earth's magnetic field in terms of millimetres, grams, and seconds.[77] Prior to this, the strength of the Earth's magnetic field had only been described in relative terms. The technique used by Gauss was to equate the torque induced on a suspended magnet of known mass by the Earth's magnetic field with the torque induced on an equivalent system under gravity. The resultant calculations enabled him to assign dimensions based on mass, length and time to the magnetic field.[Note 65][84]

A candlepower as a unit of illuminance was originally defined by an 1860 English law as the light produced by a pure spermaceti candle weighing ¹⁄₆ pound (76 grams) and burning at a specified rate. Spermaceti, a waxy substance found in the heads of sperm whales, was once used to make high-quality candles. At this time the French standard of light was based upon the illumination from a Carcel oil lamp. The unit was defined as that illumination emanating from a lamp burning pure rapeseed oil at a defined rate. It was accepted that ten standard candles were about equal to one Carcel lamp.

Metre Convention

A French-inspired initiative for international cooperation in metrology led to the signing in 1875 of the Metre Convention, also called Treaty of the Metre, by 17 nations.[Note 66][71]^:353–354 Initially the convention only covered standards for the metre and the kilogram. In 1921, the Metre Convention was extended to include all physical units, including the ampere and others thereby enabling the CGPM to address inconsistencies in the way that the metric system had been used.[78][25]^:96

A set of 30 prototypes of the metre and 40 prototypes of the kilogram,[Note 67] in each case made of a 90% platinum-10% iridium alloy, were manufactured by British metallurgy specialty firm^(who?) and accepted by the CGPM in 1889. One of each was selected at random to become the International prototype metre and International prototype kilogram that replaced the mètre des Archives and kilogramme des Archives respectively. Each member state was entitled to one of each of the remaining prototypes to serve as the national prototype for that country.[85]

The treaty also established a number of international organisations to oversee the keeping of international standards of measurement:[86] [87]

The CGS and MKS systems

Closeup of the National Prototype Metre, serial number 27, allocated to the United States

In the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell, William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) and others working under the auspices of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, built on Gauss's work and formalised the concept of a coherent system of units with base units and derived units christened the centimetre–gram–second system of units in 1874. The principle of coherence was successfully used to define a number of units of measure based on the CGS, including the erg for energy, the dyne for force, the barye for pressure, the poise for dynamic viscosity and the stokes for kinematic viscosity.[80]

In 1879, the CIPM published recommendations for writing the symbols for length, area, volume and mass, but it was outside its domain to publish recommendations for other quantities. Beginning in about 1900, physicists who had been using the symbol "μ" (mu) for "micrometre" or "micron", "λ" (lambda) for "microlitre", and "γ" (gamma) for "microgram" started to use the symbols "μm", "μL" and "μg".[88]

At the close of the 19th century three different systems of units of measure existed for electrical measurements: a CGS-based system for electrostatic units, also known as the Gaussian or ESU system, a CGS-based system for electromechanical units (EMU) and an International system based on units defined by the Metre Convention.[89] for electrical distribution systems. Attempts to resolve the electrical units in terms of length, mass, and time using dimensional analysis was beset with difficulties—the dimensions depended on whether one used the ESU or EMU systems.[81] This anomaly was resolved in 1901 when Giovanni Giorgi published a paper in which he advocated using a fourth base unit alongside the existing three base units. The fourth unit could be chosen to be electric current, voltage, or electrical resistance.[90] Electric current with named unit 'ampere' was chosen as the base unit, and the other electrical quantities derived from it according to the laws of physics. This became the foundation of the MKS system of units.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a number of non-coherent units of measure based on the gram/kilogram, centimetre/metre, and second, such as the Pferdestärke (metric horsepower) for power,[91][Note 68] the darcy for permeability[92] and "millimetres of mercury" for barometric and blood pressure were developed or propagated, some of which incorporated standard gravity in their definitions.[Note 69]

At the end of the Second World War, a number of different systems of measurement were in use throughout the world. Some of these systems were metric system variations; others were based on customary systems of measure, like the U.S customary system and Imperial system of the UK and British Empire.

The Practical system of units

In 1948, the 9th CGPM commissioned a study to assess the measurement needs of the scientific, technical, and educational communities and "to make recommendations for a single practical system of units of measurement, suitable for adoption by all countries adhering to the Metre Convention".[93] This working document was Practical system of units of measurement. Based on this study, the 10th CGPM in 1954 defined an international system derived from six base units including units of temperature and optical radiation in addition to those for the MKS system mass, length, and time units and Giorgi's current unit. Six base units were recommended: the metre, kilogram, second, ampere, degree Kelvin, and candela.

The 9th CGPM also approved the first formal recommendation for the writing of symbols in the metric system when the basis of the rules as they are now known was laid down.[94] These rules were subsequently extended and now cover unit symbols and names, prefix symbols and names, how quantity symbols should be written and used, and how the values of quantities should be expressed.[25]^:104,130

Birth of the SI

In 1960, the 11th CGPM synthesised the results of the 12-year study into a set of 16 resolutions. The system was named the International System of Units, abbreviated SI from the French name, Le Système International d'Unités.[25]^:110[95]

Historical definitions

When Maxwell first introduced the concept of a coherent system, he identified three quantities that could be used as base units: mass, length, and time. Giorgi later identified the need for an electrical base unit, for which the unit of electric current was chosen for SI. Another three base units (for temperature, amount of substance, and luminous intensity) were added later.

The early metric systems defined a unit of weight as a base unit, while the SI defines an analogous unit of mass. In everyday use, these are mostly interchangeable, but in scientific contexts the difference matters. Mass, strictly the inertial mass, represents a quantity of matter. It relates the acceleration of a body to the applied force via Newton's law, F = m × a: force equals mass times acceleration. A force of 1 N (newton) applied to a mass of 1 kg will accelerate it at 1 m/s². This is true whether the object is floating in space or in a gravity field e.g. at the Earth's surface. Weight is the force exerted on a body by a gravitational field, and hence its weight depends on the strength of the gravitational field. Weight of a 1 kg mass at the Earth's surface is m × g; mass times the acceleration due to gravity, which is 9.81 newtons at the Earth's surface and is about 3.5 newtons at the surface of Mars. Since the acceleration due to gravity is local and varies by location and altitude on the Earth, weight is unsuitable for precision measurements of a property of a body, and this makes a unit of weight unsuitable as a base unit.

SI base units[36]^:6[37][96]
Unit name	Definition[n 1]
second	Prior: (1675) 1/86400 of a day of 24 hours of 60 minutes of 60 seconds.^TLB Interim (1956): 1/31556925.9747 of the tropical year for 1900 January 0 at 12 hours ephemeris time. Current (1967): The duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.
metre	Prior (1793): 1/10000000 of the meridian through Paris between the North Pole and the Equator.^FG Interim (1889): The Prototype of the metre chosen by the CIPM, at the temperature of melting ice, represents the metric unit of length. Interim (1960): 1650763.73 wavelengths in vacuum of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the 2p¹⁰ and 5d⁵ quantum levels of the krypton-86 atom. Current (1983): The distance travelled by light in vacuum in 1/299792458 second.
kilogram	Prior (1793): The grave was defined as being the mass (then called weight) of one litre of pure water at its freezing point.^FG Interim (1889): The mass of a small squat cylinder of ≈47 cubic centimetres of platinum-iridium alloy kept in the International Burueau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), Pavillon de Breteuil, France.[Note 70] Also, in practice, any of numerous official replicas of it.[Note 71][97] Current (2019): The kilogram is defined by setting the Planck constant $h$ exactly to 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ J⋅s (J = kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²), given the definitions of the metre and the second.[23] Then the formula would be kg = $h$ /6.62607015×10⁻³⁴⋅m²⋅s⁻¹
ampere	Prior (1881): A tenth of the electromagnetic CGS unit of current. The [CGS] electromagnetic unit of current is that current, flowing in an arc 1 cm long of a circle 1 cm in radius, that creates a field of one oersted at the centre.[98] ^IEC Interim (1946): The constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular cross-section, and placed 1 m apart in vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force equal to 2×10⁻⁷ newtons per metre of length. Current (2019): The flow of 1/1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ times the elementary charge $e$ per second.
kelvin	Prior (1743): The centigrade scale is obtained by assigning 0 °C to the freezing point of water and 100 °C to the boiling point of water. Interim (1954): The triple point of water (0.01 °C) defined to be exactly 273.16 K.[n 2] Previous (1967): 1/273.16 of the thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of water. Current (2019): The kelvin is defined by setting the fixed numerical value of the Boltzmann constant $k$ to 1.380649×10⁻²³ J⋅K⁻¹, (J = kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²), given the definition of the kilogram, the metre, and the second.
mole	Prior (1900): A stoichiometric quantity which is the equivalent mass in grams of Avogadro's number of molecules of a substance.^ICAW Interim (1967): The amount of substance of a system which contains as many elementary entities as there are atoms in 0.012 kilogram of carbon-12. Current (2019): The amount of substance of exactly 6.02214076×10²³ elementary entities. This number is the fixed numerical value of the Avogadro constant, $N$ _A, when expressed in the unit mol⁻¹ and is called the Avogadro number.
candela	Prior (1946): The value of the new candle (early name for the candela) is such that the brightness of the full radiator at the temperature of solidification of platinum is 60 new candles per square centimetre. Current (1979): The luminous intensity, in a given direction, of a source that emits monochromatic radiation of frequency 5.4×10¹⁴ hertz and that has a radiant intensity in that direction of 1/683 watt per steradian. Note: both old and new definitions are approximately the luminous intensity of a spermaceti candle burning modestly bright, in the late 19th century called a "candlepower" or a "candle".
Notes Interim definitions are given here only when there has been a significant difference in the definition. In 1954 the unit of thermodynamic temperature was known as the "degree Kelvin" (symbol °K; "Kelvin" spelt with an upper-case "K"). It was renamed the "kelvin" (symbol "K"; "kelvin" spelt with a lower case "k") in 1967. The Prior definitions of the various base units in the above table were made by the following authors and authorities: TLB = Tito Livio Burattini, Misura universale, Vilnius, 1675 FG = French Government IEC = International Electrotechnical Commission ICAW = International Committee on Atomic Weights All other definitions result from resolutions by either CGPM or the CIPM and are catalogued in the SI Brochure.

Metric units that are not recognised by the SI

Although the term metric system is often used as an informal alternative name for the International System of Units,[99] other metric systems exist, some of which were in widespread use in the past or are even still used in particular areas. There are also individual metric units such as the sverdrup that exist outside of any system of units. Most of the units of the other metric systems are not recognised by the SI.[Note 72][Note 74]

Here are some examples. The centimetre–gram–second (CGS) system was the dominant metric system in the physical sciences and electrical engineering from the 1860s until at least the 1960s, and is still in use in some fields. It includes such SI-unrecognised units as the gal, dyne, erg, barye, etc. in its mechanical sector, as well as the poise and stokes in fluid dynamics. When it comes to the units for quantities in electricity and magnetism, there are several versions of the CGS system. Two of these are obsolete: the CGS electrostatic ('CGS-ESU', with the SI-unrecognised units of statcoulomb, statvolt, statampere, etc.) and the CGS electromagnetic system ('CGS-EMU', with abampere, abcoulomb, oersted, maxwell, abhenry, gilbert, etc.).[Note 75] A 'blend' of these two systems is still popular and is known as the Gaussian system (which includes the gauss as a special name for the CGS-EMU unit maxwell per square centimetre).[Note 76]

In engineering (other than electrical engineering), there was formerly a long tradition of using the gravitational metric system, whose SI-unrecognised units include the kilogram-force (kilopond), technical atmosphere, metric horsepower, etc. The metre–tonne–second (mts) system, used in the Soviet Union from 1933 to 1955, had such SI-unrecognised units as the sthène, pièze, etc. Other groups of SI-unrecognised metric units are the various legacy and CGS units related to ionising radiation (rutherford, curie, roentgen, rad, rem, etc.), radiometry (langley, jansky), photometry (phot, nox, stilb, nit, metre-candle,[103]^:17 lambert, apostilb, skot, brill, troland, talbot, candlepower, candle), thermodynamics (calorie), and spectroscopy (reciprocal centimetre).

The angstrom is still used in various fields. Some other SI-unrecognised metric units that don't fit into any of the already mentioned categories include the are, bar, barn, fermi, gradian (gon, grad, or grade), metric carat, micron, millimetre of mercury, torr, millimetre (or centimetre, or metre) of water, millimicron, mho, stere, x unit, $γ$ (unit of mass), $γ$ (unit of magnetic flux density), and $λ$ (unit of volume).[104]^:20–21 In some cases, the SI-unrecognised metric units have equivalent SI units formed by combining a metric prefix with a coherent SI unit. For example, 1 $γ$ (unit of magnetic flux density) = 1 nT, 1 Gal = 1 cm⋅s⁻², 1 barye = 1 deci pascal, etc. (a related group are the correspondences[Note 75] such as 1 abampere ≘ 1 deca ampere, 1 abhenry ≘ 1 nano henry, etc.[Note 77]). Sometimes it is not even a matter of a metric prefix: the SI-nonrecognised unit may be exactly the same as an SI coherent unit, except for the fact that the SI does not recognise the special name and symbol. For example, the nit is just an SI-unrecognised name for the SI unit candela per square metre and the talbot is an SI-unrecognised name for the SI unit lumen second. Frequently, a non-SI metric unit is related to an SI unit through a power of ten factor, but not one that has a metric prefix, e.g. 1 dyn = 10⁻⁵ newton, 1 Å = 10⁻¹⁰ m, etc. (and correspondences[Note 75] like 1 gauss ≘ 10⁻⁴ tesla). Finally, there are metric units whose conversion factors to SI units are not powers of ten, e.g. 1 calorie = 4.184 joules and 1 kilogram-force = 9.806650 newtons. Some SI-unrecognised metric units are still frequently used, e.g. the calorie (in nutrition), the rem (in the U.S.), the jansky (in radio astronomy), the reciprocal centimetre (in spectroscopy), the gauss (in industry) and the CGS-Gaussian units[Note 76] more generally (in some subfields of physics), the metric horsepower (for engine power, in Europe), the kilogram-force (for rocket engine thrust, in China and sometimes in Europe), etc. Others are now rarely used, such as the sthène and the rutherford.

Notes

For example, the SI unit of velocity is the metre per second, m⋅s⁻¹; of acceleration is the metre per second squared, m⋅s⁻²; etc.
For example the newton (N), the unit of force, equivalent to kg⋅m⋅s⁻²; the joule (J), the unit of energy, equivalent to kg⋅m²⋅s⁻², etc. The most recently named derived unit, the katal, was defined in 1999.
For example, the recommended unit for the electric field strength is the volt per metre, V/m, where the volt is the derived unit for electric potential difference. The volt per metre is equal to kg⋅m⋅s⁻³⋅A⁻¹ when expressed in terms of base units.
Meaning that different units for a given quantity, such as length, are related by factors of 10. Therefore, calculations involve the simple process of moving the decimal point to the right or to the left.[3]

For example, the basic SI unit of length is the metre, which is about the height of the kitchen counter. But if one wishes to talk about driving distances using the SI units, one will normally use kilometres, where one kilometre is 1000 metres. On the other hand, tailoring measurements would usually be expressed in centimetres, where one centimetre is 1/100 of a metre.
Although the terms the metric system and the SI system are often used as synonyms, there are in fact many different, mutually incompatible types of metric systems. Moreover, there even exist some individual metric units that are not recognised by any larger metric system. See the section Metric units that are not recognised by the SI, below.
As of May 2020, only for the following countries is it uncertain whether the SI system has any official status: Myanmar, Liberia, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, Palau, and Samoa.
It shall be lawful throughout the United States of America to employ the weights and measures of the metric system; and no contract or dealing, or pleading in any court, shall be deemed invalid or liable to objection because the weights or measures expressed or referred to therein are weights or measures of the metric system.
In the US, the history of legislation begins with the Metric Act of 1866, which legally protected use of the metric system in commerce. The first section is still part of US law (15 U.S.C. § 204).[Note 7] In 1875, the US became one of the original signatories of the Metre Convention. In 1893, the Mendenhall Order stated that the Office of Weights and Measures... will in the future regard the International Prototype Metre and Kilogramme as fundamental standards, and the customary units — the yard and the pound — will be derived therefrom in accordance with the Act of July 28, 1866. In 1954, the US adopted the International Nautical Mile, which is defined as exactly 1852 m, in lieu of the U.S. Nautical Mile, defined as 6080.20 ft = 1853.248 m. In 1959, the U.S. National Bureau of Standards officially adapted the International yard and pound, which are defined exactly in terms of the metre and the kilogram. In 1968, the Metric Study Act (Pub. L. 90-472, August 9, 1968, 82 Stat. 693) authorised a three-year study of systems of measurement in the U.S., with particular emphasis on the feasibility of adopting the SI. The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 followed, later amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, the Savings in Construction Act of 1996, and the Department of Energy High-End Computing Revitalization Act of 2004. As a result of all these acts, the US current law (15 U.S.C. § 205b) states that
It is therefore the declared policy of the United States- (1) to designate the metric system of measurement as the preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce; (2) to require that each Federal agency, by a date certain and to the extent economically feasible by the end of the fiscal year 1992, use the metric system of measurement in its procurements, grants, and other business-related activities, except to the extent that such use is impractical or is likely to cause significant inefficiencies or loss of markets to United States firms, such as when foreign competitors are producing competing products in non-metric units; (3) to seek out ways to increase understanding of the metric system of measurement through educational information and guidance and in Government publications; and (4) to permit the continued use of traditional systems of weights and measures in non-business activities.
And have been defined in terms of the SI's metric predecessors since at least the 1890s.
See e.g. here for the various definitions of the catty, a traditional Chinese unit of mass, in various places across East and Southeast Asia. Similarly, see this article on the traditional Japanese units of measurement, as well as this one on the traditional Indian units of measurement.
From French: Conférence générale des poids et mesures
from French: Comité international des poids et mesures
The SI Brochure for short. As of May 2020, the latest edition is the ninth, published in 2019. It is Ref.[2] of this article.
from French: Bureau international des poids et mesures
The latter are formalised in the International System of Quantities (ISQ).[2]^:129
Here are some examples of coherent derived SI units: the unit of velocity, which is the metre per second, with the symbol m/s; the unit of acceleration, which is the metre per second squared, with the symbol m/s²; etc.
A useful property of a coherent system is that when the numerical values of physical quantities are expressed in terms of the units of the system, then the equations between the numerical values have exactly the same form, including numerical factors, as the corresponding equations between the physical quantities;[5]^:6 An example may be useful to clarify this. Suppose we are given an equation relating some physical quantities, e.g. $T = 1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ , expressing the kinetic energy $T$ in terms of the mass $m$ and the velocity $v$ . Choose a system of units, and let ${T}$ , ${m}$ , and ${v}$ be the numerical values of $T$ , $m$ , and $v$ when expressed in that system of units. If the system is coherent, then the numerical values will obey the same equation (including numerical factors) as the physical quantities, i.e. we will have that $T = 1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ .
On the other hand, if the chosen system of units is not coherent, this property may fail. For example, the following is not a coherent system: one where energy is measured in calories, while mass and velocity are measured in their SI units. After all, in that case, $1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ will give a numerical value whose meaning is the kinetic energy when expressed in joules, and that numerical value is different, by a factor of 4.184, from the numerical value when the kinetic energy is expressed in calories. Thus, in that system, the equation satisfied by the numerical values is instead ${T} = 1 / 4.184 1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ .
For example the newton (N), the unit of force, equal to kg⋅m⋅s⁻² when written in terms of the base units; the joule (J), the unit of energy, equal to kg⋅m²⋅s⁻², etc. The most recently named derived unit, the katal, was defined in 1999.
For example, the recommended unit for the electric field strength is the volt per metre, V/m, where the volt is the derived unit for electric potential difference. The volt per metre is equal to kg⋅m⋅s⁻³⋅A⁻¹ when expressed in terms of base units.
The SI base units (like the metre) are also called coherent units, because they belong to the set of coherent SI units.
One kilometre is about 0.62 miles, a length equal to about two and a half laps around a typical athletic track. Walking at a moderate pace for one hour, an adult human will cover about five kilometres (about three miles). The distance from London, UK, to Paris, France is about 350 km; from London to New York, 5600 km.
In other words, given any base unit or any coherent derived unit with a special name and symbol.
Note, however, that there is a special group of units that are called non-SI units accepted for use with SI, most of which are not decimal multiples of the corresponding SI units; see below.
Names and symbols for decimal multiples and sub-multiples of the unit of mass are formed as if it is the gram which is the base unit, i.e. by attaching prefix names and symbols, respectively, to the unit name "gram" and the unit symbol "g". For example, 10⁻⁶ kg is written as milligram, mg, not as microkilogram, μkg.[2]^:144
Customarily, however, rainfall is measured in non-coherent SI units such as millimetres in height collected on each square metre during a certain period, equivalent to litres per square metre.
As perhaps a more familiar example, consider rainfall, defined as volume of rain (measured in m³) that fell per unit area (measured in m²). Since m³/m²=m, it follows that the coherent derived SI unit of rainfall is the metre, even though the metre is, of course, also the base SI unit of length.[Note 25]
Even base units; the mole was added as a base SI unit only in 1971.[2]^:156
See the next section for why this type of definition is considered advantageous.
Their exactly defined values are as follows:[2]^:128
$\Delta \nu _{\text{Cs}}$ = 9192631770 Hz
$c$ = 299792458 m/s
$h$ = 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ J⋅s
$e$ = 1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ C
$k$ = 1.380649×10⁻²³ J/K
$N_{\text{A}}$ = 6.02214076×10²³ mol⁻¹
$K_{\text{cd}}$ = 683 lm/W.
A mise en pratique is French for 'putting into practice; implementation'.[9][10]
The sole exception is the definition of the second, which is still given not in terms of fixed values of fundamental constants but in terms of a particular property of a particular naturally occurring object, the caesium atom. And indeed, it has been clear for some time that relatively soon, by using atoms other than caesium, it will be possible to have definitions of the second that are more precise than the current one. Taking advantage of these more precise methods will necessitate the change in the definition of the second, probably sometime around the year 2030.[17]^:196
Again, except for the second, as explained in the previous note.
The second may eventually get fixed by defining an exact value for yet another fundamental constant (whose derived unit includes the second), for example the Rydberg constant. For this to happen, the uncertainty in the measurement of that constant must become so small as to be dominated by the uncertainty in the measurement of whatever clock transition frequency is being used to define the second at that point. Once that happens, the definitions will be reversed: the value of the constant will be fixed by definition to an exact value, namely its most recent best measured value, while the clock transition frequency will become a quantity whose value is no longer fixed by definition but which has to be measured. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that this will happen in the foreseeable future, because presently there are no promising strategies for measuring any additional fundamental constants with the necessary precision.[18]^:4112–3
The one exception being the definition of the second; see Notes [Note 31] and [Note 32] in the following section.
To see this, recall that Hz = s⁻¹ and J = kg⋅m²⋅s⁻². Thus,
(Hz) (J⋅s) / (m/s)²
= (s⁻¹) [(kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²)⋅s] (m⋅s⁻¹)⁻²
= s^{(−1−2+1+2)}⋅m⁽²⁻²⁾⋅kg
= kg,
since all the powers of metres and seconds cancel out. It can further be shown that (Hz) (J⋅s) / (m/s)² is the only combination of powers of the units of the defining constants (that is, the only combination of powers of Hz, m/s, J⋅s, C, J/K, mol⁻¹, and lm/W) that results in the kilogram.
Namely,
1 Hz = $Δ ν Cs$ /9192631770
1 m/s = $c$ /299792458 , and
1 J⋅s = $h$ /6.62607015×10⁻³⁴.
The SI Brochure prefers to write the relationship between the kilogram and the defining constants directly, without going through the intermediary step of defining 1 Hz, 1 m/s, and 1 J⋅s, like this:[2]^:131 1 kg = (299792458)²/(6.62607015×10⁻³⁴)(9192631770) $h$ $Δ ν Cs$ / $c$ ².
Which define the International System of Quantities (ISQ).
For example, from 1889 until 1960, the metre was defined as the length of the International Prototype Metre, a particular bar made of platinum-iridium alloy that was (and still is) kept at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, located in the Pavillon de Breteuil in Saint-Cloud, France, near Paris. The final artefact-based definition of the metre, which stood from 1927 to the redefinition of the metre in 1960, read as follows:[2]^:159
The unit of length is the metre, defined by the distance, at 0°, between the axes of the two central lines marked on the bar of platinum-iridium kept at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures and declared Prototype of the metre by the 1st Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures, this bar being subject to standard atmospheric pressure and supported on two cylinders of at least one centimetre diameter, symmetrically placed in the same horizontal plane at a distance of 571 mm from each other.
The '0°' refers to the temperature of 0 °C. The support requirements represent the Airy points of the prototype—the points, separated by 4/7 of the total length of the bar, at which the bending or droop of the bar is minimised.[20]
The latter was called the 'quadrant', the length of a meridian from the equator to the North Pole. The originally chosen meridian was the Paris meridian.
At the time 'weight' and 'mass' were not always carefully distinguished.
This volume is 1 cm³ = 1 mL, which is 1×10⁻⁶ m³. Thus, the original definition of mass used not the coherent unit of volume (which would be the m³) but a decimal submultiple of it.
Indeed, the original idea of the metric system was to define all units using only natural and universally available measurable quantities. For example, the original definition of the unit of length, the metre, was a definite fraction (one ten-millionth) of the length of a quarter of the Earth's meridian.[Note 39] Once the metre was defined, one could define the unit of volume as the volume of a cube whose sides are one unit of length. And once the unit of volume was determined, the unit of mass could be defined as the mass of a unit of volume of some convenient substance at standard conditions. In fact, the original definition of the gram was 'the absolute weight[Note 40] of a volume of pure water equal to the cube of the hundredth part of a metre,[Note 41] and at the temperature of melting ice.'

However, it soon became apparent that these particular 'natural' realisations of the units of length and mass simply could not, at that time, be as precise (and as convenient to access) as the needs of science, technology, and commerce demanded. Therefore, prototypes were adopted instead. Care was taken to manufacture the prototypes so that they would be as close as possible, given the available science and technology of the day, to the idealised 'natural' realisations. But once the prototypes were completed, the units of length and mass became equal by definition to these prototypes (see Mètre des Archives and Kilogramme des Archives).

Nevertheless, throughout the history of the SI, one keeps seeing expressions of hope that one day, one would be able to dispense with the prototypes and define all units in terms of standards found in nature. The first such standard was the second. It was never defined using a prototype, being originally defined as 1/86400 of the length of a day (since there are 60 s/min × 60 min/hr × 24 hr/day = 86400 s/day). As we mentioned, the vision of defining all units in terms of universally available natural standards was at last fulfilled in 2019, when the sole remaining prototype used by the SI, the one for the kilogram, was finally retired.
The following references are useful for identifying the authors of the preceding reference: Ref.,, Ref., and Ref.<ref name='Edinburgh Review Report on Restoration of Standards'>"Art. VIII.—Report of the Commissioners appointed to consider the steps to be taken for restoration of the standards of weight and measure. Presented to both Houses of Parliament by Command of her Majesty, 1841.", The Edinburgh Review, Edinburgh: Ballantyne and Hughes, vol. 77 no. February, 1843–April, 1843, p. 228, 1843, retrieved 20 April 2020
As happened with British standards for length and mass in 1834, when they were lost or damaged beyond the point of useability in a great fire known as the burning of Parliament. A commission of eminent scientists was assembled to recommend the steps to be taken for the restoration of the standards, and in its report, it described the destruction caused by the fire as follows:[21][Note 43]
Indeed, one of the motivations for the 2019 redefinition of the SI was the instability of the artefact that served as the definition of the kilogram.

Before that, one of the reasons the United States started defining the yard in terms of the metre in 1893 was that[22]^:381
[t]he bronze yard No. 11, which was an exact copy of the British imperial yard both in form and material, had shown changes when compared with the imperial yard in 1876 and 1888 which could not reasonably be said to be entirely due to changes in No. 11. Suspicion as to the constancy of the length of the British standard was therefore aroused.
In the above, the bronze yard No. 11 is one of two copies of the new British standard yard that were sent to the US in 1856, after Britain completed the manufacture of new imperial standards to replace those lost in the fire of 1834 (see [Note 44]). As standards of length, the new yards, especially bronze No. 11, were far superior to the standard the US had been using up to that point, the so-called Troughton scale. They were therefore accepted by the Office of Weights and Measures (a predecessor of NIST) as the standards of the United States. They were twice taken to England and recompared with the imperial yard, in 1876 and in 1888, and, as mentioned above, measurable discrepancies were found.[22]^:381
In 1890, as a signatory of the Metre Convention, the US received two copies of the International Prototype Metre, the construction of which represented the most advanced ideas of standards of the time. Therefore it seemed that US measures would have greater stability and higher accuracy by accepting the international metre as fundamental standard, which was formalised in 1893 by the Mendenhall Order.[22]^:379–81
As mentioned above, it is all but certain that the defining constant $\Delta \nu _{\text{Cs}}$ will have to be replaced relatively soon, as it is becoming increasingly clear that atoms other than caesium can provide more precise time standards. However, it is not excluded that some of the other defining constants would eventually have to be replaced as well. For example, the elementary charge $e$ corresponds to a coupling strength of the electromagnetic force via the fine-structure constant $\alpha$ . Some theories predict that $\alpha$ can vary over time. The presently known experimental limits of the maximum possible variation of $\alpha$ are so low that 'any effect on foreseeable practical measurements can be excluded',[2]^:128 even if one of these theories turns out to be correct. Nevertheless, if the fine-structure constant turns out to slightly vary over time, science and technology may in the future advance to a point where such changes become measurable. At that point, one might consider replacing, for the purposes of defining the SI system, the elementary charge with some other quantity, the choice of which will be informed by what we learn about the time variation of $\alpha$ .
The latter group includes economic unions such as the Caribbean Community.
The official term is "States Parties to the Metre Convention"; the term "Member States" is its synonym and used for easy reference.[29] As of 13 January 2020,.[29] there are 62 Member States and 40 Associate States and Economies of the General Conference.[Note 47]
Among the tasks of these Consultative Committees are the detailed consideration of advances in physics that directly influence metrology, the preparation of Recommendations for discussion at the CIPM, the identification, planning and execution of key comparisons of national measurement standards, and the provision of advice to the CIPM on the scientific work in the laboratories of the BIPM.[30]
As of April 2020, these include those from Spain (CEM), Russia (FATRiM), Switzerland (METAS), Italy (INRiM), South Korea (KRISS), France (LNE), China (NIM), US (NIST), Japan (AIST/NIMJ), UK (NPL), Canada (NRC), and Germany (PTB).
As of April 2020, these include International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML).
As of April 2020, these include International Commission on Illumination (CIE), CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC).
As of April 2020, these include International Astronomical Union (IAU), International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), and International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP).
These are individuals with a long-term involvement in matters related to units, having actively contributed to publications on units, and having a global view and understanding of science as well as knowledge on the development and functioning of the International System of Units.[34] As of April 2020, these include[33][35] Prof. Marc Himbert and Dr. Terry Quinn.
For historical reasons, the kilogram rather than the gram is treated as the coherent unit, making an exception to this characterisation.
Ohm's law: 1 Ω = 1 V/A from the relationship E = I × R, where E is electromotive force or voltage (unit: volt), I is current (unit: ampere), and R is resistance (unit: ohm).
While the second is readily determined from the Earth's rotation period, the metre, originally defined in terms of the Earth's size and shape, is less amenable; however, the fact that the Earth's circumference is very close to 40000 km may be a useful mnemonic.
This is evident from the formula $s = v 0 t + 1 / 2 a t 2$ with $v 0 = 0$ and $a = 9.81 m/s 2$ .
This is evident from the formula $T = 2π \sqrt L / g$ .
A 60 watt light bulb has about 800 lumens[48] which is radiated equally in all directions (i.e. 4π steradians), thus is equal to $I_{v}={{\frac {800\ {\text{lm}}}{4\pi \ {\text{sr}}}}\approx 64\ {\text{cd}}}$
This is evident from the formula $P = I V$ .
Except where specifically noted, these rules are common to both the SI Brochure and the NIST brochure.
For example, the United States' National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has produced a version of the CGPM document (NIST SP 330) which clarifies usage for English-language publications that use American English
This term is a translation of the official [French] text of the SI Brochure.
The strength of the Earth's magnetic field was designated 1 G (gauss) at the surface (= 1 cm^−1/2⋅g^1/2⋅s⁻¹).
Argentina, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, France, German Empire, Italy, Peru, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Norway, Switzerland, Ottoman Empire, United States, and Venezuela.
The text "Des comparaisons périodiques des étalons nationaux avec les prototypes internationaux" (English: the periodic comparisons of national standards with the international prototypes) in article 6.3 of the Metre Convention distinguishes between the words "standard" (OED: "The legal magnitude of a unit of measure or weight") and "prototype" (OED: "an original on which something is modelled").
Pferd is German for "horse" and Stärke is German for "strength" or "power". The Pferdestärke is the power needed to raise 75 kg against gravity at the rate of one metre per second. (1 PS = 0.985 HP).
This constant is unreliable, because it varies over the surface of the earth.
It is known as the International Prototype of the Kilogram.
This object is the International Prototype Kilogram or IPK called rather poetically Le Grand K.
Meaning, they are neither part of the SI system nor one of the non-SI units accepted for use with that system.
All major systems of units in which force rather than mass is a base unit are of a type known as gravitational system (also known as technical or engineering system). In the most prominent metric example of such a system, the unit of force is taken to be the kilogram-force (kp), which is the weight of the standard kilogram under standard gravity, $g$ = 9.80665 m/s². The unit of mass is then a derived unit. Most commonly, it is defined as the mass that is accelerated at a rate of 1 m/s² when acted upon by a net force of 1 kp; often called the hyl, it therefore has a value of 1 hyl = 9.80665 kg, so that it is not a decimal multiple of the gram. On the other hand, there are also gravitational metric systems in which the unit of mass is defined as the mass which, when acted upon by standard gravity, has the weight of one kilogram-force; in that case, the unit of mass is exactly the kilogram, although it is a derived unit.
Having said that, some units are recognised by all metric systems. The second is a base unit in all of them. The metre is recognised in all of them, either as the base unit of length or as a decimal multiple or submultiple of the base unit of length. The gram is not recognized as a unit (either the base unit or a decimal multiple of the base unit) by every metric system. In particular, in gravitational metric systems, the gram-force takes its place.[Note 73]
Interconversion between different systems of units is usually straightforward; however, the units for electricity and magnetism are an exception, and a surprising amount of care is required. The problem is that, in general, the physical quantities that go by the same name and play the same role in the CGS-ESU, CGS-EMU, and SI systems—e.g. 'electric charge', 'electric field strength', etc.—do not merely have different units in the three systems; technically speaking, they are actually different physical quantities.[100]^:422[100]^:423 Consider 'electric charge', which in each of the three systems can be identified as the quantity two instances of which enter in the numerator of Coulomb's law (as that law is written in each system). This identification produces three different physical quantities: the 'CGS-ESU charge', the 'CGS-EMU charge', and the 'SI charge'.[101]^:35[100]^:423 They even have different dimensions when expressed in terms of the base dimensions: mass^1/2 × length^3/2 × time⁻¹ for the CGS-ESU charge, mass^1/2 × length^1/2 for the CGS-EMU charge, and current × time for the SI charge (where, in the SI, the dimension of current is independent of those of mass, length, and time). On the other hand, these three quantities are clearly quantifying the same underlying physical phenomenon. Thus, we say not that 'one abcoulomb equals ten coulomb', but rather that 'one abcoulomb corresponds to ten coulomb',[100]^:423 written as 1 abC ≘ 10 C.[101]^:35 By that we mean, 'if the CGS-EMU electric charge is measured to have the magnitude of 1 abC, then the SI electric charge will have the magnitude of 10 C'.[101]^:35[102]^:57–58
The CGS-Gaussian units are a blend of the CGS-ESU and CGS-EMU, taking units related to magnetism from the latter and all the rest from the former. In addition, the system introduces the gauss as a special name for the CGS-EMU unit maxwell per square centimetre
Authors often abuse notation slightly and write these with an 'equals' sign ('=') rather than a 'corresponds to' sign ('≘').

References

"SI Logo graphic files". BIPM. 2017. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
International Bureau of Weights and Measures (20 May 2019), SI Brochure: The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (9th ed.), ISBN 978-92-822-2272-0
The United States and The Metric System (A Capsule History) (PDF), Gaithersburg, MD, USA: NIST, 1997, p. 2, archived (PDF) from the original on 16 April 2020, retrieved 15 April 2020
"Interpretation of the International System of Units (the Metric System of Measurement) for the United States" (73 FR 28432). Federal Register. 2008. Archived from the original on 16 August 2017. Retrieved 14 May 2020.
ISO 80000-1:2009 Quantities and units — Part 1: General
"Decimal Nature of the Metric System". US Metric Association. 2015. Archived from the original on 15 April 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
Atkins, Tony; Escudier, Marcel (2019). A Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199587438. OCLC 1110670667.
Chapple, Michael (2014). Dictionary of Physics. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781135939267. OCLC 876513059.
"NIST Mise en Pratique of the New Kilogram Definition". NIST. 2013. Archived from the original on 14 July 2017. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
"Mise en pratique". Reverso. 2018. Archived from the original on 9 May 2020. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
"Practical realizations of the definitions of some important units". BIPM. 2019. Archived from the original on 9 April 2020. Retrieved 11 April 2020.
Mohr, J. C.; Phillips, W. D. (2015). "Dimensionless Units in the SI". Metrologia. 52 (1): 40–47. arXiv:1409.2794. Bibcode:2015Metro..52...40M. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/52/1/40. S2CID 3328342.
Mills, I. M. (2016). "On the units radian and cycle for the quantity plane angle". Metrologia. 53 (3): 991–997. Bibcode:2016Metro..53..991M. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/991.
"SI units need reform to avoid confusion". Editorial. Nature. 548 (7666): 135. 7 August 2011. doi:10.1038/548135b. PMID 28796224.
P. R. Bunker; I. M. Mills; Per Jensen (2019). "The Planck constant and its units". J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer. 237: 106594. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106594.
P. R. Bunker; Per Jensen (2020). "The Planck constant of action $h$ _A". J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer. 243: 106835. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106835.
Riehle, Fritz; Gill, Patrick; Arias, Felicitas; Robertsson, Lennart (2018). "The CIPM list of recommended frequency standard values: guidelines and procedures". Metrologia. 55 (2): 188–200. Bibcode:2018Metro..55..188R. doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aaa302.
Gill, Patrick (28 October 2011). "When should we change the definition of the second?". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 369 (1953): 4109–4130. Bibcode:2011RSPTA.369.4109G. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0237. PMID 21930568.
"What is a mise en pratique?". BIPM. 2011. Archived from the original on 22 September 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015. is a set of instructions that allows the definition to be realised in practice at the highest level.
Phelps, F. M. III (1966). "Airy Points of a Meter Bar". American Journal of Physics. 34 (5): 419–422. Bibcode:1966AmJPh..34..419P. doi:10.1119/1.1973011.
G. B. Airy; F. Baily; J. E. D. Bethune; J. F. W. Herschel; J. G. S. Lefevre; J. W. Lubbock; G. Peacock; R. Sheepshanks (1841). Report of the Commissioners appointed to consider the steps to be taken for restoration of the standards of weight & measure (Report). London: W. Clowes and Sons for Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
Fischer, Louis A. (1905). History of standard weights and measures of the United States (PDF) (Report). National Bureau of Standards. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 June 2018. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
Materese, Robin (16 November 2018). "Historic Vote Ties Kilogram and Other Units to Natural Constants". NIST. Retrieved 16 November 2018.
"Kilogram finally redefined as world's metrologists agree to new formulation for SI units". Physics World. 16 November 2018. Retrieved 19 September 2020.
International Bureau of Weights and Measures (2006), The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (8th ed.), ISBN 92-822-2213-6, archived (PDF) from the original on 14 August 2017
"Units: CGS and MKS". www.unc.edu. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
Giovanni Giorgi (1901), "Unità Razionali de Elettromagnetismo", in Atti dell' Associazione Elettrotecnica Italiana.
Brainerd, John G. (1970). "Some Unanswered Questions". Technology and Culture. JSTOR. 11 (4): 601–603. doi:10.2307/3102695. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3102695.
"Member States". BIPM. 2020. Archived from the original on 18 April 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
"The role of the Consultative Committees". BIPM. 2014. Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
"Consultative Committee for Units (CCU)". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 31 January 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
"Consultative Committee for Units (CCU): Criteria for membership". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
"Consultative Committee for Units (CCU): Members". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
"Consultative Committee for Units (CCU): Criteria for membership (version from July 2019)". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019.CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
BIPM (2003). Consultative Committees: Directory (PDF) (Report). BIPM. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
David B. Newell; Eite Tiesinga, eds. (2019). The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (NIST Special publication 330, 2019 ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Retrieved 30 November 2019.
Quantities Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, IUPAC
Page, Chester H.; Vigoureux, Paul, eds. (20 May 1975). The International Bureau of Weights and Measures 1875–1975: NBS Special Publication 420. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards. pp. 238–244.
"Units & Symbols for Electrical & Electronic Engineers". Institution of Engineering and Technology. 1996. pp. 8–11. Archived from the original on 28 June 2013. Retrieved 19 August 2013.
Thompson, Ambler; Taylor, Barry N. (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) (Special publication 811) (PDF). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Science, Tim Sharp 2017-09-15T15:47:00Z; Astronomy. "How Big Is Earth?". Space.com. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
"Metre | measurement". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
"Standard Table Sizes". Bassett Furniture. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
"The Average Height of NBA Players – From Point Guards to Centers". The Hoops Geek. 9 December 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
"RUBINGHSCIENCE.ORG / Using Euro coins as weights". www.rubinghscience.org. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
"Coin Specifications | U.S. Mint". www.usmint.gov. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
"Fifty Pence Coin". www.royalmint.com. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
"Lumens and the Lighting Facts Label". Energy.gov. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
Rowlett, Russ (14 July 2004). "Using Abbreviations or Symbols". University of North Carolina. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
"SI Conventions". National Physical Laboratory. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
Thompson, A.; Taylor, B. N. (July 2008). "NIST Guide to SI Units – Rules and Style Conventions". National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
"Interpretation of the International System of Units (the Metric System of Measurement) for the United States" (PDF). Federal Register. 73 (96): 28432–28433. 9 May 2008. FR Doc number E8-11058. Retrieved 28 October 2009.
Williamson, Amelia A. (March–April 2008). "Period or Comma? Decimal Styles over Time and Place" (PDF). Science Editor. 31 (2): 42. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2013. Retrieved 19 May 2012.
"ISO 80000-1:2009(en) Quantities and Units—Past 1:General". International Organization for Standardization. 2009. Retrieved 22 August 2013.
"The International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM)".
"1.16" (PDF). International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) (3rd ed.). International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM): Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2012. Retrieved 28 March 2015.
S. V. Gupta, Units of Measurement: Past, Present and Future. International System of Units, p. 16, Springer, 2009. ISBN 3642007384.
"Avogadro Project". National Physical Laboratory. Retrieved 19 August 2010.
"What is a mise en pratique?". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Retrieved 10 November 2012.
"International Committee for Weights and Measures – Proceedings of the 106th meeting" (PDF).
"Recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities to the International Committee for Weights and Measures" (PDF). 12th Meeting of the CCM. Sèvres: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. 26 March 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
"Recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance – Metrology in Chemistry to the International Committee for Weights and Measures" (PDF). 16th Meeting of the CCQM. Sèvres: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. 15–16 April 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
"Recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Thermometry to the International Committee for Weights and Measures" (PDF). 25th Meeting of the CCT. Sèvres: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. 6–7 May 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2012.
p. 221 – McGreevy
Foster, Marcus P. (2009), "Disambiguating the SI notation would guarantee its correct parsing", Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 465 (2104): 1227–1229, Bibcode:2009RSPSA.465.1227F, doi:10.1098/rspa.2008.0343, S2CID 62597962.
"Redefining the kilogram". UK National Physical Laboratory. Retrieved 30 November 2014.
Wood, B. (3–4 November 2014). "Report on the Meeting of the CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants" (PDF). BIPM. p. 7. [BIPM director Martin] Milton responded to a question about what would happen if ... the CIPM or the CGPM voted not to move forward with the redefinition of the SI. He responded that he felt that by that time the decision to move forward should be seen as a foregone conclusion.
"Commission Directive (EU) 2019/1258 of 23 July 2019 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, the Annex to Council Directive 80/181/EEC as regards the definitions of SI base units". Eur-Lex. 23 July 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2019.
"Amtliche Maßeinheiten in Europa 1842" [Official units of measure in Europe 1842] (in German). Retrieved 26 March 2011 Text version of Malaisé's book: Malaisé, Ferdinand von (1842). Theoretisch-practischer Unterricht im Rechnen [Theoretical and practical instruction in arithmetic] (in German). München: Verlag des Verf. pp. 307–322. Retrieved 7 January 2013.
"The name 'kilogram'". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 25 July 2006.
Alder, Ken (2002). The Measure of all Things—The Seven-Year-Odyssey that Transformed the World. London: Abacus. ISBN 978-0-349-11507-8.
Quinn, Terry (2012). From artefacts to atoms: the BIPM and the search for ultimate measurement standards. Oxford University Press. p. xxvii. ISBN 978-0-19-530786-3. OCLC 705716998. he [Wilkins] proposed essentially what became ... the French decimal metric system
Wilkins, John (1668). "VII". An Essay towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. The Royal Society. pp. 190–194.
"Reproduction (33 MB)" (PDF). Retrieved 6 March 2011.; "Transcription" (PDF). Retrieved 6 March 2011.
"Mouton, Gabriel". Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. encyclopedia.com. 2008. Retrieved 30 December 2012.
O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F. (January 2004), "Gabriel Mouton", MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.
Tavernor, Robert (2007). Smoot's Ear: The Measure of Humanity. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12492-7.
"Brief history of the SI". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Retrieved 12 November 2012.
Tunbridge, Paul (1992). Lord Kelvin, His Influence on Electrical Measurements and Units. Peter Pereginus Ltd. pp. 42–46. ISBN 978-0-86341-237-0.
Everett, ed. (1874). "First Report of the Committee for the Selection and Nomenclature of Dynamical and Electrical Units". Report on the Forty-third Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science Held at Bradford in September 1873: 222–225. Retrieved 28 August 2013. Special names, if short and suitable, would ... be better than the provisional designation 'C.G.S. unit of ...'.
Page, Chester H.; Vigoureux, Paul, eds. (20 May 1975). The International Bureau of Weights and Measures 1875–1975: NBS Special Publication 420. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards. p. 12.
Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A treatise on electricity and magnetism. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 242–245. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
Bigourdan, Guillaume (2012) [1901]. Le Système Métrique Des Poids Et Mesures: Son Établissement Et Sa Propagation Graduelle, Avec L'histoire Des Opérations Qui Ont Servi À Déterminer Le Mètre Et Le Kilogramme [The Metric System of Weights and Measures: Its Establishment and its Successive Introduction, with the History of the Operations Used to Determine the Metre and the Kilogram] (in French) (facsimile ed.). Ulan Press. p. 176. ASIN B009JT8UZU.
Smeaton, William A. (2000). "The Foundation of the Metric System in France in the 1790s: The importance of Etienne Lenoir's platinum measuring instruments". Platinum Metals Rev. 44 (3): 125–134. Retrieved 18 June 2013.
"The intensity of the Earth's magnetic force reduced to absolute measurement" (PDF). Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Nelson, Robert A. (1981). "Foundations of the international system of units (SI)" (PDF). Physics Teacher. 19 (9): 597. Bibcode:1981PhTea..19..596N. doi:10.1119/1.2340901.
"The Metre Convention". Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. Retrieved 1 October 2012.
- General Conference on Weights and Measures (Conférence générale des poids et mesures or CGPM)
- International Committee for Weights and Measures (Comité international des poids et mesures or CIPM)
- International Bureau of Weights and Measures (Bureau international des poids et mesures or BIPM) – an international metrology centre at Sèvres in France that has custody of the International prototype kilogram, provides metrology services for the CGPM and CIPM,
McGreevy, Thomas (1997). Cunningham, Peter (ed.). The Basis of Measurement: Volume 2 – Metrication and Current Practice. Pitcon Publishing (Chippenham) Ltd. pp. 222–224. ISBN 978-0-948251-84-9.
Fenna, Donald (2002). Weights, Measures and Units. Oxford University Press. International unit. ISBN 978-0-19-860522-5.
"Historical figures: Giovanni Giorgi". International Electrotechnical Commission. 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
"Die gesetzlichen Einheiten in Deutschland" [List of units of measure in Germany] (PDF) (in German). Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). p. 6. Retrieved 13 November 2012.
"Porous materials: Permeability" (PDF). Module Descriptor, Material Science, Materials 3. Materials Science and Engineering, Division of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh. 2001. p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 June 2013. Retrieved 13 November 2012.
"BIPM – Resolution 6 of the 9th CGPM". Bipm.org. 1948. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
"Resolution 7 of the 9th meeting of the CGPM (1948): Writing and printing of unit symbols and of numbers". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
"BIPM – Resolution 12 of the 11th CGPM". Bipm.org. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
Page, Chester H.; Vigoureux, Paul, eds. (20 May 1975). The International Bureau of Weights and Measures 1875–1975: NBS Special Publication 420. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards. pp. 238–244.
Secula, Erik M. (7 October 2014). "Redefining the Kilogram, The Past". Nist.gov. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2017.
McKenzie, A. E. E. (1961). Magnetism and Electricity. Cambridge University Press. p. 322.
Olthoff, Jim (2018). "For All Times, For All Peoples: How Replacing the Kilogram Empowers Industry". NIST. Archived from the original on 16 March 2020. Retrieved 14 April 2020. ... the International System of Units (SI), popularly known as the metric system.
Page, Chester H. (1970). "Relations among Systems of Electromagnetic Equations". Am. J. Phys. 38 (4): 421–424. doi:10.1119/1.1976358.
IEC 80000-6:2008 Quantities and units — Part 6: Electromagnetism
Carron, Neal (2015). "Babel of Units. The Evolution of Units Systems in Classical Electromagnetism". arXiv:1506.01951 [physics.hist-ph].
Trotter, Alexander Pelham (1911). Illumination: Its Distribution and Measurement. London: Macmillan. OCLC 458398735.
IEEE/ASTM SI 10 American National Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System. IEEE and ASTM. 2016.

External links

Official

History

LaTeX SIunits package manual gives a historical background to the SI system.

Research

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[95] Within the context of the SI, the second is the coherent base unit of time, and is used in the definitions of derived units. The name "second" historically arose as being the 2nd-level sexagesimal division (¹⁄_60²) of some quantity, the hour in this case, which the SI classifies as an "accepted" unit along with its first-level sexagesimal division the minute.

[96] Despite the prefix "kilo-", the kilogram is the coherent base unit of mass, and is used in the definitions of derived units. Nonetheless, prefixes for the unit of mass are determined as if the gram were the base unit.

[97] When the mole is used, the elementary entities must be specified and may be atoms, molecules, ions, electrons, other particles, or specified groups of such particles.

[:0-99] The radian and steradian are defined as dimensionless derived units.

[101] Prefixes adopted before 1960 already existed before SI. The introduction of the CGS system was in 1873.

[171] Interim definitions are given here only when there has been a significant difference in the definition.

[176] In 1954 the unit of thermodynamic temperature was known as the "degree Kelvin" (symbol °K; "Kelvin" spelt with an upper-case "K"). It was renamed the "kelvin" (symbol "K"; "kelvin" spelt with a lower case "k") in 1967.

[2] For example, the SI unit of velocity is the metre per second, m⋅s⁻¹; of acceleration is the metre per second squared, m⋅s⁻²; etc.

[3] For example the newton (N), the unit of force, equivalent to kg⋅m⋅s⁻²; the joule (J), the unit of energy, equivalent to kg⋅m²⋅s⁻², etc. The most recently named derived unit, the katal, was defined in 1999.

[4] For example, the recommended unit for the electric field strength is the volt per metre, V/m, where the volt is the derived unit for electric potential difference. The volt per metre is equal to kg⋅m⋅s⁻³⋅A⁻¹ when expressed in terms of base units.

[7] Meaning that different units for a given quantity, such as length, are related by factors of 10. Therefore, calculations involve the simple process of moving the decimal point to the right or to the left.[3]

For example, the basic SI unit of length is the metre, which is about the height of the kitchen counter. But if one wishes to talk about driving distances using the SI units, one will normally use kilometres, where one kilometre is 1000 metres. On the other hand, tailoring measurements would usually be expressed in centimetres, where one centimetre is 1/100 of a metre.

[8] Although the terms the metric system and the SI system are often used as synonyms, there are in fact many different, mutually incompatible types of metric systems. Moreover, there even exist some individual metric units that are not recognised by any larger metric system. See the section Metric units that are not recognised by the SI, below.

[9] As of May 2020, only for the following countries is it uncertain whether the SI system has any official status: Myanmar, Liberia, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, Palau, and Samoa.

[10] It shall be lawful throughout the United States of America to employ the weights and measures of the metric system; and no contract or dealing, or pleading in any court, shall be deemed invalid or liable to objection because the weights or measures expressed or referred to therein are weights or measures of the metric system.

[11] In the US, the history of legislation begins with the Metric Act of 1866, which legally protected use of the metric system in commerce. The first section is still part of US law (15 U.S.C. § 204).[Note 7] In 1875, the US became one of the original signatories of the Metre Convention. In 1893, the Mendenhall Order stated that the Office of Weights and Measures... will in the future regard the International Prototype Metre and Kilogramme as fundamental standards, and the customary units — the yard and the pound — will be derived therefrom in accordance with the Act of July 28, 1866. In 1954, the US adopted the International Nautical Mile, which is defined as exactly 1852 m, in lieu of the U.S. Nautical Mile, defined as 6080.20 ft = 1853.248 m. In 1959, the U.S. National Bureau of Standards officially adapted the International yard and pound, which are defined exactly in terms of the metre and the kilogram. In 1968, the Metric Study Act (Pub. L. 90-472, August 9, 1968, 82 Stat. 693) authorised a three-year study of systems of measurement in the U.S., with particular emphasis on the feasibility of adopting the SI. The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 followed, later amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, the Savings in Construction Act of 1996, and the Department of Energy High-End Computing Revitalization Act of 2004. As a result of all these acts, the US current law (15 U.S.C. § 205b) states that
It is therefore the declared policy of the United States- (1) to designate the metric system of measurement as the preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce; (2) to require that each Federal agency, by a date certain and to the extent economically feasible by the end of the fiscal year 1992, use the metric system of measurement in its procurements, grants, and other business-related activities, except to the extent that such use is impractical or is likely to cause significant inefficiencies or loss of markets to United States firms, such as when foreign competitors are producing competing products in non-metric units; (3) to seek out ways to increase understanding of the metric system of measurement through educational information and guidance and in Government publications; and (4) to permit the continued use of traditional systems of weights and measures in non-business activities.

[12] And have been defined in terms of the SI's metric predecessors since at least the 1890s.

[13] See e.g. here for the various definitions of the catty, a traditional Chinese unit of mass, in various places across East and Southeast Asia. Similarly, see this article on the traditional Japanese units of measurement, as well as this one on the traditional Indian units of measurement.

[French_CGPM-14] From French: Conférence générale des poids et mesures

[French_CIPM-16] rom French: Comité international des poids et mesures

[SI_Brochure_short-17] The SI Brochure for short. As of May 2020, the latest edition is the ninth, published in 2019. It is Ref.[2] of this article.

[BIPM_from_French-18] rom French: Bureau international des poids et mesures

[19] The latter are formalised in the International System of Quantities (ISQ).[2]^:129

[20] Here are some examples of coherent derived SI units: the unit of velocity, which is the metre per second, with the symbol m/s; the unit of acceleration, which is the metre per second squared, with the symbol m/s²; etc.

[22] A useful property of a coherent system is that when the numerical values of physical quantities are expressed in terms of the units of the system, then the equations between the numerical values have exactly the same form, including numerical factors, as the corresponding equations between the physical quantities;[5]^:6 An example may be useful to clarify this. Suppose we are given an equation relating some physical quantities, e.g. $T = 1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ , expressing the kinetic energy $T$ in terms of the mass $m$ and the velocity $v$ . Choose a system of units, and let ${T}$ , ${m}$ , and ${v}$ be the numerical values of $T$ , $m$ , and $v$ when expressed in that system of units. If the system is coherent, then the numerical values will obey the same equation (including numerical factors) as the physical quantities, i.e. we will have that $T = 1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ .
On the other hand, if the chosen system of units is not coherent, this property may fail. For example, the following is not a coherent system: one where energy is measured in calories, while mass and velocity are measured in their SI units. After all, in that case, $1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ will give a numerical value whose meaning is the kinetic energy when expressed in joules, and that numerical value is different, by a factor of 4.184, from the numerical value when the kinetic energy is expressed in calories. Thus, in that system, the equation satisfied by the numerical values is instead ${T} = 1 / 4.184 1 / 2 {m}{v} 2$ .

[23] For example the newton (N), the unit of force, equal to kg⋅m⋅s⁻² when written in terms of the base units; the joule (J), the unit of energy, equal to kg⋅m²⋅s⁻², etc. The most recently named derived unit, the katal, was defined in 1999.

[24] For example, the recommended unit for the electric field strength is the volt per metre, V/m, where the volt is the derived unit for electric potential difference. The volt per metre is equal to kg⋅m⋅s⁻³⋅A⁻¹ when expressed in terms of base units.

[25] The SI base units (like the metre) are also called coherent units, because they belong to the set of coherent SI units.

[26] One kilometre is about 0.62 miles, a length equal to about two and a half laps around a typical athletic track. Walking at a moderate pace for one hour, an adult human will cover about five kilometres (about three miles). The distance from London, UK, to Paris, France is about 350 km; from London to New York, 5600 km.

[27] In other words, given any base unit or any coherent derived unit with a special name and symbol.

[29] Note, however, that there is a special group of units that are called non-SI units accepted for use with SI, most of which are not decimal multiples of the corresponding SI units; see below.

[30] Names and symbols for decimal multiples and sub-multiples of the unit of mass are formed as if it is the gram which is the base unit, i.e. by attaching prefix names and symbols, respectively, to the unit name "gram" and the unit symbol "g". For example, 10⁻⁶ kg is written as milligram, mg, not as microkilogram, μkg.[2]^:144

[33] Customarily, however, rainfall is measured in non-coherent SI units such as millimetres in height collected on each square metre during a certain period, equivalent to litres per square metre.

[34] As perhaps a more familiar example, consider rainfall, defined as volume of rain (measured in m³) that fell per unit area (measured in m²). Since m³/m²=m, it follows that the coherent derived SI unit of rainfall is the metre, even though the metre is, of course, also the base SI unit of length.[Note 25]

[35] Even base units; the mole was added as a base SI unit only in 1971.[2]^:156

[36] See the next section for why this type of definition is considered advantageous.

[37] Their exactly defined values are as follows:[2]^:128
$\Delta \nu _{\text{Cs}}$ = 9192631770 Hz
$c$ = 299792458 m/s
$h$ = 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ J⋅s
$e$ = 1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ C
$k$ = 1.380649×10⁻²³ J/K
$N_{\text{A}}$ = 6.02214076×10²³ mol⁻¹
$K_{\text{cd}}$ = 683 lm/W.

[40] A mise en pratique is French for 'putting into practice; implementation'.[9][10]

[Second_as_exception-42] The sole exception is the definition of the second, which is still given not in terms of fixed values of fundamental constants but in terms of a particular property of a particular naturally occurring object, the caesium atom. And indeed, it has been clear for some time that relatively soon, by using atoms other than caesium, it will be possible to have definitions of the second that are more precise than the current one. Taking advantage of these more precise methods will necessitate the change in the definition of the second, probably sometime around the year 2030.[17]^:196

[Definition_of_second_in_terms_of_a_constant-43] Again, except for the second, as explained in the previous note.
The second may eventually get fixed by defining an exact value for yet another fundamental constant (whose derived unit includes the second), for example the Rydberg constant. For this to happen, the uncertainty in the measurement of that constant must become so small as to be dominated by the uncertainty in the measurement of whatever clock transition frequency is being used to define the second at that point. Once that happens, the definitions will be reversed: the value of the constant will be fixed by definition to an exact value, namely its most recent best measured value, while the clock transition frequency will become a quantity whose value is no longer fixed by definition but which has to be measured. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that this will happen in the foreseeable future, because presently there are no promising strategies for measuring any additional fundamental constants with the necessary precision.[18]^:4112–3

[44] The one exception being the definition of the second; see Notes [Note 31] and [Note 32] in the following section.

[50] To see this, recall that Hz = s⁻¹ and J = kg⋅m²⋅s⁻². Thus,
(Hz) (J⋅s) / (m/s)²
= (s⁻¹) [(kg⋅m²⋅s⁻²)⋅s] (m⋅s⁻¹)⁻²
= s^{(−1−2+1+2)}⋅m⁽²⁻²⁾⋅kg
= kg,
since all the powers of metres and seconds cancel out. It can further be shown that (Hz) (J⋅s) / (m/s)² is the only combination of powers of the units of the defining constants (that is, the only combination of powers of Hz, m/s, J⋅s, C, J/K, mol⁻¹, and lm/W) that results in the kilogram.

[51] Namely,
1 Hz = $Δ ν Cs$ /9192631770
1 m/s = $c$ /299792458 , and
1 J⋅s = $h$ /6.62607015×10⁻³⁴.

[52] The SI Brochure prefers to write the relationship between the kilogram and the defining constants directly, without going through the intermediary step of defining 1 Hz, 1 m/s, and 1 J⋅s, like this:[2]^:131 1 kg = (299792458)²/(6.62607015×10⁻³⁴)(9192631770) $h$ $Δ ν Cs$ / $c$ ².

[53] Which define the International System of Quantities (ISQ).

[58] For example, from 1889 until 1960, the metre was defined as the length of the International Prototype Metre, a particular bar made of platinum-iridium alloy that was (and still is) kept at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, located in the Pavillon de Breteuil in Saint-Cloud, France, near Paris. The final artefact-based definition of the metre, which stood from 1927 to the redefinition of the metre in 1960, read as follows:[2]^:159
The unit of length is the metre, defined by the distance, at 0°, between the axes of the two central lines marked on the bar of platinum-iridium kept at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures and declared Prototype of the metre by the 1st Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures, this bar being subject to standard atmospheric pressure and supported on two cylinders of at least one centimetre diameter, symmetrically placed in the same horizontal plane at a distance of 571 mm from each other.
The '0°' refers to the temperature of 0 °C. The support requirements represent the Airy points of the prototype—the points, separated by 4/7 of the total length of the bar, at which the bending or droop of the bar is minimised.[20]

[59] The latter was called the 'quadrant', the length of a meridian from the equator to the North Pole. The originally chosen meridian was the Paris meridian.

[60] At the time 'weight' and 'mass' were not always carefully distinguished.

[61] This volume is 1 cm³ = 1 mL, which is 1×10⁻⁶ m³. Thus, the original definition of mass used not the coherent unit of volume (which would be the m³) but a decimal submultiple of it.

[62] Indeed, the original idea of the metric system was to define all units using only natural and universally available measurable quantities. For example, the original definition of the unit of length, the metre, was a definite fraction (one ten-millionth) of the length of a quarter of the Earth's meridian.[Note 39] Once the metre was defined, one could define the unit of volume as the volume of a cube whose sides are one unit of length. And once the unit of volume was determined, the unit of mass could be defined as the mass of a unit of volume of some convenient substance at standard conditions. In fact, the original definition of the gram was 'the absolute weight[Note 40] of a volume of pure water equal to the cube of the hundredth part of a metre,[Note 41] and at the temperature of melting ice.'

However, it soon became apparent that these particular 'natural' realisations of the units of length and mass simply could not, at that time, be as precise (and as convenient to access) as the needs of science, technology, and commerce demanded. Therefore, prototypes were adopted instead. Care was taken to manufacture the prototypes so that they would be as close as possible, given the available science and technology of the day, to the idealised 'natural' realisations. But once the prototypes were completed, the units of length and mass became equal by definition to these prototypes (see Mètre des Archives and Kilogramme des Archives).

Nevertheless, throughout the history of the SI, one keeps seeing expressions of hope that one day, one would be able to dispense with the prototypes and define all units in terms of standards found in nature. The first such standard was the second. It was never defined using a prototype, being originally defined as 1/86400 of the length of a day (since there are 60 s/min × 60 min/hr × 24 hr/day = 86400 s/day). As we mentioned, the vision of defining all units in terms of universally available natural standards was at last fulfilled in 2019, when the sole remaining prototype used by the SI, the one for the kilogram, was finally retired.

[64] The following references are useful for identifying the authors of the preceding reference: Ref.,, Ref., and Ref.<ref name='Edinburgh Review Report on Restoration of Standards'>"Art. VIII.—Report of the Commissioners appointed to consider the steps to be taken for restoration of the standards of weight and measure. Presented to both Houses of Parliament by Command of her Majesty, 1841.", The Edinburgh Review, Edinburgh: Ballantyne and Hughes, vol. 77 no. February, 1843–April, 1843, p. 228, 1843, retrieved 20 April 2020

[Burning_of_imperial_standards_1834-65] As happened with British standards for length and mass in 1834, when they were lost or damaged beyond the point of useability in a great fire known as the burning of Parliament. A commission of eminent scientists was assembled to recommend the steps to be taken for the restoration of the standards, and in its report, it described the destruction caused by the fire as follows:[21][Note 43]

[67] Indeed, one of the motivations for the 2019 redefinition of the SI was the instability of the artefact that served as the definition of the kilogram.

Before that, one of the reasons the United States started defining the yard in terms of the metre in 1893 was that[22]^:381
[t]he bronze yard No. 11, which was an exact copy of the British imperial yard both in form and material, had shown changes when compared with the imperial yard in 1876 and 1888 which could not reasonably be said to be entirely due to changes in No. 11. Suspicion as to the constancy of the length of the British standard was therefore aroused.
In the above, the bronze yard No. 11 is one of two copies of the new British standard yard that were sent to the US in 1856, after Britain completed the manufacture of new imperial standards to replace those lost in the fire of 1834 (see [Note 44]). As standards of length, the new yards, especially bronze No. 11, were far superior to the standard the US had been using up to that point, the so-called Troughton scale. They were therefore accepted by the Office of Weights and Measures (a predecessor of NIST) as the standards of the United States. They were twice taken to England and recompared with the imperial yard, in 1876 and in 1888, and, as mentioned above, measurable discrepancies were found.[22]^:381
In 1890, as a signatory of the Metre Convention, the US received two copies of the International Prototype Metre, the construction of which represented the most advanced ideas of standards of the time. Therefore it seemed that US measures would have greater stability and higher accuracy by accepting the international metre as fundamental standard, which was formalised in 1893 by the Mendenhall Order.[22]^:379–81

[71] As mentioned above, it is all but certain that the defining constant $\Delta \nu _{\text{Cs}}$ will have to be replaced relatively soon, as it is becoming increasingly clear that atoms other than caesium can provide more precise time standards. However, it is not excluded that some of the other defining constants would eventually have to be replaced as well. For example, the elementary charge $e$ corresponds to a coupling strength of the electromagnetic force via the fine-structure constant $\alpha$ . Some theories predict that $\alpha$ can vary over time. The presently known experimental limits of the maximum possible variation of $\alpha$ are so low that 'any effect on foreseeable practical measurements can be excluded',[2]^:128 even if one of these theories turns out to be correct. Nevertheless, if the fine-structure constant turns out to slightly vary over time, science and technology may in the future advance to a point where such changes become measurable. At that point, one might consider replacing, for the purposes of defining the SI system, the elementary charge with some other quantity, the choice of which will be informed by what we learn about the time variation of $\alpha$ .

[76] The latter group includes economic unions such as the Caribbean Community.

[Member_States_of_CGPM-77] The official term is "States Parties to the Metre Convention"; the term "Member States" is its synonym and used for easy reference.[29] As of 13 January 2020,.[29] there are 62 Member States and 40 Associate States and Economies of the General Conference.[Note 47]

[79] Among the tasks of these Consultative Committees are the detailed consideration of advances in physics that directly influence metrology, the preparation of Recommendations for discussion at the CIPM, the identification, planning and execution of key comparisons of national measurement standards, and the provision of advice to the CIPM on the scientific work in the laboratories of the BIPM.[30]

[83] As of April 2020, these include those from Spain (CEM), Russia (FATRiM), Switzerland (METAS), Italy (INRiM), South Korea (KRISS), France (LNE), China (NIM), US (NIST), Japan (AIST/NIMJ), UK (NPL), Canada (NRC), and Germany (PTB).

[84] As of April 2020, these include International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML).

[85] As of April 2020, these include International Commission on Illumination (CIE), CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU), and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC).

[86] As of April 2020, these include International Astronomical Union (IAU), International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), and International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP).

[89] These are individuals with a long-term involvement in matters related to units, having actively contributed to publications on units, and having a global view and understanding of science as well as knowledge on the development and functioning of the International System of Units.[34] As of April 2020, these include[33][35] Prof. Marc Himbert and Dr. Terry Quinn.

[90] For historical reasons, the kilogram rather than the gram is treated as the coherent unit, making an exception to this characterisation.

[91] Ohm's law: 1 Ω = 1 V/A from the relationship E = I × R, where E is electromotive force or voltage (unit: volt), I is current (unit: ampere), and R is resistance (unit: ohm).

[102] While the second is readily determined from the Earth's rotation period, the metre, originally defined in terms of the Earth's size and shape, is less amenable; however, the fact that the Earth's circumference is very close to 40000 km may be a useful mnemonic.

[103] This is evident from the formula $s = v 0 t + 1 / 2 a t 2$ with $v 0 = 0$ and $a = 9.81 m/s 2$ .

[106] This is evident from the formula $T = 2π \sqrt L / g$ .

[113] A 60 watt light bulb has about 800 lumens[48] which is radiated equally in all directions (i.e. 4π steradians), thus is equal to $I_{v}={{\frac {800\ {\text{lm}}}{4\pi \ {\text{sr}}}}\approx 64\ {\text{cd}}}$

[114] This is evident from the formula $P = I V$ .

[generalrules-119] Except where specifically noted, these rules are common to both the SI Brochure and the NIST brochure.

[122] For example, the United States' National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has produced a version of the CGPM document (NIST SP 330) which clarifies usage for English-language publications that use American English

[Translation-127] This term is a translation of the official [French] text of the SI Brochure.

[153] The strength of the Earth's magnetic field was designated 1 G (gauss) at the surface (= 1 cm^−1/2⋅g^1/2⋅s⁻¹).

[155] Argentina, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Brazil, Denmark, France, German Empire, Italy, Peru, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Norway, Switzerland, Ottoman Empire, United States, and Venezuela.

[156] The text "Des comparaisons périodiques des étalons nationaux avec les prototypes internationaux" (English: the periodic comparisons of national standards with the international prototypes) in article 6.3 of the Metre Convention distinguishes between the words "standard" (OED: "The legal magnitude of a unit of measure or weight") and "prototype" (OED: "an original on which something is modelled").

[164] Pferd is German for "horse" and Stärke is German for "strength" or "power". The Pferdestärke is the power needed to raise 75 kg against gravity at the rate of one metre per second. (1 PS = 0.985 HP).

[166] This constant is unreliable, because it varies over the surface of the earth.

[172] It is known as the International Prototype of the Kilogram.

[173] This object is the International Prototype Kilogram or IPK called rather poetically Le Grand K.

[178] Meaning, they are neither part of the SI system nor one of the non-SI units accepted for use with that system.

[179] All major systems of units in which force rather than mass is a base unit are of a type known as gravitational system (also known as technical or engineering system). In the most prominent metric example of such a system, the unit of force is taken to be the kilogram-force (kp), which is the weight of the standard kilogram under standard gravity, $g$ = 9.80665 m/s². The unit of mass is then a derived unit. Most commonly, it is defined as the mass that is accelerated at a rate of 1 m/s² when acted upon by a net force of 1 kp; often called the hyl, it therefore has a value of 1 hyl = 9.80665 kg, so that it is not a decimal multiple of the gram. On the other hand, there are also gravitational metric systems in which the unit of mass is defined as the mass which, when acted upon by standard gravity, has the weight of one kilogram-force; in that case, the unit of mass is exactly the kilogram, although it is a derived unit.

[180] Having said that, some units are recognised by all metric systems. The second is a base unit in all of them. The metre is recognised in all of them, either as the base unit of length or as a decimal multiple or submultiple of the base unit of length. The gram is not recognized as a unit (either the base unit or a decimal multiple of the base unit) by every metric system. In particular, in gravitational metric systems, the gram-force takes its place.[Note 73]

[Corresponding_not_equal-184] Interconversion between different systems of units is usually straightforward; however, the units for electricity and magnetism are an exception, and a surprising amount of care is required. The problem is that, in general, the physical quantities that go by the same name and play the same role in the CGS-ESU, CGS-EMU, and SI systems—e.g. 'electric charge', 'electric field strength', etc.—do not merely have different units in the three systems; technically speaking, they are actually different physical quantities.[100]^:422[100]^:423 Consider 'electric charge', which in each of the three systems can be identified as the quantity two instances of which enter in the numerator of Coulomb's law (as that law is written in each system). This identification produces three different physical quantities: the 'CGS-ESU charge', the 'CGS-EMU charge', and the 'SI charge'.[101]^:35[100]^:423 They even have different dimensions when expressed in terms of the base dimensions: mass^1/2 × length^3/2 × time⁻¹ for the CGS-ESU charge, mass^1/2 × length^1/2 for the CGS-EMU charge, and current × time for the SI charge (where, in the SI, the dimension of current is independent of those of mass, length, and time). On the other hand, these three quantities are clearly quantifying the same underlying physical phenomenon. Thus, we say not that 'one abcoulomb equals ten coulomb', but rather that 'one abcoulomb corresponds to ten coulomb',[100]^:423 written as 1 abC ≘ 10 C.[101]^:35 By that we mean, 'if the CGS-EMU electric charge is measured to have the magnitude of 1 abC, then the SI electric charge will have the magnitude of 10 C'.[101]^:35[102]^:57–58

[Gaussian_as_blend-185] The CGS-Gaussian units are a blend of the CGS-ESU and CGS-EMU, taking units related to magnetism from the latter and all the rest from the former. In addition, the system introduces the gauss as a special name for the CGS-EMU unit maxwell per square centimetre

[188] Authors often abuse notation slightly and write these with an 'equals' sign ('=') rather than a 'corresponds to' sign ('≘').

[SI_Illustration_Base_Units_and_Constants-1] "SI Logo graphic files". BIPM. 2017. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2020.

[SIBrochure9thEd-5] International Bureau of Weights and Measures (20 May 2019), SI Brochure: The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (9th ed.), ISBN 978-92-822-2272-0

[USAndMetricSystem-6] The United States and The Metric System (A Capsule History) (PDF), Gaithersburg, MD, USA: NIST, 1997, p. 2, archived (PDF) from the original on 16 April 2020, retrieved 15 April 2020

[FR_Interpretation_of_the_SI-15] "Interpretation of the International System of Units (the Metric System of Measurement) for the United States" (73 FR 28432). Federal Register. 2008. Archived from the original on 16 August 2017. Retrieved 14 May 2020.

[ISO80000-1-21] ISO 80000-1:2009 Quantities and units — Part 1: General

[DecimalSystem-28] "Decimal Nature of the Metric System". US Metric Association. 2015. Archived from the original on 15 April 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2020.

[Atkins_Dictionary_of_Mechanical_Engineering-31] Atkins, Tony; Escudier, Marcel (2019). A Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199587438. OCLC 1110670667.

[Chapple_Dictionary_of_Physics-32] Chapple, Michael (2014). Dictionary of Physics. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781135939267. OCLC 876513059.

[NIST_mise_en_pratique-38] "NIST Mise en Pratique of the New Kilogram Definition". NIST. 2013. Archived from the original on 14 July 2017. Retrieved 9 May 2020.

[Reverso_Context_mise_en_pratique-39] "Mise en pratique". Reverso. 2018. Archived from the original on 9 May 2020. Retrieved 9 May 2020.

[MisesEnPratique-41] "Practical realizations of the definitions of some important units". BIPM. 2019. Archived from the original on 9 April 2020. Retrieved 11 April 2020.

[45] Mohr, J. C.; Phillips, W. D. (2015). "Dimensionless Units in the SI". Metrologia. 52 (1): 40–47. arXiv:1409.2794. Bibcode:2015Metro..52...40M. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/52/1/40. S2CID 3328342.

[46] Mills, I. M. (2016). "On the units radian and cycle for the quantity plane angle". Metrologia. 53 (3): 991–997. Bibcode:2016Metro..53..991M. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/53/3/991.

[47] "SI units need reform to avoid confusion". Editorial. Nature. 548 (7666): 135. 7 August 2011. doi:10.1038/548135b. PMID 28796224.

[48] P. R. Bunker; I. M. Mills; Per Jensen (2019). "The Planck constant and its units". J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer. 237: 106594. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106594.

[49] P. R. Bunker; Per Jensen (2020). "The Planck constant of action $h$ _A". J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer. 243: 106835. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106835.

[Changing_def_of_the_second-54] Riehle, Fritz; Gill, Patrick; Arias, Felicitas; Robertsson, Lennart (2018). "The CIPM list of recommended frequency standard values: guidelines and procedures". Metrologia. 55 (2): 188–200. Bibcode:2018Metro..55..188R. doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aaa302.

[Changing_def_of_the_second_Rydberg-55] Gill, Patrick (28 October 2011). "When should we change the definition of the second?". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 369 (1953): 4109–4130. Bibcode:2011RSPTA.369.4109G. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0237. PMID 21930568.

[WhatIsMiseEnPratique-56] "What is a mise en pratique?". BIPM. 2011. Archived from the original on 22 September 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015. is a set of instructions that allows the definition to be realised in practice at the highest level.

[57] Phelps, F. M. III (1966). "Airy Points of a Meter Bar". American Journal of Physics. 34 (5): 419–422. Bibcode:1966AmJPh..34..419P. doi:10.1119/1.1973011.

[Report_on_Restoration_of_Standards-63] G. B. Airy; F. Baily; J. E. D. Bethune; J. F. W. Herschel; J. G. S. Lefevre; J. W. Lubbock; G. Peacock; R. Sheepshanks (1841). Report of the Commissioners appointed to consider the steps to be taken for restoration of the standards of weight & measure (Report). London: W. Clowes and Sons for Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Retrieved 20 April 2020.

[Fischer_Address-66] Fischer, Louis A. (1905). History of standard weights and measures of the United States (PDF) (Report). National Bureau of Standards. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 June 2018. Retrieved 20 April 2020.

[NIST_2018-11-68] Materese, Robin (16 November 2018). "Historic Vote Ties Kilogram and Other Units to Natural Constants". NIST. Retrieved 16 November 2018.

[69] "Kilogram finally redefined as world's metrologists agree to new formulation for SI units". Physics World. 16 November 2018. Retrieved 19 September 2020.

[SIBrochure-70] International Bureau of Weights and Measures (2006), The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (8th ed.), ISBN 92-822-2213-6, archived (PDF) from the original on 14 August 2017

[72] "Units: CGS and MKS". www.unc.edu. Retrieved 22 January 2016.

[73] Giovanni Giorgi (1901), "Unità Razionali de Elettromagnetismo", in Atti dell' Associazione Elettrotecnica Italiana.

[Brainerd_1970_p=601-74] Brainerd, John G. (1970). "Some Unanswered Questions". Technology and Culture. JSTOR. 11 (4): 601–603. doi:10.2307/3102695. ISSN 0040-165X. JSTOR 3102695.

[BIPM_CGPM_Members-75] "Member States". BIPM. 2020. Archived from the original on 18 April 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.

[BIPM_Consultative_Committees-78] "The role of the Consultative Committees". BIPM. 2014. Archived from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.

[BIPM_CCU-80] "Consultative Committee for Units (CCU)". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 31 January 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.

[BIPM_CCU_Membership_Criteria-81] "Consultative Committee for Units (CCU): Criteria for membership". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.

[BIPM_CCU_Membership_Members-82] "Consultative Committee for Units (CCU): Members". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 18 April 2020.

[BIPM_CCU_Membership_Criteria_July_2019-87] "Consultative Committee for Units (CCU): Criteria for membership (version from July 2019)". BIPM. 2006. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019.CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)

[BIPM_Consultative_Committees:_Directory-88] BIPM (2003). Consultative Committees: Directory (PDF) (Report). BIPM. Retrieved 18 April 2020.

[NIST330-92] David B. Newell; Eite Tiesinga, eds. (2019). The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (NIST Special publication 330, 2019 ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Retrieved 30 November 2019.

[BIPM1975-93] Quantities Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, IUPAC

[94] Page, Chester H.; Vigoureux, Paul, eds. (20 May 1975). The International Bureau of Weights and Measures 1875–1975: NBS Special Publication 420. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards. pp. 238–244.

[98] "Units & Symbols for Electrical & Electronic Engineers". Institution of Engineering and Technology. 1996. pp. 8–11. Archived from the original on 28 June 2013. Retrieved 19 August 2013.

[NIST811-100] Thompson, Ambler; Taylor, Barry N. (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) (Special publication 811) (PDF). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[104] Science, Tim Sharp 2017-09-15T15:47:00Z; Astronomy. "How Big Is Earth?". Space.com. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

[105] "Metre | measurement". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

[107] "Standard Table Sizes". Bassett Furniture. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

[108] "The Average Height of NBA Players – From Point Guards to Centers". The Hoops Geek. 9 December 2018. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

[109] "RUBINGHSCIENCE.ORG / Using Euro coins as weights". www.rubinghscience.org. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

[110] "Coin Specifications | U.S. Mint". www.usmint.gov. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

[111] "Fifty Pence Coin". www.royalmint.com. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

[112] "Lumens and the Lighting Facts Label". Energy.gov. Retrieved 11 June 2020.

[115] Rowlett, Russ (14 July 2004). "Using Abbreviations or Symbols". University of North Carolina. Retrieved 11 December 2013.

[116] "SI Conventions". National Physical Laboratory. Retrieved 11 December 2013.

[nist_style-117] Thompson, A.; Taylor, B. N. (July 2008). "NIST Guide to SI Units – Rules and Style Conventions". National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 29 December 2009.

[NISTInterprepation-118] "Interpretation of the International System of Units (the Metric System of Measurement) for the United States" (PDF). Federal Register. 73 (96): 28432–28433. 9 May 2008. FR Doc number E8-11058. Retrieved 28 October 2009.

[120] Williamson, Amelia A. (March–April 2008). "Period or Comma? Decimal Styles over Time and Place" (PDF). Science Editor. 31 (2): 42. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2013. Retrieved 19 May 2012.

[121] "ISO 80000-1:2009(en) Quantities and Units—Past 1:General". International Organization for Standardization. 2009. Retrieved 22 August 2013.

[123] "The International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM)".

[124] "1.16" (PDF). International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) (3rd ed.). International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM): Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2012. Retrieved 28 March 2015.

[125] S. V. Gupta, Units of Measurement: Past, Present and Future. International System of Units, p. 16, Springer, 2009. ISBN 3642007384.

[126] "Avogadro Project". National Physical Laboratory. Retrieved 19 August 2010.

[128] "What is a mise en pratique?". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Retrieved 10 November 2012.

[129] "International Committee for Weights and Measures – Proceedings of the 106th meeting" (PDF).

[130] "Recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities to the International Committee for Weights and Measures" (PDF). 12th Meeting of the CCM. Sèvres: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. 26 March 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2012.

[131] "Recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance – Metrology in Chemistry to the International Committee for Weights and Measures" (PDF). 16th Meeting of the CCQM. Sèvres: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. 15–16 April 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2012.

[132] "Recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Thermometry to the International Committee for Weights and Measures" (PDF). 25th Meeting of the CCT. Sèvres: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. 6–7 May 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 27 June 2012.

[133] . 221 – McGreevy

[Foster_2009-134] Foster, Marcus P. (2009), "Disambiguating the SI notation would guarantee its correct parsing", Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 465 (2104): 1227–1229, Bibcode:2009RSPSA.465.1227F, doi:10.1098/rspa.2008.0343, S2CID 62597962.

[NPL_kg-135] "Redefining the kilogram". UK National Physical Laboratory. Retrieved 30 November 2014.

[136] Wood, B. (3–4 November 2014). "Report on the Meeting of the CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants" (PDF). BIPM. p. 7. [BIPM director Martin] Milton responded to a question about what would happen if ... the CIPM or the CGPM voted not to move forward with the redefinition of the SI. He responded that he felt that by that time the decision to move forward should be seen as a foregone conclusion.

[137] "Commission Directive (EU) 2019/1258 of 23 July 2019 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, the Annex to Council Directive 80/181/EEC as regards the definitions of SI base units". Eur-Lex. 23 July 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2019.

[Europa1842-138] "Amtliche Maßeinheiten in Europa 1842" [Official units of measure in Europe 1842] (in German). Retrieved 26 March 2011 Text version of Malaisé's book: Malaisé, Ferdinand von (1842). Theoretisch-practischer Unterricht im Rechnen [Theoretical and practical instruction in arithmetic] (in German). München: Verlag des Verf. pp. 307–322. Retrieved 7 January 2013.

[139] "The name 'kilogram'". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 25 July 2006.

[Alder-140] Alder, Ken (2002). The Measure of all Things—The Seven-Year-Odyssey that Transformed the World. London: Abacus. ISBN 978-0-349-11507-8.

[141] Quinn, Terry (2012). From artefacts to atoms: the BIPM and the search for ultimate measurement standards. Oxford University Press. p. xxvii. ISBN 978-0-19-530786-3. OCLC 705716998. he [Wilkins] proposed essentially what became ... the French decimal metric system

[142] Wilkins, John (1668). "VII". An Essay towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. The Royal Society. pp. 190–194.
"Reproduction (33 MB)" (PDF). Retrieved 6 March 2011.; "Transcription" (PDF). Retrieved 6 March 2011.

[143] "Mouton, Gabriel". Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. encyclopedia.com. 2008. Retrieved 30 December 2012.

[Mouton-144] O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F. (January 2004), "Gabriel Mouton", MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews.

[Tavernor-145] Tavernor, Robert (2007). Smoot's Ear: The Measure of Humanity. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12492-7.

[SIHistory-146] "Brief history of the SI". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Retrieved 12 November 2012.

[LordKelvin-147] Tunbridge, Paul (1992). Lord Kelvin, His Influence on Electrical Measurements and Units. Peter Pereginus Ltd. pp. 42–46. ISBN 978-0-86341-237-0.

[special-148] Everett, ed. (1874). "First Report of the Committee for the Selection and Nomenclature of Dynamical and Electrical Units". Report on the Forty-third Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science Held at Bradford in September 1873: 222–225. Retrieved 28 August 2013. Special names, if short and suitable, would ... be better than the provisional designation 'C.G.S. unit of ...'.

[BIPMCentenary-149] Page, Chester H.; Vigoureux, Paul, eds. (20 May 1975). The International Bureau of Weights and Measures 1875–1975: NBS Special Publication 420. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards. p. 12.

[Maxwell2-150] Maxwell, J. C. (1873). A treatise on electricity and magnetism. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 242–245. Retrieved 12 May 2011.

[151] Bigourdan, Guillaume (2012) [1901]. Le Système Métrique Des Poids Et Mesures: Son Établissement Et Sa Propagation Graduelle, Avec L'histoire Des Opérations Qui Ont Servi À Déterminer Le Mètre Et Le Kilogramme [The Metric System of Weights and Measures: Its Establishment and its Successive Introduction, with the History of the Operations Used to Determine the Metre and the Kilogram] (in French) (facsimile ed.). Ulan Press. p. 176. ASIN B009JT8UZU.

[152] Smeaton, William A. (2000). "The Foundation of the Metric System in France in the 1790s: The importance of Etienne Lenoir's platinum measuring instruments". Platinum Metals Rev. 44 (3): 125–134. Retrieved 18 June 2013.

[154] "The intensity of the Earth's magnetic force reduced to absolute measurement" (PDF). Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

[Nelson-157] Nelson, Robert A. (1981). "Foundations of the international system of units (SI)" (PDF). Physics Teacher. 19 (9): 597. Bibcode:1981PhTea..19..596N. doi:10.1119/1.2340901.

[158] "The Metre Convention". Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. Retrieved 1 October 2012.

[159] General Conference on Weights and Measures (Conférence générale des poids et mesures or CGPM)

International Committee for Weights and Measures (Comité international des poids et mesures or CIPM)

International Bureau of Weights and Measures (Bureau international des poids et mesures or BIPM) – an international metrology centre at Sèvres in France that has custody of the International prototype kilogram, provides metrology services for the CGPM and CIPM,

[172] General Conference on Weights and Measures (Conférence générale des poids et mesures or CGPM)

[173] International Committee for Weights and Measures (Comité international des poids et mesures or CIPM)

[174] International Bureau of Weights and Measures (Bureau international des poids et mesures or BIPM) – an international metrology centre at Sèvres in France that has custody of the International prototype kilogram, provides metrology services for the CGPM and CIPM,

[160] McGreevy, Thomas (1997). Cunningham, Peter (ed.). The Basis of Measurement: Volume 2 – Metrication and Current Practice. Pitcon Publishing (Chippenham) Ltd. pp. 222–224. ISBN 978-0-948251-84-9.

[161] Fenna, Donald (2002). Weights, Measures and Units. Oxford University Press. International unit. ISBN 978-0-19-860522-5.

[IECGiorgi-162] "Historical figures: Giovanni Giorgi". International Electrotechnical Commission. 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2011.

[163] "Die gesetzlichen Einheiten in Deutschland" [List of units of measure in Germany] (PDF) (in German). Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). p. 6. Retrieved 13 November 2012.

[165] "Porous materials: Permeability" (PDF). Module Descriptor, Material Science, Materials 3. Materials Science and Engineering, Division of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh. 2001. p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 June 2013. Retrieved 13 November 2012.

[167] "BIPM – Resolution 6 of the 9th CGPM". Bipm.org. 1948. Retrieved 22 August 2017.

[168] "Resolution 7 of the 9th meeting of the CGPM (1948): Writing and printing of unit symbols and of numbers". International Bureau of Weights and Measures. Retrieved 6 November 2012.

[169] "BIPM – Resolution 12 of the 11th CGPM". Bipm.org. Retrieved 22 August 2017.

[170] Page, Chester H.; Vigoureux, Paul, eds. (20 May 1975). The International Bureau of Weights and Measures 1875–1975: NBS Special Publication 420. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards. pp. 238–244.

[174] Secula, Erik M. (7 October 2014). "Redefining the Kilogram, The Past". Nist.gov. Archived from the original on 9 January 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2017.

[175] McKenzie, A. E. E. (1961). Magnetism and Electricity. Cambridge University Press. p. 322.

[MetricSystemAsNameForSI-177] Olthoff, Jim (2018). "For All Times, For All Peoples: How Replacing the Kilogram Empowers Industry". NIST. Archived from the original on 16 March 2020. Retrieved 14 April 2020. ... the International System of Units (SI), popularly known as the metric system.

[Page_1970-181] Page, Chester H. (1970). "Relations among Systems of Electromagnetic Equations". Am. J. Phys. 38 (4): 421–424. doi:10.1119/1.1976358.

[ISO80000-6-182] IEC 80000-6:2008 Quantities and units — Part 6: Electromagnetism

[Carron_Babel-183] Carron, Neal (2015). "Babel of Units. The Evolution of Units Systems in Classical Electromagnetism". arXiv:1506.01951 [physics.hist-ph].

[Trotter_Illumination-186] Trotter, Alexander Pelham (1911). Illumination: Its Distribution and Measurement. London: Macmillan. OCLC 458398735.

[IEEE/ASTM_SI_10-2016-187] IEEE/ASTM SI 10 American National Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System. IEEE and ASTM. 2016.

SI units
Base units	ampere candela kelvin kilogram metre mole second
Derived units with special names	becquerel coulomb degree Celsius farad gray henry hertz joule katal lumen lux newton ohm pascal radian siemens sievert steradian tesla volt watt weber
Other accepted units	astronomical unit dalton day decibel degree of arc electronvolt hectare hour litre minute minute and second of arc neper tonne
See also	Conversion of units Metric prefixes 2005–2019 definition 2019 redefinition Systems of measurement
Book Category

International System of Units

Introduction

Controlling body

SI base units

SI derived units

SI metric prefixes and the decimal nature of the SI system

Coherent and non-coherent SI units

Permitted non-SI units

New units

Defining magnitudes of units

Specifying fundamental constants vs. other methods of definition

History

Controlling authority

Units and prefixes

Base units

Derived units

Prefixes

Non-SI units accepted for use with SI

Common notions of the metric units

Lexicographic conventions

Unit names

Unit symbols and the values of quantities

General rules

Printing SI symbols

International System of Quantities

Realisation of units

Evolution of the SI

Changes to the SI

2019 redefinitions

History

The improvisation of units

Metre Convention

The CGS and MKS systems

The Practical system of units

Birth of the SI

Historical definitions

Metric units that are not recognised by the SI

See also

Notes

References

Further reading

External links